Revision as of 07:13, 11 June 2021 editWinchester2313 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,763 edits →Please stop edit warring on Linda Reade← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:00, 2 January 2025 edit undoNomoskedasticity (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers21,764 edits →Edit page - Legatum Institute | ||
(128 intermediate revisions by 47 users not shown) | |||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
== |
== Notice == | ||
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' | |||
] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at ]. Your edits appear to constitute ] and have been ]. If you would like to experiment, please use your ]. Repeated vandalism may result in the ]. Thank you.{{Z187}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> ] (]) 08:37, 30 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
:{{ping|Jh15s}} you've got the wrong end of the stick here -- IP address removes a long-standing element of the lead, and my reverting that edit is not vandalism but rather the reverse. I'm going to put it back, and if you want to remove it you can start a discussion. ] (]) 08:38, 30 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
:{{ping|Nomoskedasticity}} Thanks for that - apologies, I'm still getting the hang of patrolling for vandalism, so I really appreciate people pointing out mistakes I've made by accident. Feel free to left me know if I stuff something up again! :) ] (]) 08:41, 30 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
You have shown interest in governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic. | |||
== Closing RfC on Great Barrington Declaration == | |||
For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. | |||
Can you explain what your concern is with my closing my own RfC? Doing so is appropriate according to ]: ''There are several ways in which RfCs end: 1. The question may be withdrawn by the poster (e.g., if the community's response became obvious very quickly). In this situation, the editor who started the RfC should normally be the person who removes the rfc template.'' ]] 17:04, 18 February 2021 (UTC) | |||
}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | |||
:If you are withdrawing your own RfC, then fine. But that doesn't mean implementing the edit -- it rather means abandoning the proposal. ] (]) 17:12, 18 February 2021 (UTC) | |||
::RFCCLOSE doesn't make a distinction between a community response which obviously supports vs. obviously opposes the matter at question. The RfC has been live for eight days, the response has overwhelmingly been 'no', and there has been no additional response or comment for three days. It would be hard to argue that the community response is not obvious. ]] 17:27, 18 February 2021 (UTC) | |||
:::I can understand why you would prefer not to pay attention to the word "withdraw". ] (]) 10:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC) | |||
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' | |||
== Charlie Kirk Masks Edit == | |||
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic. | |||
You persistently revert edits that have removed the word 'falsely' from the description of Charlie Kirk's response to masks. Why? | |||
:Because he's full of shit.] (]) 17:10, 9 March 2021 (UTC) | |||
:: Agreed - but our views about him should not come through in the article. It should be written from a neutral point of view using verifiable information. 'falsely' add unnecessary slant. ] (]) 19:05, 9 March 2021 (UTC) | |||
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{tlx|Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. | |||
== Please stop edit warring on ] == | |||
}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | |||
Please avoid edit comments such as this and this | |||
I've restored my edits on ] and ask you again to please stop the war and don't just delete relevant information that belongs in an encyclopedia before you get consensus. ] (]) 18:06, 9 June 2021 (UTC) | |||
== Arbitration Enforcement notice == | |||
::Please refrain from falsely claiming consensus as you just did in your revert of my edit on ] and do not accuse me (again, falsely) of being a SPA. ] (]) 07:12, 11 June 2021 (UTC) | |||
== Invitation to participate in a research == | |||
Hello, | |||
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''. | |||
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate. | |||
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] . | |||
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns. | |||
Kind Regards, | |||
] | |||
<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Potential_Admins&oldid=27650229 --> | |||
== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
<div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
</div> | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1258243447 --> | |||
== Edit page - Legatum Institute == | |||
] | |||
Good morning, colleague, | |||
I noticed that you reverted my contributions with a "''whose sock are you?''" in the edit summary. I would like to have a constructive and respectful discussion, and I believe we could talk on the article's discussion page about how we can improve it. | |||
I think Misplaced Pages is a space for respect and community building. Therefore, I would appreciate it if, instead of reverting my changes, we could talk about them. | |||
Thank you very much. | |||
<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> ] (]) 09:43, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Hello again! | |||
:Can you help me with the changes to the article we've been working on? I would like to improve it, can you help me? ] (]) 16:02, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::Post on the article talk page -- that's where discussion about editing an article can take place. In the meantime, do have a look at ] and all the other core policies about how to edit. ] (]) 17:00, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 17:00, 2 January 2025
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Please avoid edit comments such as this and this
Arbitration Enforcement notice
Invitation to participate in a research
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Edit page - Legatum Institute
Good morning, colleague,
I noticed that you reverted my contributions with a "whose sock are you?" in the edit summary. I would like to have a constructive and respectful discussion, and I believe we could talk on the article's discussion page about how we can improve it.
I think Misplaced Pages is a space for respect and community building. Therefore, I would appreciate it if, instead of reverting my changes, we could talk about them.
Thank you very much.
~~~~ CarlesFort (talk) 09:43, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hello again!
- Can you help me with the changes to the article we've been working on? I would like to improve it, can you help me? CarlesFort (talk) 16:02, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Post on the article talk page -- that's where discussion about editing an article can take place. In the meantime, do have a look at WP:RS and all the other core policies about how to edit. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 17:00, 2 January 2025 (UTC)