Revision as of 08:53, 21 June 2021 view sourceB.L Venkatanarasimhan (talk | contribs)9 edits →History: I have added content that authenticated, true and I have studied the Hindu scriptures thou roughly and so it is like a researched information. None one should delete this content. If he deletes, he is surely not a believer of history.Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:55, 26 December 2024 view source GreekApple123 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,640 edits →HistoryTag: Visual edit | ||
(788 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{pp|small=yes}} | |||
{{Short description| |
{{Short description|Concept of unified greater India}} | ||
⚫ | {{About| |
||
⚫ | {{Distinguish|Indian reunification}} | ||
{{Original research|date=April 2021}} | |||
⚫ | {{About|the irredentist concept|the Indian cultural sphere|Greater India}} | ||
] | |||
{{Use Indian English|date=June 2015}} | {{Use Indian English|date=June 2015}} | ||
{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2020}} | {{Use dmy dates|date=July 2020}} | ||
] | |||
'''Akhand Bharat''' ({{translation|Undivided India}}), also known as '''Akhand Hindustan''', is a term for the concept of a unified ].<ref name="Erdman2007">{{cite book|last=Erdman|first=H. L.|title=The Swatantra Party and Indian Conservatism|date=17 December 2007|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=9780521049801|page=55|quote=The ultimate reunification of the subcontinent is a professed goal, as it is for the Mahasabha, but here, too, there is a difference in emphasis which deserves note: for the Sangh, the goal is 'Akhand Bharat', while for the Mahasabha it is 'Akhand Hindustan'.}}</ref><ref name="Chitkara2004">{{cite book|last=Chitkara|first=M. G.|title=Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh|date=1 January 2004|publisher=APH Publishing|isbn=9788176484657|page=262|quote=Those who dub Shri L. K. Advani, the Home Minister of India and others as foreigners, must realise that the freedom struggle was a mass movement of all the people of entire Akhand Hindustan (United Bharat).}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/07/27/india-faces-a-looming-disaster/|title=India Faces a Looming Disaster|last=Prasad|first=Sumit Ganguly, Jai Shankar|website=Foreign Policy|date=27 July 2019 |language=en-US|access-date=8 August 2019|archive-date=30 July 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190730231817/https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/07/27/india-faces-a-looming-disaster/|url-status=live}}</ref> It asserts that modern-day ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and ] are one nation.<ref name="BanerjeeGhosh">{{cite book |last1=Banerjee |first1=Supurna |last2=Ghosh |first2=Nandini |title=Caste and Gender in Contemporary India: Power, Privilege and Politics |date=17 September 2018 |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-429-78395-1 |quote=The Hindutva discourse believes in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan all being a part of ''Akhand Bharat'' as they are a part of the sacred soil of the Hindu nation with common claims of nationalism.}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{cite book |last1=Khandelwal |first1=Meena |last2=Hausner |first2=Sondra L. |last3=Gold |first3=Ann Grodzins |title=Nuns, Yoginis, Saints, and Singers: Women's Renunciation in South Asia |date=2007 |publisher=Zubaan |isbn=978-81-89884-34-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IloRAQAAIAAJ&q=Akhand+Bharat |access-date=21 January 2021 |archive-date=15 July 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220715061304/https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/Nuns_Yoginis_Saints_and_Singers/IloRAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=Akhand+Bharat&dq=Akhand+Bharat&printsec=frontcover |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Chatterji |first1=Angana P. |last2=Hansen |first2=Thomas Blom |last3=Jaffrelot |first3=Christophe |title=Majoritarian State: How Hindu Nationalism Is Changing India |date=August 2019 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-007817-1 |page=161 |language=en}}</ref> | |||
'''Akhand Bharat''' (]: अखण्ड भारत <small>(])</small>, اکھنڈ بھارت <small>(])</small>), also known as '''Akhand Hindustan''' (]: अखण्ड हिन्दुस्तान <small>(])</small>, اکھنڈ ہندوستان <small>(])</small>) is an ] term literally meaning Undivided India.<ref name="Erdman2007">{{cite book|last=Erdman|first=H. L.|title=The Swatantra Party and Indian Conservatism|date=17 December 2007|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=9780521049801|page=55|quote=The ultimate reunification of the subcontinent is a professed goal, as it is for the Mahasabha, but here, too, there is a difference in emphasis which deserves note: for the Sangh, the goal is 'Akhand Bharat', while for the Mahasabha it is 'Akhand Hindustan'.}}</ref><ref name="Chitkara2004">{{cite book|last=Chitkara|first=M. G.|title=Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh|date=1 January 2004|publisher=APH Publishing|isbn=9788176484657|page=262|quote=Those who dub Shri L.K. Advani, the Home Minister of India and others as foreigners, must realise that the freedom struggle was a mass movement of all the people of entire Akhand Hindustan (United Bharat).}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/07/27/india-faces-a-looming-disaster/|title=India Faces a Looming Disaster|last=Prasad|first=Sumit Ganguly, Jai Shankar|website=Foreign Policy|language=en-US|access-date=8 August 2019}}</ref> It posits that modern-day India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Bangladesh are one nation.<ref name=":1"/> | |||
==History== | ==History== | ||
{{further|Composite nationalism|Opposition to the Partition of India}} | |||
During the ], ] advocated for ''Akhand Hindustan'', a proposition that ] |
During the ], ] advocated for ''Akhand Hindustan'', a proposition that ] agreed with, believing that as Britain wanted to retain their empire by pursuing a policy of ], ] could not be achieved as long as the British were there.<ref name="Ghose1991">{{cite book|last=Ghose|first=Sankar|title=Mahatma Gandhi|date=1 January 1991|publisher=Allied Publishers|isbn=9788170232056|page=315|quote=Later, K.M. Munishi, with Gandhi's blessing, also resigned from the Congress to plead for Akhand Hindustan as a counter blast to Pakistan. Gandhi, who previously thought that swaraj was impossible without Hindu-Muslim unity, subsequently came to the conclusion that as Britain wanted to retain her empire by pursuing a policy of divide and rule, Hindu-Muslim unity could not be achieved as long as the British were there.}}</ref> However, in relation to Myanmar (then Burma), Gandhi felt that it should be separate from India, regarding its ] as a purely British legacy.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Idea of 'Akhand Bharat' Smacks of Imperial Aspirations |url=https://thewire.in/politics/the-idea-of-akhand-bharat-smacks-of-imperial-aspirations |access-date=2024-12-26 |website=The Wire |language=en}}</ref> In addition, ] wrote that "the ] brothers determined to fight for ''Akhand Hindustan'', and challenged the ] to fight the issue out before the electorate of the Province."<ref name="KhanKhan1996">{{cite book|last=Khan|first=Mazhar Ali|title=Pakistan: The First Twelve Years|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=B_BtAAAAMAAJ|year=1996|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=9780195776768|quote=Many months ago, when the Pakistan issue was still in the melting pot, the Khan brothers determined to fight for Akhand Hindustan, and challenged the League to fight the issue out before the electorate of the Province.|access-date=14 August 2015|archive-date=30 April 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160430214605/https://books.google.com/books?id=B_BtAAAAMAAJ|url-status=live}}</ref> On 7–8 October 1944, in Delhi, ] presided over the ''Akhand Hindustan Leaders' Conference''.<ref name="Sharma2008">{{cite book|last=Sharma|first=Jai Narain|title=Encyclopaedia Eminent Thinkers|date=1 January 2008|publisher=Concept Publishing Company|isbn=9788180694929|page=88|quote=On 5 August 1944, he issued a common letter to the leaders of various parties making a proposal to hold Akhand Hindustan Leaders' Conference. Such a conference was held on 7 and 8 October in Delhi. It was presided over by Dr. Radha Kumud Mukherji.}}</ref> | ||
The Indian activist and ] leader ] at the ]'s 19th Annual Session in ] in 1937 propounded the notion of an |
The Indian activist and ] leader ] at the ]'s 19th Annual Session in ] in 1937 propounded the notion of an ''Akhand Bharat'' that "must remain one and indivisible" "from Kashmir to Rameswaram, from Sindh to Assam." He said that "all citizens who owe undivided loyalty and allegiance to the Indian nation and to the Indian state shall be treated with perfect equality and shall share duties and obligations equally in common, irrespective of caste, creed or religion, and the representation also shall either be on the basis of one man one vote or in proportion to the population in case of separate electorates and public services shall go by merit alone."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://theprint.in/opinion/savarkar-wanted-one-god-one-nation-one-goal-modi-has-fulfilled-his-dream-with-kashmir-move/273447/|title=Savarkar Wanted One God, One Nation, One Goal|last=Sampath|first=Vikram|date=7 August 2019|website=The Print India|access-date=8 August 2019|archive-date=8 August 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190808024435/https://theprint.in/opinion/savarkar-wanted-one-god-one-nation-one-goal-modi-has-fulfilled-his-dream-with-kashmir-move/273447/|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
⚫ | ==Contemporary usage== | ||
⚫ | The call for creation of the ''Akhand Bharat'' or ''Akhand Hindustan'' has on occasion been raised by ] organisations such as the ], ], ], ], the ], the ], ], the ] etc.<ref name="Suda1953">{{cite book|last=Suda|first=Jyoti Prasad|title=India, Her Civic Life and Administration|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mVsNAQAAIAAJ|year=1953|publisher=Jai Prakash Nath & Co.|quote=Its members still swear by the ideal of Akhand Hindusthan.|access-date=14 August 2015|archive-date=5 February 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160205144240/https://books.google.com/books?id=mVsNAQAAIAAJ|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Ferguson">Yale H. Ferguson and R. J. Barry Jones, ''Political space: frontiers of change and governance in a globalizing world'', page 155, SUNY Press, 2002, {{ISBN|978-0-7914-5460-2}}</ref><ref name="Majumder">Sucheta Majumder, "Right Wing Mobilization in India", ''Feminist Review'', issue 49, page 17, Routledge, 1995, {{ISBN|978-0-415-12375-4}}</ref><ref name="Martensson">Ulrika Mårtensson and Jennifer Bailey, ''Fundamentalism in the Modern World'' (Volume 1), page 97, I.B.Tauris, 2011, {{ISBN|978-1-84885-330-0}}</ref> One organization sharing this goal, the ], bears the term in its name.<ref>{{cite book|title=Hindu Political Parties|date=30 May 2010|publisher=General Books|isbn=9781157374923}}</ref> | ||
Pre-1947 maps of India, showing the modern states of Pakistan and Bangladesh as part of ] illustrate the borders of a proto-''Akhand Bharat''.<ref name=Majumder/> The creation of an ''Akhand Bharat'' is also ideologically linked with the concept of '']'' (Hindu nationalism) and the ideas of ''sangathan'' (unity) and '']'' (purification).<ref name=Martensson/> | |||
=Historical proofs= | |||
Not only Pakistan, Bangladesh, Tibet, Myanmar, Bhutan, even Afghanistan, Nepal and some parts of China also belong to India according to the Hindu scriptures. It is mentioned in Ramayana that Sugriva, the king of the Vanaras or monkeys, had army till Singapore from his capital Kishkindha, which is now situated in Ballari district of Karnataka that means India had it’s extent till Singapore and it is also mentioned in Ramayana that Sugriva also had army in present Saudi Arabia. And another proof to prove that Saudi Arabia was also a part of India is the remains of Lord Shiva’s temple in Kaaba, the holy place of Muslims in Mecca. And it is also mentioned in Hindu scriptures that there is a foot of Lord Vishnu in Kaaba of Mecca. Another foot of Lord Vishnu is now situated in Vishnu Gaya, a holy place of the Hindus in the Bihar state of India. India is called as the Indian continent(Bharata Khanda) in the Hindu scriptures. The present India in which we are living is a part of Bharata Varsha(A group of countries is called as Varsha and a group of Varshas is called as Khanda). It is also mentioned in Ramayana that Sri Lanka was ruled by a demonic-Brahmin king Ravan. There were many great sages in Sri Lanka and there were many great temples also and some of them are present till now so Sri Lanka was also a part of India. So we can conclude that the Akhanda Hindustan was so much big that we cannot explain it by words. | |||
⚫ | The first chapter of the ] textbook for standard VII students at Akhil Bharatiya Sanskrit Gyan Pariksha included a map depicting Pakistan and Bangladesh, which along with post-partition India, were territories that were part of "Akhand Bharat" and a trade union magazine of the same organization also included Nepal, Bhutan, and Myanmar.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ev4jAwAAQBAJ&pg=PT191|title=Partition and the South Asian Diaspora: Extending the Subcontinent|last=Ghosh|first=Papiya|date=21 March 2014|publisher=Routledge|isbn=9781317809654|language=en|access-date=9 August 2019|archive-date=8 March 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210308083950/https://books.google.com/books?id=ev4jAwAAQBAJ&pg=PT191|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
⚫ | ==Contemporary usage== | ||
⚫ | The call for creation of the ''Akhand Bharat'' or ''Akhand |
||
⚫ | While the leadership of the right-wing ] wavers on the issue, the RSS has always been a strong proponent of the idea.<ref>Jyotirmaya Sharma, ", '']'', 2005-06-19.</ref><ref>Radhika Ramaseshan, " {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130728042231/http://www.telegraphindia.com/1050616/asp/frontpage/story_4874540.asp |date=28 July 2013 }}", '']'', 16 June 2005.</ref> RSS leader H. V. Seshadri's book ''The Tragic Story of Partition'' stresses the importance of the concept of ''Akhand Bharat.''<ref>Ashish Vashi, "", '']'', 27 August 2009.</ref> The RSS-affiliated magazine '']'' often publishes editorials by leaders such as the present ], ], espousing the philosophy that only ''Akhand Bharat'' and ''sampoorna samaj'' (united society) can bring "real" freedom to the people of India.<ref>Manini Chatterjee, " {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220715061310/https://indianexpress.com/article/news-archive/only-by-akhand-bharat/ |date=15 July 2022 }}", '']'', 1 February 2007.</ref> The call for ] has been supported by Indian Prime Minister ],<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.deshgujarat.com/2012/03/24/a-day-would-come-when-sindh-will-be-a-part-of-indianarendra-modi-says-adding-that-a-grand-zulelal-dham-will-be-built-in-kutch/|title=Sindhis want Sindh in India?Modi gives example of Jews|date=24 March 2012|website=DeshGujarat|language=en-US|access-date=8 September 2019|archive-date=12 December 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191212095109/https://www.deshgujarat.com/2012/03/24/a-day-would-come-when-sindh-will-be-a-part-of-indianarendra-modi-says-adding-that-a-grand-zulelal-dham-will-be-built-in-kutch/|url-status=live}}</ref> and BJP National General Secretary ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/rss-belives-india-pak-and-bangladesh-will-reunite-through-goodwill-one-day-ram-madhav/|title=One day, India, Pak and Bangladesh could reunite as Akhand Bharat: Ram Madhav|date=27 December 2015|website=The Indian Express|language=en-IN|access-date=8 September 2019|archive-date=13 December 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191213164916/https://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/rss-belives-india-pak-and-bangladesh-will-reunite-through-goodwill-one-day-ram-madhav/|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
Pre-1947 maps of India, showing the modern states of Pakistan and Bangladesh as part of ] illustrate the borders of a proto-''Akhand Bharat''.<ref name=Majumder/> The creation of an ''Akhand Bharat'' is also ideologically linked with the concept of '']'' (Hinduness) and the ideas of ''sangathan'' (unity) and '']'' (purification) that seek to focus modern Indian politics on a continuous civilizational legacy and heritage of the ].<ref name=Martensson/> The Akhand Bharat comprises present-day India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan, and all the coastal countries of Indian Ocean.<ref name=":1">{{cite book |last1=Khandelwal |first1=Meena |last2=Hausner |first2=Sondra L. |last3=Gold |first3=Ann Grodzins |title=Nuns, Yoginis, Saints, and Singers: Women's Renunciation in South Asia |date=2007 |publisher=Zubaan |isbn=978-81-89884-34-5 |url=https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/Nuns_Yoginis_Saints_and_Singers/IloRAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=Akhand+Bharat&dq=Akhand+Bharat&printsec=frontcover}}</ref> | |||
⚫ | ] | ||
⚫ | In December 2015, following Narendra Modi's diplomatic visit to Lahore, Pakistan, the BJP National Secretary ] (in an interview with Al Jazeera's Mehdi Hassan) described that "The ] still believes that one day , which have for historical reasons separated only 60 years ago, will again, through popular goodwill, come together and ''Akhand Bharat'' will be created."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/rss-akhand-bharat/|title=RSS and the idea of Akhand Bharat|date=4 January 2016|website=The Indian Express|language=en-IN|access-date=8 August 2019|archive-date=8 August 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190808030245/https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/rss-akhand-bharat/|url-status=live}}</ref> In March 2019, RSS leader Indresh Kumar claimed that Pakistan would reunite with India by 2025, that Indians would settle in and migrate to ] and ] in Tibet, that an Indian-allied government had been ensured in ], and that a European Union-style ''Akhand Bharat'' would form.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://scroll.in/latest/916896/pakistan-will-be-part-of-india-after-2025-claims-rss-leader-indresh-kumar-report|title=Pakistan will be part of India after 2025, claims RSS leader Indresh Kumar: Report|author=Scroll Staff|website=Scroll.in|date=17 March 2019 |language=en-US|access-date=8 August 2019|archive-date=3 April 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190403090747/https://scroll.in/latest/916896/pakistan-will-be-part-of-india-after-2025-claims-rss-leader-indresh-kumar-report|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
⚫ | The first chapter of the ] textbook for standard VII students at Akhil Bharatiya Sanskrit Gyan Pariksha included a map depicting Pakistan and Bangladesh, which along with post-partition India, |
||
⚫ | Former Indian Supreme Court Judge ] advocated in Pakistani newspaper '']'' that the only solution to the ongoing dispute between India and Pakistan is the ] under a strong, secular, modern-minded government.<ref name="The truth about Pakistan">{{cite news| url=https://www.nation.com.pk/02-Mar-2013/the-truth-about-pakistan| work=The Nation| title=The truth about Pakistan| date=2 March 2013| access-date=9 January 2018| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131110103720/http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/columns/02-Mar-2013/the-truth-about-pakistan| archive-date=10 November 2013| url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=IE2>{{cite news| url=http://www.indianexpress.com/news/pakistan-allpraise-for-markandey-katju/1084053/0| work=The Indian Express| title=Pakistan all-praise for Markandey Katju| date=7 March 2013| access-date=9 January 2018| archive-date=10 March 2013| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130310031846/http://www.indianexpress.com/news/pakistan-allpraise-for-markandey-katju/1084053/0| url-status=live}}</ref> He expanded on the reasons for his support for a reunified India in an article for '']'';<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.newslaundry.com/2015/12/08/we-must-reunite-why-pakistan-india-and-bangladesh-should-be-one-country|work=Newslaundry|title=We must reunite: Why Pakistan, India and Bangladesh should be one country|date=8 December 2015|access-date=9 January 2018|archive-date=17 August 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180817193306/https://www.newslaundry.com/2015/12/08/we-must-reunite-why-pakistan-india-and-bangladesh-should-be-one-country|url-status=live}}</ref> Katju advocated that such a state would be administered by a secular government.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.huffingtonpost.in/markandey-katju/india-and-pakistan-must-reunite-for-their-mutual-good_a_22033158/|title=India And Pakistan Must Reunite For Their Mutual Good|date=10 April 2017|website=HuffPost India|language=en|access-date=9 February 2019|archive-date=22 November 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201122142913/https://www.huffingtonpost.in/markandey-katju/india-and-pakistan-must-reunite-for-their-mutual-good_a_22033158/|url-status=live}}</ref> Katju serves as the chairman of the Indian Reunification Association (IRA), which seeks to campaign for this cause.<ref name="Indica2019">{{cite web |title=Mission Statement of the Indian Reunification Association |url=https://indicanews.com/2019/02/07/mission-statement-of-the-indian-reunification-association/ |publisher=Indica News |language=English |date=7 February 2019 |access-date=9 February 2019 |archive-date=22 November 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201122173012/https://indicanews.com/2019/02/07/mission-statement-of-the-indian-reunification-association/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Katju2017">{{cite web |author1=Markandey Katju |author-link=Markandey Katju |title=India And Pakistan Must Reunite For Their Mutual Good |url=https://www.huffingtonpost.in/markandey-katju/india-and-pakistan-must-reunite-for-their-mutual-good_a_22033158/ |work=] |language=English |date=10 April 2017 |access-date=9 February 2019 |archive-date=22 November 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201122142913/https://www.huffingtonpost.in/markandey-katju/india-and-pakistan-must-reunite-for-their-mutual-good_a_22033158/ |url-status=live }}</ref> The former Indian Deputy Prime Minister ], in April 2004, similarly endorsed a ] as a powerful geopolitical entity rivalling the ], United States of America, Russian Federation and People's Republic of China.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.tribuneindia.com/2005/20051113/edit.htm#1|title=The Tribune, Chandigarh, India – Opinions|website=tribuneindia.com|access-date=9 August 2019|archive-date=30 January 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170130132731/http://www.tribuneindia.com/2005/20051113/edit.htm#1|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
⚫ | While the leadership of the right-wing ] wavers on the issue, the RSS has always been a strong proponent of the idea.<ref>Jyotirmaya Sharma, ", '']'', 2005-06-19</ref><ref>Radhika Ramaseshan, "", '']'', 16 June 2005</ref> RSS leader H. V. Seshadri's book ''The Tragic Story of Partition'' stresses the importance of the concept of ''Akhand Bharat.''<ref>Ashish Vashi, "", '']'', 27 August 2009</ref> The RSS |
||
⚫ | Hindu nationalist political groups such as Shiv Sena, have sought the reclamation of Pakistan-administered Kashmir under the pretence of ''Akhand Bharat,'' especially after the abrogation of ] (removing the semi-autonomy of Jammu and Kashmir) in August 2019.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://zeenews.india.com/india/dream-of-akhand-bharat-fulfilled-partially-with-article-370-abrogation-shiv-sena-lauds-modi-amit-shah-2225094.html|title=Dream of 'Akhand Bharat' fulfilled partially with Article 370 abrogation: Shiv Sena lauds Modi, Amit Shah|date=6 August 2019|website=Zee News|language=en|access-date=8 August 2019|archive-date=8 August 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190808024436/https://zeenews.india.com/india/dream-of-akhand-bharat-fulfilled-partially-with-article-370-abrogation-shiv-sena-lauds-modi-amit-shah-2225094.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.dawn.com/news/1498716|title=Govt, opposition united on Kashmir, divided on domestic issues|last=Wasim|first=Amir|date=8 August 2019|website=DAWN.COM|language=en|access-date=8 August 2019|archive-date=8 August 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190808024434/https://www.dawn.com/news/1498716|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
⚫ | In December 2015, following Narendra Modi's diplomatic visit to Lahore, Pakistan, the BJP National Secretary ] (in an interview with Al Jazeera's Mehdi Hassan) described that "The ] still believes that one day , which have for historical reasons separated only 60 years ago, will again, through popular goodwill, come together and ''Akhand Bharat'' will be created."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/rss-akhand-bharat/|title=RSS and the idea of Akhand Bharat|date=4 January 2016|website=The Indian Express|language=en-IN}}</ref> In March 2019, RSS leader Indresh Kumar claimed that Pakistan would reunite with India by 2025, that Indians would settle in and migrate to ] and ] in Tibet, that an Indian-allied government had been ensured in ], and that a European Union-style ''Akhand Bharat'' would form.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://scroll.in/latest/916896/pakistan-will-be-part-of-india-after-2025-claims-rss-leader-indresh-kumar-report|title=Pakistan will be part of India after 2025, claims RSS leader Indresh Kumar: Report|author=Scroll Staff|website=Scroll.in|language=en-US|access-date=8 August 2019}}</ref> | ||
On 17 November 2020, the RSS campaigners released a calendar based on the "Akhand Bharat" theme. This calendar was prepared by the province patron of the ] in ].<ref>{{Cite web|date=2020-11-17|title=RSS प्रचारकों पर जारी किया अखंड भारत कैलेंडर, जीवनी-संघ के कार्यों का किया गया उल्लेख|url=https://zeenews.india.com/hindi/india/rajasthan/akhand-bharat-calendar-released-on-rss-campaigners-in-jaipur/787786|access-date=2021-09-16|website=Zee Rajasthan|language=hi|archive-date=17 November 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201117125244/https://zeenews.india.com/hindi/india/rajasthan/akhand-bharat-calendar-released-on-rss-campaigners-in-jaipur/787786|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
⚫ | Former Indian Supreme Court Judge ] advocated in Pakistani newspaper '']'' that the only solution to the ongoing dispute between India and Pakistan is the ] under a strong, secular, modern-minded government.<ref name="The truth about Pakistan">{{cite news| url= |
||
In 2023, the unveiling of a mural in India's ], said to depict a map of the ] under ], sparked controversy and criticism from several of India's neighbouring countries. Spokesperson for the ], ], criticized it as a "manifestation of a ] and ] mindset", while the ]i junior minister for foreign affairs stated "Anger is being expressed from various quarters over the map."<ref name="cnn1">{{cite news |last1=Mogul |first1=Rhea |title=Why a map in India's new Parliament is making its neighbors nervous |url=https://edition.cnn.com/2023/06/13/india/india-akhand-bharat-map-parliament-intl-hnk/index.html |access-date=17 June 2023 |publisher=CNN |date=13 June 2023 |archive-date=16 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230616192919/https://edition.cnn.com/2023/06/13/india/india-akhand-bharat-map-parliament-intl-hnk/index.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Several ]i politicians also expressed concern. While the ], ], stated it symbolized "the idea of responsible and people-oriented governance that adopted and propagated", other politicians in the ruling ] declared it a symbol of Akhand Bharat, with ] ] tweeting "The resolve is clear. Akhand Bharat".<ref name="cnn1"/> | |||
⚫ | Hindu nationalist political groups such as Shiv Sena |
||
⚫ | ] | ||
On 17 November 2020, the RSS campaigners released a calendar based on the "Akhand Bharat" theme. This calendar was prepared by the province patron of the ] in ]. | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
{{Portal|India}} | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
⚫ | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Line 50: | Line 46: | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
{{Commons category}} | |||
* | * | ||
* | * | ||
{{irredentism}} | {{irredentism}}{{South Asian topics}} | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
Line 64: | Line 59: | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] |
Latest revision as of 18:55, 26 December 2024
Concept of unified greater India Not to be confused with Indian reunification. This article is about the irredentist concept. For the Indian cultural sphere, see Greater India.
Akhand Bharat (transl. Undivided India), also known as Akhand Hindustan, is a term for the concept of a unified Greater India. It asserts that modern-day Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Tibet are one nation.
History
Further information: Composite nationalism and Opposition to the Partition of IndiaDuring the Indian independence movement, Kanaiyalal Maneklal Munshi advocated for Akhand Hindustan, a proposition that Mahatma Gandhi agreed with, believing that as Britain wanted to retain their empire by pursuing a policy of divide and rule, Hindu–Muslim unity could not be achieved as long as the British were there. However, in relation to Myanmar (then Burma), Gandhi felt that it should be separate from India, regarding its inclusion in British India as a purely British legacy. In addition, Mazhar Ali Khan wrote that "the Khan brothers determined to fight for Akhand Hindustan, and challenged the League to fight the issue out before the electorate of the Province." On 7–8 October 1944, in Delhi, Radha Kumud Mukherjee presided over the Akhand Hindustan Leaders' Conference.
The Indian activist and Hindu Mahasabha leader Vinayak Damodar Savarkar at the Hindu Mahasabha's 19th Annual Session in Ahmedabad in 1937 propounded the notion of an Akhand Bharat that "must remain one and indivisible" "from Kashmir to Rameswaram, from Sindh to Assam." He said that "all citizens who owe undivided loyalty and allegiance to the Indian nation and to the Indian state shall be treated with perfect equality and shall share duties and obligations equally in common, irrespective of caste, creed or religion, and the representation also shall either be on the basis of one man one vote or in proportion to the population in case of separate electorates and public services shall go by merit alone."
Contemporary usage
The call for creation of the Akhand Bharat or Akhand Hindustan has on occasion been raised by Hindu nationalist organisations such as the Hindu Mahasabha, Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, Vishva Hindu Parishad, Shiv Sena, the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena, the Hindu Sena, Hindu Janajagruti Samiti, the Bharatiya Janata Party etc. One organization sharing this goal, the Akhand Hindustan Morcha, bears the term in its name.
Pre-1947 maps of India, showing the modern states of Pakistan and Bangladesh as part of British India illustrate the borders of a proto-Akhand Bharat. The creation of an Akhand Bharat is also ideologically linked with the concept of Hindutva (Hindu nationalism) and the ideas of sangathan (unity) and shuddhi (purification).
The first chapter of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh textbook for standard VII students at Akhil Bharatiya Sanskrit Gyan Pariksha included a map depicting Pakistan and Bangladesh, which along with post-partition India, were territories that were part of "Akhand Bharat" and a trade union magazine of the same organization also included Nepal, Bhutan, and Myanmar.
While the leadership of the right-wing BJP wavers on the issue, the RSS has always been a strong proponent of the idea. RSS leader H. V. Seshadri's book The Tragic Story of Partition stresses the importance of the concept of Akhand Bharat. The RSS-affiliated magazine Organiser often publishes editorials by leaders such as the present Sarsanghachalak, Mohan Bhagwat, espousing the philosophy that only Akhand Bharat and sampoorna samaj (united society) can bring "real" freedom to the people of India. The call for Indian reunification has been supported by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and BJP National General Secretary Ram Madhav.
In December 2015, following Narendra Modi's diplomatic visit to Lahore, Pakistan, the BJP National Secretary Ram Madhav (in an interview with Al Jazeera's Mehdi Hassan) described that "The RSS still believes that one day , which have for historical reasons separated only 60 years ago, will again, through popular goodwill, come together and Akhand Bharat will be created." In March 2019, RSS leader Indresh Kumar claimed that Pakistan would reunite with India by 2025, that Indians would settle in and migrate to Lahore and Lake Mansarovar in Tibet, that an Indian-allied government had been ensured in Dhaka, and that a European Union-style Akhand Bharat would form.
Former Indian Supreme Court Judge Markandey Katju advocated in Pakistani newspaper The Nation that the only solution to the ongoing dispute between India and Pakistan is the reunification of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh under a strong, secular, modern-minded government. He expanded on the reasons for his support for a reunified India in an article for Newslaundry; Katju advocated that such a state would be administered by a secular government. Katju serves as the chairman of the Indian Reunification Association (IRA), which seeks to campaign for this cause. The former Indian Deputy Prime Minister Lal Krishna Advani, in April 2004, similarly endorsed a confederation of the sovereign nations of India and Pakistan as a powerful geopolitical entity rivalling the European Union, United States of America, Russian Federation and People's Republic of China.
Hindu nationalist political groups such as Shiv Sena, have sought the reclamation of Pakistan-administered Kashmir under the pretence of Akhand Bharat, especially after the abrogation of Article 370 and 35A of the Indian constitution (removing the semi-autonomy of Jammu and Kashmir) in August 2019.
On 17 November 2020, the RSS campaigners released a calendar based on the "Akhand Bharat" theme. This calendar was prepared by the province patron of the Vishva Hindu Parishad in Jaipur.
In 2023, the unveiling of a mural in India's new parliament building, said to depict a map of the Maurya Empire under Ashoka, sparked controversy and criticism from several of India's neighbouring countries. Spokesperson for the Pakistani Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Mumtaz Zahra Baloch, criticized it as a "manifestation of a revisionist and expansionist mindset", while the Bangladeshi junior minister for foreign affairs stated "Anger is being expressed from various quarters over the map." Several Nepali politicians also expressed concern. While the spokesperson of the Indian Ministry of External Affairs, Arindam Bagchi, stated it symbolized "the idea of responsible and people-oriented governance that adopted and propagated", other politicians in the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party declared it a symbol of Akhand Bharat, with Minister of Parliamentary Affairs Pralhad Joshi tweeting "The resolve is clear. Akhand Bharat".
See also
References
- ^ Banerjee, Supurna; Ghosh, Nandini (17 September 2018). Caste and Gender in Contemporary India: Power, Privilege and Politics. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-429-78395-1.
The Hindutva discourse believes in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan all being a part of Akhand Bharat as they are a part of the sacred soil of the Hindu nation with common claims of nationalism.
- Erdman, H. L. (17 December 2007). The Swatantra Party and Indian Conservatism. Cambridge University Press. p. 55. ISBN 9780521049801.
The ultimate reunification of the subcontinent is a professed goal, as it is for the Mahasabha, but here, too, there is a difference in emphasis which deserves note: for the Sangh, the goal is 'Akhand Bharat', while for the Mahasabha it is 'Akhand Hindustan'.
- Chitkara, M. G. (1 January 2004). Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh. APH Publishing. p. 262. ISBN 9788176484657.
Those who dub Shri L. K. Advani, the Home Minister of India and others as foreigners, must realise that the freedom struggle was a mass movement of all the people of entire Akhand Hindustan (United Bharat).
- Prasad, Sumit Ganguly, Jai Shankar (27 July 2019). "India Faces a Looming Disaster". Foreign Policy. Archived from the original on 30 July 2019. Retrieved 8 August 2019.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - Khandelwal, Meena; Hausner, Sondra L.; Gold, Ann Grodzins (2007). Nuns, Yoginis, Saints, and Singers: Women's Renunciation in South Asia. Zubaan. ISBN 978-81-89884-34-5. Archived from the original on 15 July 2022. Retrieved 21 January 2021.
- Chatterji, Angana P.; Hansen, Thomas Blom; Jaffrelot, Christophe (August 2019). Majoritarian State: How Hindu Nationalism Is Changing India. Oxford University Press. p. 161. ISBN 978-0-19-007817-1.
- Ghose, Sankar (1 January 1991). Mahatma Gandhi. Allied Publishers. p. 315. ISBN 9788170232056.
Later, K.M. Munishi, with Gandhi's blessing, also resigned from the Congress to plead for Akhand Hindustan as a counter blast to Pakistan. Gandhi, who previously thought that swaraj was impossible without Hindu-Muslim unity, subsequently came to the conclusion that as Britain wanted to retain her empire by pursuing a policy of divide and rule, Hindu-Muslim unity could not be achieved as long as the British were there.
- "The Idea of 'Akhand Bharat' Smacks of Imperial Aspirations". The Wire. Retrieved 26 December 2024.
- Khan, Mazhar Ali (1996). Pakistan: The First Twelve Years. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195776768. Archived from the original on 30 April 2016. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
Many months ago, when the Pakistan issue was still in the melting pot, the Khan brothers determined to fight for Akhand Hindustan, and challenged the League to fight the issue out before the electorate of the Province.
- Sharma, Jai Narain (1 January 2008). Encyclopaedia Eminent Thinkers. Concept Publishing Company. p. 88. ISBN 9788180694929.
On 5 August 1944, he issued a common letter to the leaders of various parties making a proposal to hold Akhand Hindustan Leaders' Conference. Such a conference was held on 7 and 8 October in Delhi. It was presided over by Dr. Radha Kumud Mukherji.
- Sampath, Vikram (7 August 2019). "Savarkar Wanted One God, One Nation, One Goal". The Print India. Archived from the original on 8 August 2019. Retrieved 8 August 2019.
- Suda, Jyoti Prasad (1953). India, Her Civic Life and Administration. Jai Prakash Nath & Co. Archived from the original on 5 February 2016. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
Its members still swear by the ideal of Akhand Hindusthan.
- Yale H. Ferguson and R. J. Barry Jones, Political space: frontiers of change and governance in a globalizing world, page 155, SUNY Press, 2002, ISBN 978-0-7914-5460-2
- ^ Sucheta Majumder, "Right Wing Mobilization in India", Feminist Review, issue 49, page 17, Routledge, 1995, ISBN 978-0-415-12375-4
- ^ Ulrika Mårtensson and Jennifer Bailey, Fundamentalism in the Modern World (Volume 1), page 97, I.B.Tauris, 2011, ISBN 978-1-84885-330-0
- Hindu Political Parties. General Books. 30 May 2010. ISBN 9781157374923.
- Ghosh, Papiya (21 March 2014). Partition and the South Asian Diaspora: Extending the Subcontinent. Routledge. ISBN 9781317809654. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 9 August 2019.
- Jyotirmaya Sharma, "Ideological heresy?, The Hindu, 2005-06-19.
- Radhika Ramaseshan, "Advani fires Atal weapon Archived 28 July 2013 at the Wayback Machine", The Telegraph, 16 June 2005.
- Ashish Vashi, "Anti-Sardar Patel book sold from RSS HQ in Gujarat", The Times of India, 27 August 2009.
- Manini Chatterjee, "Only by Akhand Bharat Archived 15 July 2022 at the Wayback Machine", The Indian Express, 1 February 2007.
- "Sindhis want Sindh in India?Modi gives example of Jews". DeshGujarat. 24 March 2012. Archived from the original on 12 December 2019. Retrieved 8 September 2019.
- "One day, India, Pak and Bangladesh could reunite as Akhand Bharat: Ram Madhav". The Indian Express. 27 December 2015. Archived from the original on 13 December 2019. Retrieved 8 September 2019.
- "RSS and the idea of Akhand Bharat". The Indian Express. 4 January 2016. Archived from the original on 8 August 2019. Retrieved 8 August 2019.
- Scroll Staff (17 March 2019). "Pakistan will be part of India after 2025, claims RSS leader Indresh Kumar: Report". Scroll.in. Archived from the original on 3 April 2019. Retrieved 8 August 2019.
- "The truth about Pakistan". The Nation. 2 March 2013. Archived from the original on 10 November 2013. Retrieved 9 January 2018.
- "Pakistan all-praise for Markandey Katju". The Indian Express. 7 March 2013. Archived from the original on 10 March 2013. Retrieved 9 January 2018.
- "We must reunite: Why Pakistan, India and Bangladesh should be one country". Newslaundry. 8 December 2015. Archived from the original on 17 August 2018. Retrieved 9 January 2018.
- "India And Pakistan Must Reunite For Their Mutual Good". HuffPost India. 10 April 2017. Archived from the original on 22 November 2020. Retrieved 9 February 2019.
- "Mission Statement of the Indian Reunification Association". Indica News. 7 February 2019. Archived from the original on 22 November 2020. Retrieved 9 February 2019.
- Markandey Katju (10 April 2017). "India And Pakistan Must Reunite For Their Mutual Good". The Huffington Post. Archived from the original on 22 November 2020. Retrieved 9 February 2019.
- "The Tribune, Chandigarh, India – Opinions". tribuneindia.com. Archived from the original on 30 January 2017. Retrieved 9 August 2019.
- "Dream of 'Akhand Bharat' fulfilled partially with Article 370 abrogation: Shiv Sena lauds Modi, Amit Shah". Zee News. 6 August 2019. Archived from the original on 8 August 2019. Retrieved 8 August 2019.
- Wasim, Amir (8 August 2019). "Govt, opposition united on Kashmir, divided on domestic issues". DAWN.COM. Archived from the original on 8 August 2019. Retrieved 8 August 2019.
- "RSS प्रचारकों पर जारी किया अखंड भारत कैलेंडर, जीवनी-संघ के कार्यों का किया गया उल्लेख". Zee Rajasthan (in Hindi). 17 November 2020. Archived from the original on 17 November 2020. Retrieved 16 September 2021.
- ^ Mogul, Rhea (13 June 2023). "Why a map in India's new Parliament is making its neighbors nervous". CNN. Archived from the original on 16 June 2023. Retrieved 17 June 2023.
External links
- Merge Pakistan, Bangladesh in Akhand Bharat: MVA's swipe at BJP
- NCP will welcome BJP's decision to merge India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, says Maharashtra minister
Irredentism | |
---|---|
Africa | |
North America | |
South America | |
Western Asia | |
Southern Asia | |
Eastern and Southeastern Asia | |
Central and Eastern Europe | |
Southern Europe | |
Italy | |
Northern Europe | |
Western Europe | |
Oceania | |
Related concepts: Border changes since 1914 · Partitionism · Reunification · Revanchism · Revisionism · Rump state |
South Asian topics | ||
---|---|---|
Countries and regions | ||
Ethnic groups | ||
Culture | ||
Environment | ||
Economy and Politics | ||
History | ||
Religion | ||
Sports | ||
Education | ||
Military | ||
Science and technology |