Misplaced Pages

Peter Daszak: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:08, 13 May 2021 editPeterSweden (talk | contribs)26 editsNo edit summaryTag: Reverted← Previous edit Latest revision as of 22:40, 18 October 2024 edit undoJoyous! (talk | contribs)Administrators81,044 editsm Reverted 1 edit by 78.16.147.234 (talk) to last revision by Pipe058Tags: Twinkle Undo 
(325 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|British-American zoologist}} {{short description|British zoologist}}
{{use mdy dates|date=May 2020}} {{Use dmy dates|date=August 2021}}
{{Infobox person
'''Peter Daszak''' is a British ] and an expert on ], in particular on ]. He is currently president of ], a ] ] that supports various programs on ] and pandemic prevention with headquarters in ]. He is a researcher, consultant, and public expert in the cause and spread of zoonotic disease outbreaks like that of ] (contested<ref> ResearchGate. Retrieved May 05, 2021; et al.</ref> <ref> Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Retrieved May 05, 2021 </ref>), ], ], and other zoonoses.<ref>{{Cite web|last=|first=|date=|title=Peter Daszak Profile on ResearchGate|url=https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/Peter-Daszak-2161603937|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=|website=]}}</ref>
| name = Peter Daszak
| image = Peter Daszak 2017 01.jpg
|caption= Daszak speaking in 2017
| nationality = British
| education = ] (]) <br /> ] (])
| employer = ]<br />]<br />]<br />]
| occupation = Zoologist
}}

'''Peter Daszak''' is a British ], consultant and public expert on ], in particular on ]. He is the president of ], a ] ] that supports various programs on ] and pandemic prevention.<ref>, EcoHealth Alliance</ref><ref name=":2">{{Cite web|title=Peter Daszak, PhD|url=https://www.publichealth.columbia.edu/research/center-infection-and-immunity/peter-daszak-phd|url-status=live|archive-url=https://archive.today/20210526181603/https://www.publichealth.columbia.edu/research/center-infection-and-immunity/peter-daszak-phd|archive-date=26 May 2021|access-date=26 May 2021|website=]}}</ref> He is also a member of the Center for Infection and Immunity at the ].<ref name=":2" /><ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221215012544/https://www.publichealth.columbia.edu/research/center-infection-and-immunity/faculty |date=15 December 2022 }}, Columbia Public Health</ref> He lives in ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-04-12/coronavirus-attention-impeachment-primaries-kobe|title=Impeachment. Primaries. Kobe. Coronavirus rushed in while our focus was elsewhere|author=James Rainey |author2=Kiera Feldman |website=] |date=12 Apr 2020|access-date=22 June 2022}}</ref>

Daszak was involved in investigations into the initial outbreak which eventually developed into the ]<ref name=":3">{{Cite news|last=Quinn|first=Jimmy|date=25 May 2021|title=The Growing Scrutiny of Peter Daszak's Chinese Research Collaboration|work=]|url=https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/the-growing-scrutiny-of-peter-daszaks-chinese-research-collaboration/}}</ref> and became a member of the ] team sent to ] in China.


==Education== ==Education==
Daszak earned a ] in Zoology in 1987 at ], and a Ph.D. in ] in 1994 at ].<ref name="columbia">{{cite web|url= https://www.mailman.columbia.edu/research/center-infection-and-immunity/peter-daszak-phd |title= Peter Daszak, PhD |access-date=April 20, 2020|work=]}}</ref> Daszak earned a ] in zoology in 1987, at ] and a Ph.D. in ] in 1994 at ].<ref name=":2" />


==Career== ==Career==
Daszak worked at the School of Life Sciences, Kingston University, in Surrey, England in the 1990s. In the late 1990s Daszak moved to the United States and was affiliated with the ] at the ] and the ], Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in ], ]. Later he became executive director at a collaborative ] in ], the Consortium for Conservation Medicine. He holds adjunct positions at several universities in the U.S. and the U.K., including the ].<ref name="columbia"/> Daszak worked at the School of Life Sciences, ], in Surrey, England in the 1990s. In the late 1990s Daszak moved to the United States and was affiliated with the ] at the ] and the ], in ], ]. Around 2001 he became executive director at a collaborative ] in ], the Consortium for Conservation Medicine.<ref>{{cite web |title=Peter Daszak |url=https://www.tedmed.com/speakers/show?id=6500 |website=TEDMED |publisher=TED |access-date=5 September 2021}}</ref> He has adjunct positions at two universities in the U.K. and three universities in the U.S., including the ] Mailman School of Public Health.<ref name=":2" /><ref>, Columbia University Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Biology Department</ref>


He was one of the early adopters of ].<ref name="BioS_Norris_2001">{{Cite journal| doi = 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)0512.0.CO;2| issn = 0006-3568| volume = 51| issue = 1| pages = 7–12| last = Norris| first = Scott| title = A New Voice in ConservationConservation medicine seeks to bring ecologists, veterinarians, and doctors together around a simple unifying concept: health| journal = BioScience| access-date = May 10, 2020| date = January 1, 2001| url = https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/51/1/7/251893| doi-access = free}}</ref> The ] symposium in 2000, had focused on the "complex problem of emerging diseases".<ref name="BioS_Norris_2001"/> He said in 2001 that there were "almost no examples of emerging wildlife diseases not driven by human environmental change...nd few human emerging diseases don't include some domestic animal or wildlife component." His research has focused on investigating and predicting the impacts of new diseases on wildlife, livestock, and human populations, and he has been involved in research studies on epidemics such as the ], the ] virus, ], ], and the ].<ref name="ted1">{{cite web|url= https://www.tedmed.com/speakers/show?id=6500 |title= Peter Daszak |access-date=April 20, 2020|work=]}}</ref> He was one of the early adopters of ].<ref name="BioS_Norris_2001">{{Cite journal| doi = 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)0512.0.CO;2| issn = 0006-3568| volume = 51| issue = 1| pages = 7–12| last = Norris| first = Scott| title = A New Voice in ConservationConservation medicine seeks to bring ecologists, veterinarians, and doctors together around a simple unifying concept: health| journal = BioScience| date = 1 January 2001| doi-access = free}}</ref> The ] symposium in 2000, had focused on the "complex problem of emerging diseases".<ref name="BioS_Norris_2001"/> He said in 2001 that there were "almost no examples of emerging wildlife diseases not driven by human environmental change...nd few human emerging diseases don't include some domestic animal or wildlife component." His research has focused on investigating and predicting the impacts of new diseases on wildlife, livestock, and human populations, and he has been involved in research studies on epidemics such as the ], the ], the ], ], and the ].<ref name="ted1">{{cite web|url= https://www.tedmed.com/speakers/show?id=6500 |title= Peter Daszak |access-date=20 April 2020|work=]}}</ref>


Starting in 2014, Daszak was project lead of the six NIH projects no. 2R01AI110964-01 to 2R01AI110964-06 <ref>{{Cite web|title=Project no. 1R01AI110964-01: Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence (2014-2015)|url=https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/8674931|url-status=live|access-date=2021-04-17|website=NIH RePORTER}}</ref> <ref>{{Cite web|title=Project no. 5R01AI110964-02: Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence (2015-2016)|url=https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/8853810|url-status=live|access-date=2021-04-17|website=NIH RePORTER}}</ref> <ref>{{Cite web|title=Project no. 5R01AI110964-03: Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence (2016-2017)|url=https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/9086286|url-status=live|access-date=2021-04-17|website=NIH RePORTER}}</ref> <ref>{{Cite web|title=NIH project no. 5R01AI110964-04: Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence (2017-2018)|url=https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/9320765|url-status=live|access-date=2021-04-17|website=NIH RePORTER}}</ref> <ref>{{Cite web|title=NIH project no. 5R01AI110964-05: Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence (2018-2019)|url=https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/9491676|url-status=live|access-date=2021-04-17|website=NIH RePORTER}}</ref> <ref name=":0" /> which focused on the emergence of novel zoonotic coronaviruses (CoV) with bat-origin. Among the aims of the project was to characterize as well "the diversity and distribution of high spillover-risk SARSr-CoVs in bats in southern China" as the "SARSr-CoV spillover risk" by using "S protein sequence data, infectious clone technology, in vitro and in vivo infection experiments and analysis of receptor binding ". Some of the project's work was performed at the ] (WIV), and parts of this research are considered ].<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Segreto|first1=Rossana|last2=Deigin|first2=Yuri|date=2020-11-17|title=The genetic structure of SARS‐CoV‐2 does not rule out a laboratory origin|journal=BioEssays|volume=43|issue=3|pages=e2000240|doi=10.1002/bies.202000240|pmid=33200842|pmc=7744920|doi-access=free}}</ref> The six projects received a total funding of $3,748,715 from the ] (NIAID).<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|title=Project no. 2R01AI110964-06: Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence (2019-2021)|url=https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/9819304|url-status=live|access-date=2021-04-17|website=NIH RePORTER}}</ref> Starting in 2014, Daszak was ] of a six-year NIH project which was awarded to the ] and which focused on the emergence of novel zoonotic coronaviruses with a bat origin.<ref name=":0" /> Among the aims of the project was to characterize the diversity and distribution of ] (SARSr-CoV) in bats, viruses with a significant risk of spillover, in southern China, based on data from spike protein sequences, infectious clone technology, infection experiments (both in vitro and in vivo), as well as analysis of receptor binding.<ref>{{Cite web|title=RePORT ⟩ RePORTER|url=https://reporter.nih.gov/search/xQW6UJmWfUuOV01ntGvLwQ/project-details/9819304|access-date=26 May 2021|website=reporter.nih.gov}}</ref> The six 1-year projects received $3.75 million in funding from the ] (NIAID), part of the U.S. ] agency.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|title=Project no. 2R01AI110964-06: Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence (2019-2021)|url=https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/9819304|access-date=17 April 2021|website=NIH RePORTER}}</ref>


Daszak has served on committees of the ], ] (WHO), ], and ].<ref name="columbia"/> He is a member of the ] and Chair of the ] (NASEM)'s Forum on Microbial Threats and sits on the supervisory board of the ] Commission Council of Advisors.<ref name="ecohealth_profile">{{cite web|url= https://www.ecohealthalliance.org/personnel/dr-peter-daszak |title=Dr. Peter Daszak |access-date=April 20, 2020|work=]}}</ref> Daszak has served on committees of the ], ] (WHO), ], and ].<ref name=":2" /> He is a member of the ] and Chair of the ] (NASEM)'s Forum on Microbial Threats and sits on the supervisory board of the ] Commission Council of Advisors.<ref name="ecohealth_profile">{{cite web|url= https://www.ecohealthalliance.org/personnel/dr-peter-daszak |title=Dr. Peter Daszak |access-date=20 April 2020|work=]|date=February 2016 }}</ref>


During times of large virus outbreaks Daszak has been invited to speak as an expert on epidemics involving diseases moving across the species barrier from animals to humans.<ref name="ecohealth_profile" /><ref>{{cite news|last=Gorman|first=James|date=28 January 2020|title=How do bats live with so many viruses?|newspaper=]|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/28/science/bats-coronavirus-Wuhan.html|access-date=20 April 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Bruilliard|first=Karin|date=3 April 2020|title=The next pandemic is already coming, unless humans change how we interact with wildlife, scientists say|newspaper=]|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/science/2020/04/03/coronavirus-wildlife-environment/|access-date=20 April 2020}}</ref> At the time of the ] outbreak in West Africa in 2014, Daszak said "Our research shows that new approaches to reducing emerging pandemic threats at the source would be more cost-effective than trying to mobilize a global response after a disease has emerged".<ref name="nsf1">{{cite web|date=16 December 2014|title=Ebola, Dengue fever, Lyme disease: The growing economic cost of infectious diseases|url=https://www.nsf.gov/discoveries/disc_summ.jsp?org=NSF&cntn_id=133576&preview=false6500|access-date=20 April 2020|work=]}}</ref>
Daszak is the president of the New York-headquartered NGO, ],<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.ecohealthalliance.org/|title=Wildlife Conservation and Pandemic Prevention - EcoHealth Alliance|website=EcoHealth Alliance|language=en-US|access-date=2016-10-14}}</ref> known for its research on global emergent diseases such as ] (SARS), ], ] (MERS), ], ], and ].


In October 2019, when the U.S. federal government "quietly" ended the ten-year old program called ],<ref>{{Cite news|date=25 October 2019|title=Scientists Were Hunting for the Next Ebola, Now the U.S. Has Cut Their Funding|work=]|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/25/health/predict-usaid-viruses.html|last1=Jr|first1=Donald G. Mcneil}}</ref> operated by ] (USAID)'s emerging threats division,<ref name="NYT_McNeil_20191025">{{Cite news|last=McNeil|first=Donald G. Jr|date=25 October 2019|title=Scientists Were Hunting for the Next Ebola. Now the U.S. Has Cut Off Their Funding|work=]|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/25/health/predict-usaid-viruses.html|access-date=10 May 2020|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> Daszak said that, compared to the $5 billion the U.S. spent fighting Ebola in West Africa, PREDICT—which cost $250 million—was much less expensive. Daszak further stated, "PREDICT was an approach to heading off pandemics, instead of sitting there waiting for them to emerge, and then mobilizing."<ref name="NYT_McNeil_20191025" />
In early 2021 the ] (W.H.O.) sent a group of 17 international experts to China to find out from where the ] virus originated. For this group, 3 experts were suggested by the Trump administration, who were all turned down by the W.H.O. and Peter Daszak was finally appointed. Daszak had categorically ruled out on social media that the virus may have been artificially created in laboratory and had worked for many years with chinese virologist ], director at the ], but was chosen anyway to join the group. He told the ], that he had disclosed potential conflicts of interest in his application to the W.H.O..<ref name="jchnyt">{{cite news |last1=Hernandez |first1=Javier C. |title=Two Members of W.H.O. Team on Trail of Virus Are Denied Entry to China |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/13/world/asia/china-who-wuhan-covid.html |publisher=The New York Times Company |date=13 January 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Gyr |first1=Marcel |title=Oder war es vielleicht doch ein Laborunfall? Das Rätsel um den Ausbruch der Corona-Pandemie |url=https://www.nzz.ch/gesellschaft/krimi-um-den-ausbruch-von-corona-war-es-vielleicht-doch-ein-laborunfall-ld.1608019|publisher=Neue Zürcher Zeitung |date=14 April 2021}}</ref>


{{As of|2021}}, Daszak is the president of the New York-headquartered NGO EcoHealth Alliance.<ref name="ehao">{{Cite web|url=http://www.ecohealthalliance.org/|title=Wildlife Conservation and Pandemic Prevention - EcoHealth Alliance|website=EcoHealth Alliance|language=en-US|access-date=14 October 2016}}</ref> His research focuses on global emergent diseases such as ] (SARS), ], ] (MERS), ], ], and ].<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":4" /><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/books/NBK349040/|title=Rapid Medical Countermeasure Response to Infectious Diseases: Enabling Sustainable Capabilities Through Ongoing Public- and Private-Sector Partnerships: Workshop Summary.|publisher=]|year=2016|chapter=Developing MCMs for Coronaviruses}}</ref> The organization has administered more than $100 million in U.S. federal grants to fund overseas laboratory experiments.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Ridley |first1=Matt |first2=Alina |last2=Chan |title=The World Needs a Real Investigation Into the Origins of Covid-19 |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-world-needs-a-real-investigation-into-the-origins-of-covid-19-11610728316 |work=]|date=15 January 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Subbaraman |first1=Nidhi |title='Heinous!': Coronavirus researcher shut down for Wuhan-lab link slams new funding restrictions |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02473-4 |journal=Nature |date=21 August 2020 |language=en |doi=10.1038/d41586-020-02473-4}}</ref>
==Publications==
As of 2020 he has authored or contributed to over 300 scientific papers and been designated a ''Highly Cited Researcher'' by the ]. In addition to citations in academic publications, his work has been covered in leading English-language newspapers,<ref name="NYT_Daszak_20200227"/><ref>{{cite news |last=Williams |first=Shawna |date=January 24, 2020 |title=Where Coronaviruses Come From (Interview) |url=https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/where-coronaviruses-come-from-67011|newspaper=The Scientist |access-date=April 20, 2020 }}</ref> television and radio broadcasts, documentary films,<ref>{{cite episode | title = The Next Pandemic | series = ] | air-date = November 7, 2019 | season = 2 | number = 7}}</ref> and podcasts.<ref>{{Cite news|last=|first=|date=December 23, 2020|title=Why Humans Are Responsible for the Coronavirus|work=]|url=https://slate.com/podcasts/what-next/2020/12/why-humans-are-responsible-for-the-coronavirus|url-status=live|access-date=}}</ref>

===Media coverage===
During times of large virus outbreaks he has been invited to speak as an expert on epidemics involving diseases moving from animals to humans.<ref name="ecohealth_profile"/><ref>{{cite news|last=Gorman|first=James|date=January 28, 2020| title=How do bats live with so many viruses?|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/28/science/bats-coronavirus-Wuhan.html?searchResultPosition=3|newspaper=The New York Times|access-date=April 20, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Bruilliard|first=Karin|date=April 3, 2020| title=The next pandemic is already coming, unless humans change how we interact with wildlife, scientists say |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/science/2020/04/03/coronavirus-wildlife-environment/|newspaper=]|access-date=April 20, 2020}}</ref> At the time of the ] outbreak in West Africa in 2014, Daszak said "Our research shows that new approaches to reducing emerging pandemic threats at the source would be more cost-effective than trying to mobilize a global response after a disease has emerged".<ref name="nsf1">{{cite web|url= https://www.nsf.gov/discoveries/disc_summ.jsp?org=NSF&cntn_id=133576&preview=false6500 |title= Ebola, Dengue fever, Lyme disease: The growing economic cost of infectious diseases |access-date=April 20, 2020|date=December 16, 2014|work=]}}</ref>

In October 2019, when the federal government "quietly" ended the ten-year old program called PREDICT,<ref>{{Cite news|last=|first=|date=|title=Scientists Were Hunting for the Next Ebola, Now the U.S. Has Cut Their Funding|work=]|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/25/health/predict-usaid-viruses.html|url-status=live|access-date=}}</ref> operated by ] (USAID)'s emerging threats division,<ref name="NYT_McNeil_20191025">{{Cite news| issn = 0362-4331| last = McNeil| first = Donald G. Jr| title = Scientists Were Hunting for the Next Ebola. Now the U.S. Has Cut Off Their Funding| work = The New York Times| access-date = May 10, 2020| date = October 25, 2019| url = https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/25/health/predict-usaid-viruses.html}}</ref> experts like Daszak expressed concern that shutting PREDICT down, could "leave the world more vulnerable to lethal pathogens like Ebola and MERS that emerge from unexpected places, such as bat-filled trees, gorilla carcasses and camel barns."<ref name="NYT_McNeil_20191025"/> Daszak said that compared to the $5 billion the U.S. spent fighting Ebola in West Africa, PREDICT—which cost $250 million—was much less expensive. As well, Daszak said, "PREDICT was an approach to heading off pandemics, instead of sitting there waiting for them to emerge, and then mobilizing."<ref name="NYT_McNeil_20191025"/>


=== COVID-19 pandemic === === COVID-19 pandemic ===
On February 9, 2020, ] invited Daszak as a special guest along with ] on ''Newt's World'' to discuss the coronavirus.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.gingrich360.com/2020/02/newts-world-ep-56-chinas-coronavirus/|title=Newt's World Ep 56: China's Coronavirus (Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Peter Daszak) |date=February 9, 2020 | access-date=April 21, 2020}}</ref>


In his February 27, 2020 ] article, titled "", Daszak said R&D Blueprint group of experts to which he belonged, had in February 2018 warned the WHO of the "next pandemic, which would be caused by an unknown, novel pathogen that hadn't yet entered the human population." The Blueprint group coined this hypothetical pathogen "Disease X" and was included it on a list of eight diseases which they recommended should be given highest priority in regard to research and development efforts, such as finding better diagnostic methods and developing ]s.<ref name="WHO_201802">{{cite report |url=http://origin.who.int/emergencies/diseases/2018prioritization-report.pdf |title=2018 Annual review of diseases prioritized under the Research and Development Blueprint |date=February 2018 |pages=449}}</ref> He said, "As the world stands today on the edge of the pandemic precipice, it's worth taking a moment to consider whether Covid-19 is the disease our group was warning about."<ref name="NYT_Daszak_20200227">{{cite news| url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/27/opinion/coronavirus-pandemics |title=We knew Disease X was Coming. It's here now. We need to stop what drives mass epidemics rather than just respond to individual diseases | date=2020-02-27 |access-date=2020-04-20 |work=] |last=Daszak |first=Peter }}</ref> After the outbreak of the ], Daszak noted in '']'' that he and other disease ecologists had warned the WHO in 2018 that the next pandemic "would be caused by an unknown, novel pathogen that hadn't yet entered the human population", probably in a region with significant human-animal interaction.<ref name="NYT_Daszak_20200227">{{cite news |last1=Daszak |first1=Peter |title=Opinion {{!}} We Knew Disease X Was Coming. It's Here Now. |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/27/opinion/coronavirus-pandemics.html |access-date=21 June 2021 |work=The New York Times |date=27 February 2020}}</ref> The group included this hypothetical "]" pathogen on a list of eight diseases which they recommended should be given highest priority in regard to research and development efforts, such as finding better diagnostic methods and developing ]s.<ref name="WHO_201802">{{cite report |url=http://origin.who.int/emergencies/diseases/2018prioritization-report.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200227181832/http://origin.who.int/emergencies/diseases/2018prioritization-report.pdf |archive-date=27 February 2020 |title=2018 Annual review of diseases prioritized under the Research and Development Blueprint |date=February 2018 |page=449}}</ref> He said, "As the world stands today on the edge of the pandemic precipice, it's worth taking a moment to consider whether Covid-19 is the disease our group was warning about."<ref name="NYT_Daszak_20200227"/>


Prior to the pandemic, Daszak and EcoHealth Alliance were the only U.S.-based organization researching coronavirus evolution and transmission in China,<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Latinne|first1=Alice|last2=Hu|first2=Ben|last3=Olival|first3=Kevin J.|last4=Zhu|first4=Guangjian|last5=Zhang|first5=Libiao|last6=Li|first6=Hongying|last7=Chmura|first7=Aleksei A.|last8=Field|first8=Hume E.|last9=Zambrana-Torrelio|first9=Carlos|last10=Epstein|first10=Jonathan H.|last11=Li|first11=Bei|date=25 August 2020|title=Origin and cross-species transmission of bat coronaviruses in China|journal=Nature Communications|language=en|volume=11|issue=1|page=4235|doi=10.1038/s41467-020-17687-3|issn=2041-1723|pmc=7447761|pmid=32843626|bibcode=2020NatCo..11.4235L}}</ref> where they partnered with the ], among others. On 1 April 2020, following the beginning of the ], the ] granted $2.26 million to the EcoHealth program for a six-month emergency extension of the program whose funding has expired in September 2019.<ref>{{Cite web|last1=Baumgaertner|first1=Emily|last2=Rainey|date=2 April 2020|title=Trump administration ended pandemic early-warning program to detect coronaviruses|url=https://www.latimes.com/science/story/2020-04-02/coronavirus-trump-pandemic-program-viruses-detection|access-date=26 May 2021|website=]}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite web|last=Cohen|first=Zachary|date=10 April 2020|title=Trump administration shuttered pandemic monitoring program, then scrambled to extend it|url=https://edition.cnn.com/2020/04/10/politics/trump-usaid-prevent-program-coronavirus/index.html|access-date=26 May 2021|website=]}}</ref> The ] announced that the extension would support "detection of ] cases in Africa, Asia and the Middle East to inform the public health response" as well as investigation of "the animal source or sources of SARS-CoV-2 using data and samples collected over the past 10 years in Asia and Southeast Asia."<ref name=":1" />
On March 20, 2020 Daszak was featured in a ] special podcast "Understanding the Coronavirus".<ref name="PBS_special_20200320">{{Cite news| title = Special podcast: Understanding the coronavirus| work = PBS NewsHour| access-date = May 10, 2020| date = March 20, 2020| url = https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/special-podcast-understanding-the-coronavirus}}</ref>


An ] co-authored by Daszak, signed by 27 scientists and published in '']'' on 19 February 2020, stated: "We stand together to strongly condemn ]...and overwhelmingly conclude that this coronavirus originated in wildlife." It further warned that blaming Chinese researchers for the virus' origin jeopardised the fight against the disease.<ref>{{cite journal|author1-link=Charles Calisher|last1=Calisher|first1=Charles|last2=Carroll|first2=Dennis|last3=Colwell|first3=Rita|last4=Corley|first4=Ronald B|last5=Daszak|first5=Peter|last6=Drosten|first6=Christian|last7=Enjuanes|first7=Luis|last8=Farrar|first8=Jeremy|last9=Field|first9=Hume|last10=Golding|first10=Josie|last11=Gorbalenya|first11=Alexander|date=March 2020|title=Statement in support of the scientists, public health professionals, and medical professionals of China combatting COVID-19|journal=The Lancet|volume=395|issue=10226|pages=e42–e43|doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30418-9|last16=Lam|first24=Bernard|last12=Haagmans|first12=Bart|last13=Hughes|first13=James M|last14=Karesh|first14=William B|last15=Keusch|first27=Mike|last27=Turner|first26=Kanta|last26=Subbarao|first25=Linda|last25=Saif|last24=Roizman|first15=Gerald T|first23=Leo|last23=Poon|first22=Stanley|last22=Perlman|first21=Peter|last21=Palese|first20=Jonna|last20=Mazet|first19=Larry|last19=Madoff|first18=John S|last18=Mackenzie|first17=Juan|last17=Lubroth|first16=Sai Kit|pmid=32087122|s2cid=211201028|pmc=7159294}}</ref> In June 2021, ''The Lancet'' published an addendum in which Daszak listed his cooperation with researchers in China,<ref>{{cite journal|date=June 2021|title=Addendum: competing interests and the origins of SARS-CoV-2|journal=The Lancet|doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01377-5|issn=0140-6736|volume=397|issue=10293|pages=2449–2450|s2cid=235494625|pmc=8215723|author=((Editors Of The Lancet))}}</ref> and he also recused himself from ''The Lancet''{{'}}s inquiry commission focused on COVID-19 origins.<ref>{{cite news|date=22 June 2021|title=UK scientist with links to Wuhan lab 'recuses himself' from inquiry into Covid origins|work=]|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/uk-scientist-centre-pandemic-origins-debate-removed-inquiry |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220112/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/uk-scientist-centre-pandemic-origins-debate-removed-inquiry |archive-date=12 January 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live}}{{cbignore}}</ref>
In April and May 2020, during the ], Daszak was interviewed by ] (NPR),<ref name="NPR">{{Cite news| title = Virus Researchers Cast Doubt On Theory Of Coronavirus Lab Accident|date=April 23, 2020 | work = National Public Radio (NPR)| access-date = 2020-05-11| url = https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2020/04/23/841729646/virus-researchers-cast-doubt-on-theory-of-coronavirus-lab-accident}}</ref> ],<ref name="CNN">{{Citation|title=On GPS: Tracing pandemics back to their source - CNN Video|url=https://www.cnn.com/videos/tv/2020/04/26/exp-gps-0426-daszak-int.cnn|access-date=2020-05-07}}</ref> NBC News,<ref name="NBC">{{Cite web| title = Did the coronavirus really escape from a Chinese lab? Here's what we know| access-date = 2020-05-11| url = https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/did-coronavirus-really-escape-chinese-lab-here-s-what-we-n1199531}}</ref> CBS News,<ref name="cbsnews_Pelley_20200511"/> and other outlets.


Daszak and EcoHealth Alliance were the only U.S. organization researching coronavirus spread and transmission in China<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Latinne|first1=Alice|last2=Hu|first2=Ben|last3=Olival|first3=Kevin J.|last4=Zhu|first4=Guangjian|last5=Zhang|first5=Libiao|last6=Li|first6=Hongying|last7=Chmura|first7=Aleksei A.|last8=Field|first8=Hume E.|last9=Zambrana-Torrelio|first9=Carlos|last10=Epstein|first10=Jonathan H.|last11=Li|first11=Bei|date=2020-08-25|title=Origin and cross-species transmission of bat coronaviruses in China|url= |journal=Nature Communications|language=en|volume=11|issue=1|pages=4235|doi=10.1038/s41467-020-17687-3|issn=2041-1723|pmc=7447761|pmid=32843626}}</ref> until the project's funding was "abruptly terminated" by the ] in a move that was widely reported to be politically motivated.<ref name="cbsnews_Pelley_20200511">{{Cite web| title = Trump administration cuts funding for coronavirus researcher, jeopardizing possible COVID-19 cure|date=May 9, 2020 |first=Scott |last=Pelley| access-date = May 11, 2020| url = https://www.cbsnews.com/news/coronavirus-vaccine-politics-scientific-community-60-minutes-2020-05-10/}}</ref><ref name="USAtoday_20200509">{{Cite web| title = Coronavirus: US cuts funding to group studying bat viruses in China| access-date = May 10, 2020 |date=May 9, 2020| url = https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2020/05/09/coronavirus-us-cuts-funding-group-studying-bat-viruses-china/3088205001/}}</ref> A May 8, 2020 article in the journal '']'', said that the unusual April 24 decision to cut EcoHealth's funding, occurred shortly after "President Donald Trump alleged—without providing evidence—that the pandemic virus had escaped from a Chinese laboratory supported by the NIH grant, and vowed to end the funding."<ref name="Science_Wadman_20200508">{{Cite journal| title = NIH move to ax bat coronavirus grant draws fire|first1=Meredith |last1=Wadman |first2=Jon |last2=Cohen |journal= ]| access-date = August 21, 2020|doi=10.1126/science.368.6491.561|volume= 368 |number=6491 |pages=561–562| url = https://science.sciencemag.org/content/368/6491/561 |date=May 8, 2020|pmid=32381695 |doi-access=free }}</ref> EcoHealth Alliance's project funding was "abruptly terminated" on 24 April 2020, by the ]. The move met with criticism,<ref name=":4">{{cite journal |last1=Subbaraman |first1=Nidhi |title='Heinous!': Coronavirus researcher shut down for Wuhan-lab link slams new funding restrictions |journal=Nature |date=21 August 2020 |doi=10.1038/d41586-020-02473-4 |pmid=32826989 |s2cid=225249608 |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02473-4 |language=en}}</ref><ref name="cbsnews_Pelley_20200511">{{Cite web| title = Trump administration cuts funding for coronavirus researcher, jeopardizing possible COVID-19 cure|date=9 May 2020 |first=Scott |last=Pelley|website=] | access-date = 11 May 2020| url = https://www.cbsnews.com/news/coronavirus-vaccine-politics-scientific-community-60-minutes-2020-05-10/}}</ref><ref name="USAtoday_20200509">{{Cite web| title = Coronavirus: US cuts funding to group studying bat viruses in China| website = ] | access-date = 10 May 2020 |date=9 May 2020| url = https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2020/05/09/coronavirus-us-cuts-funding-group-studying-bat-viruses-china/3088205001/}}</ref> including by a group of 77 ] laureates who wrote to NIH Director ] that they "are gravely concerned"<ref>{{Cite journal|date=21 May 2020|title=Nobel laureates and science groups demand NIH review decision to kill coronavirus grant|url=https://www.science.org/content/article/preposterous-77-nobel-laureates-blast-nih-decision-cancel-coronavirus-grant-demand|doi=10.1126/science.abc9393|website=]|s2cid=242978174}}</ref> by the decision and called the funding cut "counterintuitive, given the urgent need to better understand the virus that causes COVID-19 and identify drugs that will save lives."<ref>{{Cite web|title=Letter to Francis Collins Urging to Reconsider Decision to Cut Coronavirus Research Funding|url=https://cms.asbmb.org/getmedia/dbb22a26-ee0f-45e5-a1ed-13af91275f07/Support-Science-Sign-on-Letter_1.pdf|website=cms.asbmb.org}}</ref> An article on 8 May 2020 in the journal '']'' stated that the unusual 24 April decision to cut EcoHealth's funding had occurred shortly after "President Donald Trump alleged{{snd}}without providing evidence{{snd}}that the pandemic virus had escaped from a Chinese laboratory supported by the NIH grant, and vowed to end the funding."<ref name="Science_Wadman_20200508">{{Cite journal| title = NIH move to ax bat coronavirus grant draws fire|first1=Meredith |last1=Wadman |first2=Jon |last2=Cohen |journal= ]|doi=10.1126/science.368.6491.561|volume= 368 |number=6491 |pages=561–562|date=8 May 2020|pmid=32381695 |bibcode=2020Sci...368..561W |doi-access=free }}</ref>


In May 2020, Daszak "said there was 'zero evidence' that the virus" was created in the ] during an appearance on "60 Minutes."<ref name="nlfn">{{cite news |last1=Lanum |first1=Nikolas |title=Former State Dept investigator on leaked Fauci emails: 'I don't trust these scientists' about Wuhan lab |url=https://www.foxnews.com/media/leaked-fauci-emails-david-asher-investigator-wuhan-lab-scientists |publisher=] Network, LLC |date=2 June 2021}}</ref>
The move has been roundly criticized, including by a group of 77 ] laureates who wrote NIH Director ] that they "are gravely concerned"<ref>{{Cite web|last=|first=|date=|title=Nobel laureates and science groups demand NIH review decision to kill coronavirus grant|url=https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/05/preposterous-77-nobel-laureates-blast-nih-decision-cancel-coronavirus-grant-demand|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=|website=]}}</ref> by the decision and called the funding cut "counterintuitive, given the urgent need to better understand the virus that causes COVID-19 and identify drugs that will save lives."<ref>{{Cite web|last=|first=|date=|title=Letter to Francis Collins Urging to Reconsider Decision to Cut Coronavirus Research Funding|url=https://cms.asbmb.org/getmedia/dbb22a26-ee0f-45e5-a1ed-13af91275f07/Support-Science-Sign-on-Letter_1.pdf|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=|website=}}</ref>


In 2020 Daszak was named by the ] as the sole U.S.-based representative on a team sent to ],<ref name="Mallapaty 208–208">{{Cite journal|last=Mallapaty|first=Smriti|date=2 December 2020|title=Meet the scientists investigating the origins of the COVID pandemic|journal=Nature|language=en|volume=588|issue=7837|page=208|doi=10.1038/d41586-020-03402-1|pmid=33262500|bibcode=2020Natur.588..208M|doi-access=free}}</ref> a team that also included ], Hung Nguyen, and Fabian Leendertz.<ref name="Mallapaty 208–208"/> Daszak had previously collaborated for many years with ], the director of the ],<ref name="jchnyt">{{cite news |last1=Hernandez |first1=Javier C. |title=Two Members of W.H.O. Team on Trail of Virus Are Denied Entry to China |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/13/world/asia/china-who-wuhan-covid.html |work=] |date=13 January 2021}}</ref> on efforts to trace ] viruses to bats after the ].
Daszak was part a segment of the May 11, 2020 broadcast of '']''.<ref> ] 11 May 2020</ref>


Some critics, including journalist ]<ref>{{Cite web|author=Wade, Nicholas|authorlink=Nicholas Wade|url=https://thebulletin.org/2021/05/the-origin-of-covid-did-people-or-nature-open-pandoras-box-at-wuhan/|title = The origin of COVID: Did people or nature open Pandora's box at Wuhan?|date = 5 May 2021|work=]}}</ref> and biologist ],<ref>{{cite web|url=https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/covid-lab-leak-theory-jeffrey-sachs-peter-daszak.html| date=3 March 2023|title=Mad Scientists Nowhere is the lab-leak debate more personal than among the experts investigating the origins of COVID.|last=Walsh |first=James |work=]}}</ref> alleged that Daszak had a conflict of interest investigating the virus' origins in China. In 2021, a complaint was issued by a few Republican representatives asking for Daszak to be expelled from the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) based on conduct allegations. In 2022 this request was denied by the NAM, citing "no evidence" of the alleged breach in conduct.<ref>{{cite news |title=Conduct probe exonerates scientist accused of obscuring pandemic's origin |url=https://www.science.org/content/article/nam-exonerates-daszak |access-date=30 October 2022 |work=www.science.org |language=en}}</ref> The conduct probe by NAM to exonerate Daszak drew wider circles as the Republican minority staff of a bipartisan ] led by ] concluded "that the pandemic most likely began when the virus somehow escaped from WIV". Some NAM members called the probe into Daszak "frivolous and political", and wrote that such accusations against China are detrimental to pandemic preparedness, and hinder international collaboration to confront pandemics effectively.<ref>Cohen, J. (28 OCT 2022). ''SCIENCE|INSIDERHEALTH science.org.'' Retrieved 17 November 2022.</ref>
Daszak was interviewed for a June 2020 '']'' article on "China's bat woman" ], a ] at the ]. He praised her and defended her staunchly in the article, which notes that Shi and he are "long-term collaborators". Daszak said: "Shi leads a world-class lab of the highest standards... It’s crystal clear that bats, once again, are the natural reservoir."<ref name="qiu20">{{cite journal |title=How China's 'Bat Woman' Hunted Down Viruses from SARS to the New Coronavirus |url=https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-chinas-bat-woman-hunted-down-viruses-from-sars-to-the-new-coronavirus1/ |date=1 June 2020 |journal=Scientific American |last=Qiu |first=Jane}}</ref>


In May 2024, the ] suspended all federal funding for Daszak and the EHA, saying that he did not properly monitor research activities at the WIV and failed to report on their high-risk experiments. The department also began proceedings to permanently ] Daszak and the EHA from federal funding.<ref>{{cite news|title=Biden administration suspends funding for scientist at center of COVID lab leak theory|url=https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/4679372-biden-administration-suspends-funding-for-peter-daszak-scientist-covid-lab-leak-theory/|access-date=22 May 2024|work=The Hill}}</ref>
Daszak was named by the ] as the sole U.S.-based representative on a team sent to investigate origins of the COVID-19 pandemic,<ref name="Mallapaty 208–208">{{Cite journal|last=Mallapaty|first=Smriti|date=2020-12-02|title=Meet the scientists investigating the origins of the COVID pandemic|url=https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-03402-1|journal=Nature|language=en|volume=588|issue=7837|pages=208|doi=10.1038/d41586-020-03402-1|pmid=33262500|doi-access=free}}</ref> a team that also includes ], Hung Nguyen, and Fabian Leendertz.<ref name="Mallapaty 208–208"/> According to NPR, Daszak "says ] in southern China are the most likely source of the COVID-19 pandemic."<ref>{{cite news |title=WHO Points To Wildlife Farms In Southern China As Likely Source Of Pandemic |url=https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2021/03/15/977527808/who-points-to-wildlife-farms-in-southwest-china-as-likely-source-of-pandemic?t=1616302540855 |publisher=] |date=March 15, 2021}}</ref>

Daszak was called out in an article published in the ] for significant conflict of interest in organizing and drafting an article by a group of virologists and others in the February 19, 2020 edition of the Lancet. That article stated “We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin” but did not disclose Daszak's roles. Daszak’s organization, EcoHealth Alliance, funded coronavirus research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. <ref>https://thebulletin.org/2021/05/the-origin-of-covid-did-people-or-nature-open-pandoras-box-at-wuhan/</ref> Journalist ] described Daszak as "the closest collaborator and the fiercest defender of the Wuhan lab" and noted that, as of May 6th, 2021, Daszak had not responded to a formal request for records and information made by the ] two months prior.<ref name="RoginWaPo">{{Cite news|last=Rogin|first=Josh|title=Congress is finally investigating the lab accident covid-19 origin theory|language=en-US|work=Washington Post|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/congress-is-finally-investigating-the-lab-accident-covid-19-origin-theory/2021/05/06/d7bfb0e4-aeaf-11eb-b476-c3b287e52a01_story.html|access-date=2021-05-11|issn=0190-8286}}</ref>


==Awards and honors== ==Awards and honors==

In October 2018, Daszak was elected to the ] (NAM),<ref name="ecohealthalliance_20181015">{{Cite web| title = EcoHealth Alliance's Dr. Peter Daszak Elected to National Academy of Medicine| work = EcoHealth Alliance| access-date = May 10, 2020| date = October 15, 2018| url = https://www.ecohealthalliance.org/2018/10/peter-daszak-elected-as-a-member-of-the-national-academy-of-medicine}}</ref> which the ''New York Times'' has been called the "most esteemed and authoritative adviser on issues of health and medicine" whose "reports can transform medical thinking around the world."<ref name="NYT_Harris_20110825">{{cite news |first=Gardiner |last=Harris |date=August 25, 2011 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/26/health/26vaccine.html |title=Vaccine Cleared Again as Autism Culprit |newspaper=The New York Times}}</ref>
In 1999, Daszak received a meritorious service award from the ].<ref name="NIHgrant">, NIH grant 12891702, p. 43: "1999 Meritorious service award, CDC . . . 2002 Honored by the naming of a new species of centipede, ''Cryptops daszaki'' (J Nat Hist 36: 76–106) . . . 2013 Honored by the naming of a new parasite species, ''Isospora daszaki'' (Parasit. Res. 111: 1463–1466) . . . 2018 Member, National Academy of Medicine (NAM), USA"</ref> In 2018, he was elected to the ].<ref name="NIHgrant" /><ref name="ecohealthalliance_20181015">{{Cite web|date=15 October 2018|title=Dr. Peter Daszak Elected As a Member of the National Academy of Medicine|url=https://www.ecohealthalliance.org/2018/10/peter-daszak-elected-as-a-member-of-the-national-academy-of-medicine|access-date=10 May 2020|work=EcoHealth Alliance}}</ref> He is commemorated in the names of the centipede ''Cryptops daszaki,''<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Lewis |first1=J. G. E. |title=The scolopendromorph centipedes of Mauritius and Rodrigues and their adjacent islets (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha) |journal=] |date=2002 |volume=36 |issue=1 |pages=79–106 |doi=10.1080/00222930110098508|s2cid=83706089 }}</ref> as well as the ] parasite ''Isospora daszaki.''<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Ball |first1=S. J. |last2=Brown |first2=M. A. |last3=Snow |first3=K. R. |title=A new species of ''Isospora'' (Apicomplexa: Eimeriidae) from the greenfinch ''Carduelis chloris'' (Passeriformes: Fringillidae) |journal=Parasitology Research |date=2012 |volume=111 |issue=4 |pages=1463–1466 |doi=10.1007/s00436-012-2980-0|pmid=22706904 |s2cid=19233064 }}</ref>


==References== ==References==
Line 55: Line 59:


==External links== ==External links==
*
*
{{Scholia|author}}
*
* {{twitter}} * {{twitter}}
* {{C-SPAN|101281}}
* {{cite web|title=TWiV 623: Bats and coronaviruses with Peter Daszak|date=June 3, 2020|website=YouTube|publisher=]|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Et3CHcteWNw}}


{{COVID-19 pandemic|people}}
{{authority control}} {{authority control}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Daszak, Peter}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Daszak, Peter}}
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
] ]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 22:40, 18 October 2024

British zoologist

Peter Daszak
Daszak speaking in 2017
NationalityBritish
EducationBangor University (B.Sc.)
University of East London (Ph.D.)
OccupationZoologist
Employer(s)Kingston University
University of Georgia
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Columbia University

Peter Daszak is a British zoologist, consultant and public expert on disease ecology, in particular on zoonosis. He is the president of EcoHealth Alliance, a nonprofit non-governmental organization that supports various programs on global health and pandemic prevention. He is also a member of the Center for Infection and Immunity at the Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health. He lives in Suffern, New York.

Daszak was involved in investigations into the initial outbreak which eventually developed into the COVID-19 pandemic and became a member of the World Health Organization team sent to investigate the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic in China.

Education

Daszak earned a B.Sc. in zoology in 1987, at Bangor University and a Ph.D. in parasitic infectious diseases in 1994 at University of East London.

Career

Daszak worked at the School of Life Sciences, Kingston University, in Surrey, England in the 1990s. In the late 1990s Daszak moved to the United States and was affiliated with the Institute of Ecology at the University of Georgia and the National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in Atlanta, Georgia. Around 2001 he became executive director at a collaborative think-tank in New York City, the Consortium for Conservation Medicine. He has adjunct positions at two universities in the U.K. and three universities in the U.S., including the Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health.

He was one of the early adopters of conservation medicine. The Society for Conservation Biology symposium in 2000, had focused on the "complex problem of emerging diseases". He said in 2001 that there were "almost no examples of emerging wildlife diseases not driven by human environmental change...nd few human emerging diseases don't include some domestic animal or wildlife component." His research has focused on investigating and predicting the impacts of new diseases on wildlife, livestock, and human populations, and he has been involved in research studies on epidemics such as the Nipah virus infection, the Australian Hendra outbreaks, the 2002–2004 SARS outbreak, Avian influenza, and the West Nile virus.

Starting in 2014, Daszak was Principal Investigator of a six-year NIH project which was awarded to the EcoHealth Alliance and which focused on the emergence of novel zoonotic coronaviruses with a bat origin. Among the aims of the project was to characterize the diversity and distribution of Severe acute respiratory syndrome–related coronavirus (SARSr-CoV) in bats, viruses with a significant risk of spillover, in southern China, based on data from spike protein sequences, infectious clone technology, infection experiments (both in vitro and in vivo), as well as analysis of receptor binding. The six 1-year projects received $3.75 million in funding from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the U.S. National Institutes of Health agency.

Daszak has served on committees of the International Union for Conservation of Nature, World Health Organization (WHO), National Academy of Sciences, and United States Department of the Interior. He is a member of the National Academy of Medicine and Chair of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM)'s Forum on Microbial Threats and sits on the supervisory board of the One Health Commission Council of Advisors.

During times of large virus outbreaks Daszak has been invited to speak as an expert on epidemics involving diseases moving across the species barrier from animals to humans. At the time of the Ebola outbreak in West Africa in 2014, Daszak said "Our research shows that new approaches to reducing emerging pandemic threats at the source would be more cost-effective than trying to mobilize a global response after a disease has emerged".

In October 2019, when the U.S. federal government "quietly" ended the ten-year old program called PREDICT, operated by United States Agency for International Development (USAID)'s emerging threats division, Daszak said that, compared to the $5 billion the U.S. spent fighting Ebola in West Africa, PREDICT—which cost $250 million—was much less expensive. Daszak further stated, "PREDICT was an approach to heading off pandemics, instead of sitting there waiting for them to emerge, and then mobilizing."

As of 2021, Daszak is the president of the New York-headquartered NGO EcoHealth Alliance. His research focuses on global emergent diseases such as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), Nipah virus, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), Rift Valley fever, Ebola virus, and COVID-19. The organization has administered more than $100 million in U.S. federal grants to fund overseas laboratory experiments.

COVID-19 pandemic

After the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, Daszak noted in The New York Times that he and other disease ecologists had warned the WHO in 2018 that the next pandemic "would be caused by an unknown, novel pathogen that hadn't yet entered the human population", probably in a region with significant human-animal interaction. The group included this hypothetical "Disease X" pathogen on a list of eight diseases which they recommended should be given highest priority in regard to research and development efforts, such as finding better diagnostic methods and developing vaccines. He said, "As the world stands today on the edge of the pandemic precipice, it's worth taking a moment to consider whether Covid-19 is the disease our group was warning about."

Prior to the pandemic, Daszak and EcoHealth Alliance were the only U.S.-based organization researching coronavirus evolution and transmission in China, where they partnered with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, among others. On 1 April 2020, following the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, the USAID granted $2.26 million to the EcoHealth program for a six-month emergency extension of the program whose funding has expired in September 2019. The University of California announced that the extension would support "detection of SARS-CoV-2 cases in Africa, Asia and the Middle East to inform the public health response" as well as investigation of "the animal source or sources of SARS-CoV-2 using data and samples collected over the past 10 years in Asia and Southeast Asia."

An open letter co-authored by Daszak, signed by 27 scientists and published in The Lancet on 19 February 2020, stated: "We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin...and overwhelmingly conclude that this coronavirus originated in wildlife." It further warned that blaming Chinese researchers for the virus' origin jeopardised the fight against the disease. In June 2021, The Lancet published an addendum in which Daszak listed his cooperation with researchers in China, and he also recused himself from The Lancet's inquiry commission focused on COVID-19 origins.

EcoHealth Alliance's project funding was "abruptly terminated" on 24 April 2020, by the National Institutes of Health. The move met with criticism, including by a group of 77 Nobel Prize laureates who wrote to NIH Director Francis Collins that they "are gravely concerned" by the decision and called the funding cut "counterintuitive, given the urgent need to better understand the virus that causes COVID-19 and identify drugs that will save lives." An article on 8 May 2020 in the journal Science stated that the unusual 24 April decision to cut EcoHealth's funding had occurred shortly after "President Donald Trump alleged – without providing evidence – that the pandemic virus had escaped from a Chinese laboratory supported by the NIH grant, and vowed to end the funding."

In May 2020, Daszak "said there was 'zero evidence' that the virus" was created in the Wuhan Institute of Virology during an appearance on "60 Minutes."

In 2020 Daszak was named by the World Health Organization as the sole U.S.-based representative on a team sent to investigate the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, a team that also included Marion Koopmans, Hung Nguyen, and Fabian Leendertz. Daszak had previously collaborated for many years with Shi Zhengli, the director of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, on efforts to trace SARSr-CoV viruses to bats after the 2002–2004 SARS outbreak.

Some critics, including journalist Nicholas Wade and biologist Richard H. Ebright, alleged that Daszak had a conflict of interest investigating the virus' origins in China. In 2021, a complaint was issued by a few Republican representatives asking for Daszak to be expelled from the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) based on conduct allegations. In 2022 this request was denied by the NAM, citing "no evidence" of the alleged breach in conduct. The conduct probe by NAM to exonerate Daszak drew wider circles as the Republican minority staff of a bipartisan Senate committee led by Senator Richard Burr concluded "that the pandemic most likely began when the virus somehow escaped from WIV". Some NAM members called the probe into Daszak "frivolous and political", and wrote that such accusations against China are detrimental to pandemic preparedness, and hinder international collaboration to confront pandemics effectively.

In May 2024, the United States Department of Health and Human Services suspended all federal funding for Daszak and the EHA, saying that he did not properly monitor research activities at the WIV and failed to report on their high-risk experiments. The department also began proceedings to permanently debar Daszak and the EHA from federal funding.

Awards and honors

In 1999, Daszak received a meritorious service award from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In 2018, he was elected to the National Academy of Medicine. He is commemorated in the names of the centipede Cryptops daszaki, as well as the apicomplexan parasite Isospora daszaki.

References

  1. "Dr. Peter Daszak" bio, EcoHealth Alliance
  2. ^ "Peter Daszak, PhD". Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health. Archived from the original on 26 May 2021. Retrieved 26 May 2021.
  3. "Faculty" Archived 15 December 2022 at the Wayback Machine, Columbia Public Health
  4. James Rainey; Kiera Feldman (12 April 2020). "Impeachment. Primaries. Kobe. Coronavirus rushed in while our focus was elsewhere". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 22 June 2022.
  5. Quinn, Jimmy (25 May 2021). "The Growing Scrutiny of Peter Daszak's Chinese Research Collaboration". National Review.
  6. "Peter Daszak". TEDMED. TED. Retrieved 5 September 2021.
  7. "Peter Daszak" bio, Columbia University Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Biology Department
  8. ^ Norris, Scott (1 January 2001). "A New Voice in ConservationConservation medicine seeks to bring ecologists, veterinarians, and doctors together around a simple unifying concept: health". BioScience. 51 (1): 7–12. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0007:ANVIC]2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0006-3568.
  9. "Peter Daszak". TEDMED. Retrieved 20 April 2020.
  10. ^ "Project no. 2R01AI110964-06: Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence (2019-2021)". NIH RePORTER. Retrieved 17 April 2021.
  11. "RePORT ⟩ RePORTER". reporter.nih.gov. Retrieved 26 May 2021.
  12. ^ "Dr. Peter Daszak". EcoHealth Alliance. February 2016. Retrieved 20 April 2020.
  13. Gorman, James (28 January 2020). "How do bats live with so many viruses?". The New York Times. Retrieved 20 April 2020.
  14. Bruilliard, Karin (3 April 2020). "The next pandemic is already coming, unless humans change how we interact with wildlife, scientists say". Washington Post. Retrieved 20 April 2020.
  15. "Ebola, Dengue fever, Lyme disease: The growing economic cost of infectious diseases". National Science Foundation. 16 December 2014. Retrieved 20 April 2020.
  16. Jr, Donald G. Mcneil (25 October 2019). "Scientists Were Hunting for the Next Ebola, Now the U.S. Has Cut Their Funding". The New York Times.
  17. ^ McNeil, Donald G. Jr (25 October 2019). "Scientists Were Hunting for the Next Ebola. Now the U.S. Has Cut Off Their Funding". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 10 May 2020.
  18. "Wildlife Conservation and Pandemic Prevention - EcoHealth Alliance". EcoHealth Alliance. Retrieved 14 October 2016.
  19. ^ Subbaraman, Nidhi (21 August 2020). "'Heinous!': Coronavirus researcher shut down for Wuhan-lab link slams new funding restrictions". Nature. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-02473-4. PMID 32826989. S2CID 225249608.
  20. "Developing MCMs for Coronaviruses". Rapid Medical Countermeasure Response to Infectious Diseases: Enabling Sustainable Capabilities Through Ongoing Public- and Private-Sector Partnerships: Workshop Summary. National Academy of Sciences. 2016.
  21. Ridley, Matt; Chan, Alina (15 January 2021). "The World Needs a Real Investigation Into the Origins of Covid-19". The Wall Street Journal.
  22. Subbaraman, Nidhi (21 August 2020). "'Heinous!': Coronavirus researcher shut down for Wuhan-lab link slams new funding restrictions". Nature. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-02473-4.
  23. ^ Daszak, Peter (27 February 2020). "Opinion | We Knew Disease X Was Coming. It's Here Now". The New York Times. Retrieved 21 June 2021.
  24. 2018 Annual review of diseases prioritized under the Research and Development Blueprint (PDF) (Report). February 2018. p. 449. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 February 2020.
  25. Latinne, Alice; Hu, Ben; Olival, Kevin J.; Zhu, Guangjian; Zhang, Libiao; Li, Hongying; Chmura, Aleksei A.; Field, Hume E.; Zambrana-Torrelio, Carlos; Epstein, Jonathan H.; Li, Bei (25 August 2020). "Origin and cross-species transmission of bat coronaviruses in China". Nature Communications. 11 (1): 4235. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.4235L. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17687-3. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7447761. PMID 32843626.
  26. Baumgaertner, Emily; Rainey (2 April 2020). "Trump administration ended pandemic early-warning program to detect coronaviruses". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 26 May 2021.
  27. ^ Cohen, Zachary (10 April 2020). "Trump administration shuttered pandemic monitoring program, then scrambled to extend it". CNN. Retrieved 26 May 2021.
  28. Calisher, Charles; Carroll, Dennis; Colwell, Rita; Corley, Ronald B; Daszak, Peter; Drosten, Christian; Enjuanes, Luis; Farrar, Jeremy; Field, Hume; Golding, Josie; Gorbalenya, Alexander; Haagmans, Bart; Hughes, James M; Karesh, William B; Keusch, Gerald T; Lam, Sai Kit; Lubroth, Juan; Mackenzie, John S; Madoff, Larry; Mazet, Jonna; Palese, Peter; Perlman, Stanley; Poon, Leo; Roizman, Bernard; Saif, Linda; Subbarao, Kanta; Turner, Mike (March 2020). "Statement in support of the scientists, public health professionals, and medical professionals of China combatting COVID-19". The Lancet. 395 (10226): e42–e43. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30418-9. PMC 7159294. PMID 32087122. S2CID 211201028.
  29. Editors Of The Lancet (June 2021). "Addendum: competing interests and the origins of SARS-CoV-2". The Lancet. 397 (10293): 2449–2450. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01377-5. ISSN 0140-6736. PMC 8215723. S2CID 235494625.
  30. "UK scientist with links to Wuhan lab 'recuses himself' from inquiry into Covid origins". The Telegraph. 22 June 2021. Archived from the original on 12 January 2022.
  31. Pelley, Scott (9 May 2020). "Trump administration cuts funding for coronavirus researcher, jeopardizing possible COVID-19 cure". CBS News. Retrieved 11 May 2020.
  32. "Coronavirus: US cuts funding to group studying bat viruses in China". USA Today. 9 May 2020. Retrieved 10 May 2020.
  33. "Nobel laureates and science groups demand NIH review decision to kill coronavirus grant". Science. 21 May 2020. doi:10.1126/science.abc9393. S2CID 242978174.
  34. "Letter to Francis Collins Urging to Reconsider Decision to Cut Coronavirus Research Funding" (PDF). cms.asbmb.org.
  35. Wadman, Meredith; Cohen, Jon (8 May 2020). "NIH move to ax bat coronavirus grant draws fire". Science. 368 (6491): 561–562. Bibcode:2020Sci...368..561W. doi:10.1126/science.368.6491.561. PMID 32381695.
  36. Lanum, Nikolas (2 June 2021). "Former State Dept investigator on leaked Fauci emails: 'I don't trust these scientists' about Wuhan lab". Fox News Network, LLC.
  37. ^ Mallapaty, Smriti (2 December 2020). "Meet the scientists investigating the origins of the COVID pandemic". Nature. 588 (7837): 208. Bibcode:2020Natur.588..208M. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-03402-1. PMID 33262500.
  38. Hernandez, Javier C. (13 January 2021). "Two Members of W.H.O. Team on Trail of Virus Are Denied Entry to China". The New York Times.
  39. Wade, Nicholas (5 May 2021). "The origin of COVID: Did people or nature open Pandora's box at Wuhan?". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.
  40. Walsh, James (3 March 2023). "Mad Scientists Nowhere is the lab-leak debate more personal than among the experts investigating the origins of COVID". New York.
  41. "Conduct probe exonerates scientist accused of obscuring pandemic's origin". www.science.org. Retrieved 30 October 2022.
  42. Cohen, J. (28 OCT 2022). "Conduct probe exonerates scientist accused of obscuring pandemic's origin" SCIENCE|INSIDERHEALTH science.org. Retrieved 17 November 2022.
  43. "Biden administration suspends funding for scientist at center of COVID lab leak theory". The Hill. Retrieved 22 May 2024.
  44. ^ Peter Daszak profile, NIH grant 12891702, p. 43: "1999 Meritorious service award, CDC . . . 2002 Honored by the naming of a new species of centipede, Cryptops daszaki (J Nat Hist 36: 76–106) . . . 2013 Honored by the naming of a new parasite species, Isospora daszaki (Parasit. Res. 111: 1463–1466) . . . 2018 Member, National Academy of Medicine (NAM), USA"
  45. "Dr. Peter Daszak Elected As a Member of the National Academy of Medicine". EcoHealth Alliance. 15 October 2018. Retrieved 10 May 2020.
  46. Lewis, J. G. E. (2002). "The scolopendromorph centipedes of Mauritius and Rodrigues and their adjacent islets (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha)". Journal of Natural History. 36 (1): 79–106. doi:10.1080/00222930110098508. S2CID 83706089.
  47. Ball, S. J.; Brown, M. A.; Snow, K. R. (2012). "A new species of Isospora (Apicomplexa: Eimeriidae) from the greenfinch Carduelis chloris (Passeriformes: Fringillidae)". Parasitology Research. 111 (4): 1463–1466. doi:10.1007/s00436-012-2980-0. PMID 22706904. S2CID 19233064.

External links

Scholia has an author profile for Peter Daszak.
COVID-19 pandemic
Timeline
Pre-pandemic
2020
2021
2022
2023
Locations
Africa
Northern
Eastern
Southern
Central
Western
Asia
Central/North
East
Mainland China
South
India
By location
Southeast
Malaysia
Philippines
West
Europe
United Kingdom
By location
Eastern
Western Balkans
European Union
EFTA countries
Microstates
North
America
Atlantic
Canada
Caribbean
Countries
British Overseas Territories
Caribbean Netherlands
French West Indies
US insular areas
Central America
United States
responses
By location
Oceania
Australia
New Zealand
South
America
Others
Impact
Culture and
entertainment
Arts and
cultural heritage
Education
By country
Sports
By country
By sport
Society
and rights
Social impact
Labor
Human rights
Legal
Minority
Religion
Economic
By country
By industry
Supply and trade
Financial markets
Information
Misinformation
Politics
Political impact
Protests
International relations
Language
Others
Health issues
Medical topics
Testing and
epidemiology
Apps
Prevention
Vaccines
Topics
Authorized
DNA
Inactivated
mRNA
Subunit
Viral vector
Virus-like particles
In trials
Attenuated
DNA
Inactivated
RNA
Subunit
Viral vector
Virus-like particles
Deployment
by location
Africa
Asia
Europe
North America
Oceania
South America
Others
Treatment
Monoclonal antibodies
Small molecule antivirals
Variants
Specific
General
Institutions
Hospitals and
medical clinics
Mainland China
Others
Organizations
Health
institutes
Pandemic
institutes
Relief funds
People
Medical
professionals
Researchers
Officials
WHO
By location
Others
List of deaths due to COVID-19
Data (templates)
Global
Africa
Americas
Asia
Europe
Oceania
Others
Categories: