Misplaced Pages

User talk:Sro23: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:26, 18 August 2020 editDane (talk | contribs)Edit filter helpers, Account creators, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers19,761 editsm Reverted 1 edit by 65.113.155.26 (talk) to last revision by Kevin PottingTag: Undo← Previous edit Revision as of 15:31, 21 August 2020 edit undoSchroCat (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers112,909 edits →ArbCom: new sectionTag: contentious topics alertNext edit →
Line 63: Line 63:
:I can keep an eye on it. ] (]) 05:32, 3 August 2020 (UTC) :I can keep an eye on it. ] (]) 05:32, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
::Sure. I blanked it and just wanted you to be aware. ] (]) 05:36, 3 August 2020 (UTC) ::Sure. I blanked it and just wanted you to be aware. ] (]) 05:36, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

== ArbCom ==

{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.''

You have shown interest in discussions about ] and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> - ] (]) 15:31, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:31, 21 August 2020


Archives

Precious anniversary

Precious
Two years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:48, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Please join us with this dicussion

Hi Sro23,

May you please share you issues here on this talk page before reverting any changes on the List of iOS devices article. Thank you! 😊 149.167.60.107 (talk) 01:25, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

No. As long as you continue to evade your block, I will continue to revert your changes, as per WP:BANREVERT. Sro23 (talk) 01:48, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU 07:05, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Wishing Sro23 a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Best wishes! ~SS49~ {talk} 08:30, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Moowoo 6-14

Hello, can you salt all these categorys, they have been created like 5 times today+yesterday..

--TheImaCow (talk • contribs) 18:10, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

I've salted the ones that have been recreated over and over. The titleblacklist should hopefully take care of the rest. Sro23 (talk) 18:26, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Sexybaileycries

Could you please block user:Sexybaileycries ASAP. She clearly will not stop until blocked. CLCStudent (talk) 18:37, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

WP:NOTTHERAPY

Good times. Cheers, OhNoitsJamie 14:46, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

@Ohnoitsjamie: Speaking of partial blocks, the other day was my first time using the feature, and I really had no idea what I'm doing. There's this LTA who keeps pestering stewards' talk pages, and they've been using Special:Contributions/2405:204:3000:0:0:0:0:0/36, which is a range you partially blocked, and I'm afraid I screwed your block up. Could you please review for me? Sro23 (talk) 14:52, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Unfortunately, PBLOCK can only handle 10 entries, it looks like you just overwrote the entries I made. However, I think that's OK for now, the LTA that targeted has been somewhat quiet lately. That's a huge range covering a lot of IP editors in India; I'd estimate less than half of the edits are constructive, but still, I'd be reluctant to kill the whole range with a full block. (P.S. For the 793 LTA, I use overlapping ranges sometimes to cover more than 10 entries. It's an imperfect workaround, but it helps). OhNoitsJamie 15:01, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Yeah. I blocked the range fully for a little bit, realized it was too wide and started to panic, and that's when things went downhill. It didn't seem fair preventing them from editing the entire User talk namespace either. Sorry about that and thanks for the response. Sro23 (talk) 15:07, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

your recent block of a Tornatore2007 sock

revdel or talk page protection? Meters (talk) 05:18, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

I can keep an eye on it. Sro23 (talk) 05:32, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Sure. I blanked it and just wanted you to be aware. Meters (talk) 05:36, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 - SchroCat (talk) 15:31, 21 August 2020 (UTC)