Misplaced Pages

User talk:Modern NFL Historian: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:10, 16 June 2021 editBlueMoonset (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers72,542 edits June 2021: why the GA nomination was revertedTag: Reverted← Previous edit Latest revision as of 22:22, 20 September 2022 edit undoModern NFL Historian (talk | contribs)33 edits Replaced content with 'Test'Tags: Replaced Manual revert 
(6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Test Test

== June 2021 ==

] Hello, and ]. You appear to be repeatedly ] other editors' contributions at ]. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is known as "]" and is usually seen as obstructing the ], as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a ] on the ].

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to ] on that page. This isn't done to ]. In particular, editors should be aware of the ], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> ]] 12:30, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

:Modern NFL Historian, please note that per the GA nomination instructions, {{tq|Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article on the article talk page prior to a nomination.}} You have not made any contributions to the article nor consulted with significant contributors to it, which is why your nominations have been reverted.
:If you believe the ] article meets the ] and is ready for nomination, you need first to do the consultation by posting a request to ] and allowing seven days for responses to accumulate. If there is then a consensus that the article is ready, and if you are prepared to work on edits to the article during the GA review process, you can make a nomination once the consultation process is over. ] (]) 03:10, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:22, 20 September 2022

Test