| Revision as of 13:36, 5 December 2006 editNightstallion (talk | contribs)Administrators96,501 editsm →Parties' agreement to mediate← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:15, 5 December 2006 edit undoVsion (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers12,144 edits →Issues to be mediated: reword for precisionNext edit → | ||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| ===Issues to be mediated=== | ===Issues to be mediated=== | ||
| *Whether it is POV to call a country a Single Party |
*Whether it is POV to call a country a Single Party State when there are reports of measures that discriminate against other political parties | ||
| yet other parties still have won seats in |
yet other parties still have won seats in its parliament | ||
| *If it is Original Research ] to use the above three sources as sources to cite showing Singapore is a single-party system | *If it is Original Research ] to use the above three sources as sources to cite showing Singapore is a single-party system; even though these sources do not explicitly describe Singapore as a Single-Party State. | ||
| ===Additional issues to be mediated=== | ===Additional issues to be mediated=== | ||
Revision as of 16:15, 5 December 2006
Single-party state
view
edit
delete
watch
Filed: 02:28, December 5 2006 (UTC)
Involved parties
- Wikizach (talk · contribs)
- Regebro (talk · contribs)
- Huaiwei (talk · contribs)
- Vsion (talk · contribs)
- Nightstallion (talk · contribs)
- Instantnood (talk · contribs)
- Terence Ong (talk · contribs)
Articles involved
Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:
Issues to be mediated
- Whether it is POV to call a country a Single Party State when there are reports of measures that discriminate against other political parties
yet other parties still have won seats in its parliament
- If it is Original Research WPPolicy(see here) to use the above three sources as sources to cite showing Singapore is a single-party system; even though these sources do not explicitly describe Singapore as a Single-Party State.
Additional issues to be mediated
- Whether the definition of a single-party system must be followed exactly to determine if one country is or isn't one. Quote, "..a single-party state or one-party system or single-party system is a type of party system government in which a single political party forms the government and no other parties are permitted to run candidates for election.."
- Whether Singapore matches the definition of "de facto" single-party state in the article.
- Whether the discussion of "de facto single-party states" should be included in the article, or moved to "Dominant-party system".
Parties' agreement to mediate
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.
- Agree; WikieZach| talk 02:44, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Agree. --Regebro 11:01, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Agree Terence Ong 12:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Sure, why not. It'll be interesting to discuss this, especially as I don't even know yet what opinion I have on this -- I can see the merits of both arguments. —Nightstallion (?) 13:36, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Decision of the Mediation Committee
- Accept/Reject/Extend: Reason for rejection (if rejected), additional required information (if extended.)
- For the Mediation Committee, (Mediation Committee members only.)