Misplaced Pages

:Main Page featured article protection: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:15, 5 December 2006 editThe Moose (talk | contribs)Administrators13,908 edits Multiple points of this policy (and even its status as a policy) are being disputed.← Previous edit Revision as of 15:52, 5 December 2006 edit undoRetired username (talk | contribs)48,708 edits mention templates... status quo seems to allow protecting them pretty freely if vandalism on them happensNext edit →
Line 22: Line 22:


Semi-protection can thus be introduced for a limited amount of time, though it is preferable to try other methods of dealing with vandalism first, such as blocking problematic accounts and IPs. Semi-protection can thus be introduced for a limited amount of time, though it is preferable to try other methods of dealing with vandalism first, such as blocking problematic accounts and IPs.

==Templates==
Templates included in the main page FA are sometimes vandalized, and it is more difficult to remove this kind of vandalism quickly. It is also less likely that casual readers would need to modify the templates. Admins may semi/full-protect the templates as needed.


==Notification== ==Notification==

Revision as of 15:52, 5 December 2006

This page documents an English Misplaced Pages policy.It describes a widely accepted standard that editors should normally follow, though exceptions may apply. Changes made to it should reflect consensus.
Red question markThis page's designation as a policy or guideline is disputed or under discussion. Please see the relevant talk page discussion for further information.
Shortcut
  • ]

Misplaced Pages's Main Page featured article is one of the most visible and heavily edited on the site. For this reason, it receives a lot of vandal edits from unregistered users visiting Misplaced Pages.

It has been suggested many times in the past that the featured article should thus be protected or semi-protected. Protection of the page is generally prohibited. Administrators are advised to use extreme discretion when deciding whether to semi-protect the page. They should notify the community when they choose to do so. Circumstances under which semi-protection are appropriate are given below.

Rationale

There are several reasons for this policy.

  • Almost without exception, featured articles are improved by their time on the main page (some of them greatly improved). Check out these before-and-after diffs from September, 2005: . Protecting the featured articles means that these pages may not be improved.
  • A featured article is supposed to "exemplify our very best work, representing Misplaced Pages's unique qualities on the Internet". This includes being editable by anyone. Visitors often tend to look at our most visible articles, and having those articles editable helps attract new users to the project.
  • Vandalism (especially to highly visible articles like the main page featured article) is cleaned up very quickly, often in only a matter of seconds, helped by automated bots such as AntiVandalBot.
  • Although the more visible featured article of the day attracts more vandals than other articles, it also attracts more curious and good faith editors. Semi-protection should be avoided as a lot of vandalism on the day's featured article is reverted by other anonymous or recently-registered users (e.g. ),
  • This is codified in the page protection policy: When a page is particularly high profile, either because it is linked off the main page, or because it has recently received a prominent link from offsite, it will often become a target for vandalism. It is best not to protect pages in this case. Instead, consider adding them to your watchlist, and reverting vandalism yourself. - Misplaced Pages:Protection policy

Protection

Protection prevents anyone without administrative powers from editing an article. This should almost never occur on the day's featured article, and should only be used in rare situations where semi-protection is ineffective.

Semi-protection

Semi-protection prevents all unregistered or recently registered users from editing a page. The main page featured article should also almost never be semi-protected. However, it is recognised that there are some extreme circumstances in which semi-protection can be introduced for a limited amount of time. This could occur when, for example, a range of dynamic IP addresses are being used to vandalise the featured article page in quick succession; where personal information or potentially distressing content is being repeatedly placed onto the article; or where a few minutes of protection are needed to remove harmful vandalism from a page.

Semi-protection can thus be introduced for a limited amount of time, though it is preferable to try other methods of dealing with vandalism first, such as blocking problematic accounts and IPs.

Templates

Templates included in the main page FA are sometimes vandalized, and it is more difficult to remove this kind of vandalism quickly. It is also less likely that casual readers would need to modify the templates. Admins may semi/full-protect the templates as needed.

Notification

Should an administrator deem that protection or semi-protection of the Main Page featured article is necessary, a notice should be placed at the Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard and the page's talk page as to the reason and rationale behind the decision to protect or semi-protect, and whether there are any recommended steps for the unprotection of the page.

Move protection

To qualify for featured article status, the day's featured article will be at a stable and agreed-upon title. Therefore, in the event of page move vandalism, it is acceptable to protect the article from being moved. For housekeeping and process reasons, this protection should be lifted at the end of an article's stay on the front page.

Other front page articles

These are covered under the semi-protection policy. Although they can be semi-protected, admins should generally be more cautious in applying protection to these pages. To qualify for semi-protection, articles linked via the front page should be experiencing a higher frequency of vandalism than other articles.

Note that none of this applies to the main page itself, which is always protected.

See also

Categories: