Misplaced Pages

Talk:Pityrodia chrysocalyx: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:14, 18 May 2020 editWimpus (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,917 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 21:28, 18 May 2020 edit undoGderrin (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers58,357 edits add some common names (reffed in article)Next edit →
Line 4: Line 4:
== OR-etymology == == OR-etymology ==
I have removed in this the etymological analysis that editor ] made, by trying to find single words in a dictionary (Brown) that could be possible building blocks for the full compound, while the full compound ''chrysocalyx'' is absent in this specific dictionary. That seems like OR. ] (]) 15:14, 18 May 2020 (UTC) I have removed in this the etymological analysis that editor ] made, by trying to find single words in a dictionary (Brown) that could be possible building blocks for the full compound, while the full compound ''chrysocalyx'' is absent in this specific dictionary. That seems like OR. ] (]) 15:14, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

:There are other references to the epithet - I will add one. William Archer's web page is not a blog. ] (]) 21:28, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:28, 18 May 2020

WikiProject iconPlants Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconAustralia: Western Australia / Biota Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconPityrodia chrysocalyx is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
Note icon
Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
Note icon
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to help@wikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

OR-etymology

I have removed in this edit the etymological analysis that editor Gderrin made, by trying to find single words in a dictionary (Brown) that could be possible building blocks for the full compound, while the full compound chrysocalyx is absent in this specific dictionary. That seems like OR. Wimpus (talk) 15:14, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

There are other references to the epithet - I will add one. William Archer's web page is not a blog. Gderrin (talk) 21:28, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Categories: