| Revision as of 19:26, 21 December 2006 editCyde (talk | contribs)28,155 edits rv., there is some precedent for users removing warnings on their own talk page. There is none whatsoever for someone else doing it for them. Giano can handle himself.← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:27, 21 December 2006 edit undoIrpen (talk | contribs)32,604 editsm Reverted edits by Cyde (talk) to last version by IrpenNext edit → | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| ] ] 14:23, 19 December 2006 (UTC) | ] ] 14:23, 19 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Civility warning == | |||
| It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. ] and ] only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that preventive administrative action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Attacking another user back, as you did on , can only satisfy trolls or anger contributors and leads to general bad feeling. Please try to remain ] with your comments. Thanks! <!-- from Template:Civil1 --> --] 19:03, 21 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:27, 21 December 2006
Old messages are at
- User talk:Giano archive 1(2004)
- User talk:Giano archive 2 (2005)
- User talk:Giano archive 3 (2005)
- User talk:Giano archive 4 (2006)
- User talk:Giano archive 5 (2006)
Please leave new messages at the foot of the page
Architecture notability
To counter spurious time consuming AfD's, I've had a stab at a draft policy for architectural notability here. I've attempted to restrict the scope of the proposal to actual 'works of architecture', architects, building technology and legal aspects of the profession. Buildings and structures notability enmasse should probably be a separate enterprise, or at least a later one. I need to give some thought to threshold notability and have shied away from minor works by major architects, because buildings are not like music or literature, they cannot generally be ignored by the public and play some kind of role in most built environments, so I argue the impact is beyond just they're effectiveness or otherwise as a work of art. Comments (by anyone) gladly received. Cheers --Mcginnly | Natter 21:35, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
the dreaded infoboxes
Hi Giano,
The hated infobox has been added to Johann Sebastian Bach; it's ridiculous—bizarre compartmentalisation of the man, and repetition of info that's already in the text. Do you feel like weighing in with your opinion? The box-maniacs are gearing up for a squabble about it.
Talk:Johann_Sebastian_Bach#infobox Tony 14:23, 19 December 2006 (UTC)