Misplaced Pages

User talk:Ilena: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:44, 20 December 2006 editArthur Rubin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers130,168 edits Signature← Previous edit Revision as of 02:13, 20 December 2006 edit undoArthur Rubin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers130,168 edits Attacks outside Misplaced PagesNext edit →
Line 37: Line 37:


Would you '''please''' remove the link from your signature. Although I don't always agree with ], he is quite correct in removing it ''from your signature'' wherever it appears. — ] | ] 01:44, 20 December 2006 (UTC) Would you '''please''' remove the link from your signature. Although I don't always agree with ], he is quite correct in removing it ''from your signature'' wherever it appears. — ] | ] 01:44, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

== Attacks outside Misplaced Pages ==

I would like to add that I wasn't trying to get you banned from Misplaced Pages. I was trying to get you to follow the rules, policies, and guidelines (which you're still not doing), and stated that you ''would'' be banned from Misplaced Pages if you didn't follow them. That was not a threat, nor did I say that ''I'' would ban you from Misplaced Pages.

I did block you for ], and I did say that I thought you had been banned from the articles in question, but my recollection was faulty. I've agreed not to take ''administrative'' action against you in the future.

] suggests that both you and Lee (if you've properly identified him, which is not entirely clear) should not edit the articles. I have no direct interest in the article, other then a general interest in eliminating quackery as I see it.

I request that you edit your blog to remove the misstatements of ''fact''. ] doesn't require that you not attack Wikipedians outside of Misplaced Pages, but it does allow people to determine that your statements ''within'' Misplaced Pages are forbidden attacks if they refer to the statements outside. — ] | ] 02:13, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:13, 20 December 2006

Archive
Archives

Experiences on Misplaced Pages

I would like to share about my experiences on Misplaced Pages. Click here

For a great video ... I recommend Ronz and Friends watch this one:

For how I feel about defeating all three so called Quackbusters ... and their attempts to silence my voice and to change the history of this case:

New archive created

Now you've got your first archive! -- Fyslee 20:33, 19 December 2006 (UTC)


Comment and question

I copied this from your archive. Sorry, but I would like to keep this open and give you an opportunity to reply in light of --Ronz 23:24, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Ilena, you seem to be having some difficulty fitting in with Misplaced Pages. Whether you realize it or not, we consider WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA important. Do you not understand these, not think you are violating them, or not care? I would appreciate a clarification of your position on these. Thanks much! KillerChihuahua?!? 15:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Responded to above. Bow Wow Wow. In my opinion, saying "please" like Ronz does while erasing all my facts I'm posting is not "civility" but censure ...and I'll have none of it. Bullies are welcome to bully each other ... not me. Ilena 23:31, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for clarifying your position. --Ronz 23:35, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
My pleasure. BTW ... I love this video ... what about you?
Please and thank you, Ilena 01:02, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Signature

Would you please remove the link from your signature. Although I don't always agree with User:Ronz, he is quite correct in removing it from your signature wherever it appears. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 01:44, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Attacks outside Misplaced Pages

I would like to add that I wasn't trying to get you banned from Misplaced Pages. I was trying to get you to follow the rules, policies, and guidelines (which you're still not doing), and stated that you would be banned from Misplaced Pages if you didn't follow them. That was not a threat, nor did I say that I would ban you from Misplaced Pages.

I did block you for WP:3RR, and I did say that I thought you had been banned from the articles in question, but my recollection was faulty. I've agreed not to take administrative action against you in the future.

WP:COI suggests that both you and Lee (if you've properly identified him, which is not entirely clear) should not edit the articles. I have no direct interest in the article, other then a general interest in eliminating quackery as I see it.

I request that you edit your blog to remove the misstatements of fact. WP:NPA doesn't require that you not attack Wikipedians outside of Misplaced Pages, but it does allow people to determine that your statements within Misplaced Pages are forbidden attacks if they refer to the statements outside. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 02:13, 20 December 2006 (UTC)