Revision as of 21:26, 19 January 2007 editSmee (talk | contribs)28,728 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:55, 18 February 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,295,388 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "FA" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Film}}, {{WikiProject Religion}}, {{WikiProject Journalism}}, {{WikiProject Prem Rawat}}.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion | ||
(297 intermediate revisions by 35 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{Talk header}} | ||
{{Article history | |||
{{Film|class=Stub}} | |||
|action1=GAN | |||
|action1date=December 1, 2007 | |||
|action1link=Talk:Lord of the Universe (documentary)#GA Pass | |||
|action1result=Listed | |||
|action1oldid=174281604 | |||
|action2=PR | |||
Thanks for a well researched and meticulously sourced article. I will add some more material to provide some needed context. ] <small>]</small> 16:01, 19 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
|action2date=December 6, 2007 | |||
:You are most welcome. Do you have hyperlinks for these reviews you have added? I fear that there may be quoted portions of the reviews missing, and quotes in place appearing out of context. Also, the Dupont Award is very notable and should be mentioned early in the article. I will place the WIP tag. PLEASE respect. ] 18:45, 19 January 2007 (UTC). | |||
|action2link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Lord of the Universe (documentary)/archive1 | |||
|action2result=Reviewed | |||
|action2oldid=176152080 | |||
|action3=FAC | |||
:No, I do not have URLs of free online sources. I use several online databases that require payment. | |||
|action3date=01:35, 10 April 2008 | |||
#I have restored the context for Offman as it is pertinent to the article. True, people can hyperlink, but there is no harm in providing context for Hoffman and Davies which you described in your edit as an "activist". | |||
|action3link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Lord of the Universe | |||
#<s>I have moved the award to the appropriate section rather than the lead, as done with many other award-winning documentaries. </s> | |||
|action3result=promoted | |||
#I re-ordered the reviews in chronological fashion of their appearance as before. Could you also please provide the exact date for the Los Angeles Times review? Otherwise is not verifiable. ] <small>]</small> 20:05, 19 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
|action3oldid=204585044 | |||
:I will work on getting the citation date. I will restore the Awards section. This is common for most films articles. ] 20:40, 19 January 2007 (UTC). | |||
|action4=WPR | |||
::I already did. It is now in the lead. I understand that there is a review that was published on The Christian Science Monitor, but I cannot locate it. Maybe you could? ] <small>]</small> 20:41, 19 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
|action4date=2 February 2011 | |||
:::Thank you for that information. I will try. ] 20:51, 19 January 2007 (UTC). | |||
|action4link=Misplaced Pages:Today's featured article/February 2, 2011 | |||
|action4result=Maindate | |||
|action4oldid=411674073 | |||
|topic=Socsci | |||
Can you explain why you removed the text and described my edits as "POV pushing", when the fact is that ] was one of the ] and notable because of that? I would also appreciate that rather than making such opinions in edit summaries, you address your concerns in talk. ] <small>]</small> 21:14, 19 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
|currentstatus=FA | |||
:That is NOT what Abbie Hoffman is most known for. He is most know for his book, ''Steal this Book''. At any rate, that is not something for us to decide, that is for the editors of the ] article to decide over there. Allow the reader to read the article there, and don't try to denigrate him here with a few words of POV pushing. It is inappropriate. ] 21:26, 19 January 2007 (UTC). | |||
|maindate=2 February 2011 | |||
}} | |||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=FA|1= | |||
{{WikiProject Film|American-task-force=yes|Documentary=yes}} | |||
{{WikiProject Religion|importance=Low}} | |||
{{WikiProject Journalism|importance=Low}} | |||
{{WikiProject Prem Rawat| importance =mid}} | |||
}} | |||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
|maxarchivesize = 250K | |||
|counter = 1 | |||
|minthreadsleft = 1 | |||
|algo = old(30d) | |||
|archive = Talk:Lord of the Universe/Archive %(counter)d | |||
}} | |||
{{Archive box|auto=long}} | |||
== External links modified == | |||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, | |||
I have just modified one external link on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes: | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927213634/http://www.vdb.org/smackn.acgi%24tapedetail?LORDOFTHEU to http://www.vdb.org/smackn.acgi%24tapedetail?LORDOFTHEU | |||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. | |||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} | |||
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 23:02, 25 May 2017 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 02:55, 18 February 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lord of the Universe article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Lord of the Universe is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Misplaced Pages community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 2, 2011. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated FA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Archives | |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lord of the Universe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927213634/http://www.vdb.org/smackn.acgi%24tapedetail?LORDOFTHEU to http://www.vdb.org/smackn.acgi%24tapedetail?LORDOFTHEU
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:02, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Categories:- Misplaced Pages featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- Old requests for peer review
- FA-Class film articles
- FA-Class Documentary films articles
- Documentary films task force articles
- FA-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- FA-Class Religion articles
- Low-importance Religion articles
- WikiProject Religion articles
- FA-Class Journalism articles
- Low-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles