Revision as of 14:05, 23 December 2004 editHalibutt (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers34,067 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:56, 11 January 2005 edit undoGhirlandajo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers89,629 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
There is a discussion going on at ] whether to rename that page to ] or not. If a consensus to move the page is reached at ], the page will be moved to the new location. Please take part in the ongoing discussion. ]]]] 14:05, Dec 23, 2004 (UTC) | There is a discussion going on at ] whether to rename that page to ] or not. If a consensus to move the page is reached at ], the page will be moved to the new location. Please take part in the ongoing discussion. ]]]] 14:05, Dec 23, 2004 (UTC) | ||
(Can someone write a normal article here instead of this Russian imperial propaganda POV? I've worked with many Old Belarusan texts, and they are MORE different from Russian sometimes than modern literary Belarusan. And this "divergence" theory is purely Russian imperial invention.) ] 11:48, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:56, 11 January 2005
Template:Russian History Harmonization
Ruthenian language, also known (less precisely) as Russian, This might be a problem... I think we have a breakdown in communications here. Wetman 17:40, 30 Jan 2004 (UTC)
- And a huge one. Mikkalai 02:35, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC)
This page should be merged with Old Russian language! — Monedula 14:48, 7 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Not really, Monedula. Ukrainian and Rusyn are not equal to Old Ruthenian. I believe the current disambiguation should stay as it is. ] 14:05, Dec 23, 2004 (UTC)
Old Ruthenian language
There is a discussion going on at Talk:Old Ruthenian language whether to rename that page to Old Russian language or not. If a consensus to move the page is reached at Misplaced Pages:Requested moves, the page will be moved to the new location. Please take part in the ongoing discussion. ] 14:05, Dec 23, 2004 (UTC)
(Can someone write a normal article here instead of this Russian imperial propaganda POV? I've worked with many Old Belarusan texts, and they are MORE different from Russian sometimes than modern literary Belarusan. And this "divergence" theory is purely Russian imperial invention.) Rydel 11:48, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)