| Revision as of 09:12, 14 January 2021 editWhiteguru (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers22,156 edits Keep: A cappella genre is challenging← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 11:07, 17 January 2021 edit undoJoe Roe (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Administrators41,994 edits →Dhamakapella: Closed as keep (XFDcloser) | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| ⚫ | ===]=== | ||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|M}} | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''keep'''. – ] <small>(])</small> 11:07, 17 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | ===]=== | ||
| <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> | <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> | ||
| :{{la|Dhamakapella}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>) | :{{la|Dhamakapella}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>) | ||
| Line 16: | Line 21: | ||
| *'''Keep:''' Point taken but I still think the article is notable within the acapella genre going by the awards won. - ] (]) 15:57, 13 January 2021 (UTC) | *'''Keep:''' Point taken but I still think the article is notable within the acapella genre going by the awards won. - ] (]) 15:57, 13 January 2021 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep:''' The A cappella genre is challenging; I'll go on the awards won, and say that yes, ] sets the bar high, but sometimes we have to allow groups to just scrape through. --] (]) 09:12, 14 January 2021 (UTC) | *'''Keep:''' The A cappella genre is challenging; I'll go on the awards won, and say that yes, ] sets the bar high, but sometimes we have to allow groups to just scrape through. --] (]) 09:12, 14 January 2021 (UTC) | ||
| {{clear}} | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Latest revision as of 11:07, 17 January 2021
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. – Joe (talk) 11:07, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Dhamakapella
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Dhamakapella (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable per WP:GNG and WP:BAND. All cited sources are either self-publications or trivial references. Bestagon (talk) 00:06, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 03:39, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 03:39, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Delete: Only found local references in before search (the Observer is the uni newspaper in the same uni where the group are based). Pulisi (talk) 13:23, 6 January 2021 (UTC)- Blocked for UPE. MER-C 17:55, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep seem to be notable within the acapella genre going by the awards won and by the secondary coverage in the reception section, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:49, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note that the reception section is mostly references to either 1) sources published by the university or 2) open online forums. NBAND has a pretty high bar for awards conferring notability (i.e., the Grammy's or the Juno Awards). Bestagon (talk) 02:57, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Most of the reviews are from this site here which seems to be a website with a staff rather than an open online forum, Atlantic306 (talk) 01:18, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, but anyone can submit their album to be reviewed by volunteer reviewers, per the link you sent. If that confers notability I can be a notable singer within three weeks (per the site)! Bestagon (talk) 06:22, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Most of the reviews are from this site here which seems to be a website with a staff rather than an open online forum, Atlantic306 (talk) 01:18, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: Point taken but I still think the article is notable within the acapella genre going by the awards won. - Ret.Prof (talk) 15:57, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: The A cappella genre is challenging; I'll go on the awards won, and say that yes, WP:NBAND sets the bar high, but sometimes we have to allow groups to just scrape through. --Whiteguru (talk) 09:12, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.