| Revision as of 08:09, 26 May 2021 editBlablubbs (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators66,160 editsm fix indents← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 01:03, 27 May 2021 edit undoRoySmith (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators92,105 edits Archiving case section to w:en:Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Zero sharp/Archive (using spihelper.js)Tag: Replaced | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| {{SPIarchive notice|Zero sharp}} | {{SPIarchive notice|Zero sharp}} | ||
| {{SPIpriorcases}} | {{SPIpriorcases}} | ||
| ===20 May 2021=== | |||
| {{SPI case status|close}} | |||
| ====Suspected sockpuppets==== | |||
| * {{checkuser|1=Catchpoke|master name={{#titleparts:{{SUBPAGENAME}}}}}} | |||
| *<s>{{checkuser|1=WikiCleanerMan|master name={{#titleparts:{{SUBPAGENAME}}}}}}</s> | |||
| <!-- You may duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts--> | |||
| *'''Tools''': <span class="plainlinks"> • • </span> <small>''Auto-generated every hour.''</small> | |||
| I see a similar account setup as their previous socks, similar interests, and similar editing patterns. ] (]) 04:40, 20 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
| * Hi ], I'm not an expert on Zero sharp and do not remember him as an editor. This is definitely a weakness versus the other banned editors for whom I found sockpuppets over the years (notably Haham Hanuka and Wikixx), who I remember well as editors. Nevertheless, last time when I saw an out-of-the-blue meritless nomination for the Israeli subject domain I thought that this might be a sockpuppet and it was identified by others as Zero sharp's. Here we have a similar nomination by a new user who came around shortly after Zero's previous sockpuppets were blocked. In the history I see again a deep interest in yoga, erasing of a vandalism notice, and cursing, so I thought I'd notify again for professional consideration. This is the stronger case. I have stricken through the weaker case that showed fewer similarities. In any case, this is not a crusade against anyone and there are no objectives other than to keep WP a safe and fair place for everyone. Best, ] (]) 02:02, 25 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
| :User started an "ANI" procedure after I reported him. In this procedure he seems to express concern that his IP might be checked. ] (]) 02:39, 26 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
| ====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== | |||
| <small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | |||
| ], all this over a template discussion? There is no evidence I'm a sockpuppet of a user I've never heard of. --] (]) 18:39, 21 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
| * I am involved in ] with the three editors mentioned here. From there, I have no clue that sockpuppetry would be happening. I also note that in that discussion OP gidonb was casting BF/PA arguments. -] (]) 17:01, 22 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
| * His states "JIC" or Just in case. That is not how a sockpuppetry investigation works. There needs to be evidence as stated on the ]. There must be immediate evidence provided and as ] states, "I see a similar account setup as their previous socks, similar interests, and similar editing patterns". That is pretty vague which of course won't be investigated per the rules. --] (]) 21:46, 22 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
| :: I've informed Catchpoke on his talk page. You can find it . --] (]) 21:59, 22 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
| ::: The summary Just In Case came with a change from "he" to "they". It means that I'm not 100% sure of the gender of a person in a discussion. ] (]) 23:39, 22 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
| ::::What a spurious nomination by a ].] (]) 02:54, 23 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Thanks for being so careful in your wording, {{U|Gidonb}}. Now would you please comply with the CU request for diffs? -] (]) 10:11, 23 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
| * I propose this investigation be closed, ]. It's been four days and no evidence has been provided because Gidonb is only here to cause drama because Catcpoke and I don't agree with him on the Tfd linked above. --] (]) 19:28, 24 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
| :: I have shown strong commonalities between a disruptive user and a known sockpuppeteer for whom I have detected a sockpuppet in the past. Whether they are the same, this is a similar case, or all is coincidental is for the analyst to decide. Also, I have never tied between the discussion and the investigation here. On the contrary, I participated in the discussion as if this investigation did not exist while you kept trying to introduce it. Facts do matter. 16:14, 25 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
| :::Facts do matter. But you have not provided any facts so far. But I don't see why anyone would open this investigation when it transpired from the Tfd. I don't see why you would've suspect me in the first place. --] (]) 16:35, 25 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
| *This SPI now is part of an ]. Please, {{U|Blablubbs}} or any other CU editor: ''why has this claim not been thrown out already?'' -] (]) 20:00, 25 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
| ====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== | |||
| *{{yo|Gidonb}} {{DiffsNeeded|moreinfo}}{{pb}} --]|] 19:25, 21 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
| :*{{re|Blablubbs}} I recommend closing this for lack of evidence.--] (]) 22:37, 25 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
| ::*{{ping|Gidonb}} I have reviewed the diffs you interpolated since I recommended closure, and I see nothing that indicates a connection between Catchpoke and the master or their socks. As {{U|Blablubbs}}'s request states, you must present ''comparison'' diffs, meaning diffs of Catchpoke's edits alongside diffs of the master-socks' edits that demonstrate a behavioral connection. Instead, you focus only on those edits of Catchpoke's that bother you, like weirdly claiming that calling you a "hypocrite" is "cursing". It's not, but, regardless, if you could show that the master/socks have called editors who disagree with them hypocrites, ''that'' would be some evidence of a connection. For these reasons, I am closing this report. If Blablubbs disagrees, they are welcome to reopen it.--] (]) 05:36, 26 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
| :::*{{yo|Bbb23}} Sorry, I was meaning to get to this{{snd}}no objections to the close from my side. --]|] 07:44, 26 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
| ----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> | |||
Latest revision as of 01:03, 27 May 2021
Zero sharp
Zero sharp (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Zero sharp/Archive.