| Revision as of 04:59, 22 November 2019 editMarkZusab (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,674 edits corrected typo← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:52, 22 November 2019 edit undoTruthGuardians (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,042 edits →Michael Jackson's Dangerous LiaisonsNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| *'''Redirect''' to author page. Apparently no legitimate publications dared to review this book given its revolting author. ]<sup>]</sup> 😜 04:46, 22 November 2019 (UTC) | *'''Redirect''' to author page. Apparently no legitimate publications dared to review this book given its revolting author. ]<sup>]</sup> 😜 04:46, 22 November 2019 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Comment'''. The book has been reviewed in the academic journals and , which are reliable sources and satisfy ]. ] (]) 04:59, 22 November 2019 (UTC) | *'''Comment'''. The book has been reviewed in the academic journals and , which are reliable sources and satisfy ]. ] (]) 04:59, 22 November 2019 (UTC) | ||
| :: One source still doesn't make it notable. An academic journal doesn't neccesarily speak for the book's legitimacy. ] clearly speaks to this. There shouldn't be a separate, stand-alone article entirely dedicated to this book. ] (]) 06:52, 22 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:52, 22 November 2019
Michael Jackson's Dangerous Liaisons
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Michael Jackson's Dangerous Liaisons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. This book does not meet the basic requirements of Misplaced Pages:Notability (books). Same information about this book available on its author's page Tom O'Carroll#Michael Jackson's Dangerous Liaisons. There are also no reliable sources, per Misplaced Pages:Reliable sources, that backs the content of this book. Thus delete . TruthGuardians (talk) 02:57, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 04:19, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Redirect to author page. Apparently no legitimate publications dared to review this book given its revolting author. —Мандичка 😜 04:46, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment. The book has been reviewed in the academic journals Archives of Sexual Behavior and Sexualities, which are reliable sources and satisfy WP:NBOOK. MarkZusab (talk) 04:59, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- One source still doesn't make it notable. An academic journal doesn't neccesarily speak for the book's legitimacy. WP:NBOOK clearly speaks to this. There shouldn't be a separate, stand-alone article entirely dedicated to this book. TruthGuardians (talk) 06:52, 22 November 2019 (UTC)