Revision as of 00:09, 1 August 2020 editSchroCat (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers112,906 edits →More stalking← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:18, 1 August 2020 edit undoEl C (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators183,802 edits →More stalking: got it — preliminary evaluationNext edit → | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:*Sorry, I am unable to load that. It just times out for me. ] 00:05, 1 August 2020 (UTC) | :*Sorry, I am unable to load that. It just times out for me. ] 00:05, 1 August 2020 (UTC) | ||
::*The tool can be found at ]. If you still can’t access it, that’s fine, I can just go to ANI for wider input. It’s creepy being stalked so regularly. - ] (]) 00:09, 1 August 2020 (UTC) | ::*The tool can be found at ]. If you still can’t access it, that’s fine, I can just go to ANI for wider input. It’s creepy being stalked so regularly. - ] (]) 00:09, 1 August 2020 (UTC) | ||
:::*Okay, I got it. But this data could just be indicative of active interactions. Hounding is best shown through select individual diffs, which in this case would have to be recent (after deescalation was adopted). But I agree that this latest edit is suspect, which is why I admonished HAL333 for it. ] 00:18, 1 August 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:18, 1 August 2020
HAL333This is HAL333's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 2018, 2019, 2021 |
More stalking
... or plain coincidence? Cassianto 23:12, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- Nice. ~ HAL333 23:14, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- Sigh, HAL333. Must you be reminded to be mindful of the optics? El_C 23:16, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- Ok, ok, it was a little snippy, but the previous comment was only meant to agitate. ~ HAL333 23:24, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- What I'm talking about is supporting right after Cassianto opposed, in a bullet point right below theirs. That was a lapse in judgment on your part. To keep matters deescalating, please keep a wide margin. I'm not saying you can't participate in the same discussions, but aim for sensible distance, please. El_C 23:28, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- Will do. ~ HAL333 23:37, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- What I'm talking about is supporting right after Cassianto opposed, in a bullet point right below theirs. That was a lapse in judgment on your part. To keep matters deescalating, please keep a wide margin. I'm not saying you can't participate in the same discussions, but aim for sensible distance, please. El_C 23:28, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- Ok, ok, it was a little snippy, but the previous comment was only meant to agitate. ~ HAL333 23:24, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- Sigh, HAL333. Must you be reminded to be mindful of the optics? El_C 23:16, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- El_C, and are not coincidences. This has to end. One more overlap and it’s ANI time, and I doubt many people would think this is coincidence. Hal333 has never edited the Sibelius article or talk page before, so I do wonder just how he found the discussion a couple of minutes after Cass. - SchroCat (talk) 00:01, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, I am unable to load that. It just times out for me. El_C 00:05, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- The tool can be found at WP:TOOLS. If you still can’t access it, that’s fine, I can just go to ANI for wider input. It’s creepy being stalked so regularly. - SchroCat (talk) 00:09, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Okay, I got it. But this data could just be indicative of active interactions. Hounding is best shown through select individual diffs, which in this case would have to be recent (after deescalation was adopted). But I agree that this latest edit is suspect, which is why I admonished HAL333 for it. El_C 00:18, 1 August 2020 (UTC)