Talk:Ian Plimer: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 15:32, 11 January 2020 editHob Gadling (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users18,408 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:38, 11 January 2020 edit undoThenightaway (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users51,864 edits →What is wrong with Climate Feedback source?Next edit →
Line 23:		Line 23:
	== What is wrong with Climate Feedback source? ==		== What is wrong with Climate Feedback source? ==
	I think that page is extremely useful. What is wrong with the "highly respected source" ] ? Why is it "not compliant with WP:BLPSPS"? --] (]) 15:32, 11 January 2020 (UTC)		I think that page is extremely useful. What is wrong with the "highly respected source" ] ? Why is it "not compliant with WP:BLPSPS"? --] (]) 15:32, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
			: RSP: "Climate Feedback is a fact-checking website that is considered generally reliable for topics related to climate change. It discloses its methodologies and has been endorsed by other reliable sources. Most editors do not consider Climate Feedback a self-published source due to its high reviewer requirements." I'm also pretty sure that Peter Gulutzan, the editor who removed the content, knows perfectly well that Climate Feedback is a RS, as he has a history of trying to unsuccessfully scrub this source all across Misplaced Pages, and is aware that the RS noticeboard considers it reliable. This is tendentious fringe editing. ] (]) 15:38, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:38, 11 January 2020

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ian Plimer article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 21 days

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

Biography: Science and Academia C‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Australia C‑class Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Ian Plimer is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Ian Plimer be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

This article and its editors are subject to Misplaced Pages general sanctions. See the description of the sanctions.

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5	Archive 6
Archive 7

This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present.

Other scientists, such as Donald Prothero another geologist, have reviewed similar data to Ian Plimer and have reached different conclusions

Yet on Donald Prothero's page it does not say other scientists such as Plimer looked at the same data and reached a different conclusion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.224.251.239 (talk) 20:24, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Yes, because fringe claims need to be contextualised by mainstream science, but mainstream science doesn't need to be evaluated against the fringe. Guettarda (talk) 21:57, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

What is wrong with Climate Feedback source?

I think that page is extremely useful. What is wrong with the "highly respected source" Climate Feedback ? Why is it "not compliant with WP:BLPSPS"? --Hob Gadling (talk) 15:32, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

RSP: "Climate Feedback is a fact-checking website that is considered generally reliable for topics related to climate change. It discloses its methodologies and has been endorsed by other reliable sources. Most editors do not consider Climate Feedback a self-published source due to its high reviewer requirements." I'm also pretty sure that Peter Gulutzan, the editor who removed the content, knows perfectly well that Climate Feedback is a RS, as he has a history of trying to unsuccessfully scrub this source all across Misplaced Pages, and is aware that the RS noticeboard considers it reliable. This is tendentious fringe editing. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 15:38, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Categories: