Misplaced Pages

:Featured article candidates/U2/archive1: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates | U2 Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:04, 17 January 2007 editGimmeBot (talk | contribs)Bots75,273 editsm GimmeBot tagging closed FAC discussion← Previous edit Latest revision as of 10:23, 25 May 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!--FAtop--><div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #E6F2FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> <!--FAtop--><div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #E6F2FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following is an archived discussion of a ]. <font color="red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</font> Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in ]. No further edits should be made to this page.'' :''The following is an archived discussion of a ]. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in ]. No further edits should be made to this page.''


The article was not promoted 20:17, 9 January 2007. The article was not promoted 20:17, 9 January 2007.
Line 9: Line 9:


*'''Object''', just after a quick look-lead is too short and doesn't summarize the article, citation needed tags need to have refs found and made.] 18:28, 28 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Object''', just after a quick look-lead is too short and doesn't summarize the article, citation needed tags need to have refs found and made.] 18:28, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Comment:''' would like to see the fair use media files placed in context at appropriate points within the article, rather than in its own section. ]<sup>]</sup> 19:04, 28 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Comment:''' would like to see the fair use media files placed in context at appropriate points within the article, rather than in its own section. ]] 19:04, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
**Done ] 19:56, 31 December 2006 (UTC) **Done ] 19:56, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
:Funny, the excerpts are gone. ] 09:48, 29 December 2006 (UTC) :Funny, the excerpts are gone. ] 09:48, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Weak oppose''' because the "Campaigning" section really needs to be a couple of paragraphs, and not so listy. If not for that, I'd probably support. ] 04:27, 2 January 2007 (UTC) *'''Weak oppose''' because the "Campaigning" section really needs to be a couple of paragraphs, and not so listy. If not for that, I'd probably support. ] 04:27, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive. <font color="red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</font> Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in ]. No further edits should be made to this page.''</div><!--FAbottom--><!--Tagged by FA bot--> :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in ]. No further edits should be made to this page.''</div><!--FAbottom--><!--Tagged by FA bot-->

Latest revision as of 10:23, 25 May 2022

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Misplaced Pages talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted 20:17, 9 January 2007.


U2

A lot of work has been done on this one in the past weeks (references, pictures, cleanup). I think it is ready to be considered.Buc 18:18, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Funny, the excerpts are gone. Wiki-newbie 09:48, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak oppose because the "Campaigning" section really needs to be a couple of paragraphs, and not so listy. If not for that, I'd probably support. Tuf-Kat 04:27, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Misplaced Pages talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.