| Revision as of 05:10, 25 July 2021 editẞoßfjfúfufudh (talk | contribs)33 edits →That's it: new sectionTags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 21:36, 29 December 2024 edit undoNJZombie (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers30,533 editsm Reverted edit by DPL bot (talk) to last version by NJZombieTags: Rollback Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit | ||
| (354 intermediate revisions by 86 users not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid purple;" | for all that good work on the ] and other pages on which we've crossed paths... ] (]) 05:23, 12 September 2009 (UTC) | |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid purple;" | for all that good work on the ] and other pages on which we've crossed paths... ] (]) 05:23, 12 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| ==Wikiwatercooler Talk== | |||
| Considering how frequently I undo Jinnifer's edits, it always baffles me how frequently they come to my talkpage with the naive hope that they can sucker me into restoring her edits.--] (]) 01:47, 15 June 2021 (UTC) | |||
| :It's beyond ridiculous. I've flat out told multiple sock accounts it's never going to happen yet they'll still return to ask again. ] (]) 01:49, 15 June 2021 (UTC) | |||
| ::I'd add additional commentary, but the descriptors and wording that would be most appropriate to use would probably get both of us thrown into Facebook Jail if I typed them up.--] (]) 01:51, 15 June 2021 (UTC) | |||
| :::The kicker is when they lead by addressing you as "friend". ] (]) 23:35, 15 June 2021 (UTC) | |||
| Or the most recent messages attempting to insult me and then asking for help yet again mere moments later. Mind boggling! ] (]) 14:02, 16 June 2021 (UTC) | |||
| == Suggestion == | |||
| Just wanted to let you know that, after the past weekend, I asked an admin to semi-protect my talkpage for three months. Don't know if that's something you'd want to do, but it has been a giant sanity-saver. ] (]) 15:05, 15 June 2021 (UTC) | |||
| == Continued vandalism by ] == | |||
| FYI: ] continued their Misplaced Pages vandalism on 17 June 2021 by editing the articles for the cast of ''Friends''. See ]. I have reverted all of their edits. What next steps should be taken? Thanks. --] (]) 11:59, 19 June 2021 (UTC) | |||
| :They've been warned at least by me within the last 3 weeks yet continue to vandalize. Your next step would be to file a report at ] and let an admin take it from there. ] (]) 15:06, 19 June 2021 (UTC) | |||
| == Vince == | == Vince == | ||
| Nice job adding to the "Legacy" section. The negatives were written objectively, no undue weight, and the two paragraphs didn't come off as smear pieces. Nice job. ] (]) 01:12, 23 June 2021 (UTC) | Nice job adding to the "Legacy" section. The negatives were written objectively, no undue weight, and the two paragraphs didn't come off as smear pieces. Nice job. ] (]) 01:12, 23 June 2021 (UTC) | ||
| == |
==Carlos Correa vandal== | ||
| Thanks for suggesting protecting ], which I have now done. When I wrote the talk page message saying "The article you have been vandalising has now been protected", I had seen only one article that had been affected, but later I realised there are more. It looks as though you probably know more about this vandal than I do, so if there are other affected articles that you can let me know about, I'll consider protecting those too. ] (]) 17:43, 4 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks. I know they had been hitting ] at one point but that calmed down. However, they may resort to hitting that one again now that the others are blocked. ] (]) 18:26, 4 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
| That's it? Get Lost! That's not a reasonable answer at all! ] (]) 05:10, 25 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
| :: Well, there has been continual vandalism at ] for years, so I think protecting it may be a good idea anyway. I have now checked all of the editing history of all the accounts I know of, and semi-protected all of the articles. Unfortunately, sometimes the effect of doing that is just to drive the vandal to other articles, but it's still worth trying. ] (]) 20:07, 4 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:36, 29 December 2024
You deserve this
even if you don't want it, just delete it then... :)
|
The Music Barnstar | |
| for all that good work on the Mucky Pup and other pages on which we've crossed paths... Luminifer (talk) 05:23, 12 September 2009 (UTC) |
Vince
Nice job adding to the "Legacy" section. The negatives were written objectively, no undue weight, and the two paragraphs didn't come off as smear pieces. Nice job. Kjscotte34 (talk) 01:12, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Carlos Correa vandal
Thanks for suggesting protecting List of people from Minnesota, which I have now done. When I wrote the talk page message saying "The article you have been vandalising has now been protected", I had seen only one article that had been affected, but later I realised there are more. It looks as though you probably know more about this vandal than I do, so if there are other affected articles that you can let me know about, I'll consider protecting those too. JBW (talk) 17:43, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. I know they had been hitting Shannon Sharpe at one point but that calmed down. However, they may resort to hitting that one again now that the others are blocked. NJZombie (talk) 18:26, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- Well, there has been continual vandalism at Shannon Sharpe for years, so I think protecting it may be a good idea anyway. I have now checked all of the editing history of all the accounts I know of, and semi-protected all of the articles. Unfortunately, sometimes the effect of doing that is just to drive the vandal to other articles, but it's still worth trying. JBW (talk) 20:07, 4 May 2023 (UTC)