Misplaced Pages

Talk:Frank Lovece: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:36, 27 February 2021 editI am dis big (talk | contribs)124 edits Placed "conflict of interest" flag on article: new sectionTag: Reverted← Previous edit Latest revision as of 19:00, 16 February 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,012,441 edits Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)Tag: Talk banner shell conversion 
(37 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}} {{Talk header}}
{{Press
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
| subject = article
{{WikiProject Biography|living=yes
| author = Michael Cockram, Ramon Ramirez
|class=C
| title = Is this Misplaced Pages editor who deadnamed a trans celebrity a high-profile film critic? The curious case of Tenebrae.
|a&e-priority=low
| org = '']''
| url = https://www.dailydot.com/irl/tenebrae-wikipedia-peppermint/
| date = {{date|2 March 2021}}
| quote =
| archiveurl = https://archive.is/fc4ak
| archivedate = {{date|3 March 2021}}
| accessdate = {{date|23 March 2021}}
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C| blp=yes|listas=Lovece, Frank|
{{WikiProject Biography|a&e-priority=low
|a&e-work-group=yes |a&e-work-group=yes
|listas=Lovece, Frank
}} }}
{{WikiProject Comics|Creators=yes|class=C|importance=low|US=yes}} {{WikiProject Comics|Creators=yes|importance=low|US=yes}}
{{WikiProject Journalism|class=C}} {{WikiProject Journalism}}
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Low|WV=yes|WV-importance=low}}
| blp=yes
}} }}
{{archives}}
==Image copyright problem with Image:AtomicAge1.jpg==
{{archive basics|counter=2}}
The image ] is used in this article under a claim of ], but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the ] when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an ] linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

:* That there is a ] on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
<!-- Additional 10c list header goes here -->

This is an automated notice by ]. For assistance on the image use policy, see ]. --09:34, 12 May 2008 (UTC)


== External links modified == == Book citation ==


Lovece contributed a story to an anthology (''Holiday Gay: Tales of Love, Lust, Romance and Other Seasonal Gifts'') edited by his wife, ]. I've added it to the bibliography, but I'm not sure how to include the name of the story (''The Pope of West 44th Street''). Would someone more experienced in those kinds of citations mind fixing it? Thanks. ] (]) 20:13, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,


== "one of the first professional Web journalists" ==
I have just modified 8 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.scribd.com/doc/149494696/Frank-Lovece-profile-Morgantown-WV-Dominion-Post
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.scribd.com/doc/149494960/Frank-Lovece-profile-The-Newark-Star-Ledger
*Replaced archive link http://www.webcitation.org/5uT0ge51q?url=http://franklovece.com/about.html with https://web.archive.org/web/20120717100219/http://franklovece.com/about.html on http://franklovece.com/about.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://blogs.bgsu.edu/pclnews/?p=11
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.clivebarker.com/html/visions/bib/comics/
*Replaced archive link http://www.webcitation.org/6mx4N3mnj?url=http://eclipsemagazine.com/comic-con-2016-pow-entertainment-and-shatner-singularity-introduce-stan-lees-god-woke/ with https://web.archive.org/web/20160722185640/http://eclipsemagazine.com/comic-con-2016-pow-entertainment-and-shatner-singularity-introduce-stan-lees-god-woke/ on http://eclipsemagazine.com/comic-con-2016-pow-entertainment-and-shatner-singularity-introduce-stan-lees-god-woke/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.takegreatpictures.com/tgp-choice/10435
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.maelmill-insi.de/UHBMCC/naml23.htm


It's shoddy that such a significant claim in the lede is unsourced. Frankly there has been quite a few uncited claims in the article. There's also the claim that he made the {{tq|only – home video to obtain an MPAA rating}}, which is backed to a 1991 source, it's been ~20 years since then and perhaps that is no longer true. ''']] (])''' 05:52, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.


== Grand Comics Database as a source. ==
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}


This article cites the ] as a source in several places. To me, this raises at least two issues. Firstly, whether in general it should be cited by Misplaced Pages as a source for articles (possibly a question for ], given that the Database is an "Internet-based project to build a database of comic book information through user contributions"), and secondly, whether it should be cited in ''this'' particular article, given the questions regarding the possibility of CoI editing - Tenebrae has previously stated that he contributed to the Database, during a previous inconclusive discussion on it at WP:RSN.
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 12:09, 4 January 2017 (UTC)


To be clear, I am not suggesting that Lovece ''wasn't'' responsible for the comic-book material our biography uses the Database as a source for - I just think that it might be better cited to a better source - one that doesn't raise questions. ] (]) 23:30, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
== External links modified ==


:] should be purged in the general. ] (]) 14:17, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,


::I've removed per ]. ] (]) 18:27, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
I have just modified 6 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://franklovece.com/about.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://search.ew.com/EWSearch/ew/search/search.html?type=ew%3AFrank+Lovece+%3B
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.comic-con.org/awards/russ-manning
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://eclipsemagazine.com/comic-con-2016-pow-entertainment-and-shatner-singularity-introduce-stan-lees-god-woke/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.missingkids.com/missingkids/servlet/PageServlet?LanguageCountry=en_US&PageId=2487
*Replaced archive link https://web.archive.org/web/20110725151612/http://www.kenmeyerjr.com/fanzines/nimbus3.pdf with https://web.archive.org/web/20120227162305/http://www.kenmeyerjr.com/fanzines/nimbus3.pdf on http://www.kenmeyerjr.com/fanzines/nimbus3.pdf


::I've removed more ] stuff. ''']] (])''' 07:38, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.


:::If the Database shouldn't be cited at all here, which seems to be the consensus, it presumably shouldn't be cited elsewhere either. I see it is also being used to include Lovece in our '']'' article. Said article being written by you-know-who... ] (]) 11:22, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
:For comic books of the with-credits era of comics (going back more than half a century), the credits can generally be attributed to the comic book itself. That's not to say there's never been an error or omission in the credits, but for the general case, you can cite that Janey McJane wrote ''Publisher War Journal'' #137 to that issue of PWJ itself. (but also, because of credits, GCDB is generally good on modern works; it's the guessing that takes place on non-credited work that's the problem.) ''Transparency note: I've contributed data to GCDB on a handful of occasions.'' --] (]) 12:17, 4 April 2021 (UTC)


==Sourcing==
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 06:52, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
I've removed the COI tag, as I think that's not an issue at the moment, given recent events, but have tagged for excessive use of selfpublished sources and sources connected to the subject. Far too much comes out of the personal website. It makes me wonder if this article meets notability standards. ] (]) 18:30, 26 March 2021 (UTC)


:Agreed. It isn't just an issue with unreliable sources though. I've just removed puffery relating to the 'Bowling Green State University exhibition' including one of Lovece's products. A moments perusal of the source cited will show that the comic (or rather one edition of it) did indeed feature in the exhibition - as one of well over a hundred exhibits. The source cited is the University's own blog, which even if RS (I'd say it probably is) does nothing to establish the significance of the exhibition, never mind the comic-book series. ] (]) 12:41, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
== Year of birth ==


I got Frank Lovece's year of birth from two sources already used in the article. One (from 1989) says "At the ripe old age of 31..." and the other (from 1996) says "a lean 38 year old with expressive eyebrows..." That would mean he was born in 1958. Did I get my math wrong? ] (]) 18:24, 17 June 2020 (UTC) ::I really do feel that when an article is a time suck like this it should be deleted. The McDonagh article is worse. I just read a book about an important figure in the history of New York City who has ''no'' article. We all have better things to do than to fix the resumes that people put in Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 14:11, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
:{{ping|Tenebrae}} is this acceptable? ] (]) 17:22, 18 June 2020 (UTC)


:::I'd say that the case for McDonagh meeting Misplaced Pages notability standards was better than that for Lovece. Honestly though, I think the biggest issue, as far as Misplaced Pages content is concerned, is the way Lovece reviews have been shoehorned into a lot of high-visibility articles on Hollywood movies etc. Lovece seems to be a competent enough reviewer, but he and his employers have been given disproportionate prominence. What really needs doing is a systematic search for these, followed by replacement of the majority of them by material citing other sources. Unfortunately, it is likely to involve a lot of work, and needs to be done by people who know the topic area well. Just removing the lot would 'fix' the CoI problem, but leave Misplaced Pages with a lot of messy-looking articles. ] (]) 14:26, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
::{{ping|Mo Billings}} Absolutely. It just to be cited and with a circa ("c.") before the year. See ].--] (]) 19:19, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Tenebrae}} Ok, but for Jenna Johnson the birth year isn't clear. It's 1994 or 1995. Unless I missed something with my math Frank Lovece was born in 1958. Not circa 1958, just 1958. ] (]) 14:35, 19 June 2020 (UTC)


::::You raise some good points. What a mess. ] (]) 15:00, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
::::I just copy-paste whatever the "Birth based on age as of" template in the infobox puts out on the live site. Here's the code: "c. <nowiki>{{Birth based on age as of date|24|2000|8|13}}</nowiki>". If you've more than once source giving an age, just repeat the pattern (i.e. "|24|2000|8|13|35|2011|4|16") --] (]) 17:28, 21 June 2020 (UTC)


== Autobiography, edited by/someone connected to the subject. ==
== Placed "conflict of interest" flag on article ==


I've been trying to update this page. I am not Frank Lovece, and have never met him. I have asked him about some facts with an attempt to improve this biography, and enhance its accuracy.
After reading , it would appear that a major contributor to this biography has autobiographical intentions. I hope that's okay, and not out of line. - ] (]) 18:36, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Might be time for the warning tag to come down. cscrandall 16:56, 18 August 2022 (UTC) <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Latest revision as of 19:00, 16 February 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Frank Lovece article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1
Media mentionThis article has been mentioned by a media organization:
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconBiography: Arts and Entertainment
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconComics: Creators / United States Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Misplaced Pages. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Related work groups:
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Comics creators work group.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by United States comics work group.
WikiProject iconJournalism
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconUnited States: West Virginia Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject West Virginia (assessed as Low-importance).
Archiving icon
Archives
Archive 1


Book citation

Lovece contributed a story to an anthology (Holiday Gay: Tales of Love, Lust, Romance and Other Seasonal Gifts) edited by his wife, Maitland McDonagh. I've added it to the bibliography, but I'm not sure how to include the name of the story (The Pope of West 44th Street). Would someone more experienced in those kinds of citations mind fixing it? Thanks. Mo Billings (talk) 20:13, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

"one of the first professional Web journalists"

It's shoddy that such a significant claim in the lede is unsourced. Frankly there has been quite a few uncited claims in the article. There's also the claim that he made the only – home video to obtain an MPAA rating, which is backed to a 1991 source, it's been ~20 years since then and perhaps that is no longer true. starship.paint (exalt) 05:52, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Grand Comics Database as a source.

This article cites the Grand Comics Database as a source in several places. To me, this raises at least two issues. Firstly, whether in general it should be cited by Misplaced Pages as a source for articles (possibly a question for WP:RSN, given that the Database is an "Internet-based project to build a database of comic book information through user contributions"), and secondly, whether it should be cited in this particular article, given the questions regarding the possibility of CoI editing - Tenebrae has previously stated that he contributed to the Database, during a previous inconclusive discussion on it at WP:RSN.

To be clear, I am not suggesting that Lovece wasn't responsible for the comic-book material our biography uses the Database as a source for - I just think that it might be better cited to a better source - one that doesn't raise questions. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:30, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

WP:UGC should be purged in the general. Izno (talk) 14:17, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
I've removed per WP:UGC. Coretheapple (talk) 18:27, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
I've removed more WP:UGC stuff. starship.paint (exalt) 07:38, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
If the Database shouldn't be cited at all here, which seems to be the consensus, it presumably shouldn't be cited elsewhere either. I see it is also being used to include Lovece in our Stan Lee's God Woke article. Said article being written by you-know-who... AndyTheGrump (talk) 11:22, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
For comic books of the with-credits era of comics (going back more than half a century), the credits can generally be attributed to the comic book itself. That's not to say there's never been an error or omission in the credits, but for the general case, you can cite that Janey McJane wrote Publisher War Journal #137 to that issue of PWJ itself. (but also, because of credits, GCDB is generally good on modern works; it's the guessing that takes place on non-credited work that's the problem.) Transparency note: I've contributed data to GCDB on a handful of occasions. --Nat Gertler (talk) 12:17, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Sourcing

I've removed the COI tag, as I think that's not an issue at the moment, given recent events, but have tagged for excessive use of selfpublished sources and sources connected to the subject. Far too much comes out of the personal website. It makes me wonder if this article meets notability standards. Coretheapple (talk) 18:30, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Agreed. It isn't just an issue with unreliable sources though. I've just removed puffery relating to the 'Bowling Green State University exhibition' including one of Lovece's products. A moments perusal of the source cited will show that the comic (or rather one edition of it) did indeed feature in the exhibition - as one of well over a hundred exhibits. The source cited is the University's own blog, which even if RS (I'd say it probably is) does nothing to establish the significance of the exhibition, never mind the comic-book series. AndyTheGrump (talk) 12:41, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
I really do feel that when an article is a time suck like this it should be deleted. The McDonagh article is worse. I just read a book about an important figure in the history of New York City who has no article. We all have better things to do than to fix the resumes that people put in Misplaced Pages. Coretheapple (talk) 14:11, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
I'd say that the case for McDonagh meeting Misplaced Pages notability standards was better than that for Lovece. Honestly though, I think the biggest issue, as far as Misplaced Pages content is concerned, is the way Lovece reviews have been shoehorned into a lot of high-visibility articles on Hollywood movies etc. Lovece seems to be a competent enough reviewer, but he and his employers have been given disproportionate prominence. What really needs doing is a systematic search for these, followed by replacement of the majority of them by material citing other sources. Unfortunately, it is likely to involve a lot of work, and needs to be done by people who know the topic area well. Just removing the lot would 'fix' the CoI problem, but leave Misplaced Pages with a lot of messy-looking articles. AndyTheGrump (talk) 14:26, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
You raise some good points. What a mess. Coretheapple (talk) 15:00, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Autobiography, edited by/someone connected to the subject.

I've been trying to update this page. I am not Frank Lovece, and have never met him. I have asked him about some facts with an attempt to improve this biography, and enhance its accuracy. Might be time for the warning tag to come down. cscrandall 16:56, 18 August 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Christiancrandall (talkcontribs)

Categories: