Revision as of 20:59, 25 December 2006 editHodja Nasreddin (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers31,217 edits better translation and last statement← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:41, 26 December 2006 edit undoVlad fedorov (talk | contribs)4,845 edits →Arrest and TrialNext edit → | ||
(14 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
==Arrest and Trial== | ==Arrest and Trial== | ||
Having returned to Moscow, Stomakhin was arrested on ] ]. Stomakhin tried to escape again during his arrest and fell down from fourth floor of his building. | Having returned to Moscow, Stomakhin was arrested on ] ]. Stomakhin tried to escape again during his arrest and fell down from fourth floor of his building. Stomakhin suffered a broken ankle and back injuries. | ||
He was sentenced to five years of prison for inciting religious and ethnic hatred, promoting violent change of constitutional regime, calls for violation of terriorial integrity of Russian Federation, defamatory statements, and extremist activities (articles 282 and 280 of the Russian Criminal Code). | He was sentenced to five years of prison for inciting religious and ethnic hatred, promoting violent change of constitutional regime, calls for violation of terriorial integrity of Russian Federation, defamatory statements, and extremist activities (articles 282 and 280 of the Russian Criminal Code). | ||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
Some of the passages from Stomakhin's articles cited as incriminating evidence in the court sentence are the following: | Some of the passages from Stomakhin's articles cited as incriminating evidence in the court sentence are the following: | ||
⚫ | *“Let tens of new Chechen snipers take their positions in the mountain ridges and the city ruins and let hundreds, thousands of aggressors fall under righteous bullets! No mercy! Death to the Russian occupiers!” | ||
*“Moscow subway terrorist bombing was justified, natural and legal... The Chechens have the full moral right to bomb everything they want in Russia.” | |||
*"We do not have any other family in the World except all oppressed nations of "our" Empire, except those who fight for liberation from this Empire as ]." | *"We do not have any other family in the World except all oppressed nations of "our" Empire, except those who fight for liberation from this Empire as ]." | ||
*"Chechens have every right to blow up anything in Russia after everything that Russia and Russians did to them." | |||
*"Even Western community recognized that Russia is conducting a war to exterminate all Chehens as ]". | *"Even Western community recognized that Russia is conducting a war to exterminate all Chehens as ]". | ||
*"Russian Federation must be destroyed forever. State that does such things to entire nations has no right to exist." | *"Russian Federation must be destroyed forever. State that does such things to entire nations has no right to exist." | ||
*"] died as a hero. He launched so many strikes to bloody Russia as he could". | *"] died as a hero. He launched so many strikes to bloody Russia as he could". | ||
⚫ | * Stomakhin claimed that ], ], and ] are "clowns" of ]{{fact}}. | ||
⚫ | * |
||
⚫ | * Stomakhin claimed that ], ], and ] are "clowns" of ]. | ||
Stomakhin pleaded not guilty. He said he was "tried for his views and not for any real crime. ... In the articles, I expressed my opinion, with which people were free to agree or disagree." . | Stomakhin pleaded not guilty, according to RIA Novosti, news Agency, cited by Committee to Protect Journalists. He said he was "tried for his views and not for any real crime. ... In the articles, I expressed my opinion, with which people were free to agree or disagree." He said an opinion was not a “call to action.”. | ||
However, according to the official court sentence, Stomahin pleaded not guilty on the grounds that he never made public appeals for extremist activities, never called for violent change of the consitutional regime, and never incited ethnic hatred. | |||
==Reaction== | |||
==Public opinion== | |||
] international orgaization, which protects ], stated that "we do not believe Mr. Stomakhin’s comments can be interpreted as incitement to ethnic hatred." <ref name="a19"> , 23 November 2006 </ref> | ] international orgaization, which protects ], stated that "we do not believe Mr. Stomakhin’s comments can be interpreted as incitement to ethnic hatred." <ref name="a19"> , 23 November 2006 </ref> | ||
The ] condemned the court’s ruling and expressed hope that it would be overturned <ref name="jew"> , December 03, 2006. </ref> | The ] condemned the court’s ruling and expressed hope that it would be overturned <ref name="jew"> , December 03, 2006. </ref> | ||
], government opposition figure, leader of the ] that has a miserable number of voters, claimed that the prosecution of Stomakhin was the start of a wider campaign, "because together with him, the entire human rights sector and the entire democratic movement will be put on trial for disagreeing with the majority, for not accepting the state policy of the Russian Federation, for sympathizing with the Chechen people, for anti-war demonstrations and pickets." <ref name="Novo"> - by Jamestown Foundation </ref> | ], government opposition figure, leader of the ] that has a miserable number of voters, claimed that the prosecution of Stomakhin was the start of a wider campaign, "because together with him, the entire human rights sector and the entire democratic movement will be put on trial for disagreeing with the majority, for not accepting the state policy of the Russian Federation, for sympathizing with the Chechen people, for anti-war demonstrations and pickets." <ref name="Novo"> - by Jamestown Foundation </ref> At the same time, Novodvorskaya was a witness from Stomakhin's side at the Stomakhin's trial, where she never raised any such claims according to the official court sentence. She also never claimed specific facts in support of her statement. | ||
Micah H. Naftalin, Director of ], foreign NGO, said: | Micah H. Naftalin, Director of ], foreign NGO, said: | ||
Line 48: | Line 51: | ||
Opposition figures like human rights activist Svetlana Gannushkina and politician ] argued that Stomakhin's writings while outrageous had not been a public threat: they were very unlikely to incite anybody. According to Gannushkina and Novodvorskaya the ] who posses a real threat usually receive only minimal sentences or no sentences at all. Thus, the five year prison term to Stomahin is extremely excessive <ref name="Opinions"> - by Anna Karpuk for grani.ru </ref> <ref name="Val1"> - by ] for grani.ru </ref> <ref name="Val2"> - by ] for grani.ru </ref>. Opposition journalist Vladimir Abarinov noted that Stomakhin has been convicted for publishing an article against ] that was actually copied from a ] entry of a different person <ref name="Abarinov"> - by Vladimir Abarinov for grani.ru.</ref> On trial no one disputed the authorship of the articles written by Stomakhin <ref name="Sentence"></ref>. | Opposition figures like human rights activist Svetlana Gannushkina and politician ] argued that Stomakhin's writings while outrageous had not been a public threat: they were very unlikely to incite anybody. According to Gannushkina and Novodvorskaya the ] who posses a real threat usually receive only minimal sentences or no sentences at all. Thus, the five year prison term to Stomahin is extremely excessive <ref name="Opinions"> - by Anna Karpuk for grani.ru </ref> <ref name="Val1"> - by ] for grani.ru </ref> <ref name="Val2"> - by ] for grani.ru </ref>. Opposition journalist Vladimir Abarinov noted that Stomakhin has been convicted for publishing an article against ] that was actually copied from a ] entry of a different person <ref name="Abarinov"> - by Vladimir Abarinov for grani.ru.</ref> On trial no one disputed the authorship of the articles written by Stomakhin <ref name="Sentence"></ref>. | ||
However, no specific charges were brought by any human rights organizations and the critics of the court decision, and no details or facts of 'human rights violations' or any abuse whatsoever were presented. | |||
Critics of the court decision were censured by | Critics of the court decision were censured by | ||
Line 62: | Line 66: | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
* | * | ||
* | |||
* | * | ||
* | * | ||
* | * | ||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
{{Russia-politician-stub}} | {{Russia-politician-stub}} | ||
Line 73: | Line 78: | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] |
Revision as of 05:41, 26 December 2006
The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Boris Vladimirovich Stomakhin (Russian: Борис Владимирович Стомахин), (born August 24, 1974, Moscow), is a Russian radical politician, journalist, editor of Samizdat periodicals, and opposition figure.
Journalism
Boris Stomakhin was an editor of monthly newspaper "Radical Politics" since 2000. Besides, he contributed numerous materials to Kavkaz Center, the Islamic internet agency that promotes independence of Chechnya and is maintained by Chechen rebels. He also issued a number of other Samizdat periodicals.
Political views
In his articles, Stomakhin advocated terrorist attacks on Russian civilians, claimed that modern Russia is Evil empire and therefore must be destroyed, called Russians a "nation of occupiers", called to exterminate all Russians, and compared President Vladimir Putin to Saddam Hussein and Slobodan Milosevic. Stomakhin considered terrorists Shamil Basaev and Salman Raduev as heroes of Chechen resistance movement and claimed that terrorist acts committed by them are legitimate because Russians, according to the allegations of Stomakhin, are conducting genocide of Chechen people.
When the last elected president of Chechen Republic of Ichkeria Aslan Maskhadov was killed by FSB forces, Stomakhin stated that all Russians are collectively responsible for such actions and therefore they must be collectively "punished", e.g. killed.
Political career
Stomakhin organized a number illegal picketes by his organization against Russian government policy in Ukraine, Estonia, Belarus, Chechnya. He also criticized Russian government in defamatory and obscene statements. He also was a leader of extremist political group "Revolutionary Contact Association" (RCA). Other members of this organization are Pavel Kantor, Dmitry Tarasov, Ludmila Evstifeeva, and Pavel Luzakov.
According to the Russian newspaper Utro Stomakhin's organization might be involved with Chechen hostage-takers. It alleged that during the Moscow theater hostage crisis, terrorists had "contacted with activists of Revolutionary Contact Association" and they "may be involved in supplying terrorists with ammunition and its storing at Moscow"
Stomakhin was accused of the extremist activities, calls to violent change of Constitutional regime, calls to violate territorial integrity of Russian Federation, hate speech, inciting ethnic and religious hatred in his articles, which covered among other things, the Chechen conflict, the Russian Orthodox Church, and Russian nation. A case against him was opened in December 2003. His home was raided in April 2004 and his computers and books were confiscated for the expertise. Stomakhin was interrogated. Human Rights House alleged that prosecutors planned to declare him mentally ill and send him for treatment to Moscow Serbsky Institute where Pyotr Grigorenko and Viktor Nekipelov were treated in the past. Independent Psychiatric Association of Russia had conducted an independent unofficial expertise . However, ordered official Psychiatric expertise at Moscow Serbsky Institute found that Stomakhin is competent for the trial. Stomakhin escaped to the Ukraine seeking political asylum status, which was eventually denied, despite Stomakhin's claims that he is politically prosecuted person in Russian Federation.
Arrest and Trial
Having returned to Moscow, Stomakhin was arrested on March 21 2006. Stomakhin tried to escape again during his arrest and fell down from fourth floor of his building. Stomakhin suffered a broken ankle and back injuries.
He was sentenced to five years of prison for inciting religious and ethnic hatred, promoting violent change of constitutional regime, calls for violation of terriorial integrity of Russian Federation, defamatory statements, and extremist activities (articles 282 and 280 of the Russian Criminal Code).
No one human rights organization or non-governmental organization had supported Stomakhin at trial, and no one organization sued the Russian Federation government for alleged by them abuses of Stomakhin, trial abuses or Stomakhin sontention abuses.
Some of the passages from Stomakhin's articles cited as incriminating evidence in the court sentence are the following:
- “Let tens of new Chechen snipers take their positions in the mountain ridges and the city ruins and let hundreds, thousands of aggressors fall under righteous bullets! No mercy! Death to the Russian occupiers!”
- “Moscow subway terrorist bombing was justified, natural and legal... The Chechens have the full moral right to bomb everything they want in Russia.”
- "We do not have any other family in the World except all oppressed nations of "our" Empire, except those who fight for liberation from this Empire as Shamil Basayev."
- "Even Western community recognized that Russia is conducting a war to exterminate all Chehens as ethnic group".
- "Russian Federation must be destroyed forever. State that does such things to entire nations has no right to exist."
- "Zelimkhan Yandarbiev died as a hero. He launched so many strikes to bloody Russia as he could".
- Stomakhin claimed that Communist Party of the Russian Federation, Ivan Rybkin, and Irina Hakamada are "clowns" of Vladimir Putin.
Stomakhin pleaded not guilty, according to RIA Novosti, news Agency, cited by Committee to Protect Journalists. He said he was "tried for his views and not for any real crime. ... In the articles, I expressed my opinion, with which people were free to agree or disagree." He said an opinion was not a “call to action.”.
However, according to the official court sentence, Stomahin pleaded not guilty on the grounds that he never made public appeals for extremist activities, never called for violent change of the consitutional regime, and never incited ethnic hatred.
Public opinion
ARTICLE 19 international orgaization, which protects free speech, stated that "we do not believe Mr. Stomakhin’s comments can be interpreted as incitement to ethnic hatred."
The Committee to Protect Journalists condemned the court’s ruling and expressed hope that it would be overturned
Valeria Novodvorskaya, government opposition figure, leader of the Democratic Union that has a miserable number of voters, claimed that the prosecution of Stomakhin was the start of a wider campaign, "because together with him, the entire human rights sector and the entire democratic movement will be put on trial for disagreeing with the majority, for not accepting the state policy of the Russian Federation, for sympathizing with the Chechen people, for anti-war demonstrations and pickets." At the same time, Novodvorskaya was a witness from Stomakhin's side at the Stomakhin's trial, where she never raised any such claims according to the official court sentence. She also never claimed specific facts in support of her statement.
Micah H. Naftalin, Director of Union of Councils for Soviet Jews, foreign NGO, said: "Bogus charges aimed at stifling dissent, cruel police tactics, ethnic bias, and blatant disregard for criminal procedural statutes are all on open display. We hope that others will join us in condemning this travesty of justice" . No one Jewish NGO in Russian Federation supported his view though.
Opposition figures like human rights activist Svetlana Gannushkina and politician Valeria Novodvorskaya argued that Stomakhin's writings while outrageous had not been a public threat: they were very unlikely to incite anybody. According to Gannushkina and Novodvorskaya the neofascists who posses a real threat usually receive only minimal sentences or no sentences at all. Thus, the five year prison term to Stomahin is extremely excessive . Opposition journalist Vladimir Abarinov noted that Stomakhin has been convicted for publishing an article against Russian Orthodox Church that was actually copied from a Live Journal entry of a different person On trial no one disputed the authorship of the articles written by Stomakhin .
However, no specific charges were brought by any human rights organizations and the critics of the court decision, and no details or facts of 'human rights violations' or any abuse whatsoever were presented.
Critics of the court decision were censured by Russian publicist Maxim Sokolov. In his newspaper article published after the conviction of Stomakhin he argued that unlimited hate speech should be prosecuted according to the article 282 of the criminal code. He cited Stomakhin's article Death to Russia published on the website of the Revolutionary Contact Association . The article was written in response to murder of last elected president of Chechen Republic of Ichkeria Aslan Maskhadov by Russian forces.
The Stomakhin's article contained the following passages written by Stomakhin: Kill, Kill, Kill! To flood all Russia with blood, to not give a quarter to anyone, to try to make at least one atomic explosion on the territory of Russian Federation -- this is like the program of radical Resistance should be, and Russian's, and Chechen's, and anyone's! Let the Russians, according to their deserts, reap as they has sown . Russians should be killed, and only killed, for there is no one among them who is normal, intelligent, or who can be talked with and for understanding of whom we could rely. Harsh collective responsibility of all Russians should be introduced, of all loyal Russian citizens for the actions of the government elected by them -- for the genocide, executions, ordeals, trade with corpses... From that moment there should be no division of killers on combatant and non-combatant, wilful or forced. According to Sokolov the cited passages made application of the article 282 completely appropriate, although the court sentence did not cite this article as a reason of Stomakhin conviction.
References
- ^ Boris Stomakhin Death to Russia Internet site rko.marsho.net
- ^ Independent journalist given five-year sentence allegedly for inciting ethnic strife
- Official Court Sentence on Russian language dated 20.11.2006
- Press article Baraev's group was assisted by someone from Moscow
- Independent Psychiatric Association of Russia
- ARTICLE 19’S STATEMENT ON THE CONVICTION OF RUSSIAN NEWSPAPER EDITOR BORIS STOMAKHIN, 23 November 2006
- Jewish Russian Telegraph, December 03, 2006.
- KAVKAZ-CENTER WRITER APPEALS JAIL SENTENCE - by Jamestown Foundation
- UCSJ Calls For Fair Trial of Russian Jewish Activist, statement of UCSJ November 9, 2006)
- Conviction of Boris Stomakhin: Opinions (Russian) - by Anna Karpuk for grani.ru
- Scapegoats - by Valeria Novodvorskaya for grani.ru
- Second-hand fascism - by Valeria Novodvorskaya for grani.ru
- Stomakhin Case - by Vladimir Abarinov for grani.ru.
- Official Court Sentence on Russian language dated 20.11.2006
- ^ Maxim Sokolov Trap-282 Izvestia 23 November 2006
External links
- Official Court Sentence on Russian language dated 20.11.2006
- Conviction
- Maksim Sokolov opinion
- Articles by Boris Stomakhin
- Revolutionary Contact Association website
- Revolutionary Contact Association website
- Another website of Revolutionary Contact Association
This article about a Russian politician is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |