| Revision as of 00:39, 12 January 2007 editDreadstar (talk | contribs)53,180 edits Personal attack← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 04:20, 1 January 2023 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,294,330 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:InShaneee/Archive/Apr/2022, User talk:InShaneee/Archive/Jan/2022) (bot | ||
| (415 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| {| class="messagebox" style="background: AntiqueWhite;" | |||
| |minthreadsleft = 3 | |||
| |- | |||
| |algo = old(14d) | |||
| |This talk page is '''automatically archived''' by Werdnabot. Any sections older than '''30''' days are automatically archived to ''']'''. Sections with less than two timestamps (that have not been replied to) are not archived. | |||
| |archive = User talk:InShaneee/Archive/%(monthnameshort)s/%(year)d | |||
| |- | |||
| }} | |||
| |}<!-- BEGIN WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE --><!-- This page is automatically archived by Werdnabot-->{{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--This is an empty template, but transcluding it counts as a link, meaning Werdnabot is directed to this page - DO NOT SUBST IT --><!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-30 Target-User talk:InShaneee/Archive/(!month)06--><!--END WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE--> | |||
| {{Archives | |||
| . | |||
| |collapsed=yes | |||
| |bot=MiszaBot_III}} | |||
| . | |||
| == Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| ] | |||
| Established ] provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023. | |||
| Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at ]. | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin 2 -->— ] 08:48, 1 October 2022 (UTC) | |||
| You participated in the ] AfD a couple of weeks ago. It's now up for ]. Regards, ] 05:01, 19 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
| == Throwing accusations around == | |||
| You jumped in and told me "Calm down. Misplaced Pages does not allow you to simply throw around accusations anywhere and for any reason you please, and you can only harm the site if you're going to jump into debates to 'save the day'. --InShaneee 03:06, 14 December 2006 (UTC) But this is exactly what happens when Tajik is accused of anything, others are required to support their accusations, but administrators allow unsupported accusations against those accusing Tajik of anything. Here, for example, E104421 accuses Tajik of something, provides diffs and evidence, but another user who is a friend of Tajik's jumps in, just like they did against me, and accuses E104421 of stalking Tajik, with no diffs, no support, nothing, just throwing accusations around. As I said, when I provided diffs, when I supported my accusations, I was ignored by administrators, as is currently happening on WP:PAIN, and I was attacked by Tajik's supporters throwing around accusations anywhere and for any reason against anyone who asks for civil behaviour on the part of Tajik. And, again, administrators simply ignore supported accusations against Tajik--and seem to allow, and by allowing, encourage unsupported accusations against anyone who asks for civility from Tajik. This is exactly what happened to me, I provided evidence, I supported my accusations, I made a proper complaint, but Tajik simply uses a handy administrator, has friends accuse anyone who edits the same page as he does of stalking, and gets away with it time and again--Misplaced Pages does indeed allow editors, certain editors, to "simply throw around accusations anywhere and for any reason." The user who posted this stalking accusation against E104421 hasn't been told ''he's'' not allowed to throw around accusations, because it appears he is allowed to--in fact, anyone supporting Tajik is allowed to throw around accusations on Misplaced Pages. ] 00:39, 20 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| ==Spiritualism rating== | |||
| Established ] provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023. | |||
| Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at ]. | |||
| Hello InShanee. Please take a look at the talk pages on Spiritualism before replacing the rating again. Thanks ] 04:37, 27 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin 2 -->— ] 00:58, 1 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
| :And while we're at it, please also leave some knowledgable comments at the talk page for Reincarnation Research, as well, since you have chosen to provide the rating. Thanks ] 04:43, 27 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
| Take a look at the ] page for my response. If comments are not forthcoming in a few days, I will remove the paranormal banner, since so far it has just attracted editors who know almost nothing about the history of this religious movement. ] 05:27, 27 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| Established ] provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions have been removed. | |||
| Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at ]. | |||
| :You do not have the right to do so, and you will treat other editors with respect. --] 05:29, 27 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin 2 -->— ] <sup>]</sup> 02:47, 1 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ::I left you one further response on ], InShaneee. ] 05:36, 27 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Bikini Speedbandits== | |||
| Actually, no need to tag the article, go ahead and delete it. I put the delete tag on a couple of weeks ago, outraged at the slur on my country, and then thought, what the heck, keep it, rewritten to inform people that the supposed traffic control policy was simply a satirical public relations campaign. You're the administrator, delete it. ] 01:47, 29 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == FYI == | |||
| Just thought I should let you know about ] that concerns you. Regards, ] 03:29, 29 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Ferrylodge== | |||
| Hello, InShaneee. As the blocking admin in this case, I'd like to request that you comment further in ] and ], in order to clear up any confusion. Thank you. -] (]) 22:07, 30 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Your edits to ] (3RR) == | |||
| Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|, as you are doing in ]}}. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for ], even if they do not technically violate the ]. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.<!-- Template:3RR --> Happy New Year ]<sub>]</sub><sup><span style="position: relative; left: -16px; margin-right: -16px;">]</span></sup> 03:15, 31 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Block == | |||
| You blocked me for 24 hours, stating as a reason 'vandalism'. Care to explain what I vandalised and when? Care to offer a reason why I shouldn't think it was an incredibly petty block because I removed your 'paranormal' tag from ]? Suggest you read ], and also the bit in ] about how admins are not allowed to block people they're having a content dispute with. ] 23:37, 3 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :InShaneee, you should be aware that there is discussion on this block on the noticeboard ]. ] 00:07, 4 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Are you unable or unwilling to offer any justification of your actions? ] 23:37, 5 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Do you not think an administrator is obliged to explain his actions? If you won't offer any reason at all why you shat on the blocking policy when you blocked me, I'll have to see about an rfc or rfa. ] 22:48, 10 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Misplaced Pages Week == | |||
| The best existing proposal I can, in my own limited way, think of for the previously discussed "appreciation week" can now be found at ]. Any comments or responses would be more than welcome. ] 15:14, 5 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==User ignoring policy== | |||
| Hi InShaneee, got a little situation going on, there’s been a dispute between four editors about the redirect of an article which had its contents moved to several other articles – the original article, now empty, had to be preserved for the 2 year old edit history. | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| One editor (]) believed the redirect should go to a “lists” or “disambiguation” page, while the other three thought the article should be redirected to the main name article where the most relevant content was moved to. | |||
| In the middle of the dispute, the one editor (]) took pre-emptive action to move the old redirect article under dispute to a new article, then created a new article with the old name. | |||
| He did this over the objections of one of the disputing editors, (]) and during a holiday Wikibreak of another disputing editor (me!). This completely contrary to spirit of the AfD findings, the talk page discussion on the redirect, and bypasses the entire ] process. | |||
| The original article was ], which was moved to ], which is one of the articles we asked that it not be redirected to! Then he created a brand-new ] article with no edit history . | |||
| I’d like to see ] warned, so he doesn’t ignore the dispute resolution process again, and if possible have the changes he made reversed until we all come to a final decision. | |||
| Thanks! ] <small> ] </small> 17:33, 5 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I've been off Misplaced Pages for a few days due to illness, and I'm not sure if anything was done about this, or if anything should. Can you let me know? ] <small> ] </small> 19:29, 10 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks for the response, unfortunately the ANI entry was removed because it was not responded to within the two-day limit. Should we put it back up there, or can you assist? ] <small> ] </small> 21:36, 10 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::''There's a new one up elsewhere: ]. --] 21:38, 10 January 2007 (UTC)'' | |||
| :::Oy, it's everywhere! I was actually attempting to escalate above a request for advice on this issue and get admin involvement. ] <small> ] </small> 21:43, 10 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Should I go ahead and place my request to you on the ANI page? I don't think jc37's request on the "request for advice" page is suitable for what I'm complaining about. ] <small> ] </small> 23:33, 10 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Is it suitable for us to comment on jc37's "request"? ] 01:13, 11 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::I went ahead and put my ] on the ANI notice board. Let me know if there's any other place I should put it. ] <small> ] </small> 01:56, 11 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == I think.... == | |||
| ...that you could do with a ] :o) <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 20:14, 8 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :A cucumber doesn't help to teach him that wheel warring is bad, for instance. Or blocking when involved in a dispute. Or blocking for removing HIS template from a page and calling it vandalism. The user has probably violated more policies than I have. - ] ] 20:21, 8 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :: If you continue to violate ], ALTTP, you will be forceably stopped from doing so. ] - ] 15:11, 9 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Attempt to resolve dispute == | |||
| So are you going to apologise for calling me a douche? ] 14:42, 9 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : Here, allow me - InShaneee apologizes for any offense you may have taken at any remarks he/she may have made. He/she requests that you begin following wikipedia policies, specifically, ] and ], and pledges to do the same. If your stalking behavior, Hypno, over a 3 month old block continues, more eyes are going to start looking at you, and you will not appreciate the attention - stop now. ] - ] 15:10, 9 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Apology accepted! Lets move on and leave this behind us (RL can make me snappy too). ] 00:56, 10 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == My Request for Adminship == | |||
| {| style="background-color: #339999; border: solid 1px darkcyan;" | |||
| | ] | |||
| | style="background-color: #e8ffff; padding: 1em; border: solid 1px darkcyan;" | Thank you for your support in my ], which passed with a tally of '''117/0/1'''. I hope that my conduct as an ] lives up to the somewhat flattering confidence the community has shown in me. I hope that my outside view on ] helped resolve the dispute there, as well as providing me with some experience in mediation; a skill I'm likely to need as an admin. Please don't hesitate to leave a message on ] should you need anything or want to discuss something with me.--]] (]) 22:51, 9 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| ==ASUE== | |||
| {| class="messagebox standard-talk" | |||
| |] | |||
| | Hello, {{PAGENAME}} and thank you for your contributions on articles related to ]. I'd like to invite you to become a part of ''''']''''', a WikiProject aiming to improve coverage of ] and related articles on Misplaced Pages. | |||
| If you would like to help out and participate, please visit the ] for more information. Thanks! {{{1|<font color="lightblue">]</font><b><font color="lightgreen">]</font></b> 17:55, 10 January 2007 (UTC)}}} | |||
| |} | |||
| ==Personal attack== | |||
| This is another in a series of personal attacks and uncivil conduct by this user. Another editor blanked the comment, but I think this user needs to be warned. ] <small> ] </small> 00:39, 12 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:20, 1 January 2023
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Click here to start a new talk section.
Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 08:48, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:58, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions have been removed.
Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux 02:47, 1 January 2023 (UTC)