Misplaced Pages

William G. Tifft: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:01, 7 December 2006 editIantresman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,376 editsm Link← Previous edit Revision as of 14:56, 7 December 2006 edit undoජපස (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers60,450 edits rv -- Ian lied about consensus.Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
'''William Grant Tifft''' is Emeritus Professor of astronomer at the ], whose main interests are in ], ] and what Tifft calls redshift problems (see ]).<ref> </ref>, a view not shared by most astronomers. He has an A.B. in Astronomy from Harvard University (1954), and Ph.D. in Astronomy from the California Institute of Technology (1958). '''William G. Tifft''' is Emeritus Professor of astronomer at the ], whose main interests are in ], ] and what Tifft calls redshift problems (see ]).<ref> </ref>


He has an A.B. in Astronomy from Harvard University (1954), and Ph.D. in Astronomy from the California Institute of Technology (1958).
==On Redshift quantization==
Described by astronomer William M. Napier in 2006 as "controversial claims", he notes:
:"]" claims have appeared in the literature for about 30 years now and are associated with a few astronomers such as ], the ] and W.G. Tifft"<ref>W.M. Napier, "", writing in Jean Claude Pecker, Jayant Narlikar (editors) "" (2006) </ref>

In a 1993 article in '']'' magazine article on Tifft, popular science writer ] noted:

:"The editors of the '']'' grudgingly published his first quantized-redshift paper in 1976, but they announced in an unusual disclaimer that they couldn't endorse the idea (although they also couldn't find anything wrong with the underlying observations)"

:" isn't necessarily claiming that the universe isn't expanding, he says -- only that if it is, some other process is affecting redshifts as well. His basic idea is that redshift could be an intrinsic property of the galaxy and not merely something done to its light as the light travels through space." <ref>Dava Sobel, "", ''Discover'', April, 1993)</ref>

''Astrophysical Journal'' had written:
:"Editor's note:- The referees of this paper neither could find obvious errors with the analysis nor felt that they could enthusiastically endorse publication. The subject matter is interesting and perhaps important. A more complete assessment of the analysis is beyond the role normally expects of referees"<ref>In Tifft, W. G., "" (1977) ''Astrophysical Journal'', vol. 211, Jan. 1, 1977, pt. 1, p. 31-46.</ref>


==Sources and notes== ==Sources and notes==

Revision as of 14:56, 7 December 2006

William G. Tifft is Emeritus Professor of astronomer at the University of Arizona, whose main interests are in galaxies, superclusters and what Tifft calls redshift problems (see Redshift quantization).

He has an A.B. in Astronomy from Harvard University (1954), and Ph.D. in Astronomy from the California Institute of Technology (1958).

Sources and notes

  1. William G. Tifft's Personal Web page at the U. Arizona
Categories: