| Revision as of 21:07, 23 January 2007 editHagermanBot (talk | contribs)95,722 editsm Nateland didn't sign: "your pov forking. "← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 06:58, 12 March 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (111 intermediate revisions by 34 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for October 22== | |||
| == Cornell University == | |||
| I have addressed your objections at ] and would like further comments. Thanks! -]<sup>]</sup> <font size="4">♠</font> 19:26, 21 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Please review the additional changes. —]<sup>]</sup> 00:37, 29 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| ==Tom DeLay== | |||
| I believe that I have addressed all of your objections at ]. Please let me know if there's anything else that needs to be done before you are willing to vote "Support". Thanks, ] | ] 06:03, 25 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 12:18, 22 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Adolescence == | |||
| == Disambiguation changes == | |||
| Good job fixing up the ] article. ] 07:14, 4 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Any reason for redirecting ] to ]? The disambiguation page was much more appropriate. Then you've created ] which ]? — ] ] 02:10, 19 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
| hey illuminato... about the adolescence article. | |||
| :Went on IRC chat and discussed with other experienced editors, and went with ] redirecting to ]. We also discussed redirecting "Hookup" and "Hook up" to ] and decided this probably isn't best. I guess if you still would really like to do that let's start a discussion on the ]. Hopefully you understand why I reverted your redirects. Let's discuss further if need be. Cheers! — ] ] 02:46, 19 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| I see you restored the text i deleted WITHOUT CITING good reasons. | |||
| Andi must have you know that what was in there IS biased. IS not backed up either by scientific OR nonrelegiously based evidence. And lacks ANY nuetrality WHATSOEVER!. | |||
| Misplaced Pages is not a place to inject political opinions.. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] 19:32, 24 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
| And the adolescence article is probably a reference for who knows HOW MANY multitudes of paretsn and teens seeking info on adolescence and teen sexuality in geenral or in detail. Replacing my CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL backed information with leonard sax's own 'facts' on how teen sex is just a hook-up and that teen are emotionally immature is NOT valid!!!. | |||
| == 'request' == | |||
| There is no way to measure if it's just a hook-up, and teenagers are quite capable of compassionate relationships... imagine how many teens you could have scared to death because they came here looking for information and now think that sexi s horrible and a disease until when... at age 18 it magically becomes... 'natural and acceptable'... | |||
| You deleted all content from the page and left it untouched for over a month. I interpreted this as meaning that you wanted the page deleted. If you want it restored, just ask explicitly and I'll restore it. ] (]) 17:46, 3 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
| THERE ISN'T EVEN MENTION OF AGE OF CONSENT LAWS!. | |||
| Don't think of your own opinions... think of the kids that come here looking for info. | |||
| I redeleted this biased information and have requested protection from editing immediately. | |||
| == Edit warring on ] == | |||
| I might be new to editing wikipedia but i know a lie* when i see one | |||
| Please see my on ]. You have already reverted content four times in the past 24 hours, breaking ]. This is ], and it can get you blocked from editing. Please stop trying to ram in your own private draft for this page when there's no consensus for it. Multiple editors have requested that you stop adding contentious material and instead first discuss it on the talk page. If there is consensus to add the controversial material, '''then''' you may add it. If you continue to attempt to ram through your own private draft against the objections of myself and other editors, I will file a complaint on ]. ] (]) 19:20, 29 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *basically all of the completely unnuetral and unwikipedia acceptable information found on the page covering 'teen psychology and adolescence in general'. | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| P.S. sax's info is copied onto the psychology page when it doesn't quite fit... ---___--- | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. {{Break}}Misplaced Pages is not academia, nor a pulpit, nor a magazine. Simply put, you appear to be gaming the system to push your agenda about sexual behavior. Several editors, for the sake of neutrality, have attempted to respond to your edits constructively but at this point it has clearly become a case of patrolling them and appealing to other avenues of relief. The preferred option in this situation would be for you to take a self-imposed wikibreak.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 00:06, 27 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == about Leonard sax's data and sources derived from him == | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for August 21== | |||
| P.S.S. | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| I would REALLY appreciate it if more sources backing up the claims of harm done to teenagers from sex/ intoxication causing it/reducing embarrasment could be provided 'hopefully' in internet form that are seperate from Leonard sax's theories as a LARGE amount of ther references are from Leonard Sax and it would be gratefully acknowledged if you could come up with more sources to back up Sax's claims due to his ideas and facts filling up a lot of the topic of teen sexuality. | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:41, 21 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Oh yes... I'm wondering about a seperate wikipedia article SPECIFICALLY for teen sexuality and activity/behaviour due to the fact that it is a bit long and if info about other countries are included the length might be increased DRAMATICALLY. | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Thus warranting another article based solely on this. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 04:06, 28 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == ok... here's a possible temporary replacement until desputes can be resolved.... plus more info. == | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for August 28== | |||
| I hope this can be used as a temporary replacement for the section on teen sexuality due to it's easily verifiable and trustworthy nature. (The Centers For Disease Control are pretty reliable in my opinion and many others) Plus it's layout would EASILY allow for inclusion of information on adolescent sexual activity and sexuality in other countries.. oh yes i'm thinking. | |||
| Could someone come up with some internet sources to show that adolescents have as diverse sexual orientations as adults?, that would be a given and add some more info other then statistics on pregnancy and STD transmission. | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| I myself KNOW that teenagers (I myself am a teenager, a little over 14) have varied orientations both homo, hetero, and paraphilic, but do ont know of many good studies or surveys to prove this point which aren't under hot debate. | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:57, 28 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| below is my idea of a good temporary replacement, i've also contacted an admin a few days ago to see if they can help out in this matter. Not sure if they'll get back to me though) | |||
| ==Adolescent sexuality== | |||
| Your changes and 'facts' in the article on adolescence and adolescent psychology have also come to the attention of two other users. (The psychology one has also been critiqued by yet ANOTHER user whom i havn't been able to contact) If needed i would like to arrange a group discussion of this article to decide what to do. | |||
| I don't know of any ] that '''favors''' sex among adolescents, though '''they''' doubtless favor it! I don't want to promote an argument on "AS in the US" if you consider the argument closed. I don't have an overall grasp of the deleted material, but can support (or not!) individual issues as they are raised on the talk page. Thanks. ] (]) 19:02, 31 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | |||
| :What is an adolescent anyway? I know of sources that argue that it is best for female health to have children early. I also know of studies that argue that there are no adverse consequences of consensual sex among teenagers.] 19:08, 31 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::We can discuss issues on the talk page. I just wanted to demonstrate my support for Illuminato's position, if backed up by ] and not ]. But he probably knows that already. They've discovered in the past year or so that youth's brains are plastic (not totally formed) up until their early 20s. Probably shouldn't be letting them drive, vote or drink, until that happens, much less encouraging them to have sex. ] (]) 16:31, 1 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| :'''Various edits, generally appropriate, have left this article empty of content.''' | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| http://www.cdc.gov/STD/HPV/STDFact-HPV.htm | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 00:34, 14 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
| http://www.ashastd.org/hpv/hpv_learn_myths.cfm | |||
| == ] == | |||
| While a highly controversial topic, both sides of the issue for and against this activity have been fighting fiercely to prove their points on both relegious, secular, scientific, and statistical grounds. | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| This section deals with.... | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692013717 --> | |||
| Adolescent Sexual Activity In The United States | |||
| Research (Shown in the paragraph below) HAS proven In The United States however that pregnancy and std transmission in sexually active teens has gone down dramatically over the past 10 years, both of which have been leading secular reasons for stopping adolescent sexual activity (For pregnancy this is vaginal intercourse and for STD's like HIV it is anal, oral, or vaginal sex that counts towards the statistics, other STD's like syphillis etc. are available at the reference page) | |||
| Centers For Disease Control study On Rates For STD, and Pregnancy in United States teens | |||
| Of US teens aged 15-19 who are having sexual intercourse almost all (98%) use at least one form of contraception. The most popular form, at 94% usage, are condoms and the birth control pill at 61%. | |||
| U.S. teen pregnancies had decreased 28% between 1990 and 200 from 117 pregnancies of every 1,000 to 84 per 1,000 by the year 2,000. | |||
| Plase note however that WORLDWIDE: "Genital HPV infection is a sexually transmitted disease (STD) that is caused by human papillomavirus (HPV). Human papillomavirus is the name of a group of viruses that includes more than 100 different strains or types. More than 30 of these viruses are sexually transmitted, and they can infect the genital area of men and women including the skin of the penis, vulva (area outside the vagina), or anus, and the linings of the vagina, cervix, or rectum. Most people who become infected with HPV will not have any symptoms and will clear the infection on their own." | |||
| Also, in the case of HPV condoms DO NOT completely stop the risk of contraction oh HPV, however the use of condoms has been shown by studies to lower the risk of getting this Disease | |||
| Some of these viruses are called "high-risk" types, and may cause abnormal Pap tests. They may also lead to cancer of the cervix, vulva, vagina, anus, or penis. Others are called "low-risk" types, and they may cause mild Pap test abnormalities or genital warts. Genital warts are single or multiple growths or bumps that appear in the genital area, and sometimes are cauliflower shaped. | |||
| yours truly, | |||
| ] 22:15, 6 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I noticed you uploaded this picture in September, and it was deleted as inappropriate. We cannot allow exposed pictures of private individuals, as we have no way of verifying that the subject (as well as the owner of the picture) consents. The pictures, or similar, have since been uploaded from another account. I was just wondering whether you had any idea who was doing this. And, if you did, whether you might ask them to desist.--]<sup>g</sup> 15:20, 14 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks, for your response. The uploader has been told a number of times, but as they are using single purpose accounts, it is difficult to pin them down. I guess I'll just need to keep watching the article. But again thanks. --]<sup>g</sup> 20:25, 14 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==complaint== | |||
| I am lodging a formal complaint about the user illuminato. | |||
| Why?, because he IS ALWAYS inserting every possible kind of weasel | |||
| word, POV statement, and he CONSISTENTLY reverts changes made by me | |||
| and other people back to a HIGHLY POV state. | |||
| I am stating this now. | |||
| I request that Illuminato be BANNED from editing Misplaced Pages for a while | |||
| at least. Due to his constant unwillingness to allow ANY sort of | |||
| lettering into wikipedia other than his own biased views. | |||
| This has been glaringly obvious to me in the articles on | |||
| Adolescence, namely the adolescent sexuality section. | |||
| And the new article created on Adolescent sexuality. Which he has | |||
| CONSTANTLY been reverting back into an incredibly biased state with | |||
| sources from 2 year old single day of printing newspapers, use of | |||
| HIGHLY DUBIOUS sources to back up his OBVIOUSLY POV statements and | |||
| claims which he injects, and how he HAS ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS | |||
| disregarded the requests and wishes of me and other people on | |||
| wikipedia in order to revert and basically vandalize articles so they | |||
| reflect a TOTALLY BIASED POV, | |||
| I am sick and tired of this and will go into a revert war if need be | |||
| until this gets fixed as HARDLY ANYTHING has managed to be | |||
| accomplished with his constant interference which DOES NOTHING I | |||
| repeat... NOTHING to help the article out whatsoever...... Although i | |||
| am asking help from my fellow wikipedians n solving this issue and | |||
| perhaps calling up a moderation committee person. | |||
| If you check over the discussions and histories on these two articles | |||
| I am sure you will CLEARLY see the point of contention. | |||
| NOTE:your edit said fixing up the front part of the topic.... except it was basically reverting the article. now THAT is what REALLY annoys me, lying in order to rebias an article which is ALREADY in dire need of improvement. | |||
| I hope my wishes are at least considered or met. | |||
| ] 04:17, 17 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :] shouldn't be banned. User:Illuminato isn't reverting ]'s edits out of maliciousness, he is doing it to restore the articles. User:Nateland of the ] article. User:Illuminato hasn't been lying as previously claimed, but User:Nateland large portions of an article, called it a minor change, and didn't mention the deletion in the edit summary. That would be considered as a misrepresentation of the facts. User:Illuminato is respectful. User:Nateland is refers to people he disagrees with as . User:Nateland says POV is bad, but then adds his own point of view to the article. All related major points of view should be included in Misplaced Pages article. Points of views should be mentioned as opinions unless they can be backed up as fact with reliable sources. ] 05:57, 17 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :: Seconded. ] has been acting in an immature and juvenile manner despite best attempts to warn against this and civil discussion. I have placed a final warning on ] as an unfortunate last resort. Any further problems and I will refer ] to an administrator myself. —Mike Trausch (], ]) 21:00, 20 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Unthirded, | |||
| Look I've CLEARLY explained my view of things and the situation on ] | |||
| and on fd0mans page, if you will be kind enough to do so then look at those pages and i will CLEARLY explain the circumstances and situation, you might also want to check out the talk for the main article on adolescence and the histories of the two articles for the whole dispute, there is also a few things on adolescent psychology i got into an argument with Illuminato with... although that article seems to be in stable condition for now. | |||
| Also, I posted this complaint about a week ago and forwarded it to an administrator, | |||
| now!. I am no idiot, nor am I an immature juvenile. I would only post a formal complaint, report someone for a 3RR violation, or forward to an administrator if i was Seriously concerned. (Basically it was not uncivil to to report Illuminato as he broke the 3RR and despite my warning him and asking him to post his changes for discussion he simply ingnored it.) also, since Illuminato has deleted the final warning template so shall I delete mine. | |||
| That's it, and PLEASE get off my back, no need to gang up on me.. I think we should focus on improving the article at the moment, discomforts can be ironed or battled out later and at another place & time then wikipedia. | |||
| Oh yes, i have posted Multiple proposals for changes to the page out of which Illuminato has responded to NONE. Yet he still went about editing as he pleased... | |||
| It's quite annoying. | |||
| ] 01:11, 21 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == You have been reported. == | |||
| Since you have reverted it again I have reported you for vandalism. | |||
| Editors ARE allowed to do 3RR reports if need be. | |||
| I will wait until an admin responds however to fix the damage you have done. | |||
| ] 20:51, 20 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Proposed changes/additions to adolescent sexuality main article. == | |||
| _________________________________________________ | |||
| "Teens - and preteens - are too young to fathom the consequences, both physical and emotional, of their behavior." According to Lynn Ponton, a professor of psychiatry at the University of California, San Francisco and author of The Sex Lives of Teenagers, "early initiation into sexual behaviors a toll on teens' mental health. The result, she says, can be 'dependency on boyfriends and girlfriends, serious depression around breakups and cheating, lack of goals.'" As adolescents are not mentally or emotionally prepared to handle feelings and emotions that come with sex, nor financially able to support children, "early sexual activity - whether in or out of a romantic relationship - does far more harm than good." | |||
| A minority, including journalist Judith Levine, believes that sexual activity among adolescents and even children is natural and causes little to no harm if contraception is used. She believes that since humans are sexual beings that even the smallest children will most likely end up taking part in sex rehearsal play with other children out of their own explorations and that it causes no harm. | |||
| _________________________________________________________-- | |||
| Human sexual behavior generally and adolescent sexual behavior in most individuals is typically influenced, or heavily affected by norms from the culture in which the individual lives. Examples of such norms are prohibitions on sexual intercourse before marriage, against homosexual sexual activity, or other taboo activities, because the religion or culture to which the individual belongs forbids them. Sometimes individuals choose not to ascribe to culturally or religious imposed norms. | |||
| The text inside the dashed lines is a MAJOR thing i think we need to clean up ASAP. | |||
| You see, that is a U.S centric gropu of opinions from both sides of a U.S. centric issue with U.S sources. If this article is on world adolescent sexuality (As I think it has been consensually declared as such) | |||
| Then I think we need to go along with my earlier post which you reverted and put that in a general United states section like i had on my edits before you reverted it. | |||
| THEN underneath we put in the 3 categories, experiences of adolescents during sex If applicable, (this might be a bit hard to gather data on as easily peer accessible sources for this subtopic, are scarce), motivations for engaging in sex can be explained in part by the KFF/Seventeen Magazine survey and by Leonard Sax's stuff | |||
| (I'll not argue over the Saxion data, but i want to see some sources as you agreed you'd do), and then lastly, Frequency of sex among adoloscents, (I think that CDC and.or other VERY well known sources should be used for this. | |||
| Oh yes, and a subsection on contraception usage, I have the CDC data and can find some more, this again should be added to with easily accessible VERY well known sources (Preferably in internet form). | |||
| And the Britain section (Well, now it's not totally US centric because its got 2 countries, although we should try and add data from other ocuntries as well) | |||
| The opening though should comprise of THIS, it seems nuetral enough and worldwide applicable. | |||
| Human sexual behavior generally and adolescent sexual behavior in most individuals is typically influenced, or heavily affected by norms from the culture in which the individual lives. Examples of such norms are prohibitions on sexual intercourse before marriage, against homosexual sexual activity, or other taboo activities, because the religion or culture to which the individual belongs forbids them. Sometimes individuals choose not to ascribe to culturally or religious imposed norms. | |||
| The above seems pretty good, then in the general adolescent sex in the united states section we can add in the dashed paragraphs, and if you don't mind i'll put in my brief summary of organizations (Or just the advocates for youth one) And perhaps we can try and format it so that the two major opposing viewpoints can be put into General info subsections like FOR and AGAINST in order to reduce the problem of inequal formatting that has occured in the past. | |||
| That should clear it up, and we can add in other countries as we go along. (OR make a stub-like general info on adolescent sexuality that has links to articles on adolescent sexuality in other countries. | |||
| And... I think that we should include how Adolescent sexual orientations can differ etc. etc. (So it's more than just statistical and represented viewpoint data), I once did thata couple of hours ago, but it got deleted. I hope that it can be kept inside. | |||
| Maybe then.. (Yes i know. this is a FULL summary of fixes and additions that i think should be made) We can add links to ] ] ] ] ] or whatever. | |||
| So what does everyone think of this proposal? | |||
| NOTE: A copy of this proposal is on the adolescent sexuality main article talk page. | |||
| == Below are my suggestions which i posted on the talk page and the changes I made == | |||
| The only thing is that with the high volume of views which can easily be construed as 'against' when compared to those that can be construed themselves as 'for' it is in my opinion a good idea to sort them out like that so that people can get both sides of the issue with ease. | |||
| I mean, the current article is a MESS if you don't mind me saying... (AT least father down in it), just one big jumble of words with everything mixed in, now i won't argue the 'trying to get more spotlgiht for your views' viewpoint. | |||
| But with it in such a jumble it's bound (In my opinion) to be Really really hard to read it through and get the sources etc.... | |||
| I mean, we should at ''least'' sort the article out by who claims what. And I still think that the Advocates For Youth reference should be included to help equalize the article as i said before. You might not be obligated to give 'minority' views much sunlight, BUT as the FOR side makes up literally half (or a third counting the inbetween) due to the huge volume of people in this country whom have either a for, against, or inbetween viewpoint. | |||
| It DOES make up a significant portion of this article. Anyways, we cannot I repear Cannot have the ponton lynn etc. quotes at the START of an article on the worldwide views of Adolescence... i'm sorry if this goes against your views, I understand how you must feel right now.... but for a brief summary of worldwide views I SERIOUSLY think that keeping it to the first paragraph explaining possible cultural & relegious norms etc. is a good idea and that we relegate the Judith Levine, Leonard Sax, and Ponton Lynn opinions down to the section from the United states and seperate them into the 3 categories. | |||
| Also, a user had included a brief few words in the article about muslim views on adolescent sex that got deleted in your revert, check out his talk page, his username is Paul Foord, I gave him some suggestions for adding the brief mentions in it and I think that this might end up branching off into other articles.... | |||
| NOTE:A. and B. of the below i have done, namely added the ref and relegated ALL pov's to the US section, please discuss changes on the talk page BEFORE making ANY changes... there has been far to much reverting for progress to be made with yet ANOTHER revert. | |||
| But anyways, in summary here's what I plab to do NOW. | |||
| A. Add the AFY (Advocates for Youth) mention and description IN the main United states part. | |||
| B. relegate ALL paragraphs and citations WHICH are POV or come from the above mentioned authors and not a basic description of possible worldwide views of this subject to their respective country sections (Namely the United states section), and before you revert this illuminato, PLEASE discuss it here. We should wait AT LEAST a couple of days and get peoples consensus on the above proposal etc. | |||
| C. try and sort out the jumbled text and fix some refs i added early on in editing this article when it was still only a section of ] | |||
| And what I request be done in or at least SERIOUSLY discussed in the immediate future (within a week). | |||
| A. making sections for various authorities and so called experts on the subject OR making for and Against sections for the reasons i mentioned above. | |||
| == i think this'll work... more info below == | |||
| The current revision should be an acceptable compromise to you Illuminato, and since we're the only two people 'on' this article tonight I say we quit bickering and let it rest? | |||
| Agreed? | |||
| (I'm going to bed now, I'll place a copy of this in your talk page) | |||
| And i read the guidelines for leads, but since there are so many potential (And i'm sure existing worldwide views) on this subject that we should simply put those in each respective countries section. | |||
| But I must point out, THERE IS NO debate like this about sexual activity between ANYONE over 18 (Even for homosexuals it's not as much as this). It's like the day you turn 18 BOOM!, most controversy and government intervention stops... --___-- seems a bit needless to me considering adolescents are normally sexually mature by the late teens or earlier and EVERYONE makea mistakes and learns from them. | |||
| == Illuminato, I must NOT commend you. == | |||
| For one who denies using POV so MUCH!. | |||
| You append THIS and MORE lines. | |||
| Most experts agree that "teens - and preteens - are too young to fathom the consequences, both physical and emotional, of their behavior | |||
| Excuse me, but that's a WEASEL-WORD, hence the TEMPLATE!. I don't think MOST experts agree, in fact, you'd be suprised to hear the WIDE and FAR ranging opinions many experts have on the topic. | |||
| And cutting out the most important part of the lead and sticking in U.S. views (I know you though that sentence fits but it doesn't, a fair portion of the world doesn't worry if adolescents will have good sexual experiences or not, they just think it's natural and good and not-so-good things will happen, so don't make that seem like the WWview) | |||
| I Really hate to say this but HOW did YOU ever stoop DOWN to putting in things like | |||
| Most experts agree that "teens - and preteens - are too young to fathom the consequences, both physical and emotional, of their behavior | |||
| ... weasel-words etc. | |||
| No wonder it got protected, I'd been editing on it for over 13 hours yesterday and went to bed, I wake up at 12:00 today (The afternoon), and BOOM!, someone switched it around Big Time. | |||
| If you did that on accident (Seems hard to believe considering your self described knowledge and abidence by wikipedia rules) Then I forgive but remind you to be more careful in the future. | |||
| If you DID do that just to plot your own views with those of experts by twisting their words.... | |||
| Then FIX IT!!! | |||
| 'Most' wasn't in Lynn Ponton's original quote as you put it, and that's like twisting a study around (Comparable to the Meese commission's twsting and abstracting scientists and sociologists studies, most of whom complained) | |||
| If we're ever going to fix this we need to be willing to allow some things that we don't want to go in there, and Weasel words and switching things around like that (And also messing up the 'minority' viewpoints by taking out some of what they believe in... check the Advocates For Youthl ink that I CLEARLY placed in the article. They do more than what is still in the article) Is not allowed if we go by wikipedia guidelines. | |||
| I'm sorry to say this but i'm REALLY dissapointed in you! | |||
| I mean c'mon!, if you've been using wikipedia so long than why do this.. especially after using my age against to invalidate my opinions on the editing of the subject?. | |||
| That's all for now... | |||
| ] 18:10, 21 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == 13 hours... == | |||
| Well, my friends were either not at home, or with their step parents, or lived too far away to bike to in cold weather. (It's only three or four or five miles but STILL). | |||
| Anyways, for me, if i'm bored, i go on my computer!. (Reading i sometimes do, video games... not so much) Andi figured i'd engage myself in a good old fashioned round of | |||
| 'edit da wiki!' you know, help out with some article i'm focusing on at the moment and try to resolve them. | |||
| (Yes it was a saturday, but I was too lazy to go outside, even though it IS a warm winter, and wikipedia is Great for keeping me occupied if i get bored) | |||
| Anyways, i kinda biased it myself by saying that they FULLY supported it. But I know they at least SUPPORT allowing adolescents to make their own sexual decisions, that quote might not be plastered all over every page they have. | |||
| But the slogan itself. | |||
| right. respect. responsibility. | |||
| Although if you need a link for some proof on the spot here ya go, | |||
| "RESPONSIBILITY: Society has the responsibility to provide young people with the tools they need to safeguard their sexual health, and young people have the responsibility to protect themselves from too-early childbearing and sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV."<ref>http://www.advocatesforyouth.org/about/vision.htm</ref> | |||
| By saying they have the responsibility that means pretty much they have the right to make sexual choices, that's basically one of the pillars of the organization. | |||
| (They might not support it FULLY, but they DEFINATELY DO support allowing adolescents to make their own sexual decisions and have easy access to contraception, comprehensive sex-education, and EC if need be. | |||
| That's pretty indicative of their views. | |||
| Cheers | |||
| ] 01:16, 22 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| and oh yes, my gripe is that the START of the lead is someones own moral and/or scientific opinion on adolescent sexuality. But that opinion might probably doesn't apply to the a lot, or even most, and i'm pretty darn sure NOT ALL of the world !!!. | |||
| You see, the sentence that got relegated to the bottom pretty much layed out the stuff, and a summary of such a highly controversial subject (At least in the middle east, and North America and britain) is going to make it NEARLY IMPPOSIBLE to fit in a good summary without exclusivising it. | |||
| Which is what happened, so that's why I wanted the basic generic summary of how cultural norms etc. effect activites etc. etc. to stay in the lead, and a note saying issues specific to each country and/or region /relegion etc. etc. be placed in the lead so that people would KNOW where to find them. | |||
| It's just too specific and biased to keep it the way it is. | |||
| The rest i can focus on later (Except if you don't mind i want to fix the survey from, 17 magazine and the KFF so that it says something more to what it could indicate, because saying a cultural shift is happening in that context is like saying Adolescents already DO practice unsafe sex habits, which is clearly biased by mine and i'm sure YOUR means. So i would restate it saying | |||
| However, earlier research done in 2000 by ___ & ___ could point to an already cultural norm not recognized by the mass media | |||
| (It IS quite obvious that in the MM adolescent sex is viewed with distaste 99.8761% of the time and that leonard sax and lynn ponton THEMSELVES are in the mass media. THEN we could maybe say after the NPOV part, | |||
| or it is indicative of a shift in sexual behaviour among adolescents from an existing culture norm. (See what i mean?, human language is VERY easily switchable as you know... and we could very very easily make it POV Like that statement is now) | |||
| Other then that... I'm ok with what's in their, a bit of reformatting is needed, and a subsection in the U.S., britain and other countries to be added should be placed inside detailing sexual diversity among adolescents (not just HOW they discover their orientations but saying that sexual orientations among adolescents is as diverse as that of adults (Which it is, as they're sexually mature if not emotionally as you so stubbornly put it :-) | |||
| Although liquid sexuality is ALWAYS a possibility (But let's not be nit picky ok?) | |||
| Cheers | |||
| ] 01:16, 22 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == your pov forking. == | |||
| Illuminato, we're talking about a MAIN ARTICLE for pov's on this subject. And not as a POV fork... no, it would be to reduce edit warring in THIS article and allow things to actually get done such as inputting scientific data and such which to me hold more precendence than how many and whose POV'S are in the article. | |||
| It is not meant as a POV fork, it's meant as a POV compromise. I think that Jecowas usage of the term is simply mean't to try and detract from what I have been saying for weeks now in order to push his OWN views into the article. | |||
| Besides, your creation of the other articles IS a POV fork that would allow much easier POV'ing and crookedness of articles due to their immensity once a bunch of countries are added.. <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) 21:07, 23 January 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> | |||
Latest revision as of 06:58, 12 March 2022
Disambiguation link notification for October 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Adolescent sexuality in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Friends With Benefits (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:18, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation changes
Any reason for redirecting Hookup to Casual sex? The disambiguation page was much more appropriate. Then you've created Hookup (disambiguation) which already exists? — MusikAnimal 02:10, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
- Went on IRC chat and discussed with other experienced editors, and went with Hookup (disambiguation) redirecting to Hook-up. We also discussed redirecting "Hookup" and "Hook up" to Casual sex and decided this probably isn't best. I guess if you still would really like to do that let's start a discussion on the talk page. Hopefully you understand why I reverted your redirects. Let's discuss further if need be. Cheers! — MusikAnimal 02:46, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Hookup culture for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hookup culture is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Hookup culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 19:32, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
'request'
You deleted all content from the page and left it untouched for over a month. I interpreted this as meaning that you wanted the page deleted. If you want it restored, just ask explicitly and I'll restore it. DS (talk) 17:46, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
Edit warring on Hookup culture
Please see my last post on talk:hookup culture. You have already reverted content four times in the past 24 hours, breaking WP:3RR. This is edit warring, and it can get you blocked from editing. Please stop trying to ram in your own private draft for this page when there's no consensus for it. Multiple editors have requested that you stop adding contentious material and instead first discuss it on the talk page. If there is consensus to add the controversial material, then you may add it. If you continue to attempt to ram through your own private draft against the objections of myself and other editors, I will file a complaint on WP:AN3. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:20, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Hookup culture shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Misplaced Pages is not academia, nor a pulpit, nor a magazine. Simply put, you appear to be gaming the system to push your agenda about sexual behavior. Several editors, for the sake of neutrality, have attempted to respond to your edits constructively but at this point it has clearly become a case of patrolling them and appealing to other avenues of relief. The preferred option in this situation would be for you to take a self-imposed wikibreak. EBY (talk) 00:06, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Adolescent sexuality in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chlamydia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Psychological effects of adolescent sex for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Psychological effects of adolescent sex is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Psychological effects of adolescent sex until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:06, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Psychological effects of adolescent sex, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mental (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Adolescent sexuality
I don't know of any WP:RS that favors sex among adolescents, though they doubtless favor it! I don't want to promote an argument on "AS in the US" if you consider the argument closed. I don't have an overall grasp of the deleted material, but can support (or not!) individual issues as they are raised on the talk page. Thanks. Student7 (talk) 19:02, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
- What is an adolescent anyway? I know of sources that argue that it is best for female health to have children early. I also know of studies that argue that there are no adverse consequences of consensual sex among teenagers.User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 19:08, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
- We can discuss issues on the talk page. I just wanted to demonstrate my support for Illuminato's position, if backed up by WP:RS and not WP:UNDUE. But he probably knows that already. They've discovered in the past year or so that youth's brains are plastic (not totally formed) up until their early 20s. Probably shouldn't be letting them drive, vote or drink, until that happens, much less encouraging them to have sex. Student7 (talk) 16:31, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Pornography and adolescents
The article Pornography and adolescents has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Various edits, generally appropriate, have left this article empty of content.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 00:34, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)