Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 21:02, 1 December 2006

Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

Shortcuts WP:RFPP WP:RFP WP:RPP Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism. Skip to table of contents requests to raise protection lower protection requested edits (purge) Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level Request protection Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection Request a specific edit to a protected page Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit

Archives

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

Current requests for protection

Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Stem cell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. Constant vandalism from anonymous IPs. TimVickers 20:57, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

List of Arab scientists and scholars (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

User reverts immediatly following unprotection. Full protection please. Khoikhoi 20:55, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Fully protected Martinp23 21:02, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Rotten Apple (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. This page is constantly riddled with vandalism almost every hour. It is becoming a nuisance to constantly revert every hour or so. Zimbabweed 20:44, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Republican Party (United States) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protect. This article is frequently vandalized by anonymous IPs. Has been occuring for several days (as per History). Novaprospekt 19:51, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected --Majorly 19:59, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Marcus Aurelius (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protect. This article is frequently vandalised by anonymous IPs. --217.24.19.163 19:15, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected --Majorly 19:58, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Isaac Newton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect requested. The article suffers from numerous vandal edits daily. Has been protected before. Icemuon 17:31, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected --Majorly 18:10, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Avon, Indiana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect the article. While the original IP address editor was blocked via the request a few down, there is still a second IP address that continues to delete the section. Since I would be in violation of the 3RR, I cannot even restore the article without jeopardizing my own account (and I am not the only user who has had to revert these edits). There is reason to believe that this is either the same person using two different IP addresses or it is two people working together to disrupt the integrity of the page. Any help at all would be much appreciated. Thanks! --pIrish 17:24, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected --Majorly 18:07, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

IPod (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect constantly attacked by anonymous IPs.¤~Persian Poet Gal 17:20, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected --Majorly 18:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Akon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. New and anonymous users keep vandalizing the name of the person - removing words, adding words, and so on. It happens a few times a day, every day. AW 16:18, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected --Majorly 18:03, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Indian caste system (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Full protection Many reversions over what is supposedly "unhelpful information." BhaiSaab 16:13, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Fully protected, pending review of situation. -- tariqabjotu 16:46, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Unprotected Looking at the situation the edit war is exceedingly trivial. The page was just unprotected about two weeks ago, and since there are primarily only two parties engaging in edit/revert-warring, I just warned them about potential 3RR violations. -- tariqabjotu 16:58, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Avon, Indiana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection article continues to have an important section deleted by several anonymous IP addresses. No reason is ever given for why they continue to delete the section and there is no response when questioned, they only delete it again and have once added a personal attack within the edit. --pIrish 15:21, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

The user has been blocked from editing. Nishkid64 15:33, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Marc Lépine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection article is being subjected to daily vandalism by a dynamic IP inserting false information about these murders, specifically calling them a "counter attack to the feminist war on men" and asserting that there is an international holiday celebrating the murderer. It's been going on for more than a week. Dina 15:10, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected IP block would be ineffectual and possibly detremental to others Gnangarra 16:13, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Straight (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection article is recieving a barage of vandalism.¤~Persian Poet Gal 14:54, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

The user 80.249.49.5 has been blocked from editing. Nishkid64 15:16, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Felipe Calderón (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection This article is frequently vandalized by anonymous IPs --All-Bran 14:09, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. Srikeit 14:35, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Chelsea F.C. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

After unprotection on 19 November, this article continues to be the target of heavy anonymous vandalism, with 20 vandal edits in the past 24 hours. Please restore semi-protection. --J.L.W.S. The Special One 14:07, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected due to IP vandalism Gnangarra 14:10, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Freddie Mercury (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi requested. Article is fairly static except for constant vandalism by anons every day. See history, note how often reversions are needed to get rid of it. Thanks. *Spark* 13:40, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected IP vandalism - as its aniversary of his death, should be ok in 7-10 days Gnangarra 14:18, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

The Blood (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection requested. The singer of the band that the article is about often uses an anonymous IP to post original research that has nothing to do with the band. He treats the article as if it is a blog to express his philosophical views. He doesn't necessarily edit on a constant basis, but he is persistent and shows no indication of stopping this behaviour. Spylab 12:20, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Declined try talking to the editor and warn when reverting Gnangarra 14:20, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Autechre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection Repeated spamming by unregistered user(s), e.g. , , , --CapitalLetterBeginning 11:16, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Declined spammers have been blocked, Gnangarra 14:27, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Mickie James (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

semi-protection requested. Constant vandalism such as removal of entire conversations. Mostly by anonymous IPs. --CJ 09:55, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Gnangarra 14:33, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Mickie James (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protection requested. Constant vandalism such as: changing source links by placing a comma where a dot should be, removing information, removal of an entire section. Mostly by anonymous IPs. --CJ 09:52, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Gnangarra 14:34, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Port Vue, Pennsylvania (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

'semi-protection requested. Small, underwatched city article has been experiencing low-grade vandalism that has escalated recently. 09:01, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected IP vandalism Gnangarra 14:39, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Zakir Naik (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protection requested. Ridiculous amount of vandalism, mostly from anon IPs. constant edit-warring. --khello 07:41, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected --Majorly 18:00, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Village pump (news) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection requested. Blocked user is evading blocks by rapid-IP-drifting and making repeated vandalous and personal attacks on this page. The users actions also need to be tracked, as it would appear they will probably move to another page to continue the attack. --Jayron32 04:33, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Already protected. --Majorly 17:58, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Patrick Stewart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi protection requested. Pattern of vandalism starting from multiple IPs relating to death rumours. -- cmh 03:58, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected protected but listing at WP:AN/I for comments Gnangarra 14:45, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Ali Sina (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi protection requested - excessive anonymous vandalism thats coming from an anonymous user who keeps engaging in revert wars. I dont see how this is going to end until the article is protected. Also, this article has been protected and had been unprotected only for a short time before the vandalism returned again. I hope it is returned to its protected state or the vandalism will continue. --Matt57 02:42, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. due to WP:3RR Gnangarra 14:41, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Slavery (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi protection requested due to a steady flow of unconstructive edits and outright vandalism from multiple sources over several days. -- Jim Douglas _(contribs) 22:47, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

• Semi-protected. --Coredesat 22:51, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Germany (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Please Semi protect the article on Germany. I am trying to extensively cleanse the article, however persistent vandalism from anonymous users is making this impossible. TSO1D 22:34, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. Nishkid64 23:58, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

A. D. Winans (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi protect: repeated vandalism from two I.P. addresses of similar area/numerals. -- Kevin Doran 22:33, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected --Majorly 22:55, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Hollywoodland (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi protect Anon editor with rotating IP keeps removing parts of page - mostly removing unsigned tags repeatedly as soon as they're put back up. He's made no useful edits and just wants to edit war. The article is currently semi protected because of his vandalism. --Strothra 22:14, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Declined --Majorly 22:54, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Yasser Arafat (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi protect Anon editor with rotating IP keeps removing parts of page - mostly removing unsigned tags repeatedly as soon as they're put back up. He's made no useful edits and just wants to edit war. The article is currently semi protected because of his vandalism. --Strothra 22:10, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Declined --Majorly 22:53, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Super Smash Bros. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection This article has been vandalized by sneaky vandalism from new users and ip users multiple times in the last week. Valoem 21:26, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected Martinp23 21:45, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Johnny Rebel (singer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Protection or Semi-protection This article has been vandalized 31 times since September, according to my count. The vandal seems to be a single anonymous AOL user (i.e., who doesn't log in when making changes), so blocking this individual will not work. I would prefer full protection. --Skb8721 21:13, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Declined Just watchlist and revert - less than one anon edit per day, and doesn't seem to be (blatant) vandalism anyways. Martinp23 21:40, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

George Spencer Foundation School and Technology College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection Persistent vandalism by dynamic NTL IPs Oldelpaso 21:01, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected Martinp23 21:44, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Amanda Michalka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-Protection - I am requesting a shot term protection on the Amanda Michalka due to repeated vandalism by IP vandals. There have been repeated deletions of their vandalism but they keep on adding it again. -Rosepuff12 20:42, 30 November 2006

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- Steel 20:48, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Tuberculosis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protation requested due to high livels of vandalism by multiple IPVandals. TimVickers 20:40, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected -- Steel 20:48, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Gangster (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protation requested due to ongoing vandalism by multiple IPVandals. -Robotam 20:36, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Declined. I'm going to watch this myself and protect if necessary. -- Steel 20:48, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Cloning (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-Protection - Requesting short term Sprotect due to recent spate of IP vandalisms, apparently originating from a school ISP. Doc Tropics 20:09, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected -- Steel 20:48, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks! That should take care of it. I appreciate the quick response : ) Doc Tropics 21:09, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

DNA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protation requested due to ongoing vandalism by IPVandals. Previously denied ("nea"), but looking at the last 100, last 200 edits, I find it hard to believe that semi-protection isn't warranted. (BTW, appears this page had some protection < 2 months ago, and vandalism surged after protection was removed.) I'm still still a tadpole editor here, but when a page requires multiple rvv's every day,.... — David Spalding /_Contribs 18:06, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected --Majorly 18:15, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

World War I (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection due to ongoing vandalism, including page blanking. All the vandalism seems to be coming from anons, so it probably only needs semi-protection. Carom 16:54, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected --Majorly 17:40, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Steroids (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

It seems that this page has been vandalized more frequently than other chemicals because it is a class of chemicals associated with sex and doping (sport). --Kupirijo 04:55, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - presumed you meant Steriod article not the redirect page Steroids Gnangarra 14:17, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

If you mean steroid yes. It has been vandalized many times. --Kupirijo 18:16, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Leeds United A.F.C. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi protection Continuous vandalism insulting the club by mainly I.P. editors but also a few newly registered users. --Chappy84 20:19, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected - in future, please put new requests at the top of the listing. Martinp23 21:49, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Man (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protect.much vandalism,much like the women article.The Pink Panther 15:16, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Majorly 17:56, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Current requests for unprotection

• WP:RFUP
• WP:RFPU

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

• To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
• Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
• Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
• If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

FIFA 07 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

sprotected for over 2 weeks from anon vandals, things slowed down significantly and we should be ok now. // Laughing Man 16:59, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Unprotected --Majorly 20:50, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Cosmo Kramer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

sprotected as a result of the Michael Richards fiasco. Its pretty much blown over and there's been little activity on the page for the last week. No reason to keep protected. -- ShinmaWa 06:38, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Unprotected --Majorly 20:52, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Michael Richards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Same as Cosmo Kramer. -- ShinmaWa 06:38, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Not unprotected. Looks like there's a bit of an edit war going on there. --Majorly 20:51, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Terminal (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

I'm sorry, I'm not a registered user, but I do use Misplaced Pages often and I was upset to see that Terminal's page was protected form being recreated. Terminal is a band on a major, record label, Tooth & Nail, and is often played on many Christian radio stations. I would appreciate it if it was unprotected and undeleted so they could have a Misplaced Pages page. --66.143.53.97 22:20, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Not unprotected. Request at WP:DRV. --Majorly 22:50, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

A Bad Dream (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

It was protected to stop it being reinstated, but now it has been (as it is Keane's next single) but it is still protected. It is being considered for deletion again, but it should not be protected anymore. U-Mos 18:46, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Unprotected It looks like it was a mistake to not unprotect it when it went back to the AfD per DRV. HighInBC 20:20, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

List of Arab scientists and scholars (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

It was protected 13 days ago and there are no discussions since then in the discussion page. Jidan 18:36, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Unprotected Let's see if it's any better Martinp23 21:52, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Mashallah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

It was protected 12 days ago and there are no discussions since then in the discussion page. Jidan 18:36, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Unprotected Let's see if it's any better Martinp23 21:53, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Hiatt Baker Hall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Page was previously protected with redirect to University of Bristol, requested unprotection which was granted ca. 20th March 2006. Have made various edits to the page since then. Returned on the 28th of november to update the page in light of recent, published, news to find that the page had been changed back to a redirect to University of Bristol by user:Proto. Reverted and added news . As of the 29th of november the page had been reverted and protected by User:Proto.

I believe this page should be reinstated because:

• Four other University of Bristol Halls have pages;Wills Hall, Churchill Hall, Clifton Hill House and Goldney Hall
  • The pages of Churchill Hall, Goldney Hall and Clifton Hill House are in no way more substantial than that of ]
• Contrary to Proto's belief the hall is notable due to it's size (it is the largest UoB hall of residence) and it's infamy

Mikey - "so emo, it hurts"© 18:04, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Not unprotected I suggest you speak with Proto about that. --Majorly 18:08, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Taiwanese people (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Unprotection, as the same people are spreading the views and refusing to compromise. They are blocking and protecting all pages relating to Taiwan and the Taiwanese people. I think this is politically motivated. I just want to remove politically sensitive material from these pages, but they refuse. I don't know whether they are working for the PRC or the KMT, but their views are not objective. Its political leaning favors PRC. I've repeated showed evidence that Taiwanese are not Han Chinese based on DNA evidence, but they refuse to listen and keep putting the term Chinese back to describe Taiwanese, which is erroneous. I feel the ethnicity of Taiwanese is for native Taiwanese like myself to decide, rather than Chinese on the Mainland. The Taiwanese language is different from the Chinese language. I've tried to point out the Taiwanese is ethnically unique based on culture and language. And that the only reason people on Taiwan speak Chinese today are because of 50 years of rule by colonizers. Had the Japanese won World War II, the people would have been considered Japanese, according to their view, because the population would now be speaking Japanese and enjoying Japanese culture. Also, these editors ignore that fact that most Taiwanese still speak Taiwanese language as their mother tongue at home, not Chinese. By allowing these biased individuals to protect the page, you are giving them the incentive NOT TO COMPROMISE since they feel they control the board. Please unprotect this page for this reason. Taiwanbest 16:58, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Not unprotected --Majorly 18:14, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Current requests for significant edits to a protected page

• WP:RFED

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

• Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
• Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Misplaced Pages:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
• Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Misplaced Pages:Requested moves, not here.
• If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
• This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

Fulfilled/denied requests

User:Mike1 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Please change this to an sprotect. - Mike (Talk) 02:16, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. Nishkid64 03:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Cuba (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi protection requested. 10 days after it was unprotected, most of the edits are anon. vandalism and reverts. -- Beardo 03:01, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. Nishkid64 03:07, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

White people (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Please Fully protect this article per recent revert war. WikieZach| talk 22:45, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Declined. Edit war? --Majorly 22:58, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

WikieZach| talk 03:39, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Those are all by the same person... -Amarkov _edits 03:52, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

List of Dragon Ball episodes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Full protection requested - User 3bulletproof16 keep reverting the article to Dragon Ball without any reason although the articles are considered to be important to Dragon Ball (anime). Ragnaroknike 02:52, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

• Comment Page is not article. It is pure listcruft, which does not add any valuable information. The list is a violation of Misplaced Pages is not an indiscriminate collection of information and the underlying concept is non-notable. -- bulletproof 03:01, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Then you discuss that, you don't just unilaterally redirect and revert war to keep it in. To Ragnaroknike, WP:AN/I is what you want when one user is causing problems. -Amarkov _edits 03:05, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Ramones (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi protection requested - Much vandalism found in the Article's history by anonymous IP's. Bushcarrot 02:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

The user 68.159.118.234 has been blocked from editing. Nishkid64 02:59, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

People (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi protection requested - another article that is frequently vandalised by anon. IPs. SparrowsWing 02:17, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. Nishkid64 02:56, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Sun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi protection requested - excessive anonymous vandals lately. SparrowsWing 01:16, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected -- Steel 01:20, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Portal:Biography (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protected on 6 November after 15 min. of IP vandalism. feydey 02:03, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Un-protected. It's been protected for long enough. Nishkid64 03:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Food (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi protection requested - lots of vandalism lately. SparrowsWing 00:38, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected -- Steel 00:45, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Vanessa Anne Hudgens (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Protection requested- There has been edit warring regarding her nationality as Filipino-American or American. bibliomaniac15 00:34, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

That's not really an edit war. Discuss on the talk page with all parties, and find consensus regarding the issue. Nishkid64 00:37, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Black hole (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi protection requested - very few, if any, constructive edits over the past few days but a lot of vandalism. 00:05, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. Nishkid64 00:35, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Demographics of Taiwan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

'Unprotection, since there have been editors imposing politically disputed views in this page, more specifically that Taiwanese are Han Chinese. During a recent article, a full 66% of Taiwanese reject the view that they are Chinese, but these people continue to impose their views that Taiwanese are Han Chinese. I've tried to mediate without much success. I've suggest a compromise. I've even offered DNA evidence that showed that Taiwanese, mainly Hoklo and Hakka are descendents of the Yueh peoples, not Han Chinese from the North. My compromise would be that the term Han Chinese not be used, because the term Han Chinese is very misleading. Now, they have protection on this page and I can't do anything to remove what I think is misinformation. The views about Taiwanese people being Chinese is politically charged because that is the view that the PRC wants us to believe and could be used to justify their claim to the island. So if possible, could you help me remove the term Chinese or Han Chinese from this page. Thank you. Taiwanbest 16:50, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Declined. It was protected less than an hour ago. Were you by any chance the anonymous user editing it? --Majorly 16:57, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Kim Jong-il (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protectionUser:Diez2 This page has been the target of multiple vandals, including one vandalism right before this request was put up. Look at the edit history and see for youself that most of these vandals are coming from unregistered users. This is a request for semi-protection. Diez2 15:36, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected various IP vandalism Gnangarra 15:41, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

TOTSE (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection There is currently a 'feud' going on between the members of Totse and a televangelist, and they have taken to vandalising the Totse article for whatever reason. It should calm down in a few days. Rhoody 08:17, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Fully protected full protection as registered accounts are also being used Gnangarra 15:22, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Crop circle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Full protection. User:Tommysun has been flaming on the talk page for this article, with various highly dubious 'evidence' of unspecified anamolies around crop circles. He has recently been adding this material to the article, with no support from other editors (one of his main reasons for including the material was that no editors had objected, or, more likely, had bothered to respond to the flaming). I at one point debunked all of the 'evidence' he offered, over the course of several hours and iterations. I eventually concluded that he would not accept any of mine, or other editors', reasoning, and ceased to reply in hopes of the flaming eventually dying out. I am loath to request a block on Tommysun, because he has not blatantly vandalized, but I request protection of the article until there is an obvious consensus, either for his additions or against them. I personally am against them, but if there were consesus for addition, I would not object. Based on his pattern of taking absence of disapproval as approval, I suspect that he will keep adding the contested material in the absence of protection. Michaelbusch 08:12, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Fully protected edit war, protected while discussions take place on talk page Gnangarra 15:16, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Demographics of Taiwan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection, this is the other page that needs semi-protection. 71.106.x.x refuses to join the Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Taiwan co-ordination and claims to be a "Watchdog" with others monitoring Taiwan-related pages. This is not constructive to work outside a team especially when he joins in at the last hour of the edits to insert politically motivated wordings. Semi-protection is needed to prevent anonymous users making political statements. They can't be bothered to register on Misplaced Pages, can't be bothered to join the project group, it just shows there is no commitment to work constructively and that their purpose is one of politics only. Please semi-protect the pages. — Nrtm81 07:41, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected roving IP contiually vandalism Gnangarra 16:07, 30 November 2006 (UTC)