| Revision as of 07:38, 13 May 2021 editAdamantine123 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers28,935 editsNo edit summaryTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:47, 4 May 2022 edit undoSpicy (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators63,466 edits Archiving case section to w:en:Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Showbiz826/Archive (using spihelper.js)Tag: Replaced | ||
| (160 intermediate revisions by 32 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| {{SPIarchive notice|1=Showbiz826|crosswiki=yes}} | {{SPIarchive notice|1=Showbiz826|crosswiki=yes}} | ||
| {{SPIpriorcases}} | {{SPIpriorcases}} | ||
| ===10 May 2021=== | |||
| {{SPI case status|completed}} | |||
| ====Suspected sockpuppets==== | |||
| * {{checkuser|1=Sikandar khan67}} | |||
| <!-- You may duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts--> | |||
| *'''Tools''': <span class="plainlinks"> • • </span> <small>''Auto-generated every hour.''</small> | |||
| The pattern is simple. Removal of same content from Rajput related pages. Interestingly, the another sock of the sockmaster did same edit ] (]) 11:58, 10 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
| ====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== | |||
| <small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | |||
| This has to be a joke the content is being removed from the article by other concerned user because its just so derogatory to the community. And secondly my and that alleged socks edits dont even match, and better discuss the dispute on talk page instead of filling a dubious report i can do the same, i even know whose you're a sockpuppet of. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 12:28, 10 May 2021 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| *'''Comment''' - There's some similarities behavior wise. The general aggressive attitude matches what you see from Showbiz in general. The demand for good faith while reverting always back to their preferred version (and ignoring ]) a Showbiz trait, but it's also a trait of other nationalist / caste POV editors. The between Sikandar khan67 and other Showbiz socks is there, but not extensive. Likewise, the hostility you'd get from Showbiz and socks ( on this page for example. | |||
| :With regards to the edit mentioned on ], it was also , another prior sock. It's also been made by other editors , , , and then I stopped. Most of those edits are unlikely to have been Showbiz. Overall, I think it's possible this is Showbiz but it's at least as likely to just be another caste POV editor. I think they ARE a sock of somebody though - "Utterly unsourced puffery and promotional content removed" as the edit summary on their fifth edit is not something from a new editor. is not something you'd expect from a new editor either.<!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 12:53, May 10, 2021 (UTC)</span> | |||
| :::Yes, one can check ] page. Other editors who were sock of showbiz also tried to remove same sourced content with same pretext. ] (]) 23:22, 10 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
| ::CU said we are from same country (You're also from india aswell it doesn't mean we're both same) and different Geolocations , india is seventh largest country with 1.3billion people and having different geolocations is a proof that we both aren't same.] (]) 01:39, 11 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
| {{Od}}A lot of other evidences also point towards you being a sock. As for example ]. The article was deleted when a ] nominated it for delition and other ] repeatedly voted there. It is not difficult for me to believe that either You are using multiple accounts or engaged in ]. ] (]) 02:56, 11 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
| ::There must be a connection between {{U|Heybata}}, {{u|Pintu the dude}} and {{noping|Sikandar Khan67}} who ] as how a new user knows about that delition discussion unless he is not aware of my work and me. ] (]) 03:05, 11 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
| :::What you're engaging in is called Red Herring Fallacy, Please stick to the topic which is your accusation that I'm sockpuppet of showbiz,the only accusation I'm defending myself against, you're diverting the topic by changing your position and attacking the position which i dont hold anyway hence your argument is a strawman.] (]) 04:28, 11 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
| And please see this user interaction my edits and showbiz socks's edits don't even overlap at any other articles except for my single edit on ], and another minor edit on ] page. Which is still a extremely low overlap ratio given the number of socks showbiz used. And CU has proved that I'm at different geolocation away from showbiz ,i cant be him,i believe the case should be closed as theres just so little similarities between me and showbiz. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 04:45, 11 May 2021 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| {{tq|To be very honest, there is very little to no similarity between the two accounts. Infact all recent socks (Post-January 2021) doesn't look Showbiz socks either. Such things are very annoying for the blocked user who might be following a ] and such ill-minded reports (again & again) only keep on disturbing the process. (Even last SPI report filled was nowhere similar to Showbiz). Don't tag any uninvolved editor as socks whom edits you don't like. Thank you very much.}}] (]) 10:40, 11 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
| ::::The alleged sock has made only 150 edits and user interaction report has nothing to say at this point of time. Let them be extended confirmed, we will witness a lot of pov pushing edits and edit warring on ] pages. ] (]) 14:12, 11 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
| :::::{{u|Heba Aisha}}, they've been given the discretionary sanctions notice for India/Pakistan/Afghanistan area, and I also left the general sanctions notice for South Asian social groups, which includes caste related articles. If they start POV pushing, the sanctions available from each of those remedies is in place. Don't hesitate. Note that goes for ALL sides - play nicely. ''']''' (]) 16:08, 11 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
| '''Big evidence, we've mistaken''' | |||
| :], to CU, admins and reviewer who want to save time. Consider this. ] (]) 07:38, 13 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
| ====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== | |||
| *{{possible}}. Same country, different geolocations. ]<sup><small><b>] ]</b></small></sup> 15:46, 10 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
| ----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> | |||
Latest revision as of 00:47, 4 May 2022
Showbiz826
Showbiz826 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Showbiz826/Archive.
This SPI case may involve cross-wiki abuse. Please consider reporting the results on Meta; checkusers can send an email to the interwiki checkuser mailing list if required.