Talk:The Joy of Sect: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 06:48, 10 April 2021 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk \| contribs)Bots, Template editors2,293,067 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:The Joy of Sect/Archive 2) (bot← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 01:19, 11 December 2024 edit undoZ1720 (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators29,335 edits →WP:URFA/2020 notes: re: I am at my limit at FAR
(8 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{talk header}}		{{talk header}}
			{{Article history
	{{ArticleHistory
	\|action1=GAN		\|action1=GAN
	\|action1date=October 27, 2007		\|action1date=October 27, 2007
Line 24:		Line 24:
	\|action4oldid=190189122		\|action4oldid=190189122
	\|action4result=promoted		\|action4result=promoted
		⚫	\|ftname=The Simpsons (season 9)

		⚫	\|currentstatus=FA
	\|action5=WPR
	\|action5date=30 April 2010
	\|action5link=Misplaced Pages:Today's featured article/April 30, 2010
	\|action5result=Maindate
	\|action5oldid=359161714

⚫	\|ftname=The Simpsons (season 9)
	\|topic=socsci		\|topic=socsci
	\|maindate=30 April 2010		\|maindate=30 April 2010
⚫	\|currentstatus=FA
	}}		}}
			{{WikiProject banner shell\|collapsed=yes\|class=FA\|1=
	{{WikiProjectBannerShell\|1=
	{{WikiProject Animation~~\|class=FA~~\|importance=Low\|American-animation=yes\|American-animation-importance=Low\|portal1-name=Animation\|portal1-link=Selected article/89}}		{{WikiProject Animation\|importance=Low\|American-animation=yes\|American-animation-importance=Low\|portal1-name=Animation\|portal1-link=Selected article/89}}
	{{WikiProject Comedy}}		{{WikiProject Comedy \|importance=Low}}
	{{~~WPReligion\|class=FA~~\|importance=Low\|NRM=yes\|NRMImp=low}}		{{WikiProject Religion\|importance=Low\|NRM=yes\|NRMImp=low}}
	{{WikiProject Scientology~~\|class=FA~~\|importance=Low}}		{{WikiProject Scientology\|importance=Low}}
	{{WikiProject Television~~\|class=FA~~\|importance=low\|episode-coverage=yes\|episode-coverage-importance=low}}		{{WikiProject Television\|importance=low\|episode-coverage=yes\|episode-coverage-importance=low}}
	{{WikiProject The Simpsons~~\|class=FA~~\|importance=Mid}}		{{WikiProject The Simpsons\|importance=Mid}}
	}}		}}
	{{User:MiszaBot/config		{{User:MiszaBot/config
Line 63:		Line 57:

	This seems to be an important episode and has specific sources that allow for a decent article. However, other parts such as the reception section are extremely lacking. It will need work to remain a ]. ] (]) 18:02, 8 April 2021 (UTC)		This seems to be an important episode and has specific sources that allow for a decent article. However, other parts such as the reception section are extremely lacking. It will need work to remain a ]. ] (]) 18:02, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
			:{{ping\|Heartfox}} Do you still have concerns about this article? If so, would you like to bring this to FAR? ] (]) 01:03, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
			::{{ping\|Heartfox}} and {{ping\|Z1720}} The errors in the article have not yet been corrected, it has been three years since this comment was published, so it would be better to put it in FAR since the article has aged quite a bit. ] (]) 21:22, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
			:::I have 5 articles at FAR, which is the limit any one editor can nominate at FAR. I can add this to my list but it would take at least a month for me to nominate this. If someone else would like to bring this to FAR, I can help you with that process. ] (]) 18:02, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
			{{ping\|Z1720}} It's been a month now, now I'm wondering if you'd put it on FAR in case the article is really bad (like this one). But anyway, let me know what you think about it. ] (]) 18:27, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
			*FAR only lets editors post five articles at a time. I am at my limit, and have other articles on my list to nominate. However, if you create an account, you are welcome to nominate this to FAR and probably give a better explanation than me on what this article needs to get back to FA status. ] (]) 01:19, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 01:19, 11 December 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Joy of Sect article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days

The Joy of Sect is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Misplaced Pages community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

The Joy of Sect is part of the The Simpsons (season 9) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Misplaced Pages community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 30, 2010.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 27, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
November 2, 2007	Peer review	Reviewed
November 26, 2007	Featured article candidate	Promoted
February 10, 2008	Featured topic candidate	Promoted
Current status: Featured article

This article is rated FA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Animation: American Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been selected for use on the Animation portal.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion: New religious movements Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Misplaced Pages's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by New religious movements work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Scientology Low‑importance

	This article is supported by WikiProject Scientology, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of Scientology. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on Scientology-related topics. See WikiProject Scientology and Misplaced Pages:Contributing FAQ.ScientologyWikipedia:WikiProject ScientologyTemplate:WikiProject ScientologyScientology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Misplaced Pages articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

The Simpsons Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject The Simpsons, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to The Simpsons on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.The SimpsonsWikipedia:WikiProject The SimpsonsTemplate:WikiProject The SimpsonsThe Simpsons

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

edit

Collaboration: Featured topic Drive
Copyedit:
Merge:
Cleanup: Ralph Wiggum, Milhouse Van Houten
Shorten plot synopsis:
Free-use images: Jon Vitti, Pamela Hayden, Greg Daniels, Ian Maxtone-Graham, Jim Reardon, Alf Clausen
Reference: Bongo Comics Group, The Heartbroke Kid, World of Springfield
Expand: The Simpsons Theme, Bongo Comics, Mark Kirkland, Jim Reardon, The Simpsons: Tapped Out
Stubs: Neil Affleck, Bob Anderson (director), Wes Archer, J. Stewart Burns More...

WP:URFA/2020 notes

Reviewing for WP:URFA/2020.

Does the lead need to be so choppy? I think it's okay to move the last sentence up and create a paragraph. It is not given who the Movementarians are; I assume they're the cult that takes over Springfield, but that should be given in the first sentence then.
It is not understood who Bart, Homer, or Marge are in the plot section. There's no wikilinks or descriptions of the characters (simple things like father, mother, son, etc.). What is the Forbidden Barn? We need some descriptions. "she finds Reverend Lovejoy, Ned Flanders, and Groundskeeper Willie"—are these townspeople? who are they? we shouldn't rely on links for everything.
Some of the cultural references could be integrated in to the production section.
The reception section is troubling. Most sentences never explain what the main view of the critic was, other than it was "highlighted". It is almost formatted like a list (but definitely shouldn't be).
FACTnet does not seem to be an appropriate source, nor a lesson plan.
fn 8 is missing page numbers.

This seems to be an important episode and has specific sources that allow for a decent article. However, other parts such as the reception section are extremely lacking. It will need work to remain a featured article. Heartfox (talk) 18:02, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

@Heartfox: Do you still have concerns about this article? If so, would you like to bring this to FAR? Z1720 (talk) 01:03, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

@Heartfox: and @Z1720: The errors in the article have not yet been corrected, it has been three years since this comment was published, so it would be better to put it in FAR since the article has aged quite a bit. 181.204.42.146 (talk) 21:22, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

I have 5 articles at FAR, which is the limit any one editor can nominate at FAR. I can add this to my list but it would take at least a month for me to nominate this. If someone else would like to bring this to FAR, I can help you with that process. Z1720 (talk) 18:02, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

@Z1720: It's been a month now, now I'm wondering if you'd put it on FAR in case the article is really bad (like this one). But anyway, let me know what you think about it. 181.204.42.146 (talk) 18:27, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

FAR only lets editors post five articles at a time. I am at my limit, and have other articles on my list to nominate. However, if you create an account, you are welcome to nominate this to FAR and probably give a better explanation than me on what this article needs to get back to FA status. Z1720 (talk) 01:19, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Categories: