Misplaced Pages

Talk:Kaiser: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:53, 26 December 2006 editMatthead (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers21,271 edits Created page with '== Merging to Emperor? == An [http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Ulritz#Rex_Germanus_placed_on_revert_parole editor who is on revert p...'  Revision as of 17:09, 26 December 2006 edit undoRex Germanus (talk | contribs)11,278 edits Merging to Emperor?Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
== Merging to Emperor? == == Merging to Emperor? ==
An has tagged the article for a merger and then, only for days later and without any support, has deleted the article by replacing it with a simple redirect . No content of the article, which exists since 2002, had been saved/moved/merged to the proposed new article . -- ] ]  ]    15:53, 26 December 2006 (UTC) An has tagged the article for a merger and then, only for days later and without any support, has deleted the article by replacing it with a simple redirect . No content of the article, which exists since 2002, had been saved/moved/merged to the proposed new article . -- ] ]  ]    15:53, 26 December 2006 (UTC)


:Attack on the arguments, not the person Matthead. The fact that I'm on revert parole for cleansing this wiki of german nationalists doesn't mean you can get away with anything here. On the contruary. Accusing me of some Anti German crusade didn't help you. Kaiser mean Emperor, and the emperor article already has information on both the Holy roman emperors as well as the German emperors. I tagged the article to be merged, and NO ONE OBJECTED (instead of no one agreed) what are you're reasons for keeping this article as it is?.] 17:09, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:09, 26 December 2006

Merging to Emperor?

An editor who is on revert parole has tagged the article for a merger and then, only for days later and without any support, has deleted the article by replacing it with a simple redirect . No content of the article, which exists since 2002, had been saved/moved/merged to the proposed new article . -- Matthead      O       15:53, 26 December 2006 (UTC)


Attack on the arguments, not the person Matthead. The fact that I'm on revert parole for cleansing this wiki of german nationalists doesn't mean you can get away with anything here. On the contruary. Accusing me of some Anti German crusade didn't help you. Kaiser mean Emperor, and the emperor article already has information on both the Holy roman emperors as well as the German emperors. I tagged the article to be merged, and NO ONE OBJECTED (instead of no one agreed) what are you're reasons for keeping this article as it is?.Rex 17:09, 26 December 2006 (UTC)