| Revision as of 14:14, 25 May 2017 view source81.135.134.233 (talk) The proper name is ClueBot (NG) not Cluebot← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 07:35, 27 June 2020 view source JJMC89 bot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Administrators3,678,000 editsm Moving Category:Bots to Category:Internet bots per Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Speedy |
| (30 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
⚫ |
#REDIRECT ] |
|
{{Infobox software |
|
|
|
|
|
| name = ClueBot NG |
|
|
|
{{Redirect category shell|1= |
|
| author = Christopher Breneman and Cobi Carter |
|
|
|
{{R from merge}} |
|
| released = December 3, 2010 |
|
|
|
{{R to section}} |
|
| programming language = ], ], ], ], ], and ] |
|
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
'''ClueBot NG''' ('''CBNG''') is an anti-] ] used by ]. CBNG was created as the successor to ].<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-18892510|title=Meet the 'bots' that edit Misplaced Pages|last=Nasaw|first=Daniel|date=2012-07-25|work=BBC News|access-date=2017-04-11|language=en-GB}}</ref> It uses ] and ] to determine if recent changes are vandalism or disruptive to ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://digitfreak.com/technology/digital/1374-little-about-the-bot-that-runs-wikipedia,-cluebot-ng|title=Little about the bot that runs Misplaced Pages, ClueBot NG|last=Raja|first=Sumit|website=digitfreak.com|language=en-gb|access-date=2017-04-11}}</ref> |
|
|
__NOTOC__ |
|
|
==History== |
|
|
CBNG was created by Christopher Breneman and Cobi Carter in 2010. CBNG shares very little in relationship to the original ClueBot, except its name and how they interface with Misplaced Pages. NG stands for Next Generation.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.theverge.com/2014/2/18/5412636/this-machine-kills-trolls-how-wikipedia-robots-snuff-out-vandalism|title=This machine kills trolls|date=2014-02-18|website=The Verge|access-date=2017-04-11}}</ref> Since it's inception, CBNG has made over three million edits.<ref>{{Cite journal|date=2017-04-11|title=User talk:ClueBot Commons|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:ClueBot_Commons&oldid=774955110|journal=Misplaced Pages|language=en}}</ref> The allowable rate of mistakes is called the false positive rate. That rate is hand-set by administrators and is less than half a percent.<ref>{{Cite journal|date=2010-10-20|title=User:ClueBot NG|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:ClueBot_NG&oldid=391868393|journal=Misplaced Pages|language=en}}</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
==Criticism== |
|
|
Critics have stated that CBNG ] new users, by not being able to apply a human brain's knowledge to the edit, and leaving impersonal templates which deter users from contributing in helpful ways. Some have called it "rubbish", and tried to have the bot shut down.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.facebook.com/PetitionToGetRidOfCluebotNgWikipedia/|title=Security Check Required|website=www.facebook.com|language=en|access-date=2017-04-11}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.quora.com/How-does-Wikipedias-content-review-bot-ClueBot-NG-review-Misplaced Pages-pages-and-validate-their-facts|title=How does Misplaced Pages's content review bot ClueBot NG review Misplaced Pages pages and validate their facts? - Quora|website=www.quora.com|language=en|access-date=2017-04-11}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/bots-edit-wikipedia-humans-made/|title=The Bots Who Edit Misplaced Pages (And The Humans Who Made Them)|work=MakeUseOf|access-date=2017-04-11|language=en-US}}</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
==See also== |
|
|
{{Portal|Internet}} |
|
|
*] |
|
| ⚫ |
*] |
|
|
|
|
|
==References== |
|
|
{{reflist}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
] |
|
] |
|