| Revision as of 09:17, 15 August 2020 editSchroCat (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers112,906 edits →ANI: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:18, 15 August 2020 edit undoGovvy (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers36,247 edits (edit summary removed)Tag: UndoNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| :::: It is disruptive to post to a closed discussion and it is also disruptive to revert to keep the post there. Please ]. ] (]) 08:53, 15 August 2020 (UTC) | :::: It is disruptive to post to a closed discussion and it is also disruptive to revert to keep the post there. Please ]. ] (]) 08:53, 15 August 2020 (UTC) | ||
| ::::: {{reply|331dot}} drop the stick? I was effectively called a dick (twice) and I got no help from anyone, I found that really offensive and out of order on wikipedia. How an editor can get away with that is beyond me. Then that SchroCat who has been around on wikipedia for years is behaving oddly. I am just pissed off now and it's really sad that ANI missed the key points I pointed out. Don't let it go down hill and I thought admins should know the rules as much as anyway, but I am often shown that's false. ] (]) 09:09, 15 August 2020 (UTC) | ::::: {{reply|331dot}} drop the stick? I was effectively called a dick (twice) and I got no help from anyone, I found that really offensive and out of order on wikipedia. How an editor can get away with that is beyond me. Then that SchroCat who has been around on wikipedia for years is behaving oddly. I am just pissed off now and it's really sad that ANI missed the key points I pointed out. Don't let it go down hill and I thought admins should know the rules as much as anyway, but I am often shown that's false. ] (]) 09:09, 15 August 2020 (UTC) | ||
| == ANI == | |||
| It’s a closed thread. Stop being petulant, ] and walk away. - ] (]) 09:17, 15 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:18, 15 August 2020
 Archives |
|
Notice
Please do not post to a closed discussion. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 08:34, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- @331dot: What are you talking about? Govvy (talk) 08:40, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- This edit you made to ANI(and initially removed by someone else) was to a discussion that was closed. 331dot (talk) 08:43, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- @331dot: 1, It was a discussion I started and have every right to post under it if it's closed, 2, I've seen multiple times people post under closed discussions, so I don't know what rule you're on about. 3, it shouldn't of been removed by the other guy, as that's clearly a COI when he removed it. Govvy (talk) 08:50, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- It is disruptive to post to a closed discussion and it is also disruptive to revert to keep the post there. Please drop the stick. 331dot (talk) 08:53, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- @331dot: drop the stick? I was effectively called a dick (twice) and I got no help from anyone, I found that really offensive and out of order on wikipedia. How an editor can get away with that is beyond me. Then that SchroCat who has been around on wikipedia for years is behaving oddly. I am just pissed off now and it's really sad that ANI missed the key points I pointed out. Don't let it go down hill and I thought admins should know the rules as much as anyway, but I am often shown that's false. Govvy (talk) 09:09, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- It is disruptive to post to a closed discussion and it is also disruptive to revert to keep the post there. Please drop the stick. 331dot (talk) 08:53, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- @331dot: 1, It was a discussion I started and have every right to post under it if it's closed, 2, I've seen multiple times people post under closed discussions, so I don't know what rule you're on about. 3, it shouldn't of been removed by the other guy, as that's clearly a COI when he removed it. Govvy (talk) 08:50, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- This edit you made to ANI(and initially removed by someone else) was to a discussion that was closed. 331dot (talk) 08:43, 15 August 2020 (UTC)