| Revision as of 13:40, 25 July 2021 editRoxy the dog (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers34,207 edits →My Talk PageTag: 2017 wikitext editor← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:51, 16 December 2024 edit undoBarntToust (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,937 edits →How does one find primary sources about trolling?: new sectionTag: New topic | ||
| (71 intermediate revisions by 28 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == |
== May 2022 == | ||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ], rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. | |||
| Please never post to my Talk page again. Thanks. ] (]) 17:03, 24 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
| :Per ], "Some editors routinely tell other editors that they disagree with to "Stay off my talk page." The editors who do this tend to have long lists of folks that have been "banned." Talk pages are the fundamental medium used for editors to interact. Except in specific and clear cases of WP:WIKIHOUNDING, such "banning" is highly problematic and an indication that the banning editor is having serious problems cooperating with others." I have been nothing but civil in my discussion of the ] matter, you have participated in edit warring, and you were repeatedly abusive to me in your talk page revision history. ] (]) 17:10, 24 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
| ::Well, you're on a short list of editors banned from my Talk page; most of them are blocked or banned. I regard ]y and irrelevant templates, like yours, as trolling. ] (]) 17:15, 24 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
| :::As a rule, editors engaging in "POINTy" behavior are making edits with which they do not actually agree, for the deliberate purpose of drawing attention and provoking opposition in the hopes of making other editors see their "point". My additions to your talk page were in good faith. Remember to ]. Your accusation of my disrupting Misplaced Pages is false and smells of retaliation. ] (]) 17:30, 24 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
| ::::{{re|MarshallKe}} As uninvolved party and as a sidenote to this discussion I would kindly remind you that before making warnings like this: ]]; you are at best expected to provide evidence. I also agree with you that banning from talk pages may be done only in cases of gross ]s violations and there is no necessity for such rude summary comments like this:{{diff2|1035265344|1035264593|17:00, July 24, 2021}} - ''...: Fuck right off»''. {{tps}} <span style="font-size: small" >] ] ]</span> 09:00, 25 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | : |
||
| ::::::I think it is worth pointing out that if you continue with such behaviour, you need to get used to such responses to it. Thanks. -] ] 12:40, 25 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::I will continue to take appropriate professional response to ] and attempts at ]. Thanks. ] (]) 13:22, 25 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::Of course, but the innapropriate behaviour you displayed will get you every time. -] ] 13:40, 25 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
| Points to note: | |||
| == Just so we're clear == | |||
| # '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;''' | |||
| # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | |||
| If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases, it may be appropriate to ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.''' <!-- Template:uw-ew --> — ] <sup>( ] / ] ) </sup> ⁂ <small> Join ]! </small> 21:16, 19 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
| :What a joke. I never touched the page until today. I made one edit. This isn't edit warring. ] (]) 23:51, 19 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
| As a gesture of good faith, I'd like to share that I personally strongly suspect accupuncture and most of Chinese traditional medicine to be quackery. I scheduled a massage the other day and I discovered that the therapist was an accupuncture/pressure/Chinese traditional medicine practitioner. The things she was trying to get me to believe came across as some of the most quack stuff I've ever heard. We need to promote scientific skepticism, and the way to do that is to promote the scientific method and discourage making claims that can't be proven. Negative claims such as "qi does not exist" is itself, a claim that cannot be proven. The burden of proof lies with the one making the claim, regardless of whether it is a negative claim or a positive claim, and a Proof of impossibility is an extremely high standard that is usually not achievable outside the realm of mathematics. | |||
| :To clarify, it was not my content that I restored. ] (]) 23:57, 19 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ::Full apology in that case :) your wording in the thread seemed to indicate otherwise. — ] <sup>( ] / ] ) </sup> ⁂ <small> Join ]! </small> 00:34, 20 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
| * Yeah, MarshallKe is not one of the original "bra-men of Misplaced Pages" but the problem here is hounding. It looks like they singled-out this content because it was me (or "a well-known editor of medicine related articles" as they obliquely put it) who removed it. Adding this "jiggly boobs" content back, to the consternation of all observing editors, is classic ]-making of the type that led to MarshallKe's most recent block. It's a problem. ] (]) 03:15, 20 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == Notice of ANI discussion == | |||
| WP:FRINGE is not a blank check to make unproven negative claims against pseudoscientific topics. It is an obligation to hold accepted scientific sources in higher regard than nonscientific sources. We must not fall into the same trap as pseudoscience believers by making unproven claims. We must adhere to the principles of science and faithfully paraphrase the scientific sources, which I have done, which has been reverted now in favor of text that reads as a dogmatistic fundamentalistic afterthought and misleads the reader into thinking that science operates in the same way as a religion. ] (]) 18:00, 24 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
| ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> ] (]) 23:56, 9 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
| I apologize for bringing this matter to ANI. Instead I should have done what I am doing now: I request that you refrain from posting on my user talk page in the future. ] (]) 16:56, 11 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | :For real? I didn't think of you as this petty. It was a pony. Are you allergic to fun? ] (]) 22:22, 13 September 2022 (UTC) | ||
| ==Your draft article, ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| Hello, MarshallKe. It has been over six months since you last edited the ] submission or ] page you started, "]". | |||
| In accordance with our policy that Misplaced Pages is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia ], the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can . An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. | |||
| Thanks for your submission to Misplaced Pages, and happy editing. <!-- Template:Db-draft-deleted --><!-- Template:Db-csd-deleted-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 18:38, 29 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message == | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small> | |||
| </div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1124425183 --> | |||
| == RfC on Male expendability == | |||
| You are being contacted because you participated in . There is now an active RfC on this issue on the . You are welcome to lend your voice to the discussion. ] (]) 17:04, 30 November 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == How does one find primary sources about trolling? == | |||
| Noticed back in March 2022, a primary sources template to a section on ]. 1. How does one find a primary source about trolling? By like, going to blogs that internet trolls post and adding info from their manifestos? 2. Do you remember what you were thinking when you added that tag in a section cited with book sources and scholarly journals? Not trying to scold pointlessly, I'm just genuinely curious as to how that ended up happening. Hope you're doing well. <span style="background: cornsilk; padding: 3px;border:.5px solid salmon;">]]</span> 22:51, 16 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:51, 16 December 2024
May 2022
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sports bra. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Ixtal ⁂ Join WP:FINANCE! 21:16, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- What a joke. I never touched the page until today. I made one edit. This isn't edit warring. MarshallKe (talk) 23:51, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- To clarify, it was not my content that I restored. MarshallKe (talk) 23:57, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- Full apology in that case :) your wording in the thread seemed to indicate otherwise. — Ixtal ⁂ Join WP:FINANCE! 00:34, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah, MarshallKe is not one of the original "bra-men of Misplaced Pages" but the problem here is hounding. It looks like they singled-out this content because it was me (or "a well-known editor of medicine related articles" as they obliquely put it) who removed it. Adding this "jiggly boobs" content back, to the consternation of all observing editors, is classic WP:POINT-making of the type that led to MarshallKe's most recent block. It's a problem. Alexbrn (talk) 03:15, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
Notice of ANI discussion
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Generalrelative (talk) 23:56, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
I apologize for bringing this matter to ANI. Instead I should have done what I am doing now: I request that you refrain from posting on my user talk page in the future. Generalrelative (talk) 16:56, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- For real? I didn't think of you as this petty. It was a pony. Are you allergic to fun? MarshallKe (talk) 22:22, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:MycoMeditations
Hello, MarshallKe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "MycoMeditations".
In accordance with our policy that Misplaced Pages is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Misplaced Pages, and happy editing. Liz 18:38, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
RfC on Male expendability
You are being contacted because you participated in this NPOV noticeboard discussion. There is now an active RfC on this issue on the Male expendability talk page. You are welcome to lend your voice to the discussion. Darkfrog24 (talk) 17:04, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
How does one find primary sources about trolling?
Noticed back in March 2022, you added a primary sources template to a section on troll (slang). 1. How does one find a primary source about trolling? By like, going to blogs that internet trolls post and adding info from their manifestos? 2. Do you remember what you were thinking when you added that tag in a section cited with book sources and scholarly journals? Not trying to scold pointlessly, I'm just genuinely curious as to how that ended up happening. Hope you're doing well. BarntToust 22:51, 16 December 2024 (UTC)