Revision as of 07:08, 30 November 2006 editAltenmann (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers216,912 edits Poland_Map_Time_19390925.jpg← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:54, 30 November 2006 edit undoGhirlandajo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers89,629 edits →Under-the-carpet maneuvres: exposed more offensive statements by PiotrusNext edit → | ||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 299: | Line 299: | ||
== Image:Poland_Map_Time_19390925.jpg listed for deletion == | == Image:Poland_Map_Time_19390925.jpg listed for deletion == | ||
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —`'] 07:08, 30 November 2006 (UTC)<!-- Template:Idw --> | An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —`'] 07:08, 30 November 2006 (UTC)<!-- Template:Idw --> | ||
== Under-the-carpet maneuvres == | |||
Piotr, don't expect I have not seen your disgraceful maneuvres . If you think ] is a place for denouncing your opponents, where your content disputes will be solved by blocking your opponent behind his back, you are greatly mistaken. I hope that Misplaced Pages has grown up from the period when such things were possible (my block log is the best evidence that they used to be connived some time ago). Your deliberate choice of offensive language ("for a few months Ghirla has 'lied low'" - what is this??) has been pretty disgraceful. I hope you are a little shame-faced over the whole issue. --<font color="FC4339">]</font> <sup><font color="C98726">]</font></sup> 16:47, 30 November 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:54, 30 November 2006
File:WikipediaSignpost icon.png You have the right to stay informed. Exercise it by reading the Misplaced Pages Signpost today. |
This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived to User talk:Piotrus/Archive 13. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied!. Thank you. |
---|
Please add new comments in new sections if you are addressing a new issue. Please sign it by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Thanks in advance. |
---|
Talk archives: Archive 1 (moved Jan 17, 2005), Archive 2 (moved Feb 21, 2005), Archive 3 (moved May 19, 2005), Archive 4 (moved July 14, 2005), Archive 5 (moved September 27, 2005), Archive 6 (moved November 23, 2005), Archive 7 (moved January 7, 2006), Archive 8 (moved 19 March, 2006), Archive 9 (moved 6 May, 2006), Archive 10 (moved 17 June, 2006), Archive 11 (moved 28 July, 2006), Archive 12 (moved 25 September, 2006), Archive 13 (moved 28 October, 2006)
If you have come here to place a request for a re-confirmation of my adminship, please note that, at my discretion, I will either:
The rest of this page fills out particulars and commits to certain processes in advance so as to reduce ambiguity or the possible perception that I will change the rules as I go along to get the desired outcome. Note: This page has a talk page because I value input and feedback on this whole thing. There's some lively discussion there already, and you, gentle reader, are invited to comment as well. The Recall Petition processThe petition shall operate as follows:
The modified RfC process (choice 1)This is one of the three possible "next steps" after a certified recall. The modified RfC will be constituted as follows:
The RfAr process (choice 2)This is one of the three possible "next steps" after a certified recall. The RfAr will be initiated as follows:
Resignation (choice 3)This is one of the three possible "next steps" after a certified recall. The resignation shall be constituted as "under a cloud" meaning that a re RfA has standard success criteria as then constituted by the community and that withdrawing midway through is not an option for regaining admin status. Only a successful RfA will suffice. I may choose to stand again for RfA immediately, at some later date of my own choosing, or never, as I deem appropriate. Grace periodAny change in any provision of this that makes it more stringent to qualify a petition or participate in any other part of the process, or more likely to lead to an outcome more favourable to me shall have a 2 week "grace period" during which any recall initiated will be under the old terms. Any change that is of the opposite sense (easier to qualify/participate, less favourable to me) shall go into effect immediately. No Double JeopardyOnce this process concludes for matters raised by petitioners during an instance of this process, I will not honor a second recall request regarding the same matters. If however new matters arise, the community is welcome to initiate another recall. No vexatious litigantsNo petitioner may initiate or support a petition for my recall more than three times in any 365 day period. This does not apply to participation in a modified RfC. SeverabilityThis is about my commitment to the community to be accountable, not about a category membership. Thus, the provisions of this page shall survive if, for example, the CAT:AOTR (or successor, whatever named) is deleted, renamed, listified. etc., and under any other reasonable circumstances. Only my explicitly stated withdrawal from this commitment itself will suffice. No withdrawalI do not intend to withdraw but that's an intent, not a promise. However, I promise not to withdraw to escape the consequences of this commitment. The only time I will withdraw from this category is if no recall is currently underway. This is subject to the same 2 week grace period as the eligibility or any other changes, so any withdrawal has at least 2 weeks to go into effect. Notes
Cretan WarI've added more inline cits to some areas that were lackning them. I hope that can get your support. Kyriakos 07:25, 22 November 2006 (UTC) ksiaceta wirtemberscyThe German site Oels mentions that the last Podiebrad Carl Frederick died and Sylvius Nimrod , Düke of Württemberg-Weiltingen († 1664) inherited Oels. But only as a mediated principality, which means it hasnt full souvereignty anymore. I hope that helps a bit.--Tresckow 13:42, 22 November 2006 (UTC) Your queriesHi, and thanks for the notice. I'll be glad to help, although I only have one source available for that period - A. D. Xenopol's History (I may have some more in the historical magazines collection, but it is hard looking through them for particular topics, and it may take a long time to get to do so). I have done some quick research into the matter of Sasowy Rog, but could not come up with a proper name - all I can remember is that I have heard the name before, in the sentence "the place that the Poles call Sasowy Rog". I wish I'd remember what Romanians are supposed to call it :). From what I have seen so far, the book does not deal with that battle at its proper place in time - it may be mentioned some place else in the narrative, but I'll get back to you on that. The article on Koniecpolski currently has some style problems that I would like to solve in my edits (such as a link to Ali which leads nowhere, the spelling of Bukovina as Bukowina, etc.). I'll give editing a go as I did in the past for the Magnate Wars, and will add my sources for his activities southwards as I look through the aforementioned book (as Romanian-centered as it is,it may yield some valuable information). I hope my copyedit for Khan Temir was okay. Cheers. Dahn 20:24, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
SulmierzyceNie ma sprawy. ;) - Darwinek 21:17, 22 November 2006 (UTC) Re: nowe artykuły
Nie ma sprawy. Na razie dziękuję, że już dodałeś tam moje nowe strony. Pozdrawiam Poeticbent 23:31, 22 November 2006 (UTC) Did you know
MergeHow do we merge two articles created without the knowledge of the other because of a one letter, not at the Western keyboard? Please compare: The Academy of Fine Arts in Krakow and Kraków Academy of Fine Arts Greetings Poeticbent 00:13, 24 November 2006 (UTC) Na marginesie Panie Piotrze, w żadnym atlasie na kontynencie północno-amerykańskim nie pisze się naszego miasta "Cracow", ani "Kraków". Pisownia tego typu należy do błędów robionych przez rodaków, z czym zetknąłem się będąc w Krakowie z wizytą. Jedyną praktykowaną w atlasach pisownią jest Krakow. Mam zamiar zrobić „merge” obu stron, czyli tej, stworzonej przez Pana oraz mojej, pod końcowym tytułem „The Academy of Fine Arts in Krakow”. Poeticbent 02:33, 24 November 2006 (UTC) Merge (2)
The proper spelling, "Kraków", is listed in The Canadian Oxford School Atlas Fifth Edidtion 1985, so there's a good point of reference. I wonder, would you agree to a new name of The Academy of Fine Arts, Kraków? If not, we could "redirect" all other names to Kraków Academy of Fine Arts. See also Krakow (disambiguation). Greetings Poeticbent 16:52, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Panie Piotrze, moim zdaniem nie powinniśmy lansować pisowni, która nie jest praktykowana w języku angielskim na kontynencie amerykańskim. Pisałem wcześniej na temat tego, jak niektórzy krakowianie lansują nazwę miasta jako "Cracow", chociaż jest to pisownia wychodząca z użycia. Czy w Wikipedii nie powinniśmy być w gramatycznej czołówce? Pozdrawiam i czekam na reakcję. Poeticbent 17:37, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Studenci zagraniczni referowani są po angielsku do The Jan Matejko Academy of Fine Arts - Krakow, Poland na tej stronie. Nie wiem co mam o tym wszystkim sądzić? Urodziłem się w Krakowie i nie lubię przeinaczanych nazw mojego rodzinnego miasta... Proszę samemu zadecydować. Poeticbent 17:59, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Będę wdzięczny, jeżeli sam Pan wystąpi z tą kwestią na WP:PWNB. Ja dostosuję się do końcowej decyzji innych, bo przedstawiłem już w szczegółach mój punkt widzenia. Poza tym, nie zauważyłem śladów podobnej dyskusji na forum i nie wiem, czy mogę się spodziewać racjonalnej sugestii w tej sprawie. Pozdrawiam Poeticbent 21:36, 24 November 2006 (UTC) Spróbujmy zredagować wspólny list
Dziękuję za poparcie mojej propozycji. Jednak preferuję aby Pan wysłał ten list do Akademii, gdyż pragnę pozostać w tym wypadku osobą anonimową. Poeticbent 17:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC) Jeszcze jedno małe słówko w tej samej sprawie. Proszę mnie łaskawie poinformować, jak otrzyma Pan wiadomość z Akademii Sztuk Pięknych w sprawie tytułu strony. Pozdrawiam Poeticbent 04:02, 30 November 2006 (UTC) TrollZobacz dokonania User:Nasz i twórczy wkład 75.4.119.198 - na pl i na en. Picus viridis 01:55, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
ŁapankaWitam! Piszę artykuł o łapance dla norweskiej Wikipedii. Czy istnieje możliwość wykorzystania zdjęcia "Image:Lapanka zoliborz warszawa Polska 1941.jpg" w tym celu? Zdjęcie nie znajduje się w Wikimedia Commons - czy wynika to z jego licencji? Pozdrawiam, Moniuszko 13:46, 24 November 2006 (UTC) Articles for DeletionWstukałem coś (myślę, że pilnego) w Twojej dyskusji na pl.wiki. pozdro Gau, 19:26, 24 November 2006 (CET) Fair use rationale for Image:Lapanka Warszawa.jpgThanks for uploading Image:Lapanka Warszawa.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Misplaced Pages articles constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 19:09, 24 November 2006 (UTC) Taras FedorowiczWitam. Wielu wikipedystów z polskiej wiki jest zbulwersowanych edycjami Irpena, który na siłę forsuje marksistowską wizję powstania Fedorowicza. Dodatkowo istnieje podejrzenie złamania zasady 3 revertów, na co angielska administracja wcale nie zareagowała. czy możesz coś z tym zrobić? Pozdrawiam Mathiasrex 22:17, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Did you know
Lain FACHello Prokonsul. Thanks for commenting on the Lain FAC. I've added two books and a study, and was wondering if you would like to change your vote to supports, or would still need other changes made.--SidiLemine 14:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC) A npov comparison issueAs I have been accused of "anti-Russianism", and I saw that you are somehow interested in this specific Tatiana question, could you kindly check the diff , compare those two versions and check if you see any NPOV issuen in their differences. And comment to its talkpage about such and the differences - In each of those details, how would you write a NPOV version? Shilkanni 18:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Partisan articleHey you posted on the Soviet partisans "It amazes me to what lenght you will go to avoid informing the reader of the darker sides of SU, such as the attrocities commited by the Soviet partisans in Poland. This is an important part of their activities, and most certainly deserves a section in this article." Reading that, you may want to see the new material I just posted on the talk page. Therefore I agree with this. --Pudeo (Talk) 23:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC) DYK!
Jak stworzyć subkategorię ?Witam ! Bardzo dziękuję za wiadomość . Chętnie pomogę rozwijać wiedzę o Polsce i Polakach na angielskiej wikipedii . Mój "konik" to piłka nożna . Tworzę artykuły (?) o niektórych zawodnikach grających w Orange Ekstraklasa. Mam prośbę...Czy mógłby Pan mi pomóc w utworzeniu subkategorii "Zawisza Bydgoszcz players" w kategorii "Zawisza Bydgoscz" ? Ah..i jeszcze jedno...Mógłby Pan zerknąć na artykuł(znowu nie wiem , czy mogę nazwać to artykułem:-)) Klan (TV series) . Żąda się ode mnie cytatu , że "Klan" jest pokazywany w TVP1 . Jak mam to udowodnić ? Z góry dziękuję za pomoc DYK
interest anywhere in Polish "cabal"?I created an article to tell about the Saxony-Gessaphe family. Its ONE characteristic is that they seem to be the heirs of Polish and Lithuanian throne according to the last PLC constitution. Of course this is an esoterica, but I still think that possibly some Polish editors would be interested also in that sort of esoterica (you apparently do not have a ready royal family lurking anywhere else, and at least these persons are catholic, whereas Nicholas II of Poland's heirs are orthodox), and that the possible pretender of Polish throne would be an interesting enough article to some to improve it and give perspective from Poland. I leave it to your consideration (and to you to do the informing work) what would be best way to inform relevant Polish editors about it. And, by the way, can anyone check the PLC succession laws, if they require equal marriages within the "royal dynasty". ObRoy 01:38, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Photographs of copyrighted worksThere is already clear and established policy regarding this on Commons; see Commons:Derivative works. It just isn't enforced very well yet, because most people don't seem to know about this wrinkle of copyright law. Yes, the images in Modern art of the Picasso sculpture and the array of Warhol Campbell's Soup prints should never have been uploaded to Commons, because the works they depict are copyrighted. At a minimum, source information needs to be provided for both the photograph and the subject in the photograph, to assess whether that subject is copyrighted. It may be possible to justify the fair use of those images on Misplaced Pages, however, so consider that many images that should be removed from Commons may be permissibly uploaded here. Postdlf 22:23, 27 November 2006 (UTC) I don't think the editor above is correct, for this reason. Badagnani 11:58, 28 November 2006 (UTC) could someone translate -> article here too_article_here_too-2006-11-28T12:06:00.000Z">Hi. sorry, if it feels that I am stalking you, but I observed an interesting-looking link in your talkpage here above: pl:Polscy samozwańcy. I do not understand Polish properly, so I can only say that the article there seems interesting and presumably contains MUCH material about royal pretensions of some families. Could someone (=you?) translate that article to more or less fluent English and make it an article here in English Misplaced Pages? Because at least I would like to see precisely what it says. Shilkanni 12:06, 28 November 2006 (UTC)_article_here_too"> _article_here_too"> Filharmonie i operyKiedy będziesz miał czas to trzeba uzupełnić artykuł http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_concert_halls o filharmonie w Polsce: http://pl.wikipedia.org/Filharmonia. Chyba wszystkie inne kraje europejskie mają wypisane, tylko Polska nie. To samo z operami: trzeba je wpisać w http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_opera_houses ze spisu: http://pl.wikipedia.org/Polskie_teatry_operowe. Pozdrawiam. LUCPOL 15:16, 28 November 2006 (UTC) vandalismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special:Contributions&target=Poyeb Picus viridis 18:19, 28 November 2006 (UTC) WP:SUPThanks for your advice on the downstream processing student project. I have updated the WP:SUP page as you requested, and my students have mostly completed their training assignments: 1) establishing a user account and page 2) adding a small useful edit to an article 3) adding references to an article. Their deadline for constructing their own articles is Dec. 3 at midnight EST (UTC - 5). During the following week their classmates will review the article on the discussion page and suggest changes. Yes, I know this differs from the usual Misplaced Pages process of bold edits, but IMHO it better promotes critical thinking by the original writer, helps me evaluate the original writer's contribution more easily, and will produce similar short-term improvements to the articles. I would like your help in finding someone to demonstrate a thorough critical review of an article, ideally the article on Downstream_processing that I have begun to edit as my own contribution to the project. I thought immediately of Milton Beychok but he seems so busy that I hesitate to bother him. Can you suggest someone else, ideally among the Wikipedian chemical engineers or Wikipedian chemists ? (sorry, could not figure out how to make internal link to these category pages) As a relative newcomer to Wikipedian customs I am unsure if this request is out of line; if it is please forgive - Thank you! susato 19:10, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
EveWikiFrom --> Eve-Wiki --> User:Ronoa Hey Piotrus, I'm contacting you to get the lowdown on the eve-wiki, i've read the rules, and they seem to be contradictory. Can you take a look at the skills and Accessories section, I started working on it, but now i'm getting that sinking feeling that maybe I'm linking things improperly. Signpost updated for November 27th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 01:52, 29 November 2006 (UTC) Thanx for the star.Thank you for the Star; if I find time, I'll continue contributing to similar articles - incl. 'Red Army “Liberation Campaign” of 1939'.Constanz - Talk 10:09, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Did You Know?
Image:Poland_Map_Time_19390925.jpg listed for deletionAn image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Poland_Map_Time_19390925.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —`'mikkanarxi 07:08, 30 November 2006 (UTC) Under-the-carpet maneuvresPiotr, don't expect I have not seen your disgraceful maneuvres here. If you think WP:PAIN is a place for denouncing your opponents, where your content disputes will be solved by blocking your opponent behind his back, you are greatly mistaken. I hope that Misplaced Pages has grown up from the period when such things were possible (my block log is the best evidence that they used to be connived some time ago). Your deliberate choice of offensive language ("for a few months Ghirla has 'lied low'" - what is this??) has been pretty disgraceful. I hope you are a little shame-faced over the whole issue. --Ghirla 16:47, 30 November 2006 (UTC) |