Revision as of 02:51, 30 January 2006 view sourceSimonP (talk | contribs)Administrators113,127 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:58, 28 December 2006 view source Kurykh (talk | contribs)Administrators41,205 edits changed to redirect | ||
(127 intermediate revisions by 47 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
#REDIRECT ] | |||
''Note to other users: Please do not remove the following rant. It serves as a testament to this user's harassment towards me.'' | |||
== well == | |||
''What do you think you're doing? The next time you revert my edits to my own talk page I'll file an RFC. How dare you accuse ''me'' of "abusing" my powers. What planet are you on? Have you not seen Radiant's poll in which a majority of users have said the rollback is for any revert? Don't bother me with this again. ] 01:14, 30 January 2006 (UTC)'' | |||
Well I take pleasure in the fact that your days of abusing your admin powers are gonna be at an end as soon as the arbcom wraps up your arbcom case. Oh and unlike you I follow policy not dinky little polls and I'm not the one who's about to have his admin powers stripped for abusing his powers so stay either shape up or STFU. <small>]<sup>] | ] | ]</sup></small> ---- 01:58, 30 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
:I've left a note at Jtkiefer's talk page. He did go somewhat beyond the bounds in his comment. However, while your use of the rollback function might not have violated policy, it certainly was impolite to MONGO to simply revert his question without responding and your response to Jtkiefer was equally harsh. - ] 02:51, 30 January 2006 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 02:58, 28 December 2006
Redirect to: