Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Log/2013 July 12: Difference between revisions

< Misplaced Pages:Deletion review | Log Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 05:44, 19 August 2021 editMalnadachBot (talk \| contribs)11,637,095 editsm Removed navbox class for mobile accessibility (Task 4)Tag: AWB ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 15:23, 13 April 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk \| contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 16:		Line 16:
	I don't know why the page was deleted previously, but now there are more than enough sources for a full article:		I don't know why the page was deleted previously, but now there are more than enough sources for a full article:
	I would like to write the article but it is protected and only administrators can reinstate it. Thanks. ] (]) 11:43, 12 July 2013 (UTC)		I would like to write the article but it is protected and only administrators can reinstate it. Thanks. ] (]) 11:43, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
	*It was deleted and salted because so many spam articles with that title were created. A long time has passed since the decision to salt it was made, and I don't think we can justify maintaining the protection when a good faith user wants to create an article in that space.—] <small>]/]</small> 11:54, 12 July 2013 (UTC)		*It was deleted and salted because so many spam articles with that title were created. A long time has passed since the decision to salt it was made, and I don't think we can justify maintaining the protection when a good faith user wants to create an article in that space.—] <small>]/]</small> 11:54, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
	*'''Allow recreation''' - yeah ] is right. It was last deleted in 2007 after a solid 12 months of spamming and was presumably salted thereafter. ] is an editor in good standing with 1200 edits to his name, a good article creation track-record and zero blocks. Why the hell not? ]] 00:33, 15 July 2013 (UTC)		*'''Allow recreation''' - yeah ] is right. It was last deleted in 2007 after a solid 12 months of spamming and was presumably salted thereafter. ] is an editor in good standing with 1200 edits to his name, a good article creation track-record and zero blocks. Why the hell not? ]] 00:33, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
	*'''Allow recreation'''. Reasonable request by an editor in good standing; no previous AfDs. Disallow future WP:CSD A7s or G11s, allow testing at AfD. --] (]) 12:10, 17 July 2013 (UTC)		*'''Allow recreation'''. Reasonable request by an editor in good standing; no previous AfDs. Disallow future WP:CSD A7s or G11s, allow testing at AfD. --] (]) 12:10, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
	\|-		\|-

Latest revision as of 15:23, 13 April 2022

< 2013 July 11 Deletion review archives: 2013 July 2013 July 13 >

12 July 2013

Cube World – I unsalted it before becoming aware of this DRV, and it seems not to be controversial, so I'll close this instead of reverting myself. – :) ·Salvidrim!· ✉ 10:59, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.
Cube World (talk`\|`edit`\|`history`\|`logs`\|`links`\|`watch) (restore) I don't know why the page was deleted previously, but now there are more than enough sources for a full article: I would like to write the article but it is protected and only administrators can reinstate it. Thanks. Samwalton9 (talk) 11:43, 12 July 2013 (UTC) It was deleted and salted because so many spam articles with that title were created. A long time has passed since the decision to salt it was made, and I don't think we can justify maintaining the protection when a good faith user wants to create an article in that space.—S Marshall T/C 11:54, 12 July 2013 (UTC) Allow recreation - yeah S Marshall is right. It was last deleted in 2007 after a solid 12 months of spamming and was presumably salted thereafter. Samwalton9 is an editor in good standing with 1200 edits to his name, a good article creation track-record and zero blocks. Why the hell not? Stalwart111 00:33, 15 July 2013 (UTC) Allow recreation. Reasonable request by an editor in good standing; no previous AfDs. Disallow future WP:CSD A7s or G11s, allow testing at AfD. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:10, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.

Cube World – I unsalted it before becoming aware of this DRV, and it seems not to be controversial, so I'll close this instead of reverting myself. – :) ·Salvidrim!· ✉ 10:59, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.

I don't know why the page was deleted previously, but now there are more than enough sources for a full article: I would like to write the article but it is protected and only administrators can reinstate it. Thanks. Samwalton9 (talk) 11:43, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

It was deleted and salted because so many spam articles with that title were created. A long time has passed since the decision to salt it was made, and I don't think we can justify maintaining the protection when a good faith user wants to create an article in that space.—S Marshall T/C 11:54, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Allow recreation - yeah S Marshall is right. It was last deleted in 2007 after a solid 12 months of spamming and was presumably salted thereafter. Samwalton9 is an editor in good standing with 1200 edits to his name, a good article creation track-record and zero blocks. Why the hell not? Stalwart111 00:33, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Allow recreation. Reasonable request by an editor in good standing; no previous AfDs. Disallow future WP:CSD A7s or G11s, allow testing at AfD. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:10, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.