| Revision as of 23:42, 16 July 2021 editNaomiAmethyst (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers, Template editors6,269 edits →WHOOP WHOOP TERRAIN TERRAIN: Reply.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 08:50, 30 December 2024 edit undoCiaPan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers12,152 edits Reverted good faith edits by 2605:59C8:409B:4E10:A5C5:6CFD:BC29:C2E2 (talk): Test editTags: Twinkle Undo | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{skip to TOC}} | {{skip to TOC}} | ||
| {{divbox|1=red|2=This user is NOT a human|3=This is the combined talk page for ] and ]. These users are ''']''' and are '''not humans'''. Please be aware that bots cannot think like a human and cannot operate outside of their programming. '''Messages you leave on this talk page will not be answered by a bot''' – either a bot operator or another human will answer you.}} | {{divbox|1=red|2=This user is NOT a human|3=This is the combined talk page for ] and ]. These users are ''']''' and are '''not humans'''. Please be aware that bots cannot think like a human and cannot operate outside of their programming. '''Messages you leave on this talk page will not be answered by a bot''' – either a bot operator or another human will answer you.}} | ||
| {{divbox|1=red|2=] False positives and false negatives|3=If you believe that ClueBot NG has mistakenly identified a good edit as vandalism, please follow the directions in the warning it gave or ]. Please do not report it on this talk page. It takes less time to report the case to the correct location, and we can handle it more effectively there.<br />If you believe that ClueBot NG has missed an edit that ''is'' vandalism, again do not report it here. ClueBot is unable to catch ''all'' vandalism. Just revert the edit and warn the editor.}} | {{divbox|1=red|2=] False positives and false negatives|3=If you believe that ClueBot NG has mistakenly identified a good edit as vandalism, please follow the directions in the warning it gave or ]. Please do not report it on this talk page. It takes less time to report the case to the correct location, and we can handle it more effectively there.<br />If you believe that ClueBot NG has missed an edit that ''is'' vandalism, again do not report it here. ClueBot is unable to catch ''all'' vandalism. Just revert the edit and warn the editor.}} | ||
| {{divbox|1=blue|2=ClueBot NG Links!|3=]{{•}} ]}} | {{divbox|1=blue|2=ClueBot NG Links!|3=]{{•}} ]}} | ||
| {{divbox|1=blue|2=Purpose of this Page|3=This page is for '''comments on''' or '''questions about''' the ClueBots.}} | {{divbox|1=blue|2=Purpose of this Page|3=This page is for '''comments on''' or '''questions about''' the ClueBots.}} | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | ||
| |archiveprefix=User talk:ClueBot Commons/ |
|archiveprefix=User talk:ClueBot Commons/Archives/Facepalms | ||
| |format= | |format= | ||
| |age=99999 | |age=99999 | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
| |archivebox=yes | |archivebox=yes | ||
| |box-advert=yes | |box-advert=yes | ||
| |minkeepthreads=2 | |||
| |archivenow=<nowiki>{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}},{{/censor}},{{atop}}</nowiki> | |archivenow=<nowiki>{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}},{{/censor}},{{atop}}</nowiki> | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| Line 41: | Line 42: | ||
| <div style="clear: both;" ></div> | <div style="clear: both;" ></div> | ||
| == |
== Question regarding ClueBot == | ||
| Can I please see the source? (A github url for ClueBot) ? | |||
| He removed one of my changes 😔 ] (]) 19:55, 8 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
| Is it being run on someone's PC or is it being run in the cloud? | |||
| I have more questions than I have answers coming to this page. | |||
| Thanks ] (]) 12:20, 8 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :@] the bot runs on Wikimedia Toolforge and its source code is . <span style="white-space:nowrap"><span style="font-family:monospace">'''<nowiki>''']<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki>'''</span> (] • ])</span> 13:47, 8 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == ClueBot NG making Deprecated API calls == | |||
| Hello! | |||
| It seems the ClueBot NG account is still doing some <tt>action=query&prop=info&intoken=</tt> API calls, which have been deprecated for years. In support of ], is there any chance you can switch to more modern token handling? | |||
| Thanks! | |||
| ] (]) 12:14, 9 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
| :If it helps. it's with a <tt>ClueBot/2.0</tt> User Agent. ] (]) 12:16, 9 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
| == Thank you very much! == | |||
| Thank you for fixing the "List of Pixar Films" page! I was fixing the page at the same time you were and didn't realize it until I reloaded the page. Much thanks indeed! ] (]) 18:55, 11 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
| == WHOOP WHOOP TERRAIN TERRAIN == | |||
| I've seen (very rarely) the robot remove bad edits that weren't actually vandalism, which makes for a bad edit summary but at least the removed material needed to be removed. | |||
| But the edits were not only not vandalism, but they were actually fine (if not perfect), particularly since by a brand new editor. A promising new editor who was confused as to why she was being called a vandal right off, which is not good. | |||
| I hate to say it, but it looks like ClueBot violated the First Law of Robotics here, assuming you define "injury" to include "insult" which I would. | |||
| My understanding is that the robot is beyond human control at this point, but here's a suggestion that I think will help: change the edit summaries, from "Reverting possible vandalism" to something milder. Like "Reverting edit per ClueBot algorithm" or something. ("Algorithm", I don't know, pick a better term.) That gets the job done and its simply descriptive so it doesn't insult anyone (I know that this's quite rare, but still). ] (]) 21:43, 16 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
| :{{re|Herostratus}} I tried to report a false positive in June, not only could I not report it at the page you're meant to report on (persistent "bad captcha" message), my post here was also ignored. Beyond human control is right. ] (]) 22:42, 16 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
| :The bot's wording very intentionally never accuses the editor of vandalism. The edit summary says "possible vandalism". The initial warning simply states that a computer program has undone the edit, saying nothing about vandalism. The second warning states that the edits appear to be vandalism to the bot. It's not until ] that the bot's messaging changes to directly claim vandalism. | |||
| :A further note, about that edit in particular: While this is not what the bot is looking for, it's far from perfect. No sources or references, not formatted like the rest of the entries (not italics, a ] instead of an ]), inconsistent spacing and punctuation, "watermelon like" should be "watermelon-like", "that grown" should be "that grows" or "that is grown", "remote" should be "remove", "prosesed" should be "processed", "world famous" should be "world-famous", "liqeur" should be "liqueur", "on ground" should be "on the ground" (or something else?), "the jam is eaten" should be its own sentence or "and is eaten", "kan" should be "can", and so on. The bot is not designed to pick up on any one of these things in particular, but it does analyze most of this, and taken together with common patterns found in other vandalism, it determined this looked enough like vandalism. -- ]<sup>(]|]|])</sup> 23:41, 16 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 08:50, 30 December 2024
| Skip to table of contents |
False positives and false negativesIf you believe that ClueBot NG has mistakenly identified a good edit as vandalism, please follow the directions in the warning it gave or click here. Please do not report it on this talk page. It takes less time to report the case to the correct location, and we can handle it more effectively there.If you believe that ClueBot NG has missed an edit that is vandalism, again do not report it here. ClueBot is unable to catch all vandalism. Just revert the edit and warn the editor. ClueBot NG Links!Report False Positives • Frequently Asked Questions Purpose of this PageThis page is for comments on or questions about the ClueBots.
The current status of ClueBot NG is: Running
The current status of ClueBot III is: Running
Praise should go on the praise page. Barnstars and other awards should go on the awards page.
Use the "new section" button at the top of this page to add a new section. Use the link above each section to edit that section.
This page is automatically archived by ClueBot III.
The ClueBots' owner or someone else who knows the answer to your question will reply on this page.
| ClueBots | |
|---|---|
| ClueBot NG/Anti-vandalism · ClueBot II/ClueBot Script |  |
| ClueBot III/Archive · Talk page for all ClueBots |
 | Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back. |
Question regarding ClueBot
Can I please see the source? (A github url for ClueBot) ? Is it being run on someone's PC or is it being run in the cloud? I have more questions than I have answers coming to this page.
Thanks Vidyagamerfromaus (talk) 12:20, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Vidyagamerfromaus the bot runs on Wikimedia Toolforge and its source code is here. ''']''' (talk • contribs) 13:47, 8 December 2024 (UTC)