| Revision as of 08:39, 14 August 2021 editNoorullah21 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers10,153 edits ←Replaced content with 'Feel free to discuss anything with me here.'Tags: Replaced Manual revert Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:06, 23 December 2024 edit undoNoorullah21 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers10,153 edits →Battle of Jamrud edit: ReplyTag: Reply | ||
| (589 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| Feel free to discuss anything with me here. | |||
| |algo = old(30d) | |||
| |archive = User talk:Noorullah21/%(year)d | |||
| }}{{archive box| | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| }}<!--{{todolist|collapsed=yes}}--> | |||
| ] | |||
| ===Notice to all users on my talk page=== | |||
| '''Welcome to my talk page, feel free to discuss things with me here, ranging from disputes, or questions, etc. After the problem has been solved, your comment here will likely be removed and added to my archives section, or my sub-pages, depending on of course, what you came here for.''' | |||
| == Khalji Revolution == | |||
| Hi Noorullah21, I've been thinking about ] and my comments at the FAC - if other people have also mentioned the "antiquated" language then perhaps there is an issue there but it can certainly be learnt from and overcome. I'm a native English speaker and would be happy to do an informal or formal peer review, if you are interested and if you wanted to do that before returning to FAC. Or do the same with another article, if you have decided to switch focus to that one? My motivation here is that I really do want to see a more diverse set of articles on the main page to counteract systemic bias. Hope this message finds you well - ] (]) 16:30, 1 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :@] Sure, I’d love your help. ] (]) 16:55, 1 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Great! How would you like to proceed? With comments on the talkpage or by opening a formal peer review? Cheers, ] (]) 17:27, 1 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::Either work, I think talk page would be better. @] ] (]) 17:51, 1 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Cool, I'll put some comments on the talk page then - I'll wait until I have a decent chunk of time, should be in the next few days ] (]) 18:03, 1 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Changing the results == | |||
| The British won the first and third anglo-afghan-wars militarily(in battle) and in the third war the British repelled the afghans and kept the durand line.That was from the articles themselves. ] (]) 04:59, 8 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Changing the results == | |||
| I could also provide sources that say that the British won militarily ] (]) 06:29, 8 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive == | |||
| {| style="border: 2px solid #36c; border-radius: 4px; background: linear-gradient(to right, #ffffff, #eaf3ff); padding: 10px; color: #000;" | |||
| | style="vertical-align: middle; font-size: 130%" | ] | <span style="font-size: 85%">''']''' </span> | |||
| | rowspan=3 | ] | |||
| |- | |||
| | | |||
| * On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog. | |||
| * Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. | |||
| * Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. | |||
| * ] will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive. | |||
| * Barnstars will also be granted for ] previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. | |||
| * Interested in taking part? ''']'''. | |||
| |- | |||
| |colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself ] | |||
| |} | |||
| ] (]) 01:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1263150419 --> | |||
| == Battle of Jamrud edit == | |||
| Hi. I noticed that you some revisions to the ] page, stating that the sources you reverted weren't ]/] sources. However, the source is from the University of California, and is a secondary source. The reason why I'm bringing this up is because I don't want you and @] breaking ] or getting into an edit war. - ] (]) 16:52, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :The source is from the Punjab University and R.R.Sethi R. R. SETHI, M. A., PhD. also worked in the History Department of it his work has been supervised by G. L, CHOPRA, M. A., PhD., Keeper of the Records of the Government of the Punjab and also in preface has been appreciated by ] a British Historian ] 17:00, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks for the clarification! I forgot the exact details... - ] (]) 17:04, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::Take this to the talk page . | |||
| :::Secondly, the casualty figure has been disputed before and ultimately removed for the best of the infobox because of disputing. See the discussion I opened up on the talk page for more information. | |||
| :::@] @] ] (]) 18:06, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:06, 23 December 2024
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Notice to all users on my talk page
Welcome to my talk page, feel free to discuss things with me here, ranging from disputes, or questions, etc. After the problem has been solved, your comment here will likely be removed and added to my archives section, or my sub-pages, depending on of course, what you came here for.
Khalji Revolution
Hi Noorullah21, I've been thinking about Khalji Revolution and my comments at the FAC - if other people have also mentioned the "antiquated" language then perhaps there is an issue there but it can certainly be learnt from and overcome. I'm a native English speaker and would be happy to do an informal or formal peer review, if you are interested and if you wanted to do that before returning to FAC. Or do the same with another article, if you have decided to switch focus to that one? My motivation here is that I really do want to see a more diverse set of articles on the main page to counteract systemic bias. Hope this message finds you well - Mujinga (talk) 16:30, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Mujinga Sure, I’d love your help. Noorullah (talk) 16:55, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- Great! How would you like to proceed? With comments on the talkpage or by opening a formal peer review? Cheers, Mujinga (talk) 17:27, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- Either work, I think talk page would be better. @Mujinga Noorullah (talk) 17:51, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- Cool, I'll put some comments on the talk page then - I'll wait until I have a decent chunk of time, should be in the next few days Mujinga (talk) 18:03, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- Either work, I think talk page would be better. @Mujinga Noorullah (talk) 17:51, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- Great! How would you like to proceed? With comments on the talkpage or by opening a formal peer review? Cheers, Mujinga (talk) 17:27, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Changing the results
The British won the first and third anglo-afghan-wars militarily(in battle) and in the third war the British repelled the afghans and kept the durand line.That was from the articles themselves. Panekasos (talk) 04:59, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Changing the results
I could also provide sources that say that the British won militarily Panekasos (talk) 06:29, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive
| January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Battle of Jamrud edit
Hi. I noticed that you undid some revisions to the Battle of Jamrud page, stating that the sources you reverted weren't WP:RS/WP:HISTRS sources. However, the source is from the University of California, and is a secondary source. The reason why I'm bringing this up is because I don't want you and @HerakliosJulianus breaking WP:3RR or getting into an edit war. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 16:52, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- The source is from the Punjab University and R.R.Sethi R. R. SETHI, M. A., PhD. also worked in the History Department of it his work has been supervised by G. L, CHOPRA, M. A., PhD., Keeper of the Records of the Government of the Punjab and also in preface has been appreciated by Percival Spear a British Historian Indo-Greek 17:00, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the clarification! I forgot the exact details... - OpalYosutebito (talk) 17:04, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Take this to the talk page .
- Secondly, the casualty figure has been disputed before and ultimately removed for the best of the infobox because of disputing. See the discussion I opened up on the talk page for more information.
- @HerakliosJulianus @OpalYosutebito Noorullah (talk) 18:06, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the clarification! I forgot the exact details... - OpalYosutebito (talk) 17:04, 23 December 2024 (UTC)