Revision as of 05:55, 2 May 2020 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,291,616 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:NorthBySouthBaranof/Archives/2020/February) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:08, 3 May 2020 edit undoRenamed user 3543546 (talk | contribs)136 edits →Shooting of Greg Gunn: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
Lets hope that the US will survive --] (]) 20:36, 1 May 2020 (UTC) | Lets hope that the US will survive --] (]) 20:36, 1 May 2020 (UTC) | ||
:On a personal level, I agree with you that it's outright-dangerous behavior. But we have to follow the reliable sources. ] (]) 21:08, 1 May 2020 (UTC) | :On a personal level, I agree with you that it's outright-dangerous behavior. But we have to follow the reliable sources. ] (]) 21:08, 1 May 2020 (UTC) | ||
== Shooting of Greg Gunn == | |||
] Please remember to ] when dealing with other editors. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-agf2 --> ] (]) 06:08, 3 May 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:08, 3 May 2020
Camp Fire
C'mon man. You told me to use the Talk page, I did, you never responded. Your current action would seem to verge on bullying. Did you read what I wrote? Crescent77 (talk) 01:49, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- <tps> Umm, where do you get this "bullying" business? Your last entry on the talkpage was a year ago as far as I can tell - you're being disagreed with, or at worst, ignored, and there were other participants in that discussion. That's a long way from your accusation of bullying. Acroterion (talk) 01:55, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- You hadn't made an edit in a year; you made a bold change, which is of course entirely acceptable, but I disagree with the change and believe it contradicts the cited sources, and so I reverted it. While you were accusing me of bullying here, I was writing a talk page post at Talk:Camp Fire (2018) which explains my rationale. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 02:00, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
You were given a year to respond to the talk, then you proceeded to revert without responding. Quite clearly bullying. Crescent77 (talk) 02:22, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- I’ve seen more convincing complaints. You are warned to stop personalizing the discussion, and you are free to reopen the talkpage discussion, but you may not interpret inaction or a disinclination to engage as “bullying,” and if you keep this up you may face editing restricti9ns for personal attacks. Acroterion (talk) 19:50, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
It was not inaction that was the crux of my complaint, it was an action. Please assess the situation before you minimize my complaint. Crescent77 (talk) 20:00, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- You have complained that you waited a year after you discussed it to make a change, and that somehow NBSB’s revert is “bullying.” It is not. Please reconsider your approach to interaction with other editors, and drop the accusation. You’re being disagreed with. Acroterion (talk) 22:22, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
I didn't make the change earlier because it is appropriate to give time for a response before implementing. NBSB did not do so. Therein lies my issue. Crescent77 (talk) 22:33, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Accusations
When you recently reverted my edit on the Ainsley Earhardt page, you insinuated in the edit description that I have a conflict of interest or work for Fox News (you alluded to the few edits that I have made on Fox related pages as evidence, which is odd). If you have a disagreement with an edit I made, the proper way forward is to engage in discussion and not personal attacks and accusations. I kindly ask that you refrain from doing this in the future. Popfox3 (talk) 22:58, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the WP:BLP/Noticeboard regarding WP:NPOV. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Carl Benjamin's rape joke".The discussion is about the topic Carl Benjamin. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! --Amaroq64 (talk) 09:59, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Lets name the facts
de:Nötigung von Verfassungsorganen threatening of constitutional institutions is that behavior called in civilized contries.
Lets hope that the US will survive --Bahnmoeller (talk) 20:36, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- On a personal level, I agree with you that it's outright-dangerous behavior. But we have to follow the reliable sources. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 21:08, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Shooting of Greg Gunn
Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you. Simmo86 (talk) 06:08, 3 May 2020 (UTC)