| Revision as of 20:47, 7 April 2021 editBwadleruno (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users721 edits Update Information Literacy and Scholarly Discourse assignment detailsTag: dashboard.wikiedu.org [2.2]← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 12:19, 10 December 2024 edit undoTom.Reding (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Template editors3,861,616 editsm →top: Category:Articles with conflicting quality ratings: -Start, keep C; cleanupTag: AWB |
| (24 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{Notice|{{find}}}} |
|
{{Notice|{{find}}}} |
|
⚫ |
{{Afd-merged-from|Consciousness causes collapse|Consciousness causes collapse|22 February 2008|9 July 2008}} |
|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Paranormal|class=Start}} |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1= |
|
{{WikiProject Skepticism|class=C|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Paranormal}} |
|
{{WikiProject Philosophy|importance=mid|class=Start |
|
{{WikiProject Skepticism|importance=mid}} |
|
|logic=yes|religion=yes|eastern=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Philosophy|importance=mid|logic=yes|religion=yes|eastern=yes}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
| ⚫ |
{{afd-merged-from|Consciousness causes collapse|Consciousness causes collapse|22 February 2008|9 July 2008}} |
|
|
{{Merged-from|Consciousness causes collapse}} |
|
{{Merged-from|Consciousness causes collapse}} |
|
|
{{Press |
|
|
| subject = article |
|
|
| author = Stephen Harrison |
|
|
| title = How Quantum Theories Took Over TikTok |
|
|
| org = ] |
|
|
| url = https://slate.com/technology/2022/10/quantum-theories-nobel-prize-tiktok.html |
|
|
| date = 20 October 2022 |
|
|
| quote = Its article on “Quantum mysticism” explains that nonbelievers with expert knowledge consider it a “pseudoscience” and also references some pejorative terms such as "quantum quackery" and "quantum woo." That’s because respectable scientific journals—the kind of sources that are required for Misplaced Pages’s science articles—have not embraced these fringe interpretations. |
|
|
}} |
|
{{Archives|search=yes}} |
|
{{Archives|search=yes}} |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
| Line 20: |
Line 28: |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{clear}} |
|
{{clear}} |
|
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Misplaced Pages:Wiki_Ed/University_of_New_Orleans/Information_Literacy_and_Scholarly_Discourse_(Spring_2021) | assignments = ], ] | reviewers = ] | start_date = 2021-01-29 | end_date = 2021-05-04 }} |
|
|
== Edit war == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Weird phrasing and sources == |
|
{{talk quote|As for the page having two sets of rules, it doesn't: sources representing mainstream scientific thought have precedence over mysticism and fringe science. That should be a fairly simple rule to comprehend and abide by.|Kww}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A lot of this page feels like it poorly conforms to Misplaced Pages's general style and flow: clunky language, quotes strangely embedded in lines (generally a failure to paraphrase sources), etc. I'm thinking I may redo much of this page. ] (]) 02:18, 10 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
:Totally agree, this is a poor article. I'm not a physicist but have an interest in the subject, and agree that while it does tend to attract fringe ideas it is still a legitimate subject area and one with philosophical interest. ] (]) 21:36, 11 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
Quoted by ] (]) 05:05, 13 July 2020 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed with what the two above me have said, I have seen this article a few times, and each time it seems to have gotten worse. This is a legitimate topic of philosophical debate over what effect quantum mechanics has over the mind. It seems to be too one sided, and does not acknowledge that there are people with legitimate arguments on both sides. There are people like Henry Stapp and Fred Alan Wolf whose opinions on the topic are largely glossed over. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 07:50, 4 January 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
Although I was not part of the editing history of this page. It is clearly not a page on a definition of Quantum mysticism, but a biased debunking of Quantum mysticism. There is no evidence on the page indicating references that didn't debunk the subject would be allowed. The tone of it ranges from nonobjectivism to misrepresentative and insulting: Examples include; "Quackery and describing Fritjof Capra as a quantum metaphysicist, when he already has a wiki page with a more accurate description. <ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/Fritjof_Capra</ref> This article, in an effort to keep respect, should not be about validating or debunking the thought process of Quantum mysticism, but giving references that describe it. ] (]) 09:46, 6 February 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
{{reflist-talk}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:I agree with you but I also think that it’s better to have an article referring to the actual philosophical and metaphysical questions regarding quantum mechanics article referring to the ways in which the language of quantum mechanics is used in an improper way. Nonetheless this article does need cleaning up; I’ll start with the grammar. ] (]) 17:20, 5 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
:Ooh, reverse causation! Your contribution was answered by Tgeorgescu's contribution last year. In the edit history, it looks as if you answered what he wrote, but actually he answered what you wrote. --] (]) 12:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC) |
|
A lot of this page feels like it poorly conforms to Misplaced Pages's general style and flow: clunky language, quotes strangely embedded in lines (generally a failure to paraphrase sources), etc. I'm thinking I may redo much of this page. Kedra Bhaonne (talk) 02:18, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Agreed with what the two above me have said, I have seen this article a few times, and each time it seems to have gotten worse. This is a legitimate topic of philosophical debate over what effect quantum mechanics has over the mind. It seems to be too one sided, and does not acknowledge that there are people with legitimate arguments on both sides. There are people like Henry Stapp and Fred Alan Wolf whose opinions on the topic are largely glossed over. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.189.26.22 (talk) 07:50, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
