Misplaced Pages

talk:WikiProject Taxation: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:16, 14 January 2007 editTaxman (talk | contribs)14,708 edits Taxation articles← Previous edit Latest revision as of 09:59, 26 September 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,234,264 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion 
(311 intermediate revisions by 96 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{skiptotoc}}
==WikiProject==
{{project}}
I've been wanting to create a Taxation WikiProject for a while now and here it is! I see many of the same usernames on most of the tax articles, so I figured this would be a good way to focus and discuss our efforts. I've added some tags out there so hopefully it will be enough to grow the group. Some things that I'd like to work on for the WikiProject.
{{talkheader|wp=yes}}
*Peer Reviews
{{WikiProject banner shell|
*Article Assessments
{{WikiProject Taxation}}
*GA & FA drives
}}
*Standards
For those wishing to work on the WikiProject itself - see the ] for suggestions. Glad to have you in the Project and I look forward to improving some articles. :-) ] ] 20:09, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
:Sounds good. Let's pick an article and get it moving towards FA status. We might as well throw out suggestions and go with one we agree on. Subtopics are a little easier to start out with, so how about ]? As we go, I'm sure the project will develop. - ] <sup><small>]</small></sup> 22:19, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
::This one could certainly use some attention. Though I think a push to get it to GA would be better suited for this article. I suggest we reserve FA pushes for articles that have already achieved GA. Our initial focus might be to get several articles to GA and then push to FA. ] ] 22:26, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
:::Whether it's GA or FA for the target isn't critical, but FA isn't an unreasonable target given a few motivated and able participants. I have a fair amount of experience with them. I'm certainly open to another topic if there are any other suggestions people are more familiar with. - ] <sup><small>]</small></sup> 23:59, 19 December 2006 (UTC)


{{Archive box|
== ] ==
*]
*]
}}
{{shortcut|WT:TAX}}


== Update, Tidy & Revive ==
Kudos on starting this WikiProject. Seeing as most people are only familiar with the tax laws of their home country, myself included, one of the biggest challenges will be writing articles that reflect a worldwide view. <span class="user-sig user-Quarl"><i>—] <sup>(])</sup> <small>2006-12-19 22:29Z</small></i></span>
:Indeed. And I'm not even sure how to combat that effectively. It's not like there are many books comparing and contrasting various national tax laws. The vast majority of tax material is country specific. - ] <sup><small>]</small></sup> 23:59, 19 December 2006 (UTC)


Given that this project is semi-active, does anyone mind if I do a few things to update/summarise the project page, etc. and undertake some administrative activities to encourage participation in this project? ] (]) 06:47, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
::Thanks for the Kudos! We may have some issues with systemic bias but in many cases the articles are about tax systems or tax theory/terms that are applicable to all. As a project with a worldwide view (english speaking world), I expect we will put a higher priority on articles that have the largest impact and importance to all, such as ], ], ], ], ], ], etc. These articles will have examples and sources that become more specific as the articles become more detailed. However, expanding articles is only part of the group's purpose - standards, copyediting, organizing, improving formating/wiki-standards, peer review, assessment, and discussion are other areas where articles can be improved across national lines without detailed knowledge of their tax law. I expect that groups may organize on country specific articles and pull overall support from the project when needed. I can only see articles benefiting from such organization (including systemic bias), even if we run into some issues. This is certainly something we'll have to keep in mind. Thanks ] ] 02:50, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
:No objections here ] <sup>]</sup> <small><i>14:01, 5 June 2017 (UTC)</i></small>
::Thanks! I have gone ahead and made some updates to the project page. I will do more as I get time. ] (]) 22:21, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
:::I have archived all previous discussions due to inactivity. They can be viewed at ]. ] (]) 00:36, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
::::I have moved all members on the ] to a new Inactive Members sub-heading pending a clean up of the list. ] (]) 00:38, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
:::::Nice, Thanks - it was definitely needed. ] <sup>]</sup> <small><i>21:31, 6 June 2017 (UTC)</i></small>
::::::No problemo! I have also refreshed the assessment department page with the view to begin actively assessing taxation articles again. ] 09:27, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
:::::::I also amended the ] by removing anyone who had not made any contributions to Misplaced Pages in over 12 months. ] 10:05, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
::::::::Added a ] to the project page. I think the most important task at this stage is to recruit more ] to support this WikiProject. I will look at creating a invite template that we can put on the Talk pages of users we come across who are making good/positive contributions to taxation articles. ] 06:25, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
:::::::::I have created {{tl|Taxproj_Invite}} to invite new participants to this project. ] 07:47, 8 June 2017 (UTC)


==Welcome to WikiProject Taxation!==
== Assessment ==
We have recently begun working to revive this WikiProject and are looking for participants to join us in improving Misplaced Pages's coverage of taxation related topics. A WikiProject is a group of contributors who work together as a ] to improve Misplaced Pages. If you are new to WikiProjects, please see ] and ].


We are looking for participants to assist in all aspects of this WikiProject, so don't hesitate to lend a hand in any way that you can. If there is a specific way you would like to help out, or if you have any suggestions for this project, please
I was considering adding the project template to lots of talk pages in ] and subcategories using AWB, but thought that it would be better to include the assessment material in the template first. I'd rather make an assessment of each article I added the template too. I'm not really good with the template code, but what do you think of adding the assessment variables to it so we can use those? There's suggested code on ] of course. - ] <sup><small>]</small></sup> 03:49, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
:Working on it as you typed this... see ]. ] ] 03:58, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
::OK - this should be working now... Go for it! I would only assess up to B-Class, leave GA for the GA process (if you believe it to be GA or better - put in the comments that you recommend they submit for GA). If the article is a GA, A-Class should have multiple project reviewers. FA should be left to the FA process. :-) Priority should work too. We need to modify our examples so they reflect something more relevant. ] ] 05:45, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
:::Yep, that's great. I assessed ] because I think that one was pretty straightforward on both parameters, and wanted to do a test. Is it possible to suppress the parameters when they are absent rather than the large text saying they haven't been assessed? And yes GA and FA should certainly only be those that have run those processes. Also you're right we need to replace examples with topic appropriate ones and descriptions. We'll get there. - ] <sup><small>]</small></sup> 06:20, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
::::Excellent - I'll see what I can do to make the text appear only when the variables are present. ] ] 13:49, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
:::::Alrighty - The assessment information should now be hidden until the variable is added to the tag. Other information should be hidden until the appropriate variable is added. For example, the line about "Comments" after review will only show up after the "class=" attribute is added. The comment and dotted line will show up if either variable is added. ] ] 17:23, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
:::::Peer Review should be working now. I still need to create a few categories but everything else should be set. I'm going to talk to the ] group about the dynamic generation of statistics and such for assessment. ] ] 04:35, 21 December 2006 (UTC)


The following tasks have been added to the ]:
==What about articles on individuals?==
*Recruit more ] to support this WikiProject. This can be done by adding {{tl|Taxproj_Invite}} to the talk page of a user who has made positive contributions to a taxation-related article.
*Clear the backlog of ]. Please update the ] page if you assess any taxation articles.
*Clean up taxation articles listed on the current .
If you would like to discuss or suggest a task for the task list, please


We are currently working towards three ]:
Dear fellow editors: Should articles on tax protesters like ] be included in the project (even though they might also be listed as part of some other Misplaced Pages project)? ] 14:35, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
*Assess 95% of taxation articles and lists.
:It is fine for articles to be part of multiple projects and each project can have their own priority. I guess the question is if we want them to be within the scope of this project. I would say that if the main reason the person has a biography on Misplaced Pages is for tax related reasons, then yes. For example, I would say yes to "Irwin Schiff" but no to "Wesly Snipes". ] ] 20:53, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
*20% of articles C-Class or better.
*80% of articles Start-Class or better.
If you would like to discuss or suggest a milestone, please


] 00:49, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
== Misplaced Pages Day Awards ==


== Your feedback is requested at Flat rate withholding tax (Abgeltungsteuer) ==
Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of ] proposal for an appreciation week to end on Misplaced Pages Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at ] where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention. ] 23:24, 29 December 2006 (UTC)


Please comment at ]. English native speakers with knowledge or a background in securities accounting and capital gains taxation especially welcome. Knowledge of German is helpful but not necessary. ] (]) 22:28, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
== Taxation portal? ==
One aspect of WikiProjects is the creation of a portal. However, I'm not sure we have enough content to showcase tax articles on their own. I was thinking we might be able to request a small space on another portal such as ]. Other portal options might be ], ], or ]. Thoughts.. Should we create our own, work with the Law portal (or other), or maybe try to have space on all these portals...? ] <sup>]</sup> 15:58, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
:I've never figured out the benefit of portals that are worth the overhead. It just seems like a lot of work that doesn't go into articles. That said if someone really wants to keep it maintained that's fine, but you're right, we don't have much to go on yet. If we get some of the higher priority articles in decent shape then we'd be in a better position to showcase our material. - ] <sup><small>]</small></sup> 20:24, 9 January 2007 (UTC)


== Hello == == ] ==


] is a ridiculous stub, and has been for ''twelve years'' - can we get this fixed up? ] ] 01:17, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
I've just added my name on the members list. My main interest is UK corporation tax (indeed it was me who wrote ] and got it up to FA status). I'm also, as of 7.30pm today, responsible for a good article, '']'' and I'm (slowly) developing a Wikibook, '']''.


== Request feedback + Changes to the current ] ==
It would be interesting to know what areas of taxation others are interested in. Could we expand the members list so that we can note these next to our names? Also, it would be nice to know of anyone else looking to develop Misplaced Pages or Wikibooks content on UK tax. ] 19:42, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
:Welcome, of course. Personally I only know the US laws and a tiny bit of Canadian tax. But I'm more than happy to peer review articles from other jurisdictions to offer an outside view. - ] <sup><small>]</small></sup> 20:24, 9 January 2007 (UTC)


Hello
::I had considered putting flag icons in front of the names such as {{flagicon|USA}} {{user-c|Morphh}}. I thought this might help us in directing focus to articles with other like editors but then I thought it could also divide us and add to bias. I'd also be happy to peer review articles from other jurisdictions. I'm fine with putting short comments next to the name to specify interest. Though you might be more likely to find like editors by looking at the history page of the topic. ] <sup>]</sup> 13:58, 10 January 2007 (UTC)


After reviewing the current CCCTBwiki, I had to conclude that the three-factor formula isn't 100% correct according to made by the European Commission (EC). The three-factor formula is made by three factors the labour part consists out of the payroll and the number of employees; see chapter VIII or 8 in the proposal.
I think it would be useful to know who's writing on what as I think that would help with collaboration. Whether that is done by flags or by other device, I don't know.


] (]) 19:53, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Nor do I see that as divisive or likely to add bias. My knowledge only allows me to write about UK tax, and also allows me to write much more about corporation tax than any other type of tax. I'm not ever going to start writing about Zimbabwean taxes, say, in order to try to neutralise a systemic bias because I simply don't have the ability to do so.


== ] ==
Might I suggest a two column approach to the participants list, the first column being our names, the second allowing us to say what our interests are? ] 13:10, 11 January 2007 (UTC)


:Ok - I've made some changes to the members list to better identify members interests as suggested. ] <sup>]</sup> 19:33, 11 January 2007 (UTC) Of relevance to this project, there is a long-waiting ] that could benefit from the attention of experts in this area. ] ] 22:14, 2 December 2017 (UTC)


<ref></ref>
== Taxation articles ==


== Article request ==
Ok, I finished adding the tags to the list I was working on. For the most part I only added to articles that I didn't have any doubt about, so there may be some other's that should be tagged. ] for review of the articles that are in almost any subcategory of ] except the tax protesters and resistors. I didn't know which of those would have enough importance to their protesting activities to make them includable. I can make a full list of all articles in subcategories of Category:Taxation if anyone wants to see it. Also, while pension schemes in general have a significant tax character, I tried to avoid including articles on individual systems such as ]. One thing I did notice is a lot of articles are mis-categorized.


Hello. I wonder if it would make sense to create ], with a list of current and past members? I am clueless about this topic, and I thought someone from this WP might be interested in creating it. Please ping me if/when you do. Thank you.] (]) 19:20, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
I couldn't find an easy way to pull a list for review of just the articles I tagged, but I did ] of all talk pages I've edited that have the project tag. The majority of these I edited to add the tag. Let me know if you think I've tagged any you don't think we should be including. There's no need to include articles we don't want to work on. - ] <sup><small>]</small></sup> 10:16, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
:{{ping|Zigzig20s}} This project is pretty inactive, but I noticed this request after I created the article. I welcome any help if you still want to work on it. &#12296;&nbsp;]&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;]&nbsp;&#12297; 16:35, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

== Request for comment on the ] article ==

There is a ] on the ] article. If you are interested, please participate at {{slink|Talk:Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act|RfC: Recent additions}}. —&nbsp;''''']'''&nbsp;<small>]</small>'' 06:02, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

== Request for information on WP1.0 web tool ==

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the ]! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the ] that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at where you can leave your response. ] (]) 04:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:JJMC89@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Wikipedia_talk:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/ListOfProjects&oldid=923068486 -->

== Peer review page update ==

Hi all, I've boldly updated your project's peer review page (]) by updating the instructions and archiving old reviews.

The new instructions use Misplaced Pages's general peer review process (]) to list peer reviews. Your project's reviews are still able to be listed on your local page too.

The benefits of this change is that review requests will get seen by a wider audience and are likely to be attended to in a more timely way (many WikiProject peer reviews remain unanswered after years). The Misplaced Pages peer review process is also more maintained than most WikiProjects, and this may help save time for your active members.

I've done this boldly as it seems your peer review page is pretty inactive and I am working through around 90 such similar peer review pages. Please feel free to discuss below - please ping me ({{tlp|u|2=Tom (LT)}}) in your response.

Cheers and hope you are well, ] (]) 23:56, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

== User script to detect unreliable sources ==

{{Main|User:Headbomb/unreliable}}
I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to ] and ]s. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the ]. The idea is that it takes something like
*John Smith "" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14. (<code><nowiki>John Smith "" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.</nowiki></code>)
and turns it into something like
* John Smith "{{highlight||pink}}" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{tl|cite web}}, {{tl|cite journal}} and {{tl|doi}}.

The script is mostly based on ], ] and ] and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is '''not a script to be mindlessly used''', and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at ]. Questions, comments and requests can be made at ].

- &#32;<span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">] {] · ] · ] · ]}</span>

<span style="font-size:90%">This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from.</span> Delivered by: ] (]) 16:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Terasail@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Headbomb/sandbox3&oldid=1085285969 -->

== Source that could be useful for multiple articles ==

Hello WikiProject Taxation editors!

I wanted to share a potential source because it could be useful to those here working on article about taxation. It presents data that shows how different state tax levels are driving migration within the United States.

:https://www.moneygeek.com/financial-planning/resources/tax-friendly-state/

Thanks and let me know if you have any questions I can help with. ] (]) 19:28, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

== Requested move at ] ==
] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. <span style="background-color: orange; color: green">]</span> <sup>(]) </sup> 22:27, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

== Good article reassessment for ] ==
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 10:50, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

== Any interest in reactivating this project with me? ==

I would like to work on reactivating this project, if there are others who would be interested in working with me on that?

In the meantime, I'm going to work on updating this list by adding existing articles to the category and by making articles for the most distinguished tax law scholars who do not already have articles: https://en.wikipedia.org/Category:Scholars_of_tax_law

I'm thinking I will start with this list of most cited us tax law scholars: https://leiterlawschool.typepad.com/leiter/2021/08/10-most-cited-tax-scholars-in-the-us-2016-2020.html. But any suggestions or advice on this would be welcome, and if anyone would like to work with me on this that would be very welcome! ] (]) 20:09, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

:This would be a great project to revive. ] (]) 22:09, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
::Any suggestions on how we should go about trying to revive it? ] (]) 22:12, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
:::I think creating a public list of individuals you think are notable is a great start. Put it on the talk page here and I’ll try to work on one. ] (]) 18:32, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
::::Thanks! I just added a list as a new topic below. Does that work? ] (]) 18:54, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

== Project: Pages for the 10 Most-Cited Tax Scholars in the U.S., 2016-2020 ==

At @]'s suggestion, I am creating an entry here for leading tax law scholars. This list for the U.S. seems like a good place to start: https://leiterlawschool.typepad.com/leiter/2021/08/10-most-cited-tax-scholars-in-the-us-2016-2020.html I can try to find similar lists for outside of the U.S. if there is sufficient interest?

Working through the list, the following have pages already:
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]

The following do not have pages:
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]

I propose that we work toward restarting this project by creating pages for all of the above who do not already have pages. ] (]) 18:53, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 09:59, 26 September 2024

Skip to table of contents
This is a WikiProject, an area for focused collaboration among Wikipedians. New participants are welcome; please feel free to participate!
This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Taxation and anything related to its purposes and tasks.
Archives: 1, 2
This project page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconTaxation (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TaxationWikipedia:WikiProject TaxationTemplate:WikiProject TaxationTaxation

Archives

Shortcut

Update, Tidy & Revive

Given that this project is semi-active, does anyone mind if I do a few things to update/summarise the project page, etc. and undertake some administrative activities to encourage participation in this project? Hawkgeminus (talk) 06:47, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

No objections here Morphh 14:01, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Thanks! I have gone ahead and made some updates to the project page. I will do more as I get time. Hawkgeminus (talk) 22:21, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
I have archived all previous discussions due to inactivity. They can be viewed at /Archive 2. Hawkgeminus (talk) 00:36, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
I have moved all members on the list of members to a new Inactive Members sub-heading pending a clean up of the list. Hawkgeminus (talk) 00:38, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Nice, Thanks - it was definitely needed. Morphh 21:31, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
No problemo! I have also refreshed the assessment department page with the view to begin actively assessing taxation articles again. HawkGeminus 09:27, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
I also amended the list of members by removing anyone who had not made any contributions to Misplaced Pages in over 12 months. HawkGeminus 10:05, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Added a task list to the project page. I think the most important task at this stage is to recruit more participants to support this WikiProject. I will look at creating a invite template that we can put on the Talk pages of users we come across who are making good/positive contributions to taxation articles. HawkGeminus 06:25, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
I have created {{Taxproj_Invite}} to invite new participants to this project. HawkGeminus 07:47, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to WikiProject Taxation!

We have recently begun working to revive this WikiProject and are looking for participants to join us in improving Misplaced Pages's coverage of taxation related topics. A WikiProject is a group of contributors who work together as a team to improve Misplaced Pages. If you are new to WikiProjects, please see Misplaced Pages:WikiProjects and Misplaced Pages:WikiProject best practices.

We are looking for participants to assist in all aspects of this WikiProject, so don't hesitate to lend a hand in any way that you can. If there is a specific way you would like to help out, or if you have any suggestions for this project, please start a new discussion

The following tasks have been added to the task list:

If you would like to discuss or suggest a task for the task list, please start a new discussion

We are currently working towards three milestones:

  • Assess 95% of taxation articles and lists.
  • 20% of articles C-Class or better.
  • 80% of articles Start-Class or better.

If you would like to discuss or suggest a milestone, please start a new discussion

HawkGeminus 00:49, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Flat rate withholding tax (Abgeltungsteuer)

Please comment at Talk:Flat rate withholding tax (Abgeltungsteuer)#Title and wikilinks are wrong. English native speakers with knowledge or a background in securities accounting and capital gains taxation especially welcome. Knowledge of German is helpful but not necessary. Mathglot (talk) 22:28, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Tax cap

Tax cap is a ridiculous stub, and has been for twelve years - can we get this fixed up? bd2412 T 01:17, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Request feedback + Changes to the current Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base page

Hello

After reviewing the current CCCTBwiki, I had to conclude that the three-factor formula isn't 100% correct according to the CCCTB-proposal made by the European Commission (EC). The three-factor formula is made by three factors the labour part consists out of the payroll and the number of employees; see chapter VIII or 8 in the proposal.

Coldicekekin (talk) 19:53, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Effect of taxes on employment

Of relevance to this project, there is a long-waiting Draft:Effect of taxes on employment that could benefit from the attention of experts in this area. bd2412 T 22:14, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).

Article request

Hello. I wonder if it would make sense to create Internal Revenue Service Oversight Board, with a list of current and past members? I am clueless about this topic, and I thought someone from this WP might be interested in creating it. Please ping me if/when you do. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 19:20, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

@Zigzig20s: This project is pretty inactive, but I noticed this request after I created the article. I welcome any help if you still want to work on it. 〈 Forbes72 | Talk 〉 16:35, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Request for comment on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act article

There is a request for comment on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act article. If you are interested, please participate at Talk:Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act § RfC: Recent additions. — Newslinger talk 06:02, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Peer review page update

Hi all, I've boldly updated your project's peer review page (Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Taxation/Peer review) by updating the instructions and archiving old reviews.

The new instructions use Misplaced Pages's general peer review process (WP:PR) to list peer reviews. Your project's reviews are still able to be listed on your local page too.

The benefits of this change is that review requests will get seen by a wider audience and are likely to be attended to in a more timely way (many WikiProject peer reviews remain unanswered after years). The Misplaced Pages peer review process is also more maintained than most WikiProjects, and this may help save time for your active members.

I've done this boldly as it seems your peer review page is pretty inactive and I am working through around 90 such similar peer review pages. Please feel free to discuss below - please ping me ({{u|Tom (LT)}}) in your response.

Cheers and hope you are well, Tom (LT) (talk) 23:56, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

User script to detect unreliable sources

Main page: User:Headbomb/unreliable

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Misplaced Pages. The idea is that it takes something like

  • John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Source that could be useful for multiple articles

Hello WikiProject Taxation editors!

I wanted to share a potential source because it could be useful to those here working on article about taxation. It presents data that shows how different state tax levels are driving migration within the United States.

https://www.moneygeek.com/financial-planning/resources/tax-friendly-state/

Thanks and let me know if you have any questions I can help with. SBCornelius (talk) 19:28, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Kerosene tax#Requested move 28 June 2023

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Kerosene tax#Requested move 28 June 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. EggRoll97 22:27, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Tax protester constitutional arguments

Tax protester constitutional arguments has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:50, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Any interest in reactivating this project with me?

I would like to work on reactivating this project, if there are others who would be interested in working with me on that?

In the meantime, I'm going to work on updating this list by adding existing articles to the category and by making articles for the most distinguished tax law scholars who do not already have articles: https://en.wikipedia.org/Category:Scholars_of_tax_law

I'm thinking I will start with this list of most cited us tax law scholars: https://leiterlawschool.typepad.com/leiter/2021/08/10-most-cited-tax-scholars-in-the-us-2016-2020.html. But any suggestions or advice on this would be welcome, and if anyone would like to work with me on this that would be very welcome! JDtoBee (talk) 20:09, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

This would be a great project to revive. Thriley (talk) 22:09, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Any suggestions on how we should go about trying to revive it? JDtoBee (talk) 22:12, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
I think creating a public list of individuals you think are notable is a great start. Put it on the talk page here and I’ll try to work on one. Thriley (talk) 18:32, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Thanks! I just added a list as a new topic below. Does that work? JDtoBee (talk) 18:54, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Project: Pages for the 10 Most-Cited Tax Scholars in the U.S., 2016-2020

At @Thrilley's suggestion, I am creating an entry here for leading tax law scholars. This list for the U.S. seems like a good place to start: https://leiterlawschool.typepad.com/leiter/2021/08/10-most-cited-tax-scholars-in-the-us-2016-2020.html I can try to find similar lists for outside of the U.S. if there is sufficient interest?

Working through the list, the following have pages already:

The following do not have pages:

I propose that we work toward restarting this project by creating pages for all of the above who do not already have pages. JDtoBee (talk) 18:53, 26 July 2024 (UTC)