| Revision as of 22:59, 16 January 2006 view sourceCrashMex (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users603 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:58, 28 December 2006 view source Kurykh (talk | contribs)Administrators41,205 edits changed to redirect | ||
| (169 intermediate revisions by 57 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| ] until he votes in support of all candidates. Or dies. Whichever comes first. ''We'd prefer the latter''.]] | |||
| ==Qiyamah== | |||
| Hi, freestyle. Thanks for your message. I think you're talking about ] rather than the ] article (which I don't think I've edited). I don't necessarily disagree with you since Islam has a very different conception of Jesus. However, from the Islamic viewpoint Jesus was a Muslim (like all other Biblical figures) and as such, it doesn't make too much of a difference which name is used since "Isa" does not refer to a different person or even a different interpretation of that person. It's just the Arabic form, as Yeshua is the Hebrew/Aramaic. I think it makes it unnecessarily complex and potentially misleads the average reader if we use "Allah" and "Isa" and so on because it lends plausibility to the idea that Allah is not just Arabic for God, but an entirely different deity altogether. Islam is already so incredibly complex for the average reader (who is non-Muslim), that I think we should keep things such as naming conventions and so forth in line with familiar Western conventions so as to help in reducing confusion. | |||
| Of course, we could debate this endlessly but that's my perspective and what I suggest. If other editors disagree, I have no problems with maintaining the Arabic conventions of God, Jesus, etc. But it's like the issue of Zoroaster vs. Zarthosht, or Darius vs Dariush, to use Persian examples - which would the average English reader be most familiar with, and would be better to use to help alleviate confusion and ignorance? | |||
| By the way, I've been away for awhile so I don't know what's been going on, but considering your userpage, I'm guessing something has happened. What's this talk of "reeducation" and Kim Jong-il? ;) ] 22:35, 16 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Recognition of TRNC== | |||
| I saw in your edit summary that Bangladesh recognizes TRNC. I had never heard of this before. It's not necessary, but if possible, could you provide a link that shows their recognition? Thanks. ] 21:54, 16 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I saw on Misplaced Pages somewhere, I am trying to find it again, when I find I'll post it here and if it is wrong you can correct that page. | |||
| ] 22:59, 16 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:58, 28 December 2006
Redirect to: