| Revision as of 03:00, 12 April 2021 editBasedMises (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers956 edits Added a new sectionTag: Visual edit← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:32, 10 November 2024 edit undoAtomvinter (talk | contribs)77 editsm →Criticisms | ||
| (13 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Short description|1920 article by Ludwig Von Mises}} | |||
| ] | ] | ||
| {{italic title}} | |||
| '''''Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth''''' is an article by ] economist ]. Its ] in a ] triggered the decades-long ].<ref>{{cite book|last=Hacohen|first=Malachi Haim|year=2002|title=Karl Popper – The Formative Years, 1902-1945: Politics and Philosophy in Interwar Vienna|edition=reprint|publisher=]|isbn=978-0-521-89055-7|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3VtHcYGp2pIC&pg=PA477|page=477}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{cite web|url=https://mises.org/library/economic-calculation-socialist-commonwealth|title=Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth|publisher=Mises Institute|accessdate=27 April 2010}}</ref> | |||
| The article was first published 1920 in German under the title ''Die Wirtschaftsrechnung im sozialistischen Gemeinwesen''<ref name="Huerta de Soto"/> and based on a lecture Mises gave in 1919 as a response to a book by ], arguing for the feasibility of central planning.<ref name="Huerta de Soto">{{cite book|last=Huerta de Soto|first=Jesús|year=2010|title=Socialism, Economic Calculation and Entrepreneurship|publisher=Edward Elgar Publishing|isbn=978-1-84980-065-5|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OHcxcMHlXdgC&pg=PA103|pages=103–104}}</ref> Two years later, the essay was incorporated into Mises's book '']''. | The article was first published 1920 in German under the title ''Die Wirtschaftsrechnung im sozialistischen Gemeinwesen''<ref name="Huerta de Soto"/> and based on a lecture Mises gave in 1919 as a response to a book by ], arguing for the feasibility of central planning.<ref name="Huerta de Soto">{{cite book|last=Huerta de Soto|first=Jesús|year=2010|title=Socialism, Economic Calculation and Entrepreneurship|publisher=Edward Elgar Publishing|isbn=978-1-84980-065-5|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OHcxcMHlXdgC&pg=PA103|pages=103–104}}</ref> Two years later, the essay was incorporated into Mises's book '']''. | ||
| The Mises Institute has a , with ], ] and ] variants. | |||
| == Synopsis == | == Synopsis == | ||
| Mises laid out that economic calculation requires |
Mises laid out that economic calculation requires two fundamental things | ||
| # A medium of exchange (i.e money)<ref name=":0" /> | # A medium of exchange (i.e money)<ref name=":0" /> | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| According to Mises, although it is possible to perform ] in a proficient manner without these two requirements present, very few circumstances exist. These circumstances include economic calculation within a household. | According to Mises, although it is possible to perform ] in a proficient manner without these two requirements present, very few circumstances exist. These circumstances include economic calculation within a household. | ||
| To him, ] analysis is not hard to do on a personal scale. It is not hard to pick between a certain amount of wine and a certain amount of oil. However, because marginal utility is not homogeneous and universal, people will have different preferences. For example, a ] may prefer oil to ], whereas an ] may prefer wine. Thus the ] or bureaucrat will have trouble distributing resources as prices cannot be set without markets as prices reflect the supply and demand of goods, labour and resources. Buying and selling consumer goods within a socialist state will simply be internal transfers of goods and not "objects of exchange", which sets the ] out of order.<ref name=":0" /> | To him, ] analysis is not hard to do on a personal scale. It is not hard to pick between a certain amount of wine and a certain amount of oil. However, because ] is not homogeneous and universal, people will have different preferences. For example, a ] may prefer oil to ], whereas an ] may prefer wine. Thus the ] or bureaucrat will have trouble distributing resources as prices cannot be set without markets as prices reflect the supply and demand of goods, labour and resources. Buying and selling consumer goods within a socialist state will simply be internal transfers of goods and not "objects of exchange", which sets the ] out of order.<ref name=":0" /> | ||
| Mises thought that Economic Calculation is only possible (outside of extremely limited circumstances) by information provided by market prices, which reflects the changes of individual subjective values. Bureaucratic, centrally planned methods of resource allocation are inherently irrational and do not allocate resources in the most efficient method, which means that economic calculation in a socialist commonwealth is impossible. Because of the economist's idea that ] is imperative and crucial, the socialist economy is also impossible.<ref name=":0" /> | Mises thought that Economic Calculation is only possible (outside of extremely limited circumstances) by information provided by market prices, which reflects the changes of individual subjective values. Bureaucratic, centrally planned methods of resource allocation are inherently irrational and do not allocate resources in the most efficient method, which means that economic calculation in a socialist commonwealth is impossible. Because of the economist's idea that ] is imperative and crucial, the socialist economy is also impossible.<ref name=":0" /> | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| == Criticisms == | == Criticisms == | ||
| === Left |
=== Left-wing criticism === | ||
| Marxist computer programmer ] argues that economic calculation is possible within a socialist state as long as computational devices are used. In "''Towards a New Socialism'''s "Information and Economics: A Critique of Hayek" and "Against Mises", he argues that central planning is simplified by the use of computers |
Marxist computer programmer ] argues that economic calculation is possible within a socialist state as long as computational devices are used. In "''Towards a New Socialism'''s "Information and Economics: A Critique of Hayek" and "Against Mises", he argues that central planning is simplified by the use of computers in calculating the component of price not accounted for by Marxian ]. <ref>{{Cite book|last=Cockshott|first=Paul|title=Towards a New Socialism|publisher=Coronet Books|year=1993}}</ref> | ||
| === Right |
=== Right-wing criticism === | ||
| One of the few "non-Austrian" ], ], argues that Mises is unable to prove why the socialist economy would be "impossible". |
One of the few "non-Austrian" ], ], argues that Mises is unable to prove why the socialist economy would be "impossible". While agreeing with the concept of a calculation problem he argues that the ] employs it indistinctly.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web|title=Why I Am Not an Austrian Economist|url=https://econfaculty.gmu.edu/bcaplan/whyaust.htm|access-date=2021-03-24|website=econfaculty.gmu.edu}}</ref> ] argues that:<blockquote>"Ever since Mises, Austrians have overused the ]. In the absence of detailed ] showing that ''this'' particular problem is the most important one, it is just another argument out of hundreds on the list of arguments against socialism. How do we know that the problem of work effort, or innovation, or the underground economy, or any number of other problems were not more important than the calculation problem? | ||
| The collapse of Communism has led Austrians to loudly proclaim that 'Mises was right.' Yes, he was right that ] was a terrible economic system - and only the collapse of Communism has shown us how bad it really was. However, current events do nothing to show that economic calculation was ''the'' insuperable difficulty of socialist economies. There is no natural experiment of a socialist economy that suffered solely from its lack of economic calculation. Thus, economic history as well as pure economic theory fails to establish that the economic calculation problem was a severe challenge for socialism."<ref name=":1" /></blockquote> | The collapse of Communism has led Austrians to loudly proclaim that 'Mises was right.' Yes, he was right that ] was a terrible economic system - and only the collapse of Communism has shown us how bad it really was. However, current events do nothing to show that economic calculation was ''the'' insuperable difficulty of socialist economies. There is no natural experiment of a socialist economy that suffered solely from its lack of economic calculation. Thus, economic history as well as pure economic theory fails to establish that the economic calculation problem was a severe challenge for socialism."<ref name=":1" /></blockquote> | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| Many consider ''Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth'' to be Mises's most influential work, while others view '']'' to be more important of a book, as it fills the '']'' role. | Many consider ''Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth'' to be Mises's most influential work, while others view '']'' to be more important of a book, as it fills the '']'' role. | ||
| ], an ] ] considers it to be among his best works. He writes:<blockquote>"The significance of Mises's 1920 article extends far beyond its devastating demonstration of the impossibility of socialist economy and society. It provides the rationale for the price system, purely free markets, the security of private property against all encroachments, and sound money. Its thesis will continue to be relevant as long as economists and policy-makers want to understand why even minor government economic interventions consistently fail to achieve socially beneficial results. "Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth" surely ranks among the most important economic articles written this century."<ref name=":0" /></blockquote> | ], an ] ] considers it to be among his best works. He writes:<blockquote>"The significance of Mises's 1920 article extends far beyond its devastating demonstration of the impossibility of socialist economy and society. It provides the rationale for the price system, purely free markets, the security of private property against all encroachments, and sound money. Its thesis will continue to be relevant as long as economists and policy-makers want to understand why even minor government economic interventions consistently fail to achieve socially beneficial results. "Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth" surely ranks among the most important economic articles written this century."<ref name=":0" /></blockquote> | ||
| == See also == | == See also == | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | |||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | ] | ||
Latest revision as of 18:32, 10 November 2024
1920 article by Ludwig Von Mises
Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth is an article by Austrian School economist Ludwig von Mises. Its critique against economic calculation in a centrally planned economy triggered the decades-long economic calculation debate.
The article was first published 1920 in German under the title Die Wirtschaftsrechnung im sozialistischen Gemeinwesen and based on a lecture Mises gave in 1919 as a response to a book by Otto Neurath, arguing for the feasibility of central planning. Two years later, the essay was incorporated into Mises's book Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis.
Synopsis
Mises laid out that economic calculation requires two fundamental things
- A medium of exchange (i.e money)
- Markets
According to Mises, although it is possible to perform economic calculation in a proficient manner without these two requirements present, very few circumstances exist. These circumstances include economic calculation within a household.
To him, cost-benefit analysis is not hard to do on a personal scale. It is not hard to pick between a certain amount of wine and a certain amount of oil. However, because marginal utility is not homogeneous and universal, people will have different preferences. For example, a teetotaler may prefer oil to wine, whereas an alcoholic may prefer wine. Thus the central planner or bureaucrat will have trouble distributing resources as prices cannot be set without markets as prices reflect the supply and demand of goods, labour and resources. Buying and selling consumer goods within a socialist state will simply be internal transfers of goods and not "objects of exchange", which sets the price mechanism out of order.
Mises thought that Economic Calculation is only possible (outside of extremely limited circumstances) by information provided by market prices, which reflects the changes of individual subjective values. Bureaucratic, centrally planned methods of resource allocation are inherently irrational and do not allocate resources in the most efficient method, which means that economic calculation in a socialist commonwealth is impossible. Because of the economist's idea that cost-benefit analysis is imperative and crucial, the socialist economy is also impossible.
Criticisms
Left-wing criticism
Marxist computer programmer Paul Cockshott argues that economic calculation is possible within a socialist state as long as computational devices are used. In "Towards a New Socialism's "Information and Economics: A Critique of Hayek" and "Against Mises", he argues that central planning is simplified by the use of computers in calculating the component of price not accounted for by Marxian labor theories of value.
Right-wing criticism
One of the few "non-Austrian" anarcho-capitalists, Bryan Caplan, argues that Mises is unable to prove why the socialist economy would be "impossible". While agreeing with the concept of a calculation problem he argues that the Austrian School employs it indistinctly. Caplan argues that:
"Ever since Mises, Austrians have overused the economic calculation argument. In the absence of detailed empirical evidence showing that this particular problem is the most important one, it is just another argument out of hundreds on the list of arguments against socialism. How do we know that the problem of work effort, or innovation, or the underground economy, or any number of other problems were not more important than the calculation problem? The collapse of Communism has led Austrians to loudly proclaim that 'Mises was right.' Yes, he was right that socialism was a terrible economic system - and only the collapse of Communism has shown us how bad it really was. However, current events do nothing to show that economic calculation was the insuperable difficulty of socialist economies. There is no natural experiment of a socialist economy that suffered solely from its lack of economic calculation. Thus, economic history as well as pure economic theory fails to establish that the economic calculation problem was a severe challenge for socialism."
Influence
Many consider Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth to be Mises's most influential work, while others view Human Action: A Treatise on Economics to be more important of a book, as it fills the magnum opus role.
Joseph T Salerno, an American Austrian school economist considers it to be among his best works. He writes:
"The significance of Mises's 1920 article extends far beyond its devastating demonstration of the impossibility of socialist economy and society. It provides the rationale for the price system, purely free markets, the security of private property against all encroachments, and sound money. Its thesis will continue to be relevant as long as economists and policy-makers want to understand why even minor government economic interventions consistently fail to achieve socially beneficial results. "Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth" surely ranks among the most important economic articles written this century."
See also
- Economic calculation problem
- Socialist calculation debate
- Cost–benefit analysis
- Austrian School
- Ludwig von Mises
- Criticism of Socialism
References
- Hacohen, Malachi Haim (2002). Karl Popper – The Formative Years, 1902-1945: Politics and Philosophy in Interwar Vienna (reprint ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 477. ISBN 978-0-521-89055-7.
- ^ "Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth". Mises Institute. Retrieved 27 April 2010.
- ^ Huerta de Soto, Jesús (2010). Socialism, Economic Calculation and Entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar Publishing. pp. 103–104. ISBN 978-1-84980-065-5.
- Cockshott, Paul (1993). Towards a New Socialism. Coronet Books.
- ^ "Why I Am Not an Austrian Economist". econfaculty.gmu.edu. Retrieved 2021-03-24.