| Revision as of 04:14, 5 December 2006 editKyndFellow (talk | contribs)519 edits →Biased reporting← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:42, 5 December 2006 edit undoKyndFellow (talk | contribs)519 edits →Repeated and persistent false accusationsNext edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| ==Evidence presented by ]== | ==Evidence presented by ]== | ||
| ===Repeated and persistent false accusations=== | ===Repeated and persistent false accusations=== | ||
| :* Editor Edgarde has falsely accused me of impersonating other editors by using puppets {{fact}}. Even after the results of the puppet charges showed that I did not use puppets {{fact}} he continues to persists with these accusations . | |||
| :*{{fact}} | |||
| ::Furthermore, he personally acknowledged that his accusations were wrongfully made {{fact}}. Nevertheless, he acts with an irrational ambivalence to not follow through with his own words, which has been a constant problem throughout my discussion with him on the talkpage of Sex Tourism. | |||
| :*{{fact}} | :*{{fact}} | ||
| :*{{fact}} | :*{{fact}} | ||
Revision as of 04:42, 5 December 2006
Anyone, whether directly involved or not, may add evidence to this page. Please make a header for your evidence and sign your comments with your name.
When placing evidence here, please be considerate of the arbitrators and be concise. Long, rambling, or stream-of-conciousness rants are not helpful.
As such, it is extremely important that you use the prescribed format. Submitted evidence should include a link to the actual page diff; links to the page itself are not sufficient. For example, to cite the edit by Mennonot to the article Anomalous phenomenon adding a link to Hundredth Monkey use this form: .
This page is not for general discussion - for that, see talk page.
Please make a section for your evidence and add evidence only in your own section. Please limit your evidence to a maximum 1000 words and 100 diffs, a much shorter, concise presentation is more likely to be effective. Please focus on the issues raised in the complaint and answer and on diffs which illustrate behavior which relates to the issues.
If you disagree with some evidence you see here, please cite the evidence in your own section and provide counter-evidence, or an explanation of why the evidence is misleading. Do not edit within the evidence section of any other user.
Be aware that the Arbitrators may at times rework this page to try to make it more coherent. If you are a participant in the case or a third party, please don't try to refactor the page, let the Arbitrators do it. If you object to evidence which is inserted by other participants or third parties please cite the evidence and voice your objections within your own section of the page. It is especially important to not remove evidence presented by others. If something is put in the wrong place, please leave it for the arbitrators to move.
The Arbitrators may analyze evidence and other assertions at /Workshop. /Workshop provides for comment by parties and others as well as Arbitrators. After arriving at proposed principles, findings of fact or remedies, Arbitrators vote at /Proposed decision. Only Arbitrators may edit /Proposed decision.
Evidence presented by Daniel E. Knodel, M.A.
Repeated and persistent false accusations
- Editor Edgarde has falsely accused me of impersonating other editors by using puppets . Even after the results of the puppet charges showed that I did not use puppets he continues to persists with these accusations .
- Furthermore, he personally acknowledged that his accusations were wrongfully made . Nevertheless, he acts with an irrational ambivalence to not follow through with his own words, which has been a constant problem throughout my discussion with him on the talkpage of Sex Tourism.
Disrespectful treatment toward other editors
Lack of knowlodge on the topic
Biased reporting
Daniel E. Knodel, M.A. 03:50, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Evidence presented by edgarde
Puppetry by Mr. Knodel
Misplaced Pages:Suspected_sock_puppets/Devalover
Denied repeatedly. — edgarde 03:02, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Automanation
Can someone please do a Checkuser on Automanation (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), who keeps reinserting his "Female Domination" site in a fashion similar to Mr. Knodel, also deletes useful links, and offers similiar WikiLawyering defenses. The site's different, so I suspect Automanation is just a copycat. — edgarde 03:02, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Evidence presented by {your user name}
{Write your assertion here}
Place argument and diffs which support your assertion; for example, your first assertion might be "So-and-so engages in edit warring", which should be the title of this section. Here you would show specific edits to specific articles which show So-and-so engaging in edit warring.
{Write your assertion here}
Place argument and diffs which support the second assertion; for example, your second assertion might be "So-and-so makes personal attacks", which should be the title of this section. Here you would show specific edits where So-and-so made personal attacks.