Misplaced Pages

User talk:Light current: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:45, 2 August 2006 editLight current (talk | contribs)30,368 edits BJT← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:35, 6 March 2020 edit undoGoodguy12345678910 (talk | contribs)26 edits they were being mean to me.Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit 
Line 1: Line 1:
==] nomination of ]==
<div id="shortcut" style="border: 2px solid #669; margin: 0em 1em 0em 1em; text-align: center; padding:5px; clear: both; background-color: #c9B1DE">
]
'''Please post new messages to the <big><font color="red"><b>TOP</b></big></font> of my talk page (but below this notice)
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}}
Thank you for experimenting with Misplaced Pages. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the ] for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the ] if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.


If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{tlc|hang on}} to '''the top of ]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on ''']''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact ] to request that the administrator ] the page or email a copy to you. <!-- Template:Db-test-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] 21:07, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
= <big><font color="blue"><b>Greetings!</b></big></font>=
==Always nice to have a stimulating but civil discussion!! ==


== File:TerribleSpelling.jpg listed for deletion ==
'''(People just wont believe I have most of the day and night to discuss (and edit)-- must get out more)!'''
A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 00:59, 3 September 2011 (UTC)


== hi ==
---------------------'''Please use headlines when starting new topics''' -----------'''Thank you'''---------'''
-----Saying of the day: '''Try to be kind --- even if it hurts!!'''
-------------------------
</div>


Hello <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 02:36, 19 July 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Earlier talk archived at
== File:BadassBassBridge.jpg listed for deletion ==
A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 07:54, 20 June 2013 (UTC)


== Just to let you know ==
*]
*]
*]
*]


You have been mentioned at ]. X] (]) 14:35, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
<!--- PUT YOUR COMMENTS BELOW THIS LINE --->


== Notification of automated file description generation ==
==Opening Paragraph Electronics==
Your upload of ] or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.


This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions ]. Thanks!<!--Template:Un-botfill-null--> ''Message delivered by ] (])'' 12:38, 13 January 2014 (UTC)


*Another one of your uploads, ], has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks!<!--Template:Un-botfill--> ''Message delivered by ] (])'' 14:04, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
:You raise some interesting points. I think Ill move this discussion to the ] page so that others can have some input. 8-|
==File source problem with File:Musicians earplug.JPG==
]
Thank you for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the ].


If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a ] and ask for a chance to fix the problem.<!-- Template:You can request undeletion -->
==BJT==
Moved to ] for wider audience.


Please refer to the ''']''' to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a . If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] (]) 17:29, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
== My Edits ==
==File source problem with File:ComponentsCrop.jpg==
I understand why the clamper page was cleared, but the reason you gave (nonsense) was irrational. Check ]. ] 05:08, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
]
Thank you for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the ].


If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a ] and ask for a chance to fix the problem.<!-- Template:You can request undeletion -->
:How can completely clearing a page and replacing it with something irrrelevant be seen as anything other than vandalism? Judging by the amount of time you have been here, you should know better! Also see ] 8-(--] 09:37, 25 July 2006 (UTC)


Please refer to the ''']''' to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a . If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] <sup>]</sup> 16:15, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
Moved to ]

== What Is the Basic Idea behind a Negative Impedance Converter (NIC)? ==

Hello Light current,

I would like to focus your attention again on one of the most interesting circuit phenomenon - ] - and on its famous circuit implementation - ]. IMO, both the phenomenon and the circuit have never explained (if you have ever met good explanations about this subject, please let me know!) I have been trying to reveal the secret of this "mystic" circuit from many years. Now, I have the feeling that I have managed to grasp the basic idea behind it; so, I would like to share my penetration with Misplaced Pages audience.

I have already created the first circuit stories about and resistance. Now, I am developing two pages about and . I have the idea to co-ordinate this work with according Misplaced Pages pages. Following the Misplaced Pages conventions, I have first exposed my suggestion on ] and ]. I would be glad, if you and other experienced Wikipedians who love exotic circuits join this discussion.

I have also tried to resume the discussion about ] and the dual ] − see ] where I have suggested to rearrange the structure of these pages. As I can see, you have participated very actively in the creating of the pages; so, I may expect that you will react to my suggestion. ] 18:00, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

==Op-Amp Common Mode Rejection==
Why did you eliminate the piece on common mode rejection from the discussion of ideal and real-world op amps? Your edit summary says its a simplification of language, but it actually eliminates discussion of a standard parameter of operational amplifiers. Do you think it's unimportant? (It certainly is an issue in instrumentation amplifiers.) Did you think it's incorrect? (I left this message in the discussion section but I thought I might try to reach you this way, too.) ] 21:31, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

:I replied on article talk.
== A favor to ask ==

I've been away from home for a while and haven't really been editing much... well, anyways there is a particularly un-civil editor I might have disgruntled. Just wondering if you could add my user page to your watchlist and check for possible vandalism while I'm on vacation. Thanks &mdash; ''''']]]''''' <sup>]</sup> 14:49, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

== User-page Vandalism ==

I just noticed your vandalism of my user page on June 5, 2006 and have reverted. Please don't do that again. ] (]) 11:29, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

:Yes Robert, it does appear that I made these changes. Yet I dont remember - must have been under the influence at the height of our discussions %-). Apologies it should not have happened.--] 12:22, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

::Well, I'm glad things are better now. I probably shouldn't have mentioned it, but someone else was trying my patience when I noticed. Go ahead and erase this section if you want. ] (]) 01:44, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

:No, you are quite correct to tell me off. I shouldnt have done it. It was childish of me! 8-(--] 02:08, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

== Martin bass ==

Speaking of "Exclusionism" (as referenced on your user page), I stopped in here after a while away and noticed that you had added an extensive section on the EB 18 electric bass to the ] page. Kudos on your hard work and extensive research, but I feel that most of this material (including photos) should be excluded from the article. Far too much information on what was essentially a short-lived and unsuccessful experiment by Martin. To someone unfamiliar with musical instruments, it would appear from reading the article that Martin's primary product was that bass, with the guitars a distant second, when of course the opposite is true.

I realize I am not being bold, but I don't like wholesale eliminating that much of someone's hard work without fair warning. I would suggest either spinning that info off to another article or simply returning it to your userspace until (if) the Martin article has so much detail about their acoustics that adding the info about the bass would not "unbalance" the article.

Thanks for listening. ] 02:03, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

P.S. I actually have the matching guitar. Not a big fan of it - the neck is too thick - but it looks fun and I have a weakness for oddball orphaned guitars.

:I dont agree that its extensive. Its a short para with the details and 4 photos. I dont agree it makes the bass look primary. The bass is at the bottom of the page. What the page needs is more on other Martin guitars, not removal of worthwhile content. 8-|--] 03:17, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

== Revert in decibel entry ==

This concerns your revert of chances in the decibel entry please consider the following. You seem to think that equal distances on a decibel scale are equal in sensations and that this is equivalent to Stevens' power law. There are two problems here.

1. Data fit to power forms are better than to a logarithmic scale (Steven, 1957; and myriad of susequent research). Work in mathematical psychology and subsequent testing has found substantial support for the power law (e.g., Steingrimsson & Luce, 2006).

2. Equal distances on a logarithmic scale are not equal on a power scale. Assuming the power law <math>\psi(I)=kI^a</math>, where <math>\psi</math> is a function capturing sensation, <math>I</math> is physical intensity and <math>k,a</math> are constants. If these are converted to decibels, we have <math>10\log(\psi(I)) = 10(\log k + a\log I)</math>. Now, if we have two intensities, <math>I</math> and <math>I'</math>, then their difference in decibels (assuming the power law) is

:<math>10\log(\psi(I)) - 10\log (\psi(I)) = 10(log k + a\log I)- 10(log k + a\log I')</math>

With a little algebra and dividing by 10, we get

:<math>\log(\psi(I)) - \log (\psi(I)) = a\log I'- a\log I = a\log(\frac{I'}{I})</math>

which is an entity that is not constant. Hence, equal distance on a decibel scale are not equal in power and hence not equivalent to Stevens' power law. Equal distances on a decibel scale are equal distences on a logarithm scale, which is obvious as decibels are a logarithmic scale.

I hope this clarifies the issue. (Best regards, Rutuag)

References

* Steingrimsson, R., & Luce, R. D. (2006). Empirical evaluation of a model of global psychophysical judgments: III. A form for the psychophysical function and intensity filtering. ''Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 50,'' 15—29.

* Stevens, S. S. (1957). On the psychophysical law. ''Psychological Review'' 64(3):153—181. PMID 13441853.

==Leave out the adverts==
The article is about bass amplification, and the specific subsection is about amplifying the upright bass. Including the names of manufacturers seems reasonable. I believe an article about sports cars, specifically Italian sports cars would list the names Lambourghini, Ferrari, etc. There is even more justification in the bass amplification/upright bass preamp example, because whereas Lambourghini and Ferrari are well-known names, even to those outside the field of sports cars, the names of manufacturers of impedance-matching preamplifiers are probably unknown to most non-upright bassists.] 02:07, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

:Links to the manufacturers are at the bottom of the page. I believe this is the acceptable place to put them, not in the body of the article.8-|--] 02:12, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Policy quote:

<blockquote>
''Advertising. Articles about companies and products are acceptable if they are written in an objective and unbiased style. Furthermore, all article topics must be third-party verifiable, so articles about very small "garage" or local companies are not likely to be acceptable. External links to commercial organizations are acceptable if they can serve to identify major corporations associated with a topic (see finishing school for an example). Please note Misplaced Pages does not endorse any businesses and it does not set up affiliate programs. See also WP:CORP for a proposal on corporate notability.''
</blockquote>

::Another concern with listing three manufacturers in the body of the text as I did, is that pretty soon, someone will add another 3, and then another editor will add another 5, and then there will be a big list of manufacturers (just like the list of bass players in the bass guitar article). As well, people will start adding in bogus/unverifiable advert claims thrown in as well ("the XYZ preamplifier is widely acknowledged to be the best professional-level bass preamplifier, as it gives the truest, best tone.."). I will try to do a list at the end...Thanks for your comments and ideas. By the way, I think the bass amplification article is coming along well. One technical concern, though; when I search for "bass instrument amplification," Misplaced Pages tells me that it doesn't exist, so I always have to get to it from the "bass guitar" article page.] 14:22, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Yes I agree with your predictions. Yes I think you are doing a good job on that page -- so I'll leave it to you for now! When you search, remember to use the proper capitalisation like ] 8-)--] 15:45, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

==Article tags inappropriate in user space==
I deleted the tag you inappropriately put on my User talk page. Causing a user talk page to be placed into an article category is inappropriate use of the category. Whether and when to archive is up to the individual user. Also, if you have anything to say to me, please place it at the bottom of my page per normal procedure. Thank you. ] (]) 04:16, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

:Sorry Robert, I remeber now putting a tag on your user page. I was not aware that the toolong tag was not appropriate for user talk pages. Some one did it to my page not long ago so it seemed to be accepted practice. I aplogise for putting the actual post at the top of the page insted of the bottom. I do it the the other way round!! I dont know what you mean by catagorisation! 8-)--] 21:16, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

==Amplifying double bass==
''While double bass players amplifying their instrument are aiming at producing a wide range of tonal qualities with their amplification systems, these can be grouped into two categories for the sake of simplicity. Double bass players playing in traditional blues, jazz, folk, and bluegrass are often seeking a "natural" sound that replicates the woody, acoustic sound of the unamplified instrument. In some other settings, such as some subgenres of 1950s blues, rockabilly, punk/psychobilly, and jazz-rock, double bass players may be seeking a louder "amplified tone" that emphasizes the lower fundamentals and allows the bass to be heard under a loud band''........

Hi, this paragraph made you say "whaaat?" in your edit. The natural sound tries to replicate the sound/tone colour/resonance of the instrument playing in a room -- except it is louder. The "amplified tone" sounds like a cross between an upright bass and an electric bass, since the higher harmonics are filtered out and the bass frequencies are boosted. The resulting tone sounds far more powerful than the "natural sound." Too POV? The same trend can be seen in the other acoustic instruments, such as amplified violin] 13:27, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

:Yeah. It was an unfocused para drifting between styles of music, players etc. We just need some facts about how you amp the DB! 8-)--] 13:55, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

::It could have been worse... there could have been the names of 50 bass players spread throughout the paragraph (with lots of statements like "well known as the greatest bass player" and "the most famous two-handed tapping guru in the world"! (like the bass guitar article used to have) : )] 17:40, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

==Speakers are not fast or slow==
Hi Lightcurrent, for bass speakers if you are comparing an 8 inch low-frequency driver to a 15 inch low-frequency driver, the 8" LF drivers can respond to transient attacks much faster than a 15". The speaker and mixer company Mackie states that "Two 12-inch woofers provide greater air movement than a single 18" woofer but with greater speed, control and better attack." `] 04:24, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

:Yes but it can only be the frequency response of the smaller speakers being more extended. I think they are using loose terminology to try to sound clever. Speakers have a frequency response (not a 'speed') 8-)--] 05:31, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

The wikipedia discussion on speakers says that "...marketing claims that a bass driver is ‘fast’ or 'quick-responding' are unfounded. Speaker manufacturers often claim that small bass drivers are ‘faster’, or that they have a quicker 'transient response. While a light cone is easier to accelerate, the only result is that light cone can reproduce higher frequencies. Given that a driver can generate a given frequency, its ability to generate higher frequencies (its bandwidth) has little to do with the rate at which a low frequency tone builds up or decays. Provided that the driver is operating at reasonably low ‘Q factor’ (a feature of the driver plus its enclosure) then its contribution to the sluggishness of bass response is likely to be negligible. This is less true of bass reflex designs, though they remain popular simply because it is rare to find a room in which their defects are not swamped by resonant modes...... Interesting...it seems I have been duped by marketing claims from manufacturers websites! (note that I recently copyedited this paragraph a bit to add the term "marketing claims" and "quick-responding)...Thanks for the response] 16:10, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

:Yes this is where we have to be careful about which references we use! In fact I would always take manufacturers claims with a large spoonful of salt! 8-)--] 16:32, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

==Links in Valve Sound article==
I noticed you had been tinkering with links to directly heated valve and indirectly heated valve. As far as I know, there are no articles on either subject. I'm new at contributing to Misplaced Pages, and I would like to understand the strategy behind these "links". ] 15:22, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

:I dont 'tinker'. I may try to improve. In this case I was seeing if there were any links to ] and ]. THere arent. However the fact that these are now red links will encourage others maybe to create articles on these subjects or change the links so they point to a more relevant page like ]. In fact it may be better for thes two terms to be pinked directly to vacuum tubes Thus:
*]
*]
Does this shed any light?
--] 15:54, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
:Yes, I think I understand. I've read that links to a section within a different article do not work. That's a pity; sometimes it would be nice to link to a section of a different article. But then, someone would just come along and change the headings. Oh well. Thanks for taking the time to explain. (BTW, I didn't intend any negative connotation when I wrote "tinker".) ] 16:12, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Youre welcome 8-)--] 16:18, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

==Coin Shrinking==
I never did see the email you sent - please try again at bert.hickman@aquila.net ] 02:04, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

:Its OK Bert. You got it and replied (work coil design) 8-) I omitted to mention my WP user name. Anyway since its not strictly WP subject matter, Ill talk to you by email and not here about that. However, the subject of 'magnetoforming' probably has other applications and if it does may be worth a page on WP> 8-)--] 07:46, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

==clarification==
Please visit ] and clarify them. --] 03:39, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

:Sorry Im not familiar with this terminology!--] 03:40, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

== Packistani A-bomb ==
I have put this article u<nowiki>Insert non-formatted text here</nowiki>p at ]. Your opinion on this matter would be appreciated. --] 01:58, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

==]==
Following our conversation about internet slang/abbreviations, I saw that you recently created ]. I just thought I should remind you of ]. I'm not saying you are in violation at all, just don't let your opinion on the matter lead you to do anything disruptive. It's already been suggested that your article be merged into ], so you may want to open something of a straw poll on the matter. ] 04:17, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

:Please get a few more edits under your belt before quoting the rule book at anyone!

== Amplifier Schematic symbol==
I debate the validity of the picture I took the time to create. with this: a generic Amp symbol, http://www.kpsec.freeuk.com/symbol.htm and this http://www.ziplink.net/~teachcte/symb1.html see the OP-Amp symbol. Keep in mind I created that from memory from a tech-school for my job (Satellite communications, wideband, and telemetry systems, USAF) from 3 years ago. Yes it isen't detailed, however the article ] is devoid of any pictures which I feel is reason to spice the article up. The article probably recieves so much criticism because it lacks heart and needs imagry to illistrate and give it a more entertaining value. In my personal opinion all electronic devices should have schematic symbols, I make a page specific for schematic symbols if it doesent exist and place in the see also "]", That may be better. M Jurrens 0521 GMT 22 MAY 06.

:The article actually doesnt need a diagram becuase its about the '''concept''' of amplifiers in general. if you look at some of the main pages referred to you will see lots of diags there. 8-)

== c740uz ==
Hi - took me a while to work out what ''hdgs'' stood for :-). Thanks for the tidy up--]\<sup>]</sup> 01:14, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

UR very welcome!--] 01:15, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

==Arc converter==
But "'''''splattering''''' the r.f. spectrum with interference," was so much more ''colorful'' (me pouts) :) --] 03:15, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Yes..but not quite the right tone for a pedia! 8-)

== Cleanup tag ==

Thank you for helping to identify Misplaced Pages articles for cleanup! In case you didn't know, it's not recommended to use subst: with the cleanup tag. Leaving the actual template in place makes it easier to automatically refile the page later, and allows changes to the template to show up on all tagged pages. Thanks again, ] 20:06, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

:Oh dear! I thought I was doing the right thing here, having been told off for not doing it with other tags! (see below) 8-( --] 20:09, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

==Reminder + Suggestion ==
<div style="background-color:#F9F9F9; border:1px solid #AAA; padding:5px;"> ] When using template tags on talk pages, don't forget to ] by adding '''subst:''' to the template tag. For example, use &#123;&#123;subst:test&#125;&#125; instead of &#123;{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. <!-- Template:Subst --></div>

{| class="messagebox" style="background: #F8EABA;"
|-
|align="center"|]
|align="left" width="95%"|'''Important:''' This talk page is becoming ''very long''. Please consider ]. {{{1|}}}
|}
Very interesting layout of your talk page you have here. — ] <small>]</small> 03:39, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

:You no likee??--] 00:32, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

==Image copyright problem with Image:Jacobsladder2crop.jpg==
Thanks for uploading ]. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate ], it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
*]
*]

This is an automated notice by ]. For assistance on the image use policy, see ]. 11:46, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

== Thank you ==

I saw that you made some positive and useful edits to my bio, thanks. One thing that has bugged me for a long time is that "few means" comment... you left it in, now attributing it (loosely) to me, but I would never say such a thing.--] 20:27, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

:If you did not say it, it shall be removed!--] 20:39, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

== Re: Bach works for piano and bass (Well tempered clavier and others) ==
I am not aware of any transcriptions for bass and piano for that particular set of etudes. If you are interested in Bach, I would recommend the unaccompanied cello suites (it's quite a challenge, however). &mdash; '']'' <sup>]</sup> 19:14, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

:OK thanks. I think I'll have to ] off the LH from the ] versions. I am of course talking about the ] trio stuff! 8-)--] 19:30, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Well, that makes a little more sense now. Still, I don't know where you could find a transcription. &mdash; '']'' <sup>]</sup> 19:35, 5 May 2006 (UTC)


== Slimey face tests ==
* 8-| neutral

* 8-? quizzical

* 8-o surprised (or wearing goggles and respirator)

* 8-) satisfied/happy

* 8-)) very happy/laughing

* 8-( unhappy

* 8-(( very unhappy

* 9-) joking (one eye winking)

* 9-| sarcasm?

* $:-( angry/frowning

* $$:-(£) really angry

* %-) only half awake/drunk/tipsy/

* |-) blind drunk

* |-| asleep

== Wiki Welcome ==

'''Welcome!'''

Hello, {{PAGENAME}}, and ] to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*If you're ready for the complete list of Misplaced Pages documentation, there's also ].
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! By the way, please be sure to ] and vote pages using four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the ], add a question to the ] or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! --] 06:41, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
:

Latest revision as of 23:35, 6 March 2020

Speedy deletion nomination of Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Thomas Leach

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Thank you for experimenting with Misplaced Pages. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mhiji 21:07, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

File:TerribleSpelling.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TerribleSpelling.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:59, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

hi

Hello — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.209.3.170 (talk) 02:36, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

File:BadassBassBridge.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BadassBassBridge.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 07:54, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Just to let you know

You have been mentioned at Misplaced Pages:Missing Wikipedians. XOttawahitech (talk) 14:35, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Axmouth02.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:38, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Musicians earplug.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Musicians earplug.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:29, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

File source problem with File:ComponentsCrop.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:ComponentsCrop.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly 16:15, 22 June 2016 (UTC)