| Revision as of 11:07, 18 January 2007 editBozMo (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users14,164 edits typo← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:34, 14 April 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (20 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''Delete all'''. ] <sup>(])</sup> 17:22, 26 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|Category}} | |||
| :{{la|Circled game}} - <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | :{{la|Circled game}} - <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | ||
| I am also nominating | I am also nominating as a batch | ||
| *] | |||
| * | |||
| *] | |||
| * | |||
| *] | |||
| * | |||
| *] | |||
| * | |||
| * | *] | ||
| * | *] | ||
| * | |||
| ⚫ | All of which appear to be shallow spambait articles created with the sole purpose of providing an external link to the same websites. The creator appears to be linked to the website (see ]) --] ] 11:43, 18 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' per nom, although alternatively I could see these being merged into a bigger article or a glossary of betting terms. Definitely not single-article material by any means. ] - <b><span style="color:#FF0000;">St</span><span style="color:#FF5500;">ar</span><span style="color:#FF8000;">bli</span><span style="color:#FFC000;">nd</span></b> 13:13, 18 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Keep'''. As long as these articles are on legitimate encyclopedia topics, there is no reason to delete. Spam links ''should'' be deleted anyway - problem solved. ] 13:42, 18 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Personally I don't think they are legitimate topics. They are a list of the different type of bets that online bookmakers use: they are at best non-notable product description aren't they? I accept I have no gaming knowledge but I cannot see how to expand them into any kind of decent article (except as a list of definitions a la Wiktionary)? --] ] 15:03, 18 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Merge'''. If they're legitimate, fine. But perhaps a number could be merged into a list of betting/gambling terms? That would take care of both the linking issue and the flood of articles at the same time.] 14:49, 18 January 2007 (UTC)<small>— ] (] • ]) has made ] outside this topic. </small> | |||
| *'''Delete All''' - no merge. None of the information is cited by reliable sources and none of it is more then a slightly long dictdef. ---] <small>(]/]/])</small> 17:20, 18 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete All''' Appears to be ], as with ].<small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | |||
| *'''Delete''' No sources, poss. OR, neologism. ] 16:06, 19 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete all'''. I don't see a notable encyclopedic topic among them. ] 16:17, 19 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete all''' spambait --] 15:37, 21 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
| ⚫ | All of which appear to be shallow spambait articles created with the sole purpose of providing an external link to the same |
||
Latest revision as of 03:34, 14 April 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete all. Kungfu Adam 17:22, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Circled game
I am also nominating as a batch
All of which appear to be shallow spambait articles created with the sole purpose of providing an external link to the same websites. The creator appears to be linked to the website (see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam#Reference_Spam.2C_8_Months_of_S.E.O.) --BozMo talk 11:43, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, although alternatively I could see these being merged into a bigger article or a glossary of betting terms. Definitely not single-article material by any means. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:13, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. As long as these articles are on legitimate encyclopedia topics, there is no reason to delete. Spam links should be deleted anyway - problem solved. GregorB 13:42, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- Personally I don't think they are legitimate topics. They are a list of the different type of bets that online bookmakers use: they are at best non-notable product description aren't they? I accept I have no gaming knowledge but I cannot see how to expand them into any kind of decent article (except as a list of definitions a la Wiktionary)? --BozMo talk 15:03, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- Merge. If they're legitimate, fine. But perhaps a number could be merged into a list of betting/gambling terms? That would take care of both the linking issue and the flood of articles at the same time.Young Skywalker 14:49, 18 January 2007 (UTC)— Young Skywalker (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Delete All - no merge. None of the information is cited by reliable sources and none of it is more then a slightly long dictdef. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 17:20, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete All Appears to be OR, as with Bounce back betting system.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Exarion (talk • contribs)
- Delete No sources, poss. OR, neologism. Pete.Hurd 16:06, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete all. I don't see a notable encyclopedic topic among them. Slideshow Bob 16:17, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete all spambait --Hu12 15:37, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.