Revision as of 16:57, 2 January 2007 editSpartaz (talk | contribs)Administrators52,772 edits →[]: update← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:59, 2 January 2007 edit undoMalber (talk | contribs)6,520 edits →Pseudo-AFD question for RfA: afd qNext edit → | ||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
You have a pseudo AFD at ], that you used for posing a question in BostonMA's RfA. Another user there commented that this AFD page triggered a content filter on his computer. If you intend to repeat use of the question, could you create/find some similar AFD that wouldn't trigger a content filter? There ought to be one around that is equally challenging, but doesn't trigger content filters. ] 15:59, 2 January 2007 (UTC) | You have a pseudo AFD at ], that you used for posing a question in BostonMA's RfA. Another user there commented that this AFD page triggered a content filter on his computer. If you intend to repeat use of the question, could you create/find some similar AFD that wouldn't trigger a content filter? There ought to be one around that is equally challenging, but doesn't trigger content filters. ] 15:59, 2 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
:How about using one that is hypothetical on a topic that you weren't personally involved, and doesn't demonstrate that you're trying to prove a ]? —] (] <small>•</small> ]) 17:59, 2 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | == ] == |
Revision as of 17:59, 2 January 2007
user - talk - contributions - email - desk - sandbox - status:
This user is on an administrative Wikibreak. Please do not leave messages wishing for this user to use their admin tools until further notice. |
|
MessagesArchives: The Basement · My desk · My Barnstars A barnstar for you
Pseudo-AFD question for RfAYou have a pseudo AFD at User:Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington/Desk/AfD, that you used for posing a question in BostonMA's RfA. Another user there commented that this AFD page triggered a content filter on his computer. If you intend to repeat use of the question, could you create/find some similar AFD that wouldn't trigger a content filter? There ought to be one around that is equally challenging, but doesn't trigger content filters. GRBerry 15:59, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
User talk:DmcdevitEr I think you misread my meaning and also what side in this dispute I'm on. :-) --Spartaz 16:45, 2 January 2007 (UTC) Just to be clear this is your edit that I'm referring to
Um, I'm getting stick for referring to some of those bringing the RFC as being vindictive, showing poor judgement amnd just being plain nasty. Are you sure you have the right editor? --Spartaz 16:57, 2 January 2007 (UTC) |