Revision as of 01:23, 10 September 2006 view sourceFreestylefrappe (talk | contribs)4,471 edits response to Ryulong's assumption I might be referring to him← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:58, 28 December 2006 view source Kurykh (talk | contribs)Administrators41,205 edits changed to redirect | ||
(64 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
⚫ | #REDIRECT ] | ||
Hahahaha Mackensen and Chacor have discovered I'm using sockpuppets by editing under a new account! Not only that, but I have another sockpuppet called Tchadienne! HAHAHAHAHAHA. See relevant discussion on ]. ] 19:29, 9 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Block == | |||
You have been blocked to the end of what would have been the duration of Tchadienne's block. From your comment above, I imagine that you can understand why. ](]) 22:05, 9 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
Incidentally, if you would prefer to use a different user name for your main account, I can shorten the block on ''one'' of your other socks and block this account instead. ](]) 00:29, 10 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
==Unblocking list== | |||
⚫ | Freestylefrappe |
||
Please stop sending e-mails to the Unblock list. You have admitted using sockpuppets both here and in your e-mails. You should serve the balance of your ban as previously determined. | |||
If you continue to spam the unblocking list, you will be banned from sending messages to it. ] 23:45, 9 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
==I wish to communicate, you wish to prevent me from doing so== | |||
TenOfAllTrades, I challenge you to provide an email address I can contact you at, or email me at danofalltrades7@hotmail.com, so that I may explain why I have never used sockpuppets, I have never admitted to doing so, and when I am unblocked the actions you have taken will result in your desysopping. If you choose not to you are proving that you ar knowingly abusing power and engaging in intimidation. {{helpme|I want CBDunkerson or another rational user, not Pgk or Mackensen or another admin currently involved in a dispute with me, to evaluate the merits of Centrx's protecting of my talkpage and TenOfAllTrades indef block of my current account. When that has been completed you may remove this template. Until then, leave this be.}} | |||
==Message for Ryulong== | |||
I believe I said a rational user, not an administrator who supports a known vandal, reverts good faith edits by an anonymous user , and then has the audacity to warn him ], accusing him of vandalism! Did you even look at the anonymous user's edit? The one which Hseldon10 continually reverted, labeling it vandalism? the assertion in the article is shown to be false here, on Forbes. Forbes is what one might call a "reliable source." This is undoubtedly a new concept for you since your reversion added numerous unsourced statements such as the bolded section in the following sentence: "Fox's term has been marked by an unprecedented economic stability '''and by a democratic atmosphere that is new to Mexico.'''" You also re-added four paragraphs of unreferenced, unsourced commentary on Fox's housing policy. An unreferenced, unsourced paragraph on Fox's health policy talking about "government insurance schemes," and an unreferenced, unsourced paragraph claiming Fox's administration has arrested 35,000 people involved in drug trafficking. ] 01:23, 10 September 2006 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 02:58, 28 December 2006
Redirect to: