| Revision as of 08:04, 29 March 2021 editChiswick Chap (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers295,763 edits Changes on WikiProject YogaTag: Reverted← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 20:06, 31 August 2021 edit undoWalter Görlitz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers294,571 edits Undid most of revision 1041533785 by Catchpoke (talk). While you may remove the remainder, block notifications may not be removed until the block has expired. | ||
| (60 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Indefinite block== | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been ''']''' ''']''' from editing for too many ] coupled with little awareness (still) of there being too many personal attacks. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the ], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. </div></div><!-- Template:uw-blockindef --> ] 09:37, 30 August 2021 (UTC) | |||
| == March 2021 == | |||
| :The ANI discussion is at ]. ] (]) 01:00, 31 August 2021 (UTC) | |||
| ] Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to ] have been undone by an automated computer program called ]. | |||
| {{clear}} | |||
| * ClueBot NG makes very few ], but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please ], , remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again. | |||
| * For help, take a look at the ]. | |||
| * The following is the log entry regarding this message: ] was by ] ] ] ANN scored at 0.904868 on 2021-03-16T03:29:10+00:00 <!-- MySQL ID: 3924710 --> | |||
| Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning1 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> ] (]) 03:29, 16 March 2021 (UTC) | |||
| == ClueBotNG == | |||
| Hello, Catchpoke. On ], you mentioned you had a problem reporting a false positive Because the captcha just wouldn't work. I had this exact same issue, and have yet to receive a response about it on the page. Did you ever figure out a way past that? If you didn't, I'm probably gonna ask on Village pump. Thank you in advance. --] (]) 21:32, 23 March 2021 (UTC) | |||
| == Changes on WikiProject Yoga == | |||
| Hi, I notice you've started to make a range of changes to yoga articles, welcome. However, all the articles are fully-cited and have been carefully written; they are mainly in British English, which probably differs slightly from your personal diction, but doesn't mean their phraseology is incorrect. | |||
| On bibliographies, we generally don't attempt it: the literature on yoga is enormous, and Misplaced Pages is explicitly "not a catalogue" per policy (]), i.e. it is not our job to construct or maintain bibliographies, and in the case of yoga it would in any case be impossible. Therefore, please do not do anything in the direction of constructing a bibliography for any article on the WikiProject. | |||
| On "typology", it's to my ear an unattractive word, and (having a shelf of yoga books beside me) it's not one that I can recall being used either by yoga teachers in their books, or by scholars in theirs, at least for the usage you seem to wish to put it to. Further, Misplaced Pages has a clear policy of using plain words where these are available, so we should not use a polysyllabic latinate word where a short English word can do the job better. | |||
| I have accordingly reverted some of your proposed changes. I'm happy to discuss; I've brought over 30 of the project's articles through the formal review process to "Good Article" status, and have edited many more to a consistent standard, so we aren't starting from nowhere. As I said, the literature is vast, and there is always scope for improvement with new material from different sources, suitably cited; but as for the style and shape of the articles, that should not be modified without wide consensus, as it would imply sweeping change to reviewed materials. All the best, ] (]) 08:04, 29 March 2021 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:06, 31 August 2021
Indefinite block
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. El_C 09:37, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- The ANI discussion is at permalink. Johnuniq (talk) 01:00, 31 August 2021 (UTC)