| Revision as of 11:37, 20 December 2006 editKillerChihuahua (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users34,578 edits →Comment and question: You're dodging the issue← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:39, 20 December 2006 edit undoIlena (talk | contribs)1,128 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| For how I feel about defeating all three so called Quackbusters ... and their attempts to silence my voice and to change the history of this case: | For how I feel about defeating all three so called Quackbusters ... and their attempts to silence my voice and to change the history of this case: | ||
| :::For the mutt and others attempting to bully me ... Woof Woof Woof ... I don't respond to anonymous dogs. | |||
| :::::Updated ... http://www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/Wikipedia.htm#Barretry ] 14:39, 20 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == New archive created == | == New archive created == | ||
Revision as of 14:39, 20 December 2006
 Archives |
|---|
Experiences on Misplaced Pages
I would like to share about my experiences on Misplaced Pages. Click here
For a great video ... I recommend Ronz and Friends watch this one:
For how I feel about defeating all three so called Quackbusters ... and their attempts to silence my voice and to change the history of this case:
- For the mutt and others attempting to bully me ... Woof Woof Woof ... I don't respond to anonymous dogs.
New archive created
Now you've got your first archive! -- Fyslee 20:33, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Comment and question
I copied this from your archive. Sorry, but I would like to keep this open and give you an opportunity to reply in light of --Ronz 23:24, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Ilena, you seem to be having some difficulty fitting in with Misplaced Pages. Whether you realize it or not, we consider WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA important. Do you not understand these, not think you are violating them, or not care? I would appreciate a clarification of your position on these. Thanks much! KillerChihuahua?!? 15:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Responded to above. Bow Wow Wow. In my opinion, saying "please" like Ronz does while erasing all my facts I'm posting is not "civility" but censure ...and I'll have none of it. Bullies are welcome to bully each other ... not me. Ilena 23:31, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for clarifying your position. --Ronz 23:35, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- My pleasure. BTW ... I love this video ... what about you?
- Please and thank you, Ilena 01:02, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- My pleasure. BTW ... I love this video ... what about you?
- In the post linked to, you state "they are facts, albeit ones that you and others would prefer to hide. " This is accusatory. The concern is OR. If the concern is OR, the answer is to find reliable sources which are acceptable, not accuse other editors of "hiding facts". You find that a post which uses the word "please" yet does not support your edits is "bullying" - yet another personal attack. You seem to be focusing on accusing others of bad faith, bullying, "hiding" information - and you are completely ignoring your own hostile, accusatory tone. I'm not sure if you realize that you are shooting yourself in the foot. If you have legitimate concerns about content of an article, you can surely find a way to express those concerns without attacking other editors. You are redirecting focus here; ignoring concerns about your civility and responding with yet more attacks on other editors. Can you see how that is disruptive and not helping your case? KillerChihuahua 11:37, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Signature
Would you please remove the link from your signature. Although I don't always agree with User:Ronz, he is quite correct in removing it from your signature wherever it appears. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 01:44, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Attacks outside Misplaced Pages
I would like to add that I wasn't trying to get you banned from Misplaced Pages. I was trying to get you to follow the rules, policies, and guidelines (which you're still not doing), and stated that you would be banned from Misplaced Pages if you didn't follow them. That was not a threat, nor did I say that I would ban you from Misplaced Pages.
I did block you for WP:3RR, and I did say that I thought you had been banned from the articles in question, but my recollection was faulty. I've agreed not to take administrative action against you in the future.
WP:COI suggests that both you and Lee (if you've properly identified him, which is not entirely clear) should not edit the articles. I have no direct interest in the article, other then a general interest in eliminating quackery as I see it.
I request that you edit your blog to remove the misstatements of fact. WP:NPA doesn't require that you not attack Wikipedians outside of Misplaced Pages, but it does allow people to determine that your statements within Misplaced Pages are forbidden attacks if they refer to the statements outside. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 02:13, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- What do you consider a misstatement of "fact" Arthur? Shalom.