| Revision as of 17:51, 18 January 2006 view sourceNygdan (talk | contribs)297 edits →CheckUser← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:58, 28 December 2006 view source Kurykh (talk | contribs)Administrators41,205 edits changed to redirect | ||
| (151 intermediate revisions by 52 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| ] until he votes in support of all candidates. Or dies. Whichever comes first. ''We'd prefer the latter''.]] | |||
| == CheckUser == | |||
| ... Why would I need an anonymous IP to do stuff? It's not appreciated that you're accusing me of being a sock, even though like I mentioned elsewhere that in itself isn't wrong to do. However, it's very incivil, and I'm shocked that you'd accuse an admin of doing such a thing. I'm sure a CheckUser will solve any further doubts you may have - I've never IP-edited. ]]</font> <sub>(]+])</sub> 04:30, 17 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Nygdan== | |||
| Hello Freestylefrappe, why did you remove my addition to the article on the ]? ] 1-18-2005 | |||
| == Whoa, so the HO in IMHO doesn't matter? == | |||
| "WMC is IMHO a jerk." That's an impossibly low bar you've set for NPA. And you didn't even warn me first. I don't think this was justified at all, really. ] 06:23, 17 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks for finally replying though. ] 06:24, 17 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Poll, last section == | |||
| That would be because I just added it ten minutes ago :) several people suggested that a new group be instated for de-adminning, hence my query what kind of group they'd mean. Would you mind placing it back, if you think it could be useful? Thx, ]]] 01:56, 18 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:58, 28 December 2006
Redirect to: