| Revision as of 22:17, 5 January 2007 editTheOnlyChoice (talk | contribs)48 edits F.Y.I.← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:37, 6 January 2007 edit undoDerex (talk | contribs)5,818 edits nice ironyNext edit → | ||
| Line 151: | Line 151: | ||
| :MOngo has over 10,000 edits and was an administrator. Leaving template messages to established users is considered rude. --] 12:19, 1 January 2007 (UTC) | :MOngo has over 10,000 edits and was an administrator. Leaving template messages to established users is considered rude. --] 12:19, 1 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ::Deleting other people's talk page edits is also considered rude. ] 08:21, 2 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == F.Y.I. == | == F.Y.I. == | ||
Revision as of 07:37, 6 January 2007
- /Archive1 Created May 1. 2006
- /Archive2 Created August 24, 2006
- /Archive3 Created September 30, 2006
- /Archive4 Created November 19, 2006
Please add comments to the bottom.
Ho boy
Dang man, you beat me to it. I've got to get faster. Thanks for the laugh. 
Morton Devonshire 02:41, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Arbitration
I have opened a case of arbitration at Requests for arbitration:Seabhcan--MONGO 08:00, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
No Personal Attacks
Please see Misplaced Pages's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. ... al Seabhcán bin Baloney (Hows my driving?) 20:59, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
- What was the personal attack? I will strike/redact whatever you found offensive as it was not intentional. --Tbeatty 22:58, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
- The question "Is English your first language?" is clearly intended to insult. ... al Seabhcán bin Baloney (Hows my driving?) 23:54, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, it's not. I don't presume that europeans speak english as their first language or that they understand colloquial American expressions. I tend to write in an American colloqial fashion and when people don't understand very basic expression, I want to make sure they understand the writing style and the biggest impediment to colloquial understanding is whether or not English is their primary language (second to that is whether they are American). You seemed to not grasp the essence of what I was saying so I wanted to know if English was your firt language or should I write more formally. Tbeatty 04:46, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- The question "Is English your first language?" is clearly intended to insult. ... al Seabhcán bin Baloney (Hows my driving?) 23:54, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Seabhcan
Hello,
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Seabhcan. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Seabhcan/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Seabhcan/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Cowman109 23:15, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your support
I wasn't going to send thank-you cards, but the emotional impact of hitting WP:100 (and doing so unanimously!) changed my mind. So I appreciate your confidence in me at RFA, and hope you'll let me know if I can do anything for you in the future to ensure that your prediction comes true. Cheers! -- nae'blis 00:11, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Huh?
Did you mean to do this? That is Cplot's user page. JoshuaZ 04:19, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- Oops. He's the puppet master, not puppet. Will fix momentarily. thanks! Tbeatty 04:23, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you for you input. I've revised the WP:Sock. I am trying to remain objectional. But if cplot is sock puppeteering it would be for "Circumventing policy." (Even though we are currently objecting to the block doing sock-puppets will not help the situation; meaning I can understand why you would want to remain sturn.) As per the rules "Policies apply per person, not per account... Users who are banned or blocked from editing may not use sock puppets to circumvent this. Evading a block or ban causes the timer on the block to restart, and may further lengthen it." I would hence, unfortunately, understand and have to support, a lenghtening of the band. (That is the advice I can say which I hope falls on anyone thinking of doing sock puppeteering while blocked ). Again, if cplot is doing this I can not support it, but on the other hand I can certainly empathise if he is doing it. --CyclePat 05:53, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm not sure about this edit. Certainly the edit complained of was trolling of the first order and his block was justified, but a misspelled link to dem attic is permissible, in itself. Fred Bauder 19:13, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- Here's the arbitration remedy: Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/MONGO#Links_to_ED Fred Bauder 21:43, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- Fair enough. My interpretation was that the specific insertion of the MONGO page was to attack MONGO (and the other links attack wikipedia in general) and that those links (misspelled or not) could be removed. In general, I wouldn't remove the links if it was simply informative or part of a discussion but if the intent was to attack, I interpreted it to mean removal was supported by ArbComm. --Tbeatty 23:29, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Hope you did not misunderstand me.
Hope you did not mis-understand about me. I just wanted to bring these indecency to your notice. swadhyayee 16:02, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Opus Dei "cult allegations" section head
Do you really think it's wrong of us to have a section about the cult allegations? I mean, I know it's a very prejudicial word and I would never, ever even think of using it to decribe Opus Dei directly. But nonetheless, "cult" criticism are a big big big part of the discourse around Opus Dei-- almost all the new sources mention it, a google search for Opus Dei and cult gives 130,000 hits or so. True or not, the "cult issue" is what the criticism is all about-- shouldn't we say so? --Alecmconroy 16:17, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Cool!
I didn't know there was a special infobox for politicians!--BenBurch 14:17, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Withdrawn
I appreciate your support, but have decided to withdraw from consideration for a position as an arbitrator. The community has overwhelming found me to be too controversial to hold that position. Thanks again for your support.--MONGO 19:59, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Request for Mediation
|
A Request for Mediation to which you are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/September 11, 2001 Attacks.
|
RFArb Seabchan
Please do not post proposals on the /Proposed Decision page as the page is only supposed to be edited by arbitrators and clerks (for maintenance and formatting). You may make proposals in the /Workshop page where they will be considered by the arbs and added for voting if they find it appropriate. Thanks --Srikeit 07:26, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Dysgenics
Hi Tbeatty; on 15 November 2006 you suggested that Dysgenics "should be rolled into Eugenics". This has been proposed. You might wish to comment at Talk:Eugenics#Merge_the_Dysgenics_article_with_Eugenics.3F Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 20:24, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Citation needed
Questions to the parties
Question 1 to complaining editor Tbeatty: You state in your claim that: "My experience with him forced me to do research on the Carcano rifle" "This was six months ago and I thought it was settled since it is overwhelming."
Could you give me the cite to the change you made based on the research I forced you to do? RPJ 06:54, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Seabhcan
This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.
For misuse of his administrative tools and failure to relate appropriately with other administrators, MONGO is desysopped. For misuse of his administrative tools, as well as disruptive conduct in edit warring and incivility, Seabhcan is desysopped. Seabhcan is placed on standard personal attack parole for one year. He may be briefly blocked by any administrator for any edit which is deemed to be a personal attack or incivility for up to 24 hours. All blocks to be logged at Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/Seabhcan#Log_of_blocks_and_bans.
For the Arbitration Committee --Srikeit 08:06, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Your vandal report page
I thought you would want it more inclusive after that ED person was erasing stuff from it. Misplaced Pages:Long term abuse/JarlaxleArtemis still has a lot more information than what I added. Anomo 02:12, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/RPJ
This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.
- RPJ is banned from Misplaced Pages for one year.
- RPJ is placed on indefinite probation. He may be banned from the site for an appropriate period by any administrator if he edits in a disruptive manner.
- Edits by anonymous ips or alternative accounts which mirror RPJ's editing behavior are subject to the remedies applied to RPJ. Blocks and bans to be logged at Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/RPJ#Log_of_blocks_and_bans.
For the Arbitration Committee --Srikeit 05:24, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
| Thanks for the support! MONGO 09:40, 20 December 2006 (UTC) |
9/11: The Big Lie
I have now totally revamped/stubified this article in order to deal with the POV issues. Please take a look at the new version if you like. Thanks, Bwithh 08:01, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
They huffed, and puffed, . . .
 |
Thank you for offering your opinion at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:GabrielF/ConspiracyNoticeboard (2nd mfd). Look forward to seeing you around in 2007 at Conspiracy Central! For a little fun, check out Brad Greux's video blog at The Most Brilliant and Flawlessly Executed Plan, Ever, Ever. Good cheer from The Mad Dog, Morton devonshire 20:00, 29 December 2006 (UTC) |
Tbeatty, I am requesting your comments
I have just filed a formal complaint against BenBurch and F.A.A.F.A., alleging that they have formed a cabal or meatpuppet partnership, in violation of WP:CABAL.
I notice that you have encountered their special brand of tag-team intimidation in the past, and I encourage you to comment on your experiences at the page I have linked above, during the investigation. Thank you for your input. ArlingtonTX 20:55, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Revert?
Why did you revert my message on User:MONGO's talk page? He recently reverted a persistent vandal, but did not leave a warning on the vandal's talk page. If people do not leave warnings, I am never going to get the vandal blocked. --Kralizec! (talk) 06:46, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- MOngo has over 10,000 edits and was an administrator. Leaving template messages to established users is considered rude. --Tbeatty 12:19, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Deleting other people's talk page edits is also considered rude. Derex 08:21, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
F.Y.I.
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center (3rd). TheOnlyChoice 22:17, 5 January 2007 (UTC)